• Info
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Archive
  • Research Topics
  • View Some Authors
  • Review Guidelines
  • Subscribe to Alerts
  • Search
  • Article Type

    Publication Date

  • Author Info
  • Why Submit?
  • Fees
  • Article Types
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Checklist
  • Contact Editorial Office
  • Submit Manuscript
Start date should be earlier than end date. OK Please enter valid date format.

Original Research ARTICLE

Spatial selection of features within perceived and remembered objects

University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Our representation of the visual world can be modulated by spatially specific attentional biases that depend flexibly on task goals. We compared searching for task-relevant features in perceived versus remembered objects. When searching perceptual input, selected task-relevant and suppressed task-irrelevant features elicited contrasting spatiotopic ERP effects, despite them being perceptually identical. This was also true when participants searched a memory array, suggesting that memory had retained the spatial organization of the original perceptual input and that this representation could be modulated in a spatially specific fashion. However, task-relevant selection and task-irrelevant suppression effects were of the opposite polarity when searching remembered compared to perceived objects. We suggest that this surprising result stems from the nature of feature- and object-based representations when stored in visual short-term memory. When stored, features are integrated into objects, meaning that the spatially specific selection mechanisms must operate upon objects rather than specific feature-level representations.
Keywords:
spatial attention, visual short-term memory, working memory, ERPs, electrophysiology, task-set control
Citation:
Astle DE, Scerif G, Kuo B-C and Nobre AC (2009). Spatial selection of features within perceived and remembered objects. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 3:6. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.006.2009
Received:
04 February 2009;
 Paper pending published:
16 February 2009;
Accepted:
07 April 2009;
 Published online:
27 April 2009.

Edited by:

George R. Mangun, University of California Davis, USA

Reviewed by:

Mircea A. Schoenfeld, Otto-von-Guericke University, Germany
Robert T. Knight, University of California Berkeley, USA
Copyright:
© 2009 Astle, Scerif, Kuo and Nobre. This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
*Correspondence:
Duncan Astle, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK. e-mail: duncan.astle@psy.ox.ac.uk

People who looked at this article, also looked at:


Original Research Article, Published on 21 Apr 2009

Comparing neural correlates of visual target detection in serial visual presentations having different temporal correlations

An Luo and Paul Sajda

Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.005.2009

Review Article, Published on 12 Feb 2010

Adolescent development of the reward system

Adriana Galván

Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.006.2010

Original Research Article, Published on 08 May 2009

Brain activity during landmark and line bisection tasks

Metehan Cicek, Leon Y Deouell and Robert T Knight

Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.007.2009

Original Research Article, Published on 20 Aug 2008

Towards a digital body: the virtual arm illusion

Mel Slater, Daniel Pérez Marcos, Henrik Ehrsson and Maria V Sanchez-Vives

Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.006.2008


© 2007 - 2012 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved