Event Abstract

Back to Event

Effects of Meditation on Attention and Spoken Word Finding in People with Aphasia

Britta Biedermann1*, Rosemary Croasdale1, Anne Whitworth1, Neville Hennessey1 and Peter Sedlmeier2
  • 1 Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Australia
  • 2 Technische Universität Chemnitz, Germany

Background. People with aphasia after stroke can show both linguistic (e.g., word comprehension and production) and non-linguistic cognitive difficulties (e.g., memory, attention, Murray, 2012). While empirical evidence shows meditation can enhance cognitive processes in healthy long-term meditators (Sedlmeier et al., 2012; 2017; Biedermann et al., 2016) with positive short-term effects on attention in novices (Norris et al., 2018), only a small number of studies have explored whether meditation may affect change in cognitive processes in aphasia (Marshall et al., 2018). Although aphasia is primarily seen as a language disorder, improving attention through meditation might benefit impaired linguistic processes since word planning requires some attentional capacity (see Roelofs & Piai, 2011). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a meditation intervention in people with aphasia can enhance attention and spoken word production. We also investigated changes in the clients’ self-reported everyday communication, social participation activities, and progress to learn meditation as a new skill. Participants. Seven people (six male, M = 62 years) with chronic aphasia, spoken word finding difficulties, and relatively preserved comprehension were recruited. All participants had no prior meditation experience. Procedure. A nine-week meditation intervention including two weekly 1-hr sessions was carried out. The intervention taught to notice the present moment without judgement ( Bishop et al., 2004). Different meditation techniques were used (e.g., body scan, listening to sounds, and breath counting). A case series design was applied including background attention and language assessments (e.g., the Test of Everyday Attention [TEA], the Psycholinguistic Assessment of Language Processing in Aphasia [PALPA]) and repeated baselines and post-test measures on attention and spoken picture naming. Throughout the intervention, independent running measures on spoken picture naming, and self-reports on everyday communication and social participation, were collected. An exit questionnaire was administered capturing the meditation experience. Measures. Subtests from the TEA and the PALPA assessed selective auditory attention, switching visual attention, sustained auditory attention and auditory short-term memory. Linguistic measures were based on standardised object pictures (Biedermann et al., 2014a;b, n=163), and picture naming running measures (taken from Nickels, unpublished) were based on five independent item sets (n=30 each) matched on key lexical variables (e.g., name agreement, frequency, length, etc). Results. Using Weighted Statistics (Howard et al., 2015) for the baseline and post-test analyses, five participants showed significant maintained improvement on at least one measure of attention (ps < .05), whereas no effects were found for spoken picture naming. Using Kendall’s Tau (Parker et al., 2011) for the running measure analyses, two participants showed significant improvement immediately after meditation for picture naming (TAUs > .80, ps < .05). Only one participant reported on positive change for their everyday communication, whereas all participants reported in their exit questionnaire an overall beneficial meditation experience affecting their sense of self and social participation activities positively. Conclusions. Theoretical and clinical implications for meditation in aphasia remediation are discussed with reference to Sohlberg and Mateer’s attention framework (2001) and the Two-Stage model of word production (Levelt et al., 1999).

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the seven dedicated people with aphasia who have given their time, commitment, and interest to this project. This project was funded by a Macquarie Research Development Grant (Biedermann et al., 9201401476) and a Curtin University New Staff project grant (Biedermann, H1073003580).

References

Biedermann, B., Beyersmann, E., Mason, C., Hameau, S., & Nickels, L. (2014a). A test battery for assessment of plural processing in aphasia exploring frequency (BAPPA-F). Macquarie Online Test Interface (MOTIF). [Open access: https://www.motif.org.au/] Biedermann, B., Beyersmann, E., Mason, C., Hameau, S., & Nickels, L. (2014b). A test battery for assessment of plural processing in aphasia exploring regularity (BAPPA-R). Macquarie Online Test Interface (MOTIF). [Open access: https://www.motif.org.au/] Biedermann, B., De Lissa, P., Mahajan, Y., Polito, V., Badcock, N., Connors, M. H., Quinto, L., Larsen, L., McArthur, G. (2016). Meditation and auditory attention: An ERP study of meditators and non-meditators. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 109, 63-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.016 Bishop, S. R. …et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychologist Scientific Practice, 11, 230-241. doi:10.1093/clipsy/bph077 Howard, D., Best, W., & Nickels, L. (2015). Optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward. Aphasiology, 29(5), 526-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.985884 Kay, Lesser & Coltheart (1996): Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): An introduction, Aphasiology, 10(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039608248403 Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. Marshall, R.S., Laures-Gore, J., & Love, K. (2018). Brief mindfulness meditation group training in aphasia: exploring attention, language and psychophysiological outcomes. International Journal of Language Communication Disorders, 53(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.111/1460-6984.12325 Murray, L.L. (2012). Attention and other cognitive deficits in aphasia: Presence and relation to language and communication measures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), S51-S64. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0067) Nickels, L. (unpublished materials). 147-picture items. Norris, C., Creem, D., Hendler, R., & Kober, H. (2018). Brief mindfulness meditation improves attention in novices: Evidence from ERPs and moderation by neuroticism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(315), 1-20. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00315 Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006 Robertson, I. H., Ward, T., Ridgeway, V., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1994). The test of everyday attention (TEA). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers of Psychology, 2:307, 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00307 Sedlmeier, P., Eberth, J., Schwarz, M., Zimmermann, D., Haarig, F., Jaeger, S., & Kunze, S. (2012). The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1139-1171. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028168 Sedlmeier, P., Loße, C., & Quasten, L. C. (2018). Psychological effects of meditation for healthy practitioners: An update. Mindfulness, 9(2), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0780-4. Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (2001). Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Keywords: Meditation, Aphasia after stroke, auditory and visual attention, spoken word production, Social Participation

Conference: Academy of Aphasia 57th Annual Meeting, Macau, Macao, SAR China, 27 Oct - 29 Oct, 2019.

Presentation Type: Platform presentation

Topic: Not eligible for student award

Citation: Biedermann B, Croasdale R, Whitworth A, Hennessey N and Sedlmeier P (2019). Effects of Meditation on Attention and Spoken Word Finding in People with Aphasia. Front. Hum. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: Academy of Aphasia 57th Annual Meeting. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2019.01.00112

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 06 May 2019; Published Online: 09 Oct 2019.

* Correspondence: Dr. Britta Biedermann, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia, b.biedermann@curtin.edu.au