All manuscripts submitted to Frontiers receive in depth review from qualified expert reviewers and
editors. Full peer review includes both ‘Independent Review’ and ‘Interactive
Review’ phases. In the Independent Review phase – more like traditional peer review - each
reviewer prepares a report on a manuscript and the editor considers these reports in deciding on the
level of revision required. The ‘Interactive Review’ phase, which is unique to Frontiers,
follows Independent Review and allows authors and reviewers to correspond directly, with the goal of
improving the manuscript a much as is reasonably achievable. Full Review is carried out when novel
data, techniques, methods, etc., are presented and thereby require detailed validation. Article types
subject to full peer review are:
- Original Research Articles
- Methods Articles
- Hypothesis & Theory Articles
- Review Articles
- Mini Review Articles
- Clinical Case Study Articles
- Focused Reviews Articles
Short reviews are applied to manuscripts that do not require extensive validation. The Independent
Review phase is skipped, and Interactive Review is immediately activated. The Associate Editor will
review the manuscript, and may choose to invite one or more additional reviewers. Any reviewers and the
editor will give feedback directly in the Interactive Review Forum. Article types subject to short peer
review are:
- Opinion Articles
- Editorial
- Commentaries (General and Frontiers)
- Book Reviews