Cataphora processing in agrammatic aphasia: Eye movement evidence for integration deficits
-
1
Northwestern University, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, United States
-
2
Northwestern University, Department of Linguistics, United States
-
3
Northwestern University, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Department of Neurology, United States
Background
Individuals with agrammatic aphasia show selective comprehension impairments in complex sentences with long-distance dependencies such as Wh-filler-gap dependencies (WhFG). Recent studies suggest that this difficulty arises from failure to integrate grammatical and lexical information (Lexical Integration Deficit Hypothesis [LIDH]; Thompson & Choy, 2009). This study further evaluates LIDH by investigating cataphora processing.
Cataphoric dependencies involve a long-distance relation between a preceding pronoun (dependent element) and its antecedent (licensing element), as in (1a). They are processed similarly to WhFG where the parser searches for the licensing element upon encountering the dependent element (Kazanina et al., 2007). Importantly, cataphora resolution is sensitive to structural (Binding Condition C) and lexical (gender) information, thereby allows examinations of the interaction between grammatical and lexical information.
Method
In an eye-tracking self-paced reading experiment, 6 individuals with agrammatic aphasia and 15 controls were tested using a paradigm where the c-command relation (c-command vs. non-c-command), the gender congruency (gender-matched vs. gender-mismatched) between the pronoun and potential antecedent, and the gender specification (stereotypical vs. definitional) were manipulated, as illustrated below.
(1) a/b. After he/*she read the paper, the king happily went...
c/d. He/she read the paper after the king happily went...
e/f. After he/she read the paper, the minister happily went...
g/h. He/she read the paper after the minister happily went...
In (1a/b), the pronoun is grammatically linked to the potential antecedent (the king). Furthermore, because the gender of the antecedent is definitional (king-male), in (1b) we expect the parser to show a reading time slowdown at the gender-mismatched antecedent (i.e., gender-mismatched effect; GMME). In (1e/f) the antecedent is gender-ambiguous, but understood stereotypically as male or female (minister-male). Since the interpretation of stereotypical-gender nouns is affected by the gender of the pronoun in healthy individuals (Kreiner et al., 2008), in (1f), minister is interpreted as female. Consequently, this process requires additional integration costs. The LIDH predicts that since the integration process is impaired in agrammatic aphasia, the GMME is expected for patients but not for controls. In (1c/d/g/h), since pronoun-antecedent relation is impossible, no GMME is expected.
Results
Analyses of second-pass reading times revealed a significant interaction of c-command x gender x noun type at the critical antecedent region for the controls, associated with a GMME in the non-c-command/mismatched/definitional condition, but not in the stereotypical condition. Similarly, the patient group showed the same three-way interaction, but in the spillover region. However, GMMEs in both definitional and stereotypical c-command/mismatched conditions were found, with a greater GMME in the stereotypical compared to the definitional condition.
Conclusion
These findings indicate that the patients exhibited similar eye-movement patterns to that of the controls when processing definitional-gender nouns. However, unlike controls, they failed to use contextual gender information to revise gender stereotypes. These patterns support the LIDH.
References
Kazanina et al. (2007). Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 239-261.
Kreiner et al. (2008). Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 384-409.
Thompson, C.K. & Choy, J.J. (2009). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38, 255-283.
Keywords:
agrammatic aphasia,
selective comprehension deficits,
cataphora,
long-distance dependencies,
sentence processing,
integration deficits,
lexical integration deficits
Conference:
Academy of Aphasia -- 52nd Annual Meeting, Miami, FL, United States, 5 Oct - 7 Oct, 2014.
Presentation Type:
Platform or poster presentation
Topic:
Student award eligible
Citation:
Hsu
C,
Yoshida
M and
Thompson
C
(2014). Cataphora processing in agrammatic aphasia: Eye movement evidence for integration deficits.
Front. Psychol.
Conference Abstract:
Academy of Aphasia -- 52nd Annual Meeting.
doi: 10.3389/conf.fpsyg.2014.64.00035
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
25 Apr 2014;
Published Online:
04 Aug 2014.
*
Correspondence:
Ms. Chien-Ju Hsu, Northwestern University, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Evanston, United States, chienjuhsu@u.northwestern.edu