• Info
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Archive
  • Research Topics
  • View Some Authors
  • Review Guidelines
  • Subscribe to Alerts
  • Search
  • Article Type

    Publication Date

  • Author Info
  • Why Submit?
  • Fees
  • Article Types
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Checklist
  • Contact Editorial Office
  • Submit Manuscript
Start date should be earlier than end date. OK Please enter valid date format.

Original Research ARTICLE

MEART: The semi-living artist

  • 1 Laboratory for Neuroengineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
  • 2 SymbioticA, School of Anatomy and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Australia

Here, we and others describe an unusual neurorobotic project, a merging of art and science called MEART, the semi-living artist. We built a pneumatically actuated robotic arm to create drawings, as controlled by a living network of neurons from rat cortex grown on a multi-electrode array (MEA). Such embodied cultured networks formed a real-time closed-loop system which could now behave and receive electrical stimulation as feedback on its behavior. We used MEART and simulated embodiments, or animats, to study the network mechanisms that produce adaptive, goal-directed behavior. This approach to neural interfacing will help instruct the design of other hybrid neural-robotic systems we call hybrots. The interfacing technologies and algorithms developed have potential applications in responsive deep brain stimulation systems and for motor prosthetics using sensory components. In a broader context, MEART educates the public about neuroscience, neural interfaces, and robotics. It has paved the way for critical discussions on the future of bio-art and of biotechnology.

Keywords: learning, embodiment, multi-electrode array, neural network, rat, art

Citation: Douglas J. Bakkum, Philip M. Gamblen, Guy Ben-Ary, Zenas C. Chao and Steve M. Potter (2007). MEART: The semi-living artist. Front. Neurorobot. 1:5. doi: 10.3389/neuro.12/005.2007

Received: 12 September 2007; Paper pending published: 9 October 2007;
Accepted: 15 October 2007; Published online: 2 November 2007.

Edited by:

Frederic Kaplan, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland

Reviewed by:

Frederic Kaplan, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland
Suguru N. Kudoh, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Osaka, Japan
Sergio Martinoia, Department of Biophysical and Electronic Engineering (DIBE), University of Genova, Italy

Copyright: © 2007 Bakkum, Gamblen, Ben-Ary, Chao, Potter. This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.

*Correspondence: S. M. Potter, Laboratory for Neuroengineering, Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0535, USA. e-mail: steve.potter@bme.gatech.edu

People who looked at this article, also looked at:


Original Research Article, Published on 02 Nov 2007

What is intrinsic motivation? A typology of computational approaches

Pierre-Yves Oudeyer and Frederic Kaplan

Front. Neurorobot. doi: 10.3389/neuro.12.006.2007

Original Research Article, Published on 29 Oct 2009

Generating spatiotemporal joint torque patterns from dynamical synchronization of distributed pattern generators

Alex Pitti, Max Lungarella and Yasuo Kuniyoshi

Front. Neurorobot. doi: 10.3389/neuro.12.002.2009


© 2007 - 2012 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved