Evaluating the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) as a basis for targeting communication aimed at prompting attempts to improve health related behaviours: A pilot randomised controlled trial
-
1
UCL, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, United Kingdom
-
2
UCL, Research Department of Epidemiology & Public Health - Gower Street Campus, United Kingdom
-
3
UCL, Research Department of Epidemiology & Public Health - Gower Street Campus, United Kingdom
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the utility of the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) as a measure for gauging self-reported reasons for participation in a range of health behaviours, and as a basis for targeting behaviour change interventions.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Methods: A sample of 639 UK adults (18+ years) were recruited into an online study and asked about their participation in four health behaviours; smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, fruit and vegetable consumption. Those with a health behaviour to modify (N=130) were allocated a behaviour change target and completed the RAL. Eligible participants (N=97) were then randomised to one of two groups; an intervention group received brief motivating information based on their RAL response (on-target), the control received information mismatched to their RAL response (off-target). Following intervention delivery, behavioural response was measured by recording whether participants clicked on a link to find out more about changing their target behaviour.
Results: Three-quarters (N= 97, 74.60%, 95% CI: 67.12 – 82.08) of participants felt the RAL provided a suitable response option that identified why they had not changed their target behaviour and 60% (N=78, 95% CI: 51.58 – 68.42) agreed that it was easy to select just one option. Logistic regression confirmed that those in the intervention group had greater odds of clicking the link than those in the control group (OR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.01 – 7.91).
Conclusions: The response to the RAL was generally positive and this pilot study provides tentative support for the use of the RAL to develop effective, targeted interventions.
Keywords:
Behaviour Change,
Targeted interventions,
Smoking Cessation,
physical activity,
Diet,
Alcohol consumption
Conference:
2nd Behaviour Change Conference: Digital Health and Wellbeing, London, United Kingdom, 24 Feb - 25 Feb, 2016.
Presentation Type:
Oral presentation
Topic:
Academic
Citation:
Stevens
C,
Shahab
L and
West
R
(2016). Evaluating the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) as a basis for targeting communication aimed at prompting attempts to improve health related behaviours: A pilot randomised controlled trial.
Front. Public Health.
Conference Abstract:
2nd Behaviour Change Conference: Digital Health and Wellbeing.
doi: 10.3389/conf.FPUBH.2016.01.00004
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
11 Dec 2015;
Published Online:
08 Jan 2016.
*
Correspondence:
Ms. Claire Stevens, UCL, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom, claire.stevens.14@ucl.ac.uk