• Info
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Archive
  • Research Topics
  • View Some Authors
  • Review Guidelines
  • Subscribe to Alerts
  • Search
  • Article Type

    Publication Date

  • Author Info
  • Why Submit?
  • Fees
  • Article Types
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Checklist
  • Contact Editorial Office
  • Submit Manuscript
Start date should be earlier than end date. OK Please enter valid date format.

Original Research ARTICLE

A low-cost multielectrode system for data acquisition enabling real-time closed-loop processing with rapid recovery from stimulation artifacts

1
Department of Neurological Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
2
Laboratory for Neuroengineering, Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
Commercially available data acquisition systems for multielectrode recording from freely moving animals are expensive, often rely on proprietary software, and do not provide detailed, modifiable circuit schematics. When used in conjunction with electrical stimulation, they are prone to prolonged, saturating stimulation artifacts that prevent the recording of short-latency evoked responses. Yet electrical stimulation is integral to many experimental designs, and critical for emerging brain-computer interfacing and neuroprosthetic applications. To address these issues, we developed an easy-to-use, modifiable, and inexpensive system for multielectrode neural recording and stimulation. Setup costs are less than US$10,000 for 64 channels, an order of magnitude lower than comparable commercial systems. Unlike commercial equipment, the system recovers rapidly from stimulation and allows short-latency action potentials (<1 ms post-stimulus) to be detected, facilitating closed-loop applications and exposing neural activity that would otherwise remain hidden. To illustrate this capability, evoked activity from microstimulation of the rodent hippocampus is presented. System noise levels are similar to existing platforms, and extracellular action potentials and local field potentials can be recorded simultaneously. The system is modular, in banks of 16 channels, and flexible in usage: while primarily designed for in vivo use, it can be combined with commercial preamplifiers to record from in vitro multielectrode arrays. The system’s open-source control software, NeuroRighter, is implemented in C#, with an easy-to-use graphical interface. As C# functions in a managed code environment, which may impact performance, analysis was conducted to ensure comparable speed to C++ for this application. Hardware schematics, layout files, and software are freely available. Since maintaining wired headstage connections with freely moving animals is difficult, we describe a new method of electrode-headstage coupling using neodymium magnets.
Keywords:
data acquisition system, multi-electrode array, stimulation artifact, local field potential, recording, microstimulation, hippocampus, population spike
Citation:
Rolston JD, Gross RE and Potter SM (2009). A low-cost multielectrode system for data acquisition enabling real-time closed-loop processing with rapid recovery from stimulation artifacts. Front. Neuroeng. 2:12. doi: 10.3389/neuro.16.012.2009
Received:
12 March 2009;
 Paper pending published:
10 April 2009;
Accepted:
02 July 2009;
 Published online:
23 July 2009.

Edited by:

Sergio Martinoia, University of Genova, Italy

Reviewed by:

Berdondini Luca, Italian Institute of Technology, Italy
Enrique Claverol, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain
Copyright:
© 2009 Rolston, Gross and Potter. This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
*Correspondence:
Steve M. Potter, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 313 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, GA 30332-0535, USA. e-mail: steve.potter@bme.gatech.edu

People who looked at this article, also looked at:


Focused Review Article, Published on 15 Sep 2010

Closed-Loop, Open-Source Electrophysiology

John D. Rolston, Robert E. Gross and Steve M. Potter

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00031

Methods Article, Published on 06 Apr 2011

Neuronal Response Clamp

Avner Wallach, Danny Eytan, Asaf Gal, Christoph Zrenner and Shimon Marom

Front. Neuroeng. doi: 10.3389/fneng.2011.00003

Original Research Article, Published on 27 Mar 2009

Brain-machine interactions for assessing the dynamics of neural systems

Michael Kositsky, Michela Chiappalone, Simon T Alford and Sandro Mussa-Ivaldi

Front. Neurorobot. doi: 10.3389/neuro.12.001.2009

Original Research Article, Published on 04 May 2009

Directed interactions between auditory and superior temporal cortices and their role in sensory integration

Christoph Kayser and Nikos K Logothetis

Front. Integr. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.07.007.2009


© 2007 - 2012 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved