• Info
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Archive
  • Research Topics
  • View Some Authors
  • Review Guidelines
  • Subscribe to Alerts
  • Search
  • Article Type

    Publication Date

  • Author Info
  • Why Submit?
  • Fees
  • Article Types
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Checklist
  • Contact Editorial Office
  • Submit Manuscript
Start date should be earlier than end date. OK Please enter valid date format.

Hypothesis & Theory ARTICLE

Babies and brains: habituation in infant cognition and functional neuroimaging

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, USA
Many prominent studies of infant cognition over the past two decades have relied on the fact that infants habituate to repeated stimuli – i.e. that their looking times tend to decline upon repeated stimulus presentations. This phenomenon had been exploited to reveal a great deal about the minds of preverbal infants. Many prominent studies of the neural bases of adult cognition over the past decade have relied on the fact that brain regions habituate to repeated stimuli – i.e. that the hemodynamic responses observed in fMRI tend to decline upon repeated stimulus presentations. This phenomenon has been exploited to reveal a great deal about the neural mechanisms of perception and cognition. Similarities in the mechanics of these two forms of habituation suggest that it may be useful to relate them to each other. Here we outline this analogy, explore its nuances, and highlight some ways in which the study of habituation in functional neuroimaging could yield novel insights into the nature of habituation in infant cognition – and vice versa.
Keywords:
repetition attenuation, repetition suppression, repetition enhancement, fMRI adaptation, priming, implicit memory, novelty preferences, cognitive neuroscience
Citation:
Turk-Browne NB, Scholl BJ and Chun MM (2008). Babies and brains: habituation in infant cognition and functional neuroimaging. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2:16. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.016.2008
Received:
27 August 2008;
 Paper pending published:
14 October 2008;
Accepted:
15 October 2008;
 Published online:
02 December 2008.

Edited by:

Silvia A. Bunge, University of California Berkeley, USA

Reviewed by:

Leslie J. Carver, University of California, San Diego, USA
Scott P. Johnson, University of California, USA
Copyright:
© 2008 Turk-Browne, Scholl and Chun. This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
*Correspondence:
Nicholas B. Turk-Browne, Department of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven CT 06511, USA. e-mail: nicholas. turk-browne@yale.edu

People who looked at this article, also looked at:


Focused Review Article, Published on 11 May 2011

Spike Correlations – What Can They Tell About Synchrony?

Tatjana Tchumatchenko, Theo Geisel, Maxim Volgushev and Fred Wolf

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00068

Original Research Article, Published on 23 Mar 2010

fMR-adaptation reveals invariant coding of biological motion on human STS

Emily D Grossman, Nicole L Jardine and John A Pyles

Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.015.2010

Original Research Article, Published on 20 Aug 2009

Who can you trust? Behavioral and neural differences between perceptual and memory-based influences

John D Rudoy and Ken A Paller

Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.016.2009

Original Research Article, Published on 29 Oct 2008

Hippocampal amnesia impairs all manner of relational memory

Alex Konkel, David E Warren, Melissa C Duff, Daniel Tranel and Neal J Cohen

Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.015.2008

Original Research Article, Published on 03 Dec 2008

The vestibular component in out-of-body experiences: a computational approach

Lars Schwabe and Olaf Blanke

Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.017.2008


© 2007 - 2012 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved