Continuous thetaburst stimulation for the treatment of refractory neocortical epilepsy
Sofie
Carrette1, 2*,
Debby
Klooster3, 4,
Willeke
Staljanssens5,
Pieter
Van Mierlo5,
Annelies
Van Dycke6,
Evelien
Carrette1, 2, 4,
Robrecht
Raedt1,
Alfred
Meurs1, 2,
Chris
Baeken7,
Kristl
Vonck1, 2 and
Paul
Boon1, 2, 3
-
1
Ghent University, Belgium
-
2
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Belgium
-
3
Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, Heeze, the Netherlands, Netherlands
-
4
Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
-
5
Ghent University, Belgium
-
6
AZ Sint-Jan Brugge, Department of Neurology, Belgium
-
7
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Belgium
Aim
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may have anti-epileptic effects, especially in patients with neocortical lesions (1). Continuous thetaburst stimulation (TBS) seems to be a potent protocol with potential superiority compared to conventional rTMS with regards to safety, tolerability and applicability based on a lower stimulation intensity and duration. No reports of cTBS in the context of epilepsy have been published to date.
Methods
Patients with refractory neocortical epilepsy are treated with a 4-day open label accelerated cTBS protocol, consisting of 5 trains per day (600pulses per train, 10min intertain interval, 80% resting motor threshold), targeted over the epileptogenic focus using a navigated figure-of-8 coil. Seizure frequency and adverse events are assessed over a 4-week baseline period and 8 weeks of follow-up. Cognitive and neuropsychological testing is performed at baseline and end of follow-up.
Results
Four subjects completed the study protocol. Subject 1 (M, 51y) and subject 2 (M, 27y) suffer from refractory epilepsy due to a low-grade tumor in the primary motor cortex causing focal clonic motor seizures. Subject 1 also experiences myoclonia of the left leg. Subject 3 (F, 55y) suffered from an intracranial hemorrhage in the left temporal lobe and subsequently developed refractory epilepsy with focal non-motor seizures with auditory symptoms. Subject 4 (F, 50y) has focal clonic and myoclonic motor seizures of the right leg of unknown etiology.
In all subjects cTBS was well-tolerated and did not induce serious adverse events or seizures. A mild headache occurred in subject 3 following 2 out of 4 sessions and responded well to treatment with first-line pain relief. No negative cognitive or psychological side effects were noticed.
Anti-epileptic effects of cTBS varied. Subject 1 experienced a transient reduction in severity of clonic seizures, with complete resolution of myoclonia for a duration of 6 weeks. Subject 2 experienced an overall 50% seizure frequency reduction, with most pronounced effect during treatment and initial 4 weeks of follow-up (70% reduction, 3 seizure-free weeks). No marked effect on seizure frequency or severity could be identified in subject 3. Subject 4 presented with an overall 50% seizure frequency reduction, but did show a considerable seizure frequency variability during baseline.
Conclusions
The results of this pilot study show that cTBS is safe and well-tolerated in subjects intrinsically prone to seizure occurence. A reduction in seizure frequency and/or severity was identified in 3 out of 4 subjects. The extensive parenchymal defect at the target site in subject 3 may have interfered with effective stimulation.
References
1. Carrette et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of refractory epilepsy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016 Sep;16(9):1093-110.
Keywords:
Epilepsy,
theta burst stimulation,
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS),
Treatment,
anti-epileptic effect,
Safety
Conference:
12th National Congress of the Belgian Society for Neuroscience, Gent, Belgium, 22 May - 22 May, 2017.
Presentation Type:
Poster Presentation
Topic:
Novel Methods and Technology Development
Citation:
Carrette
S,
Klooster
D,
Staljanssens
W,
Van Mierlo
P,
Van Dycke
A,
Carrette
E,
Raedt
R,
Meurs
A,
Baeken
C,
Vonck
K and
Boon
P
(2019). Continuous thetaburst stimulation for the treatment of refractory neocortical epilepsy.
Front. Neurosci.
Conference Abstract:
12th National Congress of the Belgian Society for Neuroscience.
doi: 10.3389/conf.fnins.2017.94.00073
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
24 Apr 2017;
Published Online:
25 Jan 2019.
*
Correspondence:
Miss. Sofie Carrette, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, sofie.carrette@ugent.be