Event Abstract

Scaffold for the regeneration of cartilage tissue.

  • 1 Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Electric Engineering, Mexico
  • 2 HIMFG, Department of Urology, Mexico
  • 3 Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Physical, Mexico

Introduction: The main problems of cartilage tissue engineering are to get a scaffold with god cell interaction, good transport properties since it is not vascularized, and to avoid fibrous tissue. This paper discusses scaffold based on electrospinning polylactic acid (PLA)-polycaprolactone (PCL), surface modified with plasma polimerized polypyrrole-iodine (PPy-I) to improve their interaction with cells, and coated with Aggrecan (AG) which is a important component of the extracellular matrix of native cartilage. This protein is essential for normal tissue function and their concentration favors hidratation and tissues development during the early stage[1],[2].

Materials and Methods: The polymer scaffolds were produced by the electrospinning technique of with polymer solutions of PLA and PCL 12% (w/v) in chloroform.  Distance from the collector was 20cm, voltage of 20kV and jet flow 2ml/h.

Membranes surface was modified using plasma polymerization of pirrole with Iodine PPy-I. The operating parameters of the reactor were: 8cm electrode spacing, power of 20Watts, 1.2x10-1mmHg pressure. The coated substrates with PPy-I were immersed in a solution of aggrecan (AG) from bovine articular cartilage (Sigma Aldrich) for 24 hours. Subsequently rinsed with distilled water for 10 minutes and allowed to dry at room temperature in a vacuum desiccator for 24 hours. Samples were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For in vivo culture, cells were obtained from an auricular cartilage biopsy using a New Zealand white rabbit and a cell expansion cultures for 3 weeks was conducted. Approximately 1.2x106 cells were deposited on the scaffolds and cultured in vivo for 30 days in the dorsal region of the rabbit.

Results and Discussion: After the PPy-I treatment FTIR showed characteristic chemical variety in the surface showing primary and secondary amines aliphatic chains, pirrole rings, hidroxyles and nitriles FTIR-ATR also confirmed the presence of the AG protein on the scaffold[3],[4]. The materials were tested for in vivo culture in a rabbit model, showing excellent biocompatibility and cell growth, the immunohistochemical shows the presence of proteins aggrecan and collagen in the neotissue.

Conclusion: According to the findings, the scaffolding PLA-PCL-PPy-I-AG could be used for the regeneration of cartilage tissue.

The first author thanks CONACyT for Ph.D. scholarship No. 265465

References:
[1] Puppi, D., Chiellini, F., Piras, A., & Chiellini, E. (2010). Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair. Progress in Polymer Science, 35(4), 403-440.
[2] Domowicz, M. S., Cortes, M., Henry, J. G., & JudiSchwartz, N. B. (2009). Aggrecan modulation of growth plate morphogenesis. Developmental Biology, 329(2), 242-257.
[3] Morales, J.; Osorio, C.; Montiel, R.; Vázquez, H.; Olayo, R.; Olayo, M.G.; Cruz, G.J.; Pérez, E (2008). Autoensamble de capas de polímeros iónicos sobre polietileno funcionalizado por plasma de pirrol. Superficies y vacío, 21(3), 1-4.
[4] N. P. Camcho, P. West, P. A. Torzilli y R. Mendelson. (2000). FTIR Microscopic Imaging of Collagen and Proteoglycan in Bovine Cartilage. Biopolymers, 62(1),1-8.

Keywords: Scaffold, Surface modification, Biodegradable material, in vivo tissue engineering

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Biomaterials in constructing tissue substitutes

Citation: Islas-Arteaga NC, Raya AM, Esquiliano D, Morales J and Olayo R (2016). Scaffold for the regeneration of cartilage tissue.. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00469

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.