Event Abstract

Back to Event

Rapid recovery from aphasia after infarction of Wernicke’s area

Stephanie Yagata1, Melodie Yen1, 2, Angelica McCarron1, Alexa Bautista1, Genevieve Lamair-Orosco1 and Stephen M. Wilson1, 3*
  • 1 University of Arizona, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, United States
  • 2 University of Arizona, Department of Linguistics, United States
  • 3 University of Arizona, Department of Neurology, United States

Introduction Wernicke’s area (the posterior superior temporal gyrus) is a critical brain region for language. However language function does recover over time to varying extents in many patients with damage to Wernicke’s area (Kertesz et al., 1993). In this study, we characterized the nature and time course of language recovery in detail in two patients with acute infarction of Wernicke’s area. We focused on the first three months post stroke, and especially on the first two weeks, since previous studies have shown that the greatest gains take place during this period (Pedersen et al., 1995; Basso, 1992). We relied primarily on quantitative analysis of conversational speech samples, as an efficient means of probing multiple language domains in the clinically and logistically challenging acute/subacute period (Holland et al., 1985). Methods Two patients with acute ischemic infarction of Wernicke’s area participated in the study after providing informed consent: VG, an 85-year-old female retired nurse, and JI, a 76-year-old male security guard. Conversational speech samples were elicited every day from 2 days to 16 days post-stroke, and also at 1 month and approximately 3 months. A brief aphasia battery was also administered at a subset of time points. Five minutes of connected speech per time point were transcribed using ELAN (Wittenburg et al., 2006), and coded with CHAT (MacWhinney et al., 2011). Multiple speech/language measures were derived from the coded samples using a custom MATLAB program. Patterns of change over time were investigated with principal components analysis and correlations between language measures and log-transformed time post stroke. Results Both patients presented acutely with Wernicke’s aphasia, but demonstrated rapid recovery. In both patients, almost all speech/language measures improved essentially in parallel with a logarithmic time course, with increases in words per minute (Fig. 1a,b), mean length of utterance, frequency of embeddings (Fig. 1c,d), frequency of bound morphemes, and aphasia battery scores for confrontation naming, sentence comprehension, repetition, and reading aloud. Both patients showed decreases in the frequency of phonemic errors and neologisms (Fig. 1e,f), semantic errors and lexical access impairments, fillers, false starts, and retracings (Fig. 1g,h). Morphosyntactic errors reduced in frequency only in patient VG and not in JI. Single word comprehension improved only in patient JI and not in VG. The patients showed opposite changes in the ratio of open to closed class words, reflecting resolution of agrammatic features in VG, and less empty speech in JI (Fig. 1i,j). Neither patient met criteria for Wernicke’s aphasia for more than a few days, both evolving quickly to conduction aphasia. Discussion Quantitative analysis of connected speech samples and language testing following infarction of Wernicke’s area revealed rapid improvements in almost all speech/language measures, spanning phonological, syntactic and semantic domains. The greatest changes occurred early, with recovery slowing over time, and the data were well fit by logarithmic recovery curves. Despite the importance of Wernicke’s area, the rapidity and extent of recovery observed suggest that other brain regions can be rapidly recruited to support many of the functions of Wernicke’s area (Weiller et al., 1995).

Figure 1
Image

References

Basso, A. (1992). Prognostic factors in aphasia. Aphasiology, 6(4), 337–348.
Holland, A., Miller, J., Reinmuth, O., Bartlett, C., Fromm, D., Pashek, G., Stein, D., & Swindell, C. (1985). Rapid recovery from aphasia: a detailed language analysis. Brain and Language, 24(1), 156–173
Kertesz, A., Lau, W. K., & Polk, M. (1993). The structural determinants of recovery in Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 44(2), 153–164.
MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). AphasiaBank: methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1286–1307.
Pedersen, P. M., Jørgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. (1995). Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Annals of Neurology, 38(4), 659–666.
Weiller, C., Isensee, C., Rijntjes, M., Huber, W., Müller, S., Bier, D., Dutschka, K., Woods, R. P., Noth, J., Diener, H. C. (1995). Recovery from Wernicke’s aphasia: a positron emission tomographic study. Annals of Neurology, 37(6), 723–732.
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: a professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006) (pp. 1556-1559).

Keywords: Aphasia, Wernicke's area, Connected speech, conversational speech, Recovery

Conference: Academy of Aphasia 53rd Annual Meeting, Tucson, United States, 18 Oct - 20 Oct, 2015.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Student first author

Citation: Yagata S, Yen M, McCarron A, Bautista A, Lamair-Orosco G and Wilson SM (2015). Rapid recovery from aphasia after infarction of Wernicke’s area. Front. Psychol. Conference Abstract: Academy of Aphasia 53rd Annual Meeting. doi: 10.3389/conf.fpsyg.2015.65.00003

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 01 May 2015; Published Online: 24 Sep 2015.

* Correspondence: Dr. Stephen M Wilson, University of Arizona, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Tucson, Arizona, United States, smwilson@u.arizona.edu