Event Abstract

Ocular application of a polyisobutylene-based polymer as a glaucoma drainage device

  • 1 InnFocus Inc., United States
  • 2 Pole Opthalmologique de la Clinique Mutualiste, France
  • 3 Centro Laser, Dominican Republic
  • 4 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, United States
  • 5 Anne Bates Leach Eye Hospital, United States
  • 6 University of Paris Hotel-Dieu Hospital, France
  • 7 University of Miami, Biomedical Engineering, United States

Statement of Purpose:  Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness with more than 6 million blind eyes worldwide due to progression of the disease.  InnFocus, Inc. (Miami, FL) has developed a Minimally Invasive Drainage Implant (“MIDI”) glaucoma device called the InnFocus MicroShunt® (Figure 1C) made from a highly biocompatible biomaterial called poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) or “SIBS” (Figure 2)[1]. SIBS has been used in human coronary arteries (Boston Scientific’s TAXUS® drug-eluting stent) for over 15 years[1]. Rabbit studies confirmed its superb biocompat-ibility in the eye[2]-[4]. This abstract summarizes the evolution of this device from clinical study outcomes.

Figure 2: SIBS, where X is a hindered dicumylether and N/(N+M) = 0.3

Methods: SIBS (Shore 40A) was prepared according to the methods described by Kennedy.[4] The purified polymer was then extruded into tubes and compression molded.  The lumen of the device serves as a flow restrictor to drop intraocular pressure (IOP). 3 Physical stability, hydrolysis, exhaustive extraction, leachable and biocompatibility testing were performed according to ISO and ANSI standards. The 3 iterations of glaucoma devices were implanted in patients at the Centro Laser, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic and in Bordeaux, France and followed for two years. Patient selection was restricted to those with primary open angle glaucoma who had failed maximum tolerated glaucoma medication.  All except MIDI Ray cases used the antiproliferative drug Mitomycin C (0.2-0.4 mg/mL applied for 3 min) intraoperatively as is used routinely in trabeculectomy.

Results: The device and material passed all pre-clinical tests. The table below summarizes the clinical data and surgical success rates of the various iterations of devices.

The InnFocus MicroShunt® was selected as the best iteration and the design was frozen.  The one and two-year success rates, as measured by dropping IOP by ≥20% without surgical intervention, was 100% and 96%, the percent of patients totally off of glaucoma medication was 93% and 87%, the average IOP was 10.7 ± 2.8 mm Hg and 10.3 ± 2.0 mm Hg, which represents a 55% and 57% drop in IOP, respectively.  There were no long-term sight-threatening adverse events.

Figure 3:  Kaplan Meier survival curves showing the qualified success rate of various iterations of the device.

Figure 4: One year human implant of the InnFocus MicroShunt showing no encapsulation of the tube and a quiet diffuse bleb (arrows).

Conclusions: The InnFocus MicroShunt® made from SIBS is safe and effective. 

FLEB, center grant NIH-P30EY014801, RPB, Lesieur Foundation (JMP), NIH-1R43EY018519-01A1, InnFocus, INC.; Maria Varela Consuelo, Sophie Abrespi and staff.

References:
[1] Pinchuk L, Biomaterials; 2008; 29(4); 448-460.
[2] Acosta AC, Arch Ophthalmol 2006, 124: 1742-1749.
[3] Arrieta -Quintero E, Ophthalmic Surg, Laser, Imaging 2011:42(4):338-45.
[4] Wang B, Polym Bull 1987;17:205–211.

Keywords: clinical application, device, Polymeric material, Novel material

Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Biomaterials for ophthalmic applications

Citation: Kato Y, Riss I, Batlle J, Martin JB, Arrieta E, Palmberg P, Parrish RK, Weber BA, Kwon Y, Parel J and Pinchuk L (2016). Ocular application of a polyisobutylene-based polymer as a glaucoma drainage device. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.03009

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 28 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016.