Event Abstract

In-vivo comparison of chemically polished vs. unpolished magnesium-based screws in ovine tibiae

  • 1 TU Wien, Institute for Building Construction and Technology, Austria
  • 2 Medical University of Graz, Department of Orthopaedic and Orthopaedic Surgery, Austria
  • 3 ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Metal Physics and Technology, Department of Materials, Switzerland

Introduction: Magnesium (Mg) and its alloys possess ideal characteristics in mecha­nical properties and biological acceptance, and thus are of great promise for deployment as implant material, particularly in surgical stabi­lisation of bone fractures. The relatively fast degradation ability avoids second surgeries for removal of the implant [1]. Essential for their applicability is a sufficient load baring capacity for a clinically relevant time frame, which is directly linked to a reliable degradation rate and good bone ingrowth. , The purpose of this study was therefore to (1) analyse the general applicability of Mg-based screws for their use in cortical bone (2) study whether an improved degradation and therefore biomechanical performance can be achieved by chemical surface treatment.

Methods: Screws (diameter: 3.5 mm, length: 16 mm) were dry-machined from the biodegradable Mg alloy ultrahigh-purity (XHP) ZX00 (Mg-0.3Zn-0.4Ca). The surface of 4 screws was chemically polished (mixture of ethanol and phosphoric acid), whereas the others remained untreated. Seven screws (4 chemically polished and 3 unpolished) were gamma-sterilized and inserted into two ovine right tibiae (experimental, N=2 animals), and six further screws were implanted in the cadaveric right tibiae (control, N=2) after sacrificing the animal six weeks after implantation. These control screws were placed exactly on contralateral positions.

All animal studies were performed in accordance with the Austrian Ministry of Science and Research (accreditation number BMWFW-66.010/0190-WF/V/3b/2014). An axial pull-out test was performed on the screws of the in vivo groups, and the same method was also applied on the cadaveric control bones.

Fig. 1: Pull-out test method performed on XHP-ZX00 screws in sheep tibiae.

Results: The pull-out tests revealed lower strength of screws that stayed in the tibia for 6 weeks in comparison to the control group (Fig. 1). Chemically polished screws exhibited lower pull-out strength than untreated samples (sample size not sufficient for statistical comparison). [MC1]  Analysis of bone cross section after pull-out tests revealed that the screws of both groups partly failed by shearing-off the thread flanks and partly by failure of the bone tissue.

Fig. 2: Pull-out test of XHP ZX00 screws (chemically polished and untreated) inserted in ovine tibiae (diaphysis and distal epiphysis) for 6 weeks vs. ex vivo control group.

Discussions and Conclusions: These first experiments show that screws made of XHP-Mg-alloy ZX00 revealed good bone integration. For all screws tested, after 6 weeks of implantation the pull-out test reveals lower load-bearing capacity in comparison to the non-degraded control.  This loss in strength is associated with initial degradation of the screws and according to expectations. The lower pull-out strength of chemically polished screws may be due to volume loss resulting from the chemical surface treatment. Facing the importance of surface finish for medical implants, results emphasize the need of (1) careful adjustment of the polishing protocol and (2) thorough evaluation of its in vivo response. The interface strength still appears to be sufficient for clinical applications. Obtained data is subject of high volatility. Thus, further studies need to be performed to evaluate degradation, ingrowth and tissue reactions of Mg-screws in more detail.

Laura Bassi BRIC, Austrian Promotion Agency

References:
[1] K. Pichler, T. Kraus, E. Martinelli, et al (2014) Int Orthop. 38(4):881-9.

Keywords: Biocompatibility, biomedical application, Biodegradable material, Biodegradable metal

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Biomaterials evaluation in animal models

Citation: Berger L, Eichler J, Cihova M, Martinelli E, Kleinhans C, Löffler J and Weinberg A (2016). In-vivo comparison of chemically polished vs. unpolished magnesium-based screws in ovine tibiae. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00010

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.