• Info
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Archive
  • Research Topics
  • View Some Authors
  • Review Guidelines
  • Subscribe to Alerts
  • Search
  • Article Type

    Publication Date

  • Author Info
  • Why Submit?
  • Fees
  • Article Types
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Checklist
  • Contact Editorial Office
  • Submit Manuscript
Start date should be earlier than end date. OK Please enter valid date format.

Focused Review ARTICLE

Relationship of hippocampal theta and gamma oscillations to potentiation of synaptic transmission

1
Department of Experimental Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
2
International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
In the hippocampus in vivo, both synaptic plasticity and network activity are closely interdependent. We have found that immediately after an attempt to induce long-term potentiation (LTP), changes in theta (5–10 Hz) and gamma (30–100 Hz) activity correlate tightly with the occurrence of LTP, suggesting that tetanisation-driven activation of sensory inputs synchronises the activity of granule cells and interneurons, and thus, facilitates the encoding of acquired stimuli. This results in increase of theta and gamma power, and elevates the probability that afferent stimuli both coincide with the peak of theta cycle and reach their post-synaptic target within the gamma time-window (of 10–30 ms). Both these mechanisms can effectively shift the direction, of tetanisation-induced changes in synaptic weight, towards potentiation and induction of LTP. Here, we discuss our findings in the context of possible mechanisms that link theta and gamma oscillations with LTP induction, as well as their role in information processing and formation of memories.
Keywords:
LTP, theta, gamma, network activity, oscillations, synaptic plasticity, tetanisation, in vivo
Citation:
Bikbaev A and Manahan-Vaughan D (2008). Relationship of hippocampal theta and gamma oscillations to potentiation of synaptic transmission. Front. Neurosci. 2,1: 56-63. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.010.2008
Received:
15 May 2008;
 Paper pending published:
13 June 2008;
Accepted:
13 June 2008;
 Published online:
15 July 2008.

Edited by:

Carmen Sandi, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland

Reviewed by:

Bruno Poucet, CNRS and Université de Provence, France
Alexander Dityatev, Italian Institute of Technology, Italy
Copyright:
© 2008 Bikbaev and Manahan-Vaughan. This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
*Correspondence:
Denise Manahan-Vaughan, Department of Experimental Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitaetsstrasse 150, MA 01/551,44780 Bochum,Germany. e-mail: denise.manahan-vaughan@rub.de

People who looked at this article, also looked at:


Focused Review Article, Published on 15 May 2010

The behavioral relevance of multisensory neural response interactions

Holger F Sperdin, Céline Cappe and Micah M Murray

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.009.2010

Focused Review Article, Published on 15 Sep 2009

The Brian simulator

Dan F M Goodman and Romain Brette

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.026.2009

Focused Review Article, Published on 15 Jul 2008

Neurons and objects: the case of auditory cortex

Israel Nelken and Omer Bar-Yosef

Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.009.2008


© 2007 - 2012 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved