Who jumps to conclusions? A comprehensive assessment of probabilistic reasoning in psychosis following traumatic brain injury (PFTBI)
-
1
Swinburne University of Technology, Brain and Psychological Sciences Research Centre (BPsyC), Australia
-
2
Monash-Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPrc), Australia
-
3
RMIT University, Australia
-
4
Austin Hospital, Australia
-
5
Epworth Hospital, Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Australia
Background: To “jump” to a conclusion is the act of making a decision based on “insufficient” or poor evidence. Probabilistic reasoning impairment, which may underpin a jumping to conclusions (JTC) bias, has received robust discussion in the schizophrenia and delusion literature as an important component of poor cognition in psychosis. However, reasoning biases have not been explored in PFTBI to date.
Methods: Probabilistic reasoning was investigated in dually diagnosed PFTBI patients using an adaptation of Huq et al.’s (1988) original ‘beads task’ design with the ratios 85:15 and 60:40. Probabilistic predictions, draws-to-decision, self-rated decision confidence, and JTC bias were recorded. These data were compared to responses from patients with traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and healthy controls.
Results: PFTBI patients demonstrated the poorest predictions but the highest self-rated confidence of any of the cohorts. Furthermore, patients from both psychotic cohorts took the longest draws-to-decision in the first, and easier, trial (85:15), but responded the fastest in the second, and more difficult, trial (60:40). JTC behaviour was not evident in PFTBI over and above the other cohorts.
Discussion: PFTBI appears to be associated with some initial caution in decision making requiring probabilistic reasoning, but this may give way to an overconfident and more rushed decision making process once patients’ become familiar with a task. This process, however, may not constitute a JTC cognitive bias.
Keywords:
psychosis,
Traumatic Brain Injury,
Probabilistic reasoning,
JTC bias,
Schizophrenia
Conference:
ACNS-2013 Australasian Cognitive Neuroscience Society Conference, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia, 28 Nov - 1 Dec, 2013.
Presentation Type:
Poster
Topic:
Other
Citation:
Batty
RA,
Francis
AJ,
Thomas
N,
Hopwood
M,
Ponsford
JL and
Rossell
S
(2013). Who jumps to conclusions? A comprehensive assessment of probabilistic reasoning in psychosis following traumatic brain injury (PFTBI).
Conference Abstract:
ACNS-2013 Australasian Cognitive Neuroscience Society Conference.
doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2013.212.00035
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
15 Oct 2013;
Published Online:
25 Nov 2013.
*
Correspondence:
Dr. Rachel A Batty, Swinburne University of Technology, Brain and Psychological Sciences Research Centre (BPsyC), Melbourne, Australia, rachel.ann.batty@gmail.com