Practising coarse orientation discrimination improves orientation signals in an fMRI-defined region of the macaque posterior inferior temporal cortex.
-
1
KU Leuven, KU Leuven Medical School, Belgium
We have recently shown that practising coarse orientation discrimination improves orientation signals in the macaque visual area V4 (Zivari Adab and Vogels, Current Biology, 2011). In this task, monkeys discriminated grating orientations that differed by 90 deg and were masked by noise. V4 neurons showed robust increases in their capacity to discriminate the trained orientations during the course of the training. To identify other areas that are possibly involved in perceptual learning of coarse orientation discrimination, we determined with fMRI which areas were activated by high noise (20% SNR) gratings in the two trained monkeys. Trained and untrained orientations (differing by 45 degree from the trained) were presented at trained and untrained (opposite hemifield) locations using an event-related design during passive fixation. In both animals, activations (high noise grating compared to noise) were present in V2/V3, V4, posterior inferior temporal (PIT) and prefrontal cortex, with the strongest activations in V4. Based on this fMRI study we subsequently recorded single cells in the activated PIT region (close to the anterior tip of the posterior middle temporal sulcus) of both animals. Orientation tuning was assessed during passive fixation with 80% SNR gratings. The majority of neurons preferred one of the two trained orientations and the mean normalized net response was significantly greater for the trained compared to the untrained orientations. These anisotropies were not related to orientation per se but were induced by learning since trained and untrained orientations differed between the two monkeys. Single neurons discriminated more reliably (assessed by ROC analysis) the two trained orientations compared to two untrained orientations differing by 45 degree from the trained ones. This higher discriminability for the trained compared to the untrained orientations was not due to a higher attention to the trained orientations since it was also present when the monkeys were performing a difficult, orthogonal color discrimination task.
Previously we showed significant correlations between the monkey’s decision and the neural responses (Choice Probabilities: CPs) in area V4 during coarse orientation discrimination. CPs of the PIT neurons were similar to those observed in V4 and were larger for neurons that discriminated the trained orientations with high accuracy.
In conclusion, using a combined monkey fMRI-single cell study we identified an orientation selective region in PIT with response properties that are affected by extensive practising a coarse orientation discrimination task.
Keywords:
Perceptual Learning,
Orientation Discrimination,
inferior temporal cortex,
extrastriate cortex,
macaque monkey
Conference:
Belgian Brain Council, Liège, Belgium, 27 Oct - 27 Oct, 2012.
Presentation Type:
Poster Presentation
Topic:
Other basic/clinical neurosciences topic
Citation:
Zivariadab
H,
Popivanov
ID,
Vanduffel
W and
Vogels
R
(2012). Practising coarse orientation discrimination improves orientation signals in an fMRI-defined region of the macaque posterior inferior temporal cortex..
Conference Abstract:
Belgian Brain Council.
doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2012.210.00082
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
23 Aug 2012;
Published Online:
12 Sep 2012.
*
Correspondence:
Prof. Rufin Vogels, KU Leuven, KU Leuven Medical School, Leuven, 3000, Belgium, rufin.vogels@kuleuven.be