Event Abstract

Nanopillar modified neuroelectrodes through block copolymer self-assembly

  • 1 National University of Ireland, Centre for Research in Medical Devices (CÚRAM), Ireland
  • 2 Trinity College Dublin, Centre for Research on Adaptive Nanostructures and Nanodevices (CRANN), Ireland

Introduction: Neuroelectrodes are susceptible to deterioration via scar encapsulation following implantation. Biologically relevant nanosurfaces which mimic the biological length scale may prevent this deterioration via the modulation of protein adsorption and cell adhesion. Furthermore, nanotopography may significantly enhance electrode performance via enhanced charge transfer.

Here we describe a self-assembly process for the production of aligned and dense arrays of silicon nanopillars using block copolymers[1]. We discuss the effect of the surface modifications on cell-substrate interaction in vitro and how they may enhance electrode charge transfer and improve neuron/electrode integration.

Experimental Methods: Polystyrene-b-ethylene oxide (PS-b-PEO) diblock copolymer was dissolved in 1 wt% toluene. The thin film was formed by spin cast and annealed at 50°C exposed to toluene/water (1:1). The film was immersed at 40°C for 15h to obtain activated film. Different concentrations of iron (III) nitrate nonahydrate were dissolved and UV/Ozone treatment was used to oxidize the precursor and remove polymer.  Surface morphologies were imaged by scanning probe microscopy in tapping mode and scanning electron microscopy. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy was used to evaluate the charge transfer rate of the substrate. The effect of the surface modifications on cell-substrate interaction was investigated through a temporal study with primary rat mesencephalic neural cells which were analysed for phenotypic and genomic changes for 1, 7 and 14 days.

Results and Discussion:

Nanomodified Si surfaces possessed well-ordered nanoscale pillars across the entire substrate. The measured average centre-to-centre cylinder diameter was approx. 50 nm with pillar highs of 100 nm, 500 nm and 1 µm and diameters of approx. 20 nm.

Conclusion: We have fabricated sub-20 nm pillar features in silicon using a block copolymer mask technique. The impedance modulus of nanopillar silicon substrates was significantly reduced relative to planar control substrates in In addition, the adhesion and proliferation of primary rat mesencephalic neural cells on the substrates indicated the nanopillar substrates significantly modulated cell adhesion and function for up to 14 days in culture.

Acknowledgments: The authors would like to acknowledge CRANN and Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) for funding through SFI-CSET CRANN. Also Advance Microscopy Laboratory (AML) / CRANN for the collaborations. Bell Labs Ireland thanks the Industrial Development Agency (IDA) Ireland for their financial support. M.J. Biggs is an SFI SIRG fellow, grant no. 11/SIRG/B2135.

References:
[1] Ghoshal. et al., Adv.Mater. 24:2390-2397, 2012

Keywords: Cell Adhesion, Biomimetic, electric, nanotopography

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Surface and interfacial characterization

Citation: Biggs M, Mokarian-Tabari P, Vallejo-Giraldo C, Thomas D, Morris MA and Pandit A (2016). Nanopillar modified neuroelectrodes through block copolymer self-assembly. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.02560

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.