Event Abstract

Effect of high temperature melting on radiation cross-linked UHMWPE

  • 1 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harris Orthopaedic Laboratory, United States
  • 2 Harvard Medical School, Orthopaedic Surgery, United States

Introduction: High temperature melting (HTM) of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) (280 - 330°C) can improve elongation and toughness[1]. Radiation cross-linking of UHMWPE is used to lower its wear as a bearing surface in total joint arthroplasty[2]. We hypothesized that HTM could also improve the toughness of cross-linked UHMWPE.

Materials and Methods: Medical grade 0.1wt% vitamin E- blended GUR1020 UHMWPE was electron beam irradiated to 100,125, 140, 160 or 175 kGy. After irradiation, HTM  was performed in a convection oven under nitrogen at 280, 300 or 310°C for 5 hours.

A terminal vinyl index was calculated using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) on thin sections using the absorbance at 880-920 cm-1. The IZOD impact strength was determined by double notching and testing according to ASTM F-648. Type V tensile testing was done according to ASTM-638 with a crosshead speed of 10mm/min. Pin-on-disc (POD) wear testing was performed on cylindrical pins (dia. 9 mm, height 13 mm)[3] at 2 Hz for 1.2 million-cycles (MC). The oxidation induction time (OIT) was determined using a differential scanning calorimeter. Statistical significance was reported using the student’s t-test at p < 0.05.

Results: The vinyl index increased with increasing HTM temperature from 280 - 310°C. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS) did not change after HTM compared to that of the non-HTM control (p= 0.70, 0.72 and 0.61 for 280°C, 300°C and 310°C respectively). The elongation at break (EAB) increased (p= 0.23, 0.01 and 0.006 for 280°C, 300°C and 310°C respectively). The impact strength increased with increasing HTM temperature compared to that of the non-HTM control (p= 0.02, 0.003 and 0.002 for 280°C, 300°C and 310°C respectively; Fig 1). The wear rate decreased with increasing radiation dose; but did not change as a result of HTM. The oxidation induction time (OIT) increased after HTM (p = 0.02, 0.007 and 0.001 for 280, 300 and 310°C respectively; Fig 2).

Discussion: The impact strength increase after HTM compared to non-HTM was 25, 40 and 37 % for HTM at 280°C, 300°C and 310°C respectively without a clear trend with respect to radiation dose. The decrease at 310°C suggested that there is a VI threshold around 0.05 beyond which increased scissioning (suggested by increasing terminal vinyl groups) leads to degradation.

The wear rate slightly increased with HTM at the higher temperatures, but at a given wear rate, the impact strength increase due to HTM was significant (Fig 1). These results suggested that HTM of radiation cross-linked UHMWPE at around 300°C increased its impact toughness by about 40% without sacrificing its wear resistance. Oxidation resistance was also improved tremendously after HTM (Fig 2). The mechanism for this increase is not yet known.

Conclusion: High temperature melting of radiation cross-linked vitamin E blended UHMWPEs showed improved toughness and can be used as an alternative method to fabricate joint implant bearing surfaces for applications requiring improved toughness and high wear resistance.

References:
[1] Fu et al. Polymer 51 (2010) 2721-2731
[2] Kurtz et al. Clin Orthop Rel Res 469 (2011) 2262-2277
[3] Bragdon et al. J Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 658-665.

Keywords: biomaterial, Implant, clinical application, Oxidation resistance

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Biomaterials in musculoskeletal orthopeadics and tissues

Citation: Doshi BN, Oral E and Muratoglu OK (2016). Effect of high temperature melting on radiation cross-linked UHMWPE. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00881

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.