• Info
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Archive
  • Research Topics
  • View Some Authors
  • Review Guidelines
  • Subscribe to Alerts
  • Search
  • Article Type

    Publication Date

  • Author Info
  • Why Submit?
  • Fees
  • Article Types
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Checklist
  • Contact Editorial Office
  • Submit Manuscript
Start date should be earlier than end date. OK Please enter valid date format.

Focused Review ARTICLE

Can attractor network models account for the statistics of firing during persistent activity in prefrontal cortex?

1
ISI Foundation, Torino, Italy
2
Laboratoire de Neurophysique et Physiologie, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
3
UMR 8119, CNRS, Paris, France
Persistent activity observed in neurophysiological experiments in monkeys is thought to be the neuronal correlate of working memory. Over the last decade, network modellers have strived to reproduce the main features of these experiments. In particular, attractor network models have been proposed in which there is a coexistence between a non-selective attractor state with low background activity with selective attractor states in which sub-groups of neurons fire at rates which are higher (but not much higher) than background rates. A recent detailed statistical analysis of the data seems however to challenge such attractor models: the data indicates that firing during persistent activity is highly irregular (with an average CV larger than 1), while models predict a more regular firing process (CV smaller than 1). We discuss here recent proposals that allow to reproduce this feature of the experiments.
Keywords:
network model, integrate-and-fi re neuron, working memory, prefrontal cortex, short-term depression
Citation:
Barbieri F and Brunel N (2008). Can attractor network models account for the statistics of firing during persistent activity in prefrontal cortex? Front. Neurosci.2,1: 114-122 doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.003.2008
Received:
29 April 2008;
 Paper pending published:
16 May 2008;
Accepted:
16 May 2008;
 Published online:
15 July 2008.

Edited by:

Misha Tsodyks, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel

Reviewed by:

Peter Dayan, University College London, UK
Copyright:
© 2008 Barbieri and Brunel. This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
*Correspondence:
Nicolas Brunel, Laboratoire de Neurophysique et Physiologie, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; CNRS UMR 8119 45 rue des Saints Peres 75270 Paris Cedex 06. e-mail: nicolas.brunel@univ-paris5.fr

People who looked at this article, also looked at:


Original Research Article, Published on 13 Apr 2011

Development of Maps of Simple and Complex Cells in the Primary Visual Cortex

Ján Antolík and James A. Bednar

Front. Comput. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00017

Original Research Article, Published on 24 Sep 2010

Emergence of Modular Structure in a Large-Scale Brain Network with Interactions between Dynamics and Connectivity

Cornelis J. Stam, Arjan Hillebrand, Huijuan Wang and Piet Van Mieghem

Front. Comput. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2010.00133

Review Article, Published on 15 Oct 2007

Functional maps of neocortical local circuitry

Alex M Thomson and Christophe Lamy

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.002.2007

Original Research Article, Published on 02 Nov 2007

Bilinearity, rules, and prefrontal cortex

Peter Dayan

Front. Comput. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.10.001.2007

Opinion Article, Published on 01 Aug 2008

Computational neuroscience grand challenges - a humble attempt at future forecast

Misha Tsodyks

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.021.2008


© 2007 - 2012 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved