Event Abstract

Enzymatically-responsive poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for the controlled delivery of therapeutic peptides

  • 1 University of Rochester, Department of Biomedical Engineering, United States
  • 2 University of Rochester, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics, United States
  • 3 University of Rochester, Department of Chemical Engineering, United States

Introduction: Therapeutic angiogenesis holds great potential within regenerative medicine approaches, where insufficient vascularization limits construct size, complexity, and anastomosis with host vasculature. Many pro-angiogenic approaches have been developed, often via delivery of angiogenic proteins or peptides. Peptides typically mimic the bioactivity of larger proteins or growth factors, and offer advantages over traditional protein delivery. However, like proteins, peptides suffer from rapid clearance and poor pharmacokinetics when delivered systemically. Therefore, a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogel-based platform technology was developed to control and sustain peptide drug release via matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity.

Materials and Methods: Nine pro-angiogenic peptides, identified from literature, were synthesized with MMP substrate modifications using solid phase peptide synthesis. In vitro screening using human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) proliferation and tube formation assays[4] of peptides identified three that retained native pro-angiogenic peptide bioactivity in the form released upon liberation from hydrogel networks: Qk (a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) mimic), and SPARC113 and SPARC118 (derived from the Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine). Norbornene-functionalized PEG was synthesized and reacted with MMP-releasable pro-angiogenic peptides with cysteine-based thiol functionalities to form hydrogels via thiol-ene reactions[5]. Enzymatically-responsive peptide release was assessed, as was overall hydrogel behaviors in vivo. Specifically, one month after implantation, hydrogels were collected and vascular ingrowth assessed via hemoglobin (Hb) quantification and fluorescent dextran imaging using two photon microscopy. All animal procedures were approved by the University of Rochester’s University Committee of Animal Resources.

Results and Discussion: Incorporation Qk, SPARC113, and SPARC118 into hydrogels flanked (Figure 1A) or tethered (Figure 1B) by MMP-degradable substrates successfully produced hydrogels with enzymatically-responsive peptide release behaviors. Qk, SPARC113, and SPARC118-releasing hydrogels were confirmed to release bioactive components in vitro after MMP-mediated degradation (Figure 1A). Further investigation revealed key peptide drug properties, specifically size and hydrophobicity, control the rate of hydrogel degradation and peptide release[3]. When implanted subcutaneously, SPARC113 and SPARC118-releasing hydrogels both significantly increased vascular ingrowth compared to controls without significantly affecting vessel size[1]. As the longitudinal availability of VEGF has been shown critical for bioactivity, alternate hydrogels were developed to provide temporal control over enzymatically-responsive release of Qk, the VEGF peptide mimic[2]. MMP-degradable linkers with a variety of cleavage kinetics were used to tether Qk to hydrogels formed with non-degradable peptide crosslinks (Figure 1B) [2]. Hydrogel degradation was successfully uncoupled from peptide release, and three of the linkers provided temporal control over enzymatically-responsive peptide release kinetics in vitro and in vivo[2]. Modifying the MMP-degradable linker used to tether Qk to hydrogels provided temporal control over enzymatically-responsive peptide release in vitro and in vivo. Qk was confirmed to be bioactive as released and induced significant vascularization in vivo 1 month after implantation (Figure 2)[2].

Conclusions: The hydrogels developed are a promising and versatile platform technology for stimuli-responsive delivery of therapeutic peptides from poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels that could be adapted to release virtually any peptide or small molecule drug for myriad applications. 

NIH-R01AR064200, Howard Hughes Med-into-Grad Program

References:
[1] A.H. Van Hove, K. Burke, E. Antonienko, E. Brown III, and D.S.W. Benoit. Enzymatically-responsive pro-angiogenic peptide-releasing poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels promote vascularization in vivo. Journal of Controlled Release. In press.
[2] A.H. Van Hove, E. Antonienko, K. Burke, E. Brown III, and D.S.W. Benoit. Temporally Tunable, Enzymatically-responsive Delivery of Pro-angiogenic Peptides from Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogels. Advanced Healthcare Materials. In press.
[3] A.H. Van Hove, M.J. Beltejar, and D.S.W. Benoit. Development and In Vitro Assessment of Enzymatically-Responsive Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogels for the Delivery of Therapeutic Peptides. Biomaterials. 35 (2014) 9719-9730.
[4] R. Auerbach, R. Lewis, B. Shinners, L. Kubai and N. Akhtar. Angiogenesis assays: A critical overview. Clinical Chemistry 49, 32-40 (2003).
[5] B.D. Fairbanks, M.P. Schwartz, A.E. Halevi, C.R. Nuttelman, C.N. Bowman, K.S. Anseth. A Versatile Synthetic Extracellular Matrix Mimic via Thiol-Norbornene Photopolymerization. Advanced Materials 21, 5005-5010 (2009).

Keywords: Hydrogel, Drug delivery, Tissue Regeneration, stimuli-response

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: General Session Oral

Topic: Biomaterials for therapeutic delivery

Citation: Van Hove AH, Antonienko E and Benoit D (2016). Enzymatically-responsive poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for the controlled delivery of therapeutic peptides. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.01371

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.

* Correspondence:
Dr. Amy H Van Hove, University of Rochester, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester, NY, United States, amyvanhove@gmail.com
Dr. Erin Antonienko, University of Rochester, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester, NY, United States, eantonie@u.rochester.edu
Dr. Danielle Benoit, University of Rochester, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester, NY, United States, Email1