Event Abstract

Do cobalt and chromium ions affect the formation of an extracellular matrix?

  • 1 University of Birmingham, PSIBS Doctoral Centre, United Kingdom
  • 2 University of Birmingham, School of Chemical Engineering, United Kingdom
  • 3 University of Birmingham, School of Dentistry, United Kingdom
  • 4 University of Birmingham, Centre for Translational Inflammation Research, United Kingdom
  • 5 NHS, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, United Kingdom
  • 6 University of Birmingham, School of Computer Science, United Kingdom

Background: Research regarding the biological response to metallic implant debris has a large focus on investigating the response of various cell lines upon the addition of particles and/or ions[1]. Understanding cellular response to a material is critical in determining the pathways to negative immune response; however the majority of studies are focused on effects on 2D cell cultures in vitro, and have yet to consider the effects on the extracellular matrix; which plays a crucial role in providing the physical and chemical cues to direct cell function and fate. Collagen type 1 is the most abundant component of the organic matrix of bone which acts as a template for mineralisation and hence also for bone tissue formation. Given that the highly ordered hierarchical structure of bone is critical to maintaining bone mechanical properties and interfacial bonding, the effect of Co(II) and Cr(III) ions on type I collagen could play a role in the mechanism behind aseptic loosening.

Methods: Gel Preparation: Collagen gels (Cultrex Rat Collagen I, Trevigen) were prepared in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium at 1mg/ml, with various physiologically relevant conc. of Co and Cr ions. Final pH was adjusted to 8-8.5 with sodium hydroxide to promote gelation.

Analysis Techniques: Kinetic analysis of collagen fibril formation was examined (with and without Co and Cr ions) by measuring turbidity (loss of transparency) of the gelling collagen using spectrophotometry (Cecil Instruments, UK). Turbidity-time profiles were determined at an absorbance of 620nm at 37oC.

In addition, collagen fibrils were left to fully form overnight at 37oC in 35mm MatTek imaging. Imaging was performed on an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope at 488nm, using a x60 water immersion lens in reflection mode. Z-stacks were acquired for a fixed volume in each case.

Results and Discussion: The characteristic curve of a turbidity graph contains a lag phase before an increase in turbidity, indicative of fibril formation, followed by a plateau phase resulting from complete fibril formation. These curves in fig1A show the addition of Co and Cr ions does affect the fibril kinetics of collagen gels. Increasing conc. of Co ions indicate decreasing formation rates and final fibril diameters; whereas increasing conc. of Cr ions imply an apparent increase in fibril diameter, with little effect on the formation rate.

Fig1B shows that the distribution of collagen fibrils in the control appears homogeneous in comparison to the Co ion-containing sample, where the density of fibrils seems reduced; and lacks any localised highly scattering regions as seen in the Cr containing sample. Preliminary micro-XRF mapping suggests the latter to be precipitation effects caused due to dehydration of the collagen.

Conclusions: The presence of even low concentrations of Co and Cr ions demonstrates a significant effect on collagen fibrillogenesis. Suggesting more attention needs to paid to the influence of implants on local matrix formation rather than simply demonstrating efficacy in in vitro monolayer cell cultures. Further work will be performed, such as circular dichroism and NMR to determine conformation of collagen molecules, transmission electron microscopy to visualize the fiber banding and rheometry to determine stiffness of the gel. These techniques will complement each other to allow determination of the mechanism of collagen-metal ion interaction, as well as evaluating the biological response to the modified collagen.

Thanks to EPSRC for financial support through a PSIBS Doctoral Training Centre studentship (EP/F50053X/1)

References:
[1] V. Sansone, D. Pagani and M. Melato. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 10(1):34-40. 2013

Keywords: Extracellular Matrix, Mechanism, Implant wear

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: General Session Oral

Topic: Biomaterials in immune response

Citation: Floyd H, Addison O, Lord J, Davies E, Dehghani H and Grover L (2016). Do cobalt and chromium ions affect the formation of an extracellular matrix?. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00480

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.