Successful treatment of colorectal anastomotic stricture by using sphincterotomes
Tzu-An Chen1* 
Wei-Lun Hsu2
- 1Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taiwan Landseed Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- 2Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taiwan Landseed Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Colorectal or colocolic anastomotic stricture is a common complication after colorectal surgery. Traditionally, endoscopic balloon dilation technique was used for those patients with symptomatic stricture. The use of electroincision (radial incisions of the scar) along with pneumatic balloon dilation was reported with good result in literature. We present a novel method for relieving colorectal anastomotic stricture by using sphincterotomes, which is indicated for use in the cannulation of the biliary ducts and the transendoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of Vater and the sphincter of Oddi. The use of sphincterotomes in upper GI tract anastomotic stricture was reported before, but the experience in managing lower GI tract was pending. Based on our preliminary report, sphincterotomes can be an effective and safe treatment option for colorectal anastomotic stricture.
Introduction
Anastomotic stricture is a relatively common complication of low anterior resection that requires further management if an obstruction occurs (1). Direct digital dilatation or transrectal surgical treatment is possible if the anastomosis is located in the lower rectum. Endoscopic balloon dilatation is the most effective method for any patients on whom these lower rectum procedures cannot be performed (2–4), although repeated dilation over time is often required to achieve normal bowel function (5). Dilation can be combined with other procedures such as neodymium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser treatment (6), electroincision (7), and electrocautery (8). We present a novel method for relieving anastomotic stricture by using sphincterotomes, which is indicated for use in the cannulation of the biliary ducts and the transendoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of Vater and the sphincter of Oddi. Our preliminary report revealed that our method was easily and safely performed and the long-term result seems good.
Case Series
Case 1
A 47-year-old male patient received multiple colonoscopic reductions for sigmoid volvulus. Because of the recurrent episodes, the patient finally accepted surgery. After resection of the redundant sigmoid colon, an end-to-side colorectal anastomosis was completed with a double-stapled technique. He was later discharged in good condition with fairly regular bowel movements.
One month after discharge, the patient was hospitalized again because of abdominal pain and 7 days of constipation. Diffuse bowel dilation was noted in the X-ray study. A colonoscopy exam was performed and a stricture of colorectal anastomosis was identified, where the colonoscope was unable to pass through the anastomosis (Figure 1A). We changed the instrument to a panendoscope for using sphincterotomes (Clevercut; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) to release the circumferential scar of the anastomosis (Figure 1B). The other incisions were made in different directions (Figure 1C). After the procedure, a massive stool passage was noted and the obstructive symptom was relieved. Four months later, we performed another colonoscopy for surveillance. The diameter of the anastomosis had increased obviously and the underlying mucosa was growing well (Figure 1D). No more symptoms of intestinal obstruction were noted after 18-month follow up.
Figure 1. (A) Stricture of anastomosis (white arrow). Note the previous stapled linear scar (black arrow). (B) Using Sphincterotomes to release the circumferential scar. (C) Complete the bilateral incisions. (D) Increased the diameter of anastomosis.
Case 2
A 73-year-old male patient received low anterior resection with a double-stapled technique for rectosigmoid colon cancer. The operation and hospital course were uneventful. Constipation and abdominal fullness were complained later. The surveillance colonoscopy was performed 6 months after operation. Stricture of the anastomosis was noted and we used sphincterotomes for releasing the circumferential scar again (Figures 2A,B). The obstructive symptoms were relieved after the procedure and the lumen was markedly increased in the following-up exam (Figure 2C).
Figure 2. (A) Stricture of anastomosis. (B) Using Sphincterotomes to release the circumferential scar. (C) Increased the diameter of anastomosis.
Discussion
Although circular stapling anastomosis of the rectum has been used widely and has been regarded as a safe and quick technique, the development of frequent anastomotic strictures is the major postoperative complication of this procedure (9, 10). The incidence of colorectal anastomotic strictures varies from 3 to 30%, and is considered to be related to factors including radiation (11) and anastomotic leakage (12). Most of these anastomotic strictures are simple constrictions that can be successfully treated using dilation or endoscopic alternatives. However, up to 28% of patients require a surgical correction. This can be technically difficult, and a permanent colostomy is possible (13).
Endoscopic incision for the treatment of anastomotic stenosis in the upper gastrointestinal tract is well accepted (14), but its application for colorectal anastomotic strictures is limited. The sphincterotome is a bow-like device, which has an electrosurgical cutting wire at the distal end of the catheter. A monopolar power source is connected to the catheter at an electrode connector on the handle. During a sphincterotomy activation of the power source causes electrical current to pass along an insulated portion of the wire within the catheter to the exposed cutting wire. A retractable plunger on the control handle permits flexing of the catheter tip upward by pulling on the cutting wire. This flexing assists with aligning the cutting wire and maintaining contact of the wire with the scarred anastomosis while the catheter is pulled back, incising the circular scar of anastomosis by electrocauterization. Because of the bilateral plastic limbs of the sphincterotome, the depth of electrocauterization was limited and perforation of bowel wall could be avoided (Figure 3). We made three or four incisions at different directions to release the stricture. The purpose of the incision was breakdown of the membranous circular scar, and we preferred multiple shallow incisions but not one deep incision with curative intent. We believe that if the strength of stricture was released by multiple incisions, the lumen would be dilated by the following stool passage. One curative deep incision was not necessary so the risk of bowel injury could be diminished.
Figure 3. The depth of incision was limited by the arms of Sphincterotomes.
Some authors also reported small case series about using endoscopic incisions plus balloon dilation for the anastomotic stricture (15, 16). Based on our result, additional balloon dilation might not be necessary if the multiple incisions were completed and the membranous scar was demolished. Recently, some authors tried to treat benign colorectal strictures by stenting (17). Although the use of self-expanding metal stents to treat obstruction colorectal tumors has been commonly described in the literature, the application of stenting to benign stricture is uncommon. The long-term reliability of stenting is questioned; migration, erosion, pressure necrosis, and bleeding all have been reported (18). In our opinion, endoscopic self-expanding metal stent placement as a bridge to surgery is an option for acute malignant colonic obstruction. For the long-term usage in benign anastomotic stricture, colonic stenting is not encouraged.
The application of sphincteromes seems suitable for colorectal anastomotic strictures, which was easily performed, and yielded an effective result. The present outcome was also satisfactory. However, the risk and the long-term results of this method could not be assessed because of limited experiences.
Authors Contribution
We are accepting full responsibility for the conduct of the study. Specific author contributions: Tzu-An Chen looked after the patients and wrote the report. Tzu-An Chen and Wei-Lun Hsu completed the procedures.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Tsung-Hua Chen for the illustration drawing and Mrs. Su-Ling Chang for assistance while performing the procedures.
References
1. Weinstock LB, Shatz BA. Endoscopic abnormalities of the anastomosis following resection of colonic neoplasm. Gastrointest Endosc (1994) 40(5):558–61. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(94)70252-7
2. Di Giorgio P, De Luca L, Rivellini G, Sorrentino E, D’Amore E, De Luca B. Endoscopic dilation of benign colorectal anastomotic stricture after low anterior resection: a prospective comparison study of two balloon types. Gastrointest Endosc (2004) 60(3):347–50. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01813-9
3. Lin SC, Sy E, Lin BW, Lee JC. Management of colorectal anastomotic strictures using multidiameter balloon dilation. J Soc Colon Rectal Surgeon (Taiwan) (2009) 20(3):62–8.
4. Johansson C. Endoscopic dilation of rectal strictures: a prospective study of 18 cases. Dis Colon Rectum (1996) 39(4):423–8. doi:10.1007/BF02054058
5. Garcea G, Sutton CD, Lloyd TD, Jameson J, Scott A, Kelly MJ. Management of benign rectal strictures: a review of present therapeutic procedures. Dis Colon Rectum (2003) 46(11):1451–60. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-6792-x
6. Luck A, Chapuis P, Sinclair G, Hood J. Endoscopic laser stricturotomy and balloon dilatation for benign colorectal strictures. ANZ J Surg (2001) 71(10):594–7. doi:10.1046/j.1445-2197.2001.02207.x
7. Truong S, Willis S, Schumpelick V. Endoscopic therapy of benign anastomotic strictures of the colorectum by electroincision and balloon dilatation. Endoscopy (1997) 29(9):845–9. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1004319
8. Brandimarte G, Tursi A, Gasbarrini G. Endoscopic treatment of benign anastomotic colorectal stenosis with electrocautery. Endoscopy (2000) 32(6):461–3. doi:10.1055/s-2000-651
9. Ravitch MM, Steinchen FM. A stapling instrument for end-to-end inverting anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract. Ann Surg (1979) 189(6):791–7. doi:10.1097/00000658-197906000-00017
10. Brennan SS, Pickford IR, Evans M, Pollock AV. Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses – a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg (1982) 69(12):722–4. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800691212
11. Anseline PF, Lavery IC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Weakley FL. Radiation injury of the rectum: evaluation of surgical treatment. Ann Surg (1981) 194(6):716–24. doi:10.1097/00000658-198112000-00010
12. Lim M, Akhtar S, Sasapu K, Harris K, Burke D, Sagar P, et al. Clinical and subclinical leaks after low colorectal anastomosis: a clinical and radiologic study. Dis Colon Rectum (2006) 49(10):1611–9. doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0663-6
13. Schlegel RD, Dehni N, Parc R, Caplin S, Tiret E. Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. Dis Colon Rectum (2001) 44(10):1464–8. doi:10.1007/BF02234598
14. Hordijk ML, Siersema PD, Tilanus HW, Kuipers EJ. Electrocautery therapy for refractory anastomotic strictures of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 63(1):157–63. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.016
15. Hagiwara A, Sakakura C, Shirasu M, Torii T, Hirata Y, Yamagishi H. Sigmoid fiberscopic incision plus balloon dilatation for anastomotic cicatricial stricture after anterior resection of the rectum. World J Surg (1999) 23(7):717–20. doi:10.1007/PL00012375
16. Hayashi Y, Chino A, Fujimoto Y, Ishikawa H, Kishihara T, Uragami N, et al. Successful endoscopic incision for a membranous obstruction of the anastomosis after surgical treatment of rectal cancer: report of two cases (in Japanese with English abstract). Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi (2012) 65(4):219–23. doi:10.3862/jcoloproctology.65.219
17. Forshaw MJ, Sankararajah D, Stewart M, Parker MC. Self-expanding metallic stents in the treatment of benign colorectal disease: indications and outcomes. Colorectal Dis (2006) 8(2):102–11. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00806.x
Keywords: colorectal anastomosis, stricture, sphincterotomes, colorectal surgery, colonoscopy
Citation: Chen T-A and Hsu W-L (2014) Successful treatment of colorectal anastomotic stricture by using sphincterotomes. Front. Surg. 1:22. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2014.00022
Received: 30 April 2014; Paper pending published: 02 June 2014;
Accepted: 03 June 2014; Published online: 20 June 2014.
Edited by:
Saleh Abbas, Deakin University, AustraliaReviewed by:
Marcello Picchio, Civil Hospital “P. Colombo”, ItalyCarlos Moreno Sanz, Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
Copyright: © 2014 Chen and Hsu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tzu-An Chen, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taiwan Landseed Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan No. 77, Kwang-Tai Road, Ping-Jen City, Taoyuan 32449, Taiwan e-mail: tlalocc@gmail.com