Event Abstract

Back to Event

Measuring the Emotional Conflict with a Word-Face Stroop Task

Zeynep Basgöze1* and D. Gökçay1
  • 1 Informatics Institute, Middle East Technical University, Türkiye

Background: Conflict resolution is essential for humans to survive. Stroop Task is a cognitive task designed to measure conflict resolution based on congruent and incongruent situations. Cognitive conflict resolution occurs in DLPFC and caudal ACC parts of the brain [1]. On the other hand, when emotions are involved, the limbic areas such as rostral & subgenual ACC and amygdala take over [1, 2]. Currently, emotional conflict is being measured by creating a conflict between emotional words and their color or emotional words and their number. However, these tasks fail to generate emotional conflict consistently, because they activate both cognitive and emotional parts of the system. To be able to measure emotional conflict, one needs to create a task where the conflict activates emotional networks exclusively. The word-face Stroop [1], which we conducted in this study, is such a task where the conflict is between “emotional” words and “emotional” faces. In congruent situations, positive words are shown on positively affective faces; negative words are shown on negatively affective faces; whereas in incongruent situations positive words are shown on negatively affective faces and vice versa. The novelty of our task in this study is due to the use of a brand-new Turkish affective word list, TUDADEN [4], and evaluation of valence as well as concreteness of the words.

Method: 19 healthy right handed subjects (8 F, 11 M, age 25±3.8) voluntarily participated in the experiment. Emotionally normed words were selected from TUDADEN database [4]. 96 words are used: 32 positive, 32 negative, 32 neutral; 16 abstract and 16 concrete words existed for each category. Positive and negative words had 16 congruent and 16 incongruent situations each. Neutral words had no incongruent situation, serving as a baseline. Faces in the background (4 happy, 4 sad, 4 neutral, each from 2 M 2 F) were chosen from “The Productive Aging Lab Face Database” [3]. The subjects were asked to make a decision about the valence (positive, negative or neutral) of the emotional words which appeared on a background showing these affective faces. Each subject responded to three types of trials: congruent cases, incongruent cases and neutral cases (neutral word on a neutral face). They first saw a fixation point during 1500 ms, and then observed the stimuli during 2000 ms.

Results: A 3×2 ANOVA with factors of congruency, valence, concreteness (2×2×2) showed that subjects differed significantly in RT’s of congruency [F(1,18)=9.467, p<0.01] and valence [F(1,18)=5.476, p<0.05]. A barely significant effect of interaction between congruency, valence and concreteness is also found [F(1,18)=3.886, p=0.064], but there is no significant effect of words’ concreteness, nor of responses’ correctness.

Conclusion: Our task showed that healthy people are slower in reacting to incongruent stimuli compared to the congruent ones, just as in classical Stroop, but here, in an emotional state. Moreover, reaction times also differ according to the valence of the words: People are slower when the words are negative compared to positively valenced words.

References

1. Brian W Haas; Kazufumi Omura; R Todd Constable; Turhan Canli. Interference produced by emotional conflict associated with anterior cingulate activation. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience; Jun 2006; 6, 2; ProQuest Psychology Journals pg. 152

2. George Bush Phan Luu; Michael I. Posner.Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol .4, No. 6 , June 2000.

3. Minear, M. & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 630-633.

4. Gökçay D., Smith MA., "TÜDADEN:Türkçede Duygusal ve Anlamsal Değerlendirmeli Norm Veri Tabanı", Proceedings of Brain-Computer Workshop 4, 2008, Istanbul.

Conference: 10th International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience, Bodrum, Türkiye, 1 Sep - 5 Sep, 2008.

Presentation Type: Poster Presentation

Topic: Emotional Processing

Citation: Basgöze Z and Gökçay D (2008). Measuring the Emotional Conflict with a Word-Face Stroop Task. Conference Abstract: 10th International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/conf.neuro.09.2009.01.206

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 08 Dec 2008; Published Online: 08 Dec 2008.

* Correspondence: Zeynep Basgöze, Informatics Institute, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Türkiye, zeynep.basgoze@gmail.com