Event Abstract

Back to Event

Prediction during sentence comprehension in aphasia

Michael W. Dickey1, 2*, Tessa Warren2, Rebecca Hayes2 and Evelyn Milburn2
  • 1 VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, United States
  • 2 University of Pittsburgh, United States

Much recent psycholinguistic work has focused on prediction in language comprehension (Altmann & Kamide, 1999; Federmeier, 2007; Levy, 2008). Unimpaired adults predict upcoming words and phrases based on material in the preceding context, like verbs (Altmann & Kamide, 1999) or constraining sentence contexts (Federmeier, 2007). Several models have tied rapid prediction to the language production system (Federmeier, 2007; Pickering & Garrod, 2013; Dell & Chang, 2014). Evidence for this link comes from that fact that older adults with lower verbal fluency show less predictive behavior (Federmeier, et al., 2010; DeLong, et al., 2012). Prediction in aphasic language comprehension has not been widely investigated, even though constraining sentence contexts are strongly facilitative for naming in aphasia (e.g., Love & Webb, 1977). Mack, et al. (2013) found in a visual-world task that people with aphasia (PWA) do not predict upcoming objects based on verbs (cf. Altmann & Kamide, 1999). This finding suggests that prediction may be reduced in aphasia. However, it is unclear whether reduced prediction was caused by language-production impairments: all the PWA in their study had non-fluent aphasia. The current study examined whether PWA show evidence of prediction based on constraining sentence contexts (e.g., Federmeier, 2007). Specifically, it tested whether they exhibited facilitation for highly predictable words in reading, using materials that have previously demonstrated strong predictability effects for unimpaired adults (Rayner, et al., 2004). In addition, it tested whether differences in language-production ability among PWA accounted for differences in predictive behavior (viz. Pickering & Garrod, 2013; Dell & Chang, 2014). Eight PWA read sentences adapted from Rayner, et al. (2004) in a self-paced reading task. The materials crossed word frequency with predictability: high- vs. low-frequency words (bottle/diaper) were preceded by contexts which made them either highly predictable or unpredictable (Before warming the milk/To prevent a mess, the babysitter took out/checked the …). The PWA varied widely in their verbal fluency, as measured by their verbal-fluency scores on the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (Swinburn, et al., 2004; verbal fluency T-score range: 43-71). Reading times at the critical word (bottle/diaper; see Figure 1) showed a large effect of predictability, with both high- and low-frequency words being read faster in constraining sentence contexts (F[1,7]=13.66, p<.01). There was no effect of frequency (F<1) and no interaction (F=2.53, p>.1). This pattern is different from findings for older and younger unimpaired adults, who show similar-sized effects for predictability and frequency (Rayner, et al., 2004; Ashby, et al., 2005; Rayner, et al., 2006). However, it is consistent with previous results for aphasia, where effects of word frequency are often missing (e.g., DeDe, 2012). There was no relationship between verbal fluency and the size of the predictability effect (r=.06, p>.4). These findings indicate that PWA can show very robust prediction in comprehension, at least for constraining sentence contexts (Federmeier, 2007). However, prediction appears to be dissociated from variation in verbal fluency/language-production impairment. This finding casts doubt on theories which ground prediction in comprehension in the language production system (Federmeier, 2007; Pickering & Garrod, 2013; Dell & Chang, 2014).

Figure 1
Image

References

Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247-264.
Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(6), 1065-1086.
DeDe, G. (2012). Effects of word frequency and modality on sentence comprehension impairments in people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), S103-S114.
Dell, G. & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369: 20120394
DeLong, K. A., Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2012). Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading. Brain and language, 121(3), 226-239.
Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44(4), 491-505.
Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Schul, R. (2010). Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language, 115(3), 149-161.
Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126-1177.
Love, R. J., & Webb, W. G. (1977). The efficacy of cueing techniques in Broca's aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42(2), 170.
Mack, J. E., Ji, W., & Thompson, C. K. (2013). Effects of verb meaning on lexical integration in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking. Journal of neurolinguistics, 26(6), 619-636.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 329-347.
Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the EZ Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 720.
Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and aging, 21(3), 448.
Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D. (2004). CAT: comprehensive aphasia test. Psychology Press.

Keywords: Aphasia, sentence comprehension in aphasia, prediction, semantics, context effects

Conference: Academy of Aphasia -- 52nd Annual Meeting, Miami, FL, United States, 5 Oct - 7 Oct, 2014.

Presentation Type: Platform or poster presentation

Topic: Not student

Citation: Dickey MW, Warren T, Hayes R and Milburn E (2014). Prediction during sentence comprehension in aphasia. Front. Psychol. Conference Abstract: Academy of Aphasia -- 52nd Annual Meeting. doi: 10.3389/conf.fpsyg.2014.64.00067

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 25 Apr 2014; Published Online: 04 Aug 2014.

* Correspondence: Dr. Michael W Dickey, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, mdickey@pitt.edu