• Info
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Archive
  • Research Topics
  • View Some Authors
  • Review Guidelines
  • Subscribe to Alerts
  • Search
  • Article Type

    Publication Date

  • Author Info
  • Why Submit?
  • Fees
  • Article Types
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Checklist
  • Contact Editorial Office
  • Submit Manuscript
Start date should be earlier than end date. OK Please enter valid date format.

Decoding developmental differences and individual variability in response inhibition through predictive analyses across individuals

  • 1 Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  • 2 Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  • 3 Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Response inhibition is thought to improve throughout childhood and into adulthood. Despite the relationship between age and the ability to stop ongoing behavior, questions remain regarding whether these age-related changes reflect improvements in response inhibition or in other factors that contribute to response performance variability. Functional neuroimaging data shows age-related changes in neural activity during response inhibition. While traditional methods of exploring neuroimaging data are limited to determining correlational relationships, newer methods can determine predictability and can begin to answer these questions. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to determine which aspects of neural function predict individual differences in age, inhibitory function, response speed, and response time variability. We administered a stop-signal task requiring rapid inhibition of ongoing motor responses to healthy participants aged 9–30. We conducted a standard analysis using GLM and a predictive analysis using high-dimensional regression methods. During successful response inhibition we found regions typically involved in motor control, such as the ACC and striatum, that were correlated with either age, response inhibition (as indexed by stop-signal reaction time; SSRT), response speed, or response time variability. However, when examining which variables neural data could predict, we found that age and SSRT, but not speed or variability of response execution, were predicted by neural activity during successful response inhibition. This predictive relationship provides novel evidence that developmental differences and individual differences in response inhibition are related specifically to inhibitory processes. More generally, this study demonstrates a new approach to identifying the neurocognitive bases of individual differences.

Keywords: development, predictive analysis, fMRI, response inhibition, stop-signal

Citation: Cohen JR, Asarnow RF, Sabb FW, Bilder RM, Bookheimer SY, Knowlton BJ and Poldrack RA (2010) Decoding developmental differences and individual variability in response inhibition through predictive analyses across individuals. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4:47. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00047

Received: 20 December 2009; Paper pending published: 03 February 2010;
Accepted: 05 May 2010; Published online: 02 July 2010

Edited by:

Silvia A. Bunge, University of California Berkeley, USA

Reviewed by:

John-Dylan Haynes, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Germany
Luiz Pessoa, Indiana University, USA

Copyright: © 2010 Cohen, Asarnow, Sabb, Bilder, Bookheimer, Knowlton and Poldrack. This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.

*Correspondence: Jessica R. Cohen, Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. e-mail: jrcohen@psych.ucla.edu

People who looked at this article, also looked at:


Original Research Article, Published on 10 Aug 2010

Mal-Adaptation of Event-Related EEG Responses Preceding Performance Errors

Heike Eichele, Hilde T. Juvodden, Markus Ullsperger and Tom Eichele

Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00065

Opinion Article, Published on 18 Nov 2011

A Philosophical Analysis of Neuroenergetics

Robert G. Shulman

Front. Neuroenerg. doi: 10.3389/fnene.2011.00006

Original Research Article, Published on 14 May 2010

A signal processing analysis of Purkinje cells in vitro

Ze'ev R Abrams, Ajithkumar Warrier, Dirk Trauner and Xiang Zhang

Front. Neural Circuits doi: 10.3389/fncir.2010.00013


© 2007 - 2012 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved