Relationship between cortical connectivity and aphasia therapy response
-
1
University of Queensland, Australia
-
2
University of British Columbia, Canada
-
3
Queensland University of Technology, Australia
-
4
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia
Introduction. Individual response to aphasia therapy is highly variable and difficult to predict. While different therapies for word retrieval are often given based on assumptions regarding the underlying breakdown, behavioural symptoms do not consistently predict which type of naming therapy will be most effective. Measures of cortical connectivity derived from EEG before and after therapy may provide additional important information for predicting and understanding response to therapy.
Methods. Twenty-three adults were recruited including eight adults with chronic, post-stroke aphasia who successfully completed 12 therapy sessions over 4 weeks, alternating between semantic and phonological approaches to word retrieval based on semantic feature analysis and phonological components analysis. Fifteen age-matched healthy controls were included for comparison. High-density electroencephalography (128 channel EEG) was measured during a picture-word judgement task performed before and after treatment for the aphasia group. Analysis of EEG via a dynamic causal modelling (DCM) approach was used to assess semantic and phonological processing pre and post therapy. DCM was applied using five fronto-temporo-parietal regions of interest based on source imaging analysis in the control and aphasia groups.
Results. Post-treatment naming improvement was associated with cortical responses measured bilaterally in a DCM connectivity model. Specifically, naming improvement for items treated with semantic feature analysis was correlated with (a) increased pre-treatment coupling between the left inferior parietal lobule and left inferior frontal gyrus (r = 0.63, pFDR=0.016) (b) increased coupling from left to right inferior parietal lobule (r = .77, FDRp = .0005) and (c) decreased pre-treatment coupling between the right inferior parietal lobule and right anterior middle temporal gyrus (r = -0.76, pFDR = 0.03). Post-treatment, reduced coupling between right inferior frontal gyrus and right posterior superior temporal gyrus was also significantly correlated with naming improvement for semantic treatment items (r= −0.53, pFDR=0.010).
Conclusions. This preliminary study on a small cohort of individuals with chronic aphasia has demonstrated the potential of DCM connectivity models derived from EEG data to predict and understand aphasia therapy response. In addition to highlighting the importance of connectivity within left hemisphere networks and inter-hemispheric coupling for treatment, the observation of reduced right intrahemispheric coupling in those individuals with improved outcomes supports the view that right hemisphere mechanisms may not invariably support treatment-induced recovery. Elucidating effective ipsilateral and contralateral connectivity before and after aphasia treatment provides new insights into therapy-induced reorganisation of cortical networks associated with successful therapy outcomes.
Keywords:
aphasia therapy,
dynamic causal modeling,
semantic,
phonological,
High density EEG/ERP
Conference:
Academy of Aphasia 57th Annual Meeting, Macau, Macao, SAR China, 27 Oct - 29 Oct, 2019.
Presentation Type:
Poster presentation
Topic:
Not eligible for student award
Citation:
Iyer
KK,
Angwin
AJ,
Van Hees
S,
McMahon
K,
Breakspear
M and
Copland
D
(2019). Relationship between cortical connectivity and aphasia therapy response.
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Conference Abstract:
Academy of Aphasia 57th Annual Meeting.
doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2019.01.00078
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
06 May 2019;
Published Online:
09 Oct 2019.
*
Correspondence:
Mx. David Copland, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia, d.copland@uq.edu.au