Event Abstract

Injectable Thermosensitive Chitosan/Chondroitin Sulfate Hydrogels for Intervertebral Disc Regeneration

  • 1 École de technologie supérieure (ETS), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Canada
  • 2 Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Laboratory of Endovascular Biomaterials (LBeV), Canada

Introduction: Restoration of nucleus pulposus (NP) using biomaterials capable of retaining cells and stimulating molecules is one of the new treatment strategies for intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. Hydorgels have been receiving great attention in this regard because they can be applied through minimally invasive surgery and they can retain cells, water and other substances such as growth factors[1]. Ideal hydrogels must rapidly gelify, be biocompatible, injectable and possess enough strength. However, most of the hydrogel systems proposed until now lack enough mechanical strength and/or cell compatibility[2]-[5]. Our group has recently synthesized injectable hydrogels with improved mechanical and biological properties using chitosan (CH)[6]. Chondroitin sulfate (CS) is a glycosaminoglycan found in IVD extracellular matrix (ECM). It inhibits the activity of ECM degrading enzymes, stimulates production of proteoglycans by chondrocytes and reduces apoptosis in these cells[7],[8]. Our objective is to develop an injectable and biocompatible CH/CS hydrogel with mechanical properties comparable to those of native NP.

Materials and Methods: Hydrogels were made by mixing purified CH (2% w/v) with gelation agents (GA) (BGP0.4M, SHC0.075M/BGP0.1M and SHC0.075M/PB0.4M, pH8) with and without CS (highest concentration: 1% w/v, dissolved in the GA). pH of the hydrogels was measured at room temperature (RT) after mixing and after 24h of gelation at 37°C. Rheological properties (within 1h at 37°C) were analyzed following preparation of the hydrogels. Elastic properties of the hydrogels were studied after 24h of gelation at 37°C using an ElastoSensTM system. Injectability of the hydrogels was evaluated by studying their initial viscosity at 37°C and also by measuring the maximum force applied to extrude the hydrogels after preparation. Direct cytotoxicity of the hydrogels was evaluated by encapsulating L929 fibroblasts in the hydrogels and performing alamar blue and LIVE/DEAD assays. Indirect cytotoxicity was evaluated by studying the effect of hydrogel extracts on cell viability.

Results and Discussion: All the formulations resulted in thermosensitive and injectable hydrogels with pH close to physiological levels and addition of CS did not disturb the pH balance. Rheological studies showed a higher storage modulus for the formulations containing SHC compared to BGP0.4M. The hydrogels containing PB showed the highest gelation rate. Addition of CS to the hydrogels prepared using SHC0.075M/PB0.4M, accelerated gelation and increased the storage modulus. Interestingly, addition of CS improved the growth of encapsulated cells.

Conclusion: The preliminary results obtained so far in this study suggest the promising potential of CH/CS hydrogels as a thermosensitive, biocompatible and injectable matrix with good mechanical properties. Additional experiments evaluating mechanical properties of these hydrogels with various CS concentrations under compression are being performed. The compatibility of the hydrogels with human mesenchymal stem cells and the effect of CS addition on the differentiation potential of these cells towards chondrocytes and NP cells will be studied as well.

Rheolution Inc. and C. Ceccaldi for the use of Elastosense; Funding by the Canada Research Chair program; YA also acknowledges FRQ-S scholarship

References:
[1] Baroli, B., Hydrogels for tissue engineering and delivery of tissue-inducing substances. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2007. 96(9): p. 2197-2223.
[2] Burdick, J.A. and G.D. Prestwich, Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Materials, 2011. 23(12): p. H41-H56.
[3] Butcher, A.L., G.S. Offeddu, and M.L. Oyen, Nanofibrous hydrogel composites as mechanically robust tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends in Biotechnology, 2014. 32(11): p. 564-570.
[4] Hoffman, A.S., Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2002. 54(1): p. 3-12.
[5] Kim, J.K., et al., Natural and synthetic biomaterials for controlled drug delivery. Archives of Pharmacal Research, 2014. 37(1): p. 60-68.
[6] Assaad, E., M. Maire, and S. Lerouge, Injectable thermosensitive chitosan hydrogels with controlled gelation kinetics and enhanced mechanical resistance. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2015. 130: p. 87-96
[7] Bali, J.P., H. Cousse, and E. Neuzil, Biochemical basis of the pharmacologic action of chondroitin sulfates on the osteoarticular system. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 2001. 31(1): p. 58-68.
[8] Morreale, P., et al., Comparison of the antiinflammatory efficacy of chondroitin sulfate and diclofenac sodium in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 1996. 23(8): p. 1385-1391.

Keywords: Hydrogel, stem cell, Biocompatibility, 3D scaffold

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Regenerative medicine: biomaterials for control of tissue induction

Citation: Alinejad Y, Zehtabi F and Lerouge S (2016). Injectable Thermosensitive Chitosan/Chondroitin Sulfate Hydrogels for Intervertebral Disc Regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00033

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.