• Info
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Archive
  • Research Topics
  • View Some Authors
  • Review Guidelines
  • Subscribe to Alerts
  • Search
  • Article Type

    Publication Date

  • Author Info
  • Why Submit?
  • Fees
  • Article Types
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Checklist
  • Contact Editorial Office
  • Submit Manuscript
Start date should be earlier than end date. OK Please enter valid date format.

Focused Review ARTICLE

Statistical learning analysis in neuroscience: aiming for transparency

  • 1 Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
  • 2 Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
  • 3 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
  • 4 Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany

Encouraged by a rise of reciprocal interest between the machine learning and neuroscience communities, several recent studies have demonstrated the explanatory power of statistical learning techniques for the analysis of neural data. In order to facilitate a wider adoption of these methods, neuroscientific research needs to ensure a maximum of transparency to allow for comprehensive evaluation of the employed procedures. We argue that such transparency requires “neuroscience-aware” technology for the performance of multivariate pattern analyses of neural data that can be documented in a comprehensive, yet comprehensible way. Recently, we introduced PyMVPA, a specialized Python framework for machine learning based data analysis that addresses this demand. Here, we review its features and applicability to various neural data modalities.

Keywords: machine learning, Python, PyMVPA, MVPA

Citation: Hanke M, Halchenko YO, Haxby JV and Pollmann S (2010) Statistical learning analysis in neuroscience: aiming for transparency. Front. Neurosci. 4,1: 38-43 doi:10.3389/neuro.01.007.2010

Received: 25 September 2009; Paper pending published: 14 November 2009;
Accepted: 24 November 2009; Published online: 15 May 2010

Edited by:

Rolf Kötter, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands

Reviewed by:

Stephen C. Strother, Baycrest, Canada; University of Toronto, Canada
Rolf Kötter, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands

Copyright: © 2010 Hanke, Halchenko, Haxby and Pollmann. This is an open-access publication subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.

*Correspondence: Michael Hanke & Dr. Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Dartmouth College, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 419 Moore Hall, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA, michael.hanke@gmail.com, yaroslav.o.halchenko@onerussian.com

People who looked at this article, also looked at:


Focused Review Article, Published on 15 Sep 2010

Binding by Asynchrony: The Neuronal Phase Code

Zoltan Nadasdy

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00051

Focused Review Article, Published on 15 Sep 2010

Embedding Reward Signals into Perception and Cognition

Luiz Pessoa and Jan B. Engelmann

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00017

Focused Review Article, Published on 15 Sep 2010

Patterned Activity within the Local Cortical Architecture

Farran Briggs and W. Martin Usrey

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00018

Focused Review Article, Published on 08 Dec 2010

Neural Correlates of Intentional Communication

Matthijs L. Noordzij, Sarah E. Newman-Norlund, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Peter Hagoort, Stephen C. Levinson and Ivan Toni

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00188


© 2007 - 2012 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved