• Info
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Archive
  • Research Topics
  • View Some Authors
  • Review Guidelines
  • Subscribe to Alerts
  • Search
  • Article Type

    Publication Date

  • Author Info
  • Why Submit?
  • Fees
  • Article Types
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Checklist
  • Contact Editorial Office
  • Submit Manuscript
Start date should be earlier than end date. OK Please enter valid date format.
Share 0
Like 0

From acoustic segmentation to language processing: evidence from optical imaging

  • 1 Max-Planck-Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
  • 2 Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Clinic Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  • 3 Department of Neurology, Berlin NeuroImaging Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 4 Neurocognition of Language/Neurolinguistics, Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
  • 5 Cluster Languages of Emotion, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

During language acquisition in infancy and when learning a foreign language, the segmentation of the auditory stream into words and phrases is a complex process. Intuitively, learners use “anchors” to segment the acoustic speech stream into meaningful units like words and phrases. Regularities on a segmental (e.g., phonological) or suprasegmental (e.g., prosodic) level can provide such anchors. Regarding the neuronal processing of these two kinds of linguistic cues a left-hemispheric dominance for segmental and a right-hemispheric bias for suprasegmental information has been reported in adults. Though lateralization is common in a number of higher cognitive functions, its prominence in language may also be a key to understanding the rapid emergence of the language network in infants and the ease at which we master our language in adulthood. One question here is whether the hemispheric lateralization is driven by linguistic input per se or whether non-linguistic, especially acoustic factors, “guide” the lateralization process. Methodologically, functional magnetic resonance imaging provides unsurpassed anatomical detail for such an enquiry. However, instrumental noise, experimental constraints and interference with EEG assessment limit its applicability, pointedly in infants and also when investigating the link between auditory and linguistic processing. Optical methods have the potential to fill this gap. Here we review a number of recent studies using optical imaging to investigate hemispheric differences during segmentation and basic auditory feature analysis in language development.

Keywords: optical imaging, infants, language acquisition, acoustic segmentation, NIRS

Citation: Obrig H, Rossi S, Telkemeyer S and Wartenburger I (2010) From acoustic segmentation to language processing: evidence from optical imaging. Front. Neuroenerg. 2:13. doi: 10.3389/fnene.2010.00013

Received: 28 February 2010; Paper pending published: 31 March 2010;
Accepted: 27 May 2010; Published online: 23 June 2010

Edited by:

David Boas, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA; Harvard Medical School, USA

Reviewed by:

Heather Bortfeld, University of Connecticut, USA
Sharon Fox, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA

Copyright: © 2010 Obrig, Rossi, Telkemeyer and Wartenburger. This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.

*Correspondence: Hellmuth Obrig, Max-Planck-Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstrasse 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. e-mail: obrig@cbs.mpg.de

Share 0
Like 0

© 2007 - 2012 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved