Event Abstract

Methylphenidate Alters Behavioral and Neural Measures of Response Time Variability

  • 1 The University of Queensland , Queensland Brain Institute and School of Psychology, Australia
  • 2 The University of Melbourne, School of Behavioural Science, Australia

Increased variability in response time performance on cognitive tasks has emerged as a powerful marker of brain pathology in both neurology and psychiatry. Despite its relevance for understanding brain pathology, the neural and neurochemical mechanisms underpinning performance variability remain poorly understood. We undertook a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over design of the influence of methlyphenidate (30mg), atomoxetine (60mg), and citalopram (30mg) on behavioural and neural (fMRI) measures of response time variability, as assessed using a Go/No-go reaction time task, in 24 healthy male participants. Compared with placebo only methylphenidate lead to a reduction in response time variability, suggesting a specific role for dopamine in performance variability. Neural activation related to response time variability also changed robustly under methylphenidate in fronto-striatal regions that are rich in dopaminergic innervation. Improved behavioural and neural indices of response time variability under methylphenidate likely reflects a critical role for dopamine in reducing neural signal to noise ratios and allowing efficient, top-down attentional control.

Conference: The 20th Annual Rotman Research Institute Conference, The frontal lobes, Toronto, Canada, 22 Mar - 26 Mar, 2010.

Presentation Type: Poster Presentation

Topic: Neuropharmacology

Citation: Bellgrove M, Hester R, Matthews N, Nandam L and Wagner J (2010). Methylphenidate Alters Behavioral and Neural Measures of Response Time Variability. Conference Abstract: The 20th Annual Rotman Research Institute Conference, The frontal lobes. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnins.2010.14.00060

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 28 Jun 2010; Published Online: 28 Jun 2010.

* Correspondence: N. Matthews, The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute and School of Psychology, Brisbane, Australia, natasha.leigh.matthews@gmail.com