The local-global dimension in cognitive control after left lateral prefrontal cortex damage: Evidence from the verbal and the non-verbal domain
-
1
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Theoretical Linguistics, Greece
-
2
University of Reading, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, United Kingdom
-
3
Johns Hopkins University, Department of Neurology, United States
Introduction
The local-global dimension (Navon, 1977) has been studied extensively in healthy controls and preference for globally processed stimuli has been validated in both the visual and auditory modalities. Critically, the local-global dimension has an inherent interference resolution component, a type of cognitive control, and left-prefrontal-cortex-damaged (LPFC) individuals have exhibited inability to override habitual response behaviors in item recognition tasks that involve representational interference (Hamilton & Martin, 2005; Novick, Trueswell, & Thompson-Schill, 2005). However, very little is known about how the local-global attentional dimension affects LPFC-damaged individuals with aphasia in language and non-language domains that involve cognitive control mechanisms.
Methods
Eight patients with damage in the left PFC and twenty age- and education-matched language-unimpaired adults have participated in the study. Non-verbal tasks included an online Global-Local Identification task (designed after Navon, 1977) asking from participants to identify global geometrical shapes, which were made up of smaller (local) geometrical configurations while inhibiting local ones, and vice versa. In congruent trials, local and global shapes coincided whereas in incongruent trials they did not. Apart from the local and global condition, the task included a mixed local-global condition, in which participants were asked to identify global and local shapes interchangeably. Participants’ updating functions were independently measured by an online 2-back digit task where individuals were presented with digit sequences and were asked to respond by pressing a pre-specified key once a digit matched the digit occurring two digits earlier. The study also involved four online language tasks: (a) a task testing the interpretation of pronouns (Peristeri & Tsimpli, 2013) in globally ambiguous sentential contexts, (b) a task testing the interpretation of homophones in sentences requiring global processing, (c) a task testing the participants’ sensitivity to local, grammatical gender conflicts of single words in a picture-word interference task, and, (d) a task testing participants’ sensitivity to local orthographic violations in the stems and suffixes of single words in a semantic judgment task.
Results
In the Global-Local Identification task, LPFC-damaged patients with non-fluent aphasia performed more poorly in both accuracy (42% correct) and RTs on the local incongruent trials—where identification of the local shape presupposed inhibition of the global configuration—than any other global incongruent or congruent category. Controls were slower (but accurate) in local incongruent trials. On the other hand, PFC-damaged patients (along with controls) performed at ceiling level in the 2-back digit task, thus, indicating no deficit in their updating abilities. With respect to the language tasks, the patients performed more poorly in RTs in the tasks tapping on the integration of local cues relative to the tasks where conflict resolution was critically dependent on the parser’s sensitivity to global context.
Discussion
Overall, the local-global dimension seems to critically influence the performance of LPFC-damaged individuals with non-fluent aphasia in both language and non-language domains. A possible interpretation is that participants were able to override conflict more easily in tasks tapping on global than local processing. Broader implications for distinct types of inhibitory processes depending on the level of processing will be discussed.
References
Hamilton, A. C., & Martin, R. C. (2005). Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 1-13.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Executive control and parsing: reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 263–281.
Peristeri, E., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2013) Pronoun processing in Broca's aphasia: discourse-syntax effects in ambiguous anaphora resolution. Aphasiology, 27 (11), 1381-1407.
Keywords:
LPFC-damage,
cognitive control,
language tasks,
non-verbal tasks,
local-global attention
Conference:
Academy of Aphasia -- 52nd Annual Meeting, Miami, FL, United States, 5 Oct - 7 Oct, 2014.
Presentation Type:
Platform or poster presentation
Topic:
Not student
Citation:
Peristeri
E,
Tsimpli
IM and
Tsapkini
K
(2014). The local-global dimension in cognitive control after left lateral prefrontal cortex damage: Evidence from the verbal and the non-verbal domain.
Front. Psychol.
Conference Abstract:
Academy of Aphasia -- 52nd Annual Meeting.
doi: 10.3389/conf.fpsyg.2014.64.00089
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
30 Apr 2014;
Published Online:
04 Aug 2014.
*
Correspondence:
Dr. Eleni Peristeri, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Theoretical Linguistics, Thessaloniki, Greece, eperiste@enl.auth.gr