• Info
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Archive
  • Research Topics
  • View Some Authors
  • Review Guidelines
  • Subscribe to Alerts
  • Search
  • Article Type

    Publication Date

  • Author Info
  • Why Submit?
  • Fees
  • Article Types
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Checklist
  • Contact Editorial Office
  • Submit Manuscript
Start date should be earlier than end date. OK Please enter the date in dd/mm/yyyy format or use the calendar icon to the left of the date field.

Research Topic

Share 0
Like 0

Sweating the Small Stuff: Does data cleaning and testing of assumptions really matter in the 21st century?

Topic Editors:

Jason W. Osborne, University of Louisville, USA

Submission Closed.

Modern statistical software makes it easier than ever to do thorough data screening/cleaning and to test assumptions associated with the analyses researchers perform.

However, few authors (even in top-tier journals) seem to be reporting data cleaning/screening and testing assumptions associated with the statistical analyses being reported. Few popular textbooks seem to focus on these basics.

In the 21st Century, with our complex modern analyses, is data screening and cleaning still relevant? Do outliers or extreme scores matter any more? Does having normally distributed variables improve analyses? Are there new techniques for screening or cleaning data that researchers should be aware of?

Are most analyses robust to violations of most assumptions, to the point that researchers really don't need to pay attention to assumptions any more?

My goal for this Research Topic is examine this issue with fresh eyes and 21st century methods. I believe that we can demonstrate that these things do still matter, even when using "robust" methods or non-parametric techniques, and perhaps identify when they matter MOST or in what way they can most substantially affect the results of an analysis.

I believe we can encourage researchers to change their habits through evidence-based discussions revolving around these issues. It is possible we can even convince editors of important journals to include these aspects in their evaluation /review criteria, as many journals in the social sciences have done with effect size reporting in recent years.

I encourage you to join me in demonstrating WHY paying attention to these mundane aspects of quantitative analysis can be beneficial to researchers.

Share 0
Like 0

About Frontiers Research Topics


Frontiers Research Topics

With their unique mixes of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area! Find out more on how to host your own Frontiers Research Topic or contribute to one as an author.

© 2007 - 2014 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved