Assessing publication bias in coordinate-based meta-analysis techniques?
-
1
Ghent University, Data Analysis, Belgium
-
2
Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Lifespan Psychology, Germany
fMRI is an important neuroimaging technique to localize brain functions. Since publications of single fMRI studies have flourished, it is increasingly recognized that progress in understanding human brain function requires the integration of data across studies. Meta-analysis is a promising tool to achieve this. Furthermore, meta-analysis can address some of the shortcomings of fMRI studies such as lack of power and the large multiple testing problem. Recently coordinate-based methods have been specifically developed for fMRI data that combine the limited amount of voxels that survive a statistical threshold or peaks into a summary map. The most frequently employed meta-analysis toolbox for fMRI data is Activation Likelihood Estimation(ALE) (Eickhoff et al., 2009). ALE verifies whether the congruency of location of activation across studies is larger than can be expected by chance.
However, no procedures exist to assess publication bias for coordinate-based meta-analyses of fMRI studies. To validate the ALE toolbox, we study how many studies without activation in a location of interest can be added to the meta-analysis before the congruency of activation is no longer statistically significant in this location. On the one hand, we want this number to be sufficiently large as this reflects the robustness of the effect against publication bias. On the other hand, a large number might indicate that a small amount of studies drives the analysis. We simulated data-sets, consisting of studies with activation and up to 100 null studies with no activation at a predefined location in the brain. The number of null-studies that can be added is evaluated in function of different multiple testing corrections and sample sizes.
References
Eickhoff, S.B., Laird, A.R., Grefkes, C., Wang, L.E., Zilles, K., & Fox, P.T. (2009). Human Brain Mapping, 30(9), 2907-2926. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20718.
Keywords:
coordinate-based meta-analysis,
Publication Bias,
ALE meta-analysis,
fMRI,
simulation
Conference:
Second Belgian Neuroinformatics Congress, Leuven, Belgium, 4 Dec - 4 Dec, 2015.
Presentation Type:
Poster Presentation
Topic:
Methods and Modeling
Citation:
Acar
F,
Seurinck
R,
Kühn
S and
Moerkerke
B
(2015). Assessing publication bias in coordinate-based meta-analysis techniques?.
Front. Neuroinform.
Conference Abstract:
Second Belgian Neuroinformatics Congress.
doi: 10.3389/conf.fninf.2015.19.00027
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
20 Oct 2015;
Published Online:
17 Nov 2015.
*
Correspondence:
Ms. Freya Acar, Ghent University, Data Analysis, Gent, 9000, Belgium, freya.acar@ugent.be