This article is a commentary on:
Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: a replication study
Kiki Zanolie
Diane Pecher- 1Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- 2Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
A corrigendum on
Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: a replication study
by Zanolie, K., and Pecher, D. (2014). Front. Psychol. 5:987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00987
This is a corrigendum for Number-Induced Shifts in Spatial Attention: A Replication Study.
Figure 1 of the manuscript does not completely represent the exact configuration of the experiments, such that the Display of the Digit should also hold two placeholders as in all the other Displays (Fixation, Variable delay, Target and Parity/Magnitude judgment). This is a subtle but critical difference.
FIGURE 1
Figure 1. The trial sequencestarted with a 500 ms fixation cross, followed by a 300 ms digit (1,2,8,9) display, and a variable delay of 250, 500, 750, or 1000 ms. Then a target was presented randomly in one of the two place holders on 80% of all trials. Participants had to respond as fast as possible by pressing the space bar when they detected the target. In Experiment 2 and 3 a delay of 200 ms (as the variable delay) was presented after which participants decided whether the previously seen digit was odd or even (Experiment 2 and Replication Experiment 2) or whether the digit was higher or lower than 5 (Experiment 3 and Replication Experiment 3). Underneath the parity or magnitude question the response options with corresponding keys “z” and “x” where displayed.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Keywords: corrigendum, Figure 1, placeholders, digit display, missing placeholders
Citation: Zanolie K and Pecher D (2014) Corrigendum: Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: a replication study. Front. Psychol. 5:1206. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01206
Received: 26 September 2014; Accepted: 06 October 2014;
Published online: 27 October 2014.
Edited and reviewed by: Andriy Myachykov, Northumbria University, UK
Copyright © 2014 Zanolie and Pecher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: c.k.k.zanolie@fsw.leidenuniv.nl