Event Abstract

Engineering the intestinal basement membrane microenvironment using PEG-based hydrogels

  • 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Biological Engineering, United States
  • 2 Louisiana State University and Agricultural Center, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, United States
  • 3 Northeastern University, Department of Chemical Engineering, United States

Introduction: Intestinal organoids or “mini-guts” are multilobulated structures composed of budding crypts, epithelial cells and well-defined lumens. Mini-guts have gained interest as a tool to study intestinal biology and as a platform for drug screening because they resemble aspects of the intestinal complexity found in vivo[1]. Mini-guts are cultured embedded in ill-defined Matrigel-based hydrogels. Lot-to-lot variability and the presence of residual growth factors in Matrigel can negatively impact the biological outcomes. Thus, the development of a well-defined matrix that can recapitulate aspects of the basement membrane for intestinal organoid culture is of vital importance. Poly(ethylene glycol, PEG)-based hydrogels are good candidates as synthetic matrices. They can be tailored to different applications by varying the stiffness, degradability and cell adhesion properties. Here we report our efforts to develop PEG-based hydrogels functionalized with a fibronectin-derived peptide (SYNK-RGDS) or a collagen-derived peptide (GFOGER) for intestinal organoid culture.

Materials and Methods: Hydrogels were prepared by first reacting a 40 KDa, 8-arm PEG-vinyl sulfone with cell adhesive peptides containing single free thiols groups. Then cross-linked using matrix metalloproteinase sensitive peptides harboring two free thiols groups. We incorporated two fibronectin-derived peptides (RGDS and SYNK-RGDS) and one derived from collagen (GFOGER). Single intestinal stem cells were embedded in these hydrogels either directly during hydrogel assembly or indirectly using a two-step encapsulation. The two-step encapsulation allowed us to modulate the stiffness and cell adhesion properties of the bottom and top hydrogel.

Results and Discussion: Preliminary results suggest that direct encapsulation of single cells obtained from mouse organoids in these PEG-based hydrogels results in formation of organoids similar to those that form in Matrigel (Fig. 1b). The PEG-GFOGER hydrogel showed higher number of organoids when compared to PEG-Synk-RGDS hydrogel. A two steps encapsulation procedure with varying stiffness and cell adhesion properties resulted in a completely different morphology. Mouse cells developed multicellular growth structures that resemble the villi of the intestine (Fig. 1c). Further analysis will be needed to confirm the identity of these structures.

Figure 1. a) Overall strategy to created PEG-Based hydrogels. b-c) Representative confocal image of mouse intestinal stem cells directly embedded b) or two-steps embedding strategy c) after 7 days of culture in PEG-GFOGER hydrogel systems. Actin is depicted in green and nuclei in blue.

Conclusions: We were able to identify hydrogel culture conditions that allow single mouse cells to develop into three-dimensional structures that resemble mouse organoids in direct cell encapsulation or multicellular growth that resembles the villi when using two stem cell encapsulation. 

DARPA; NIH; Boston Children Hospital

References:
[1] Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, van de Wetering M, Barker N, Stange DE, et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459:262-5

Keywords: Cell Adhesion, Hydrogel, 3D scaffold, bioactive interface

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Synthetic scaffolds as extracellular matrices

Citation: Hernandez-Gordillo V, Choi G, Smoak M, Carrier R and Griffith L (2016). Engineering the intestinal basement membrane microenvironment using PEG-based hydrogels. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00503

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.