Event Abstract

Syllabic complexity effects in phonological speech errors: The role of articulatory-phonetic impairment

  • 1 Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, United States
  • 2 Aston University, United Kingdom

Research with native Italian people with aphasia (PWA) argues that syllabic complexity effects in phonological speech errors are based in articulatory encoding impairments [1, 2]. This important claim has yet to be substantiated for English. Indeed, one influential study reported no effects of syllabic complexity (a.k.a, “markedness”) on phonological error production [3]. We present evidence from an ongoing study that corroborates and extends the main claims of the Italian studies. In [1], markedness effects were contrasted in PWA with high vs. low proportions of phonetic-articulatory errors in single word repetition. We measured this “phonetic error proportion” (PEP) in 121 diverse, English-speaking PWA and found a graded distribution ranging from .00 to .55 with Mn = .10 and SD = .12. PEP scores correlated positively with apraxia of speech (AOS), WAB AQ, and lesion size (all r > .35; p < .001). From the sample of 121, we identified those who made > 20% phonological errors on the Philadelphia Naming Test. This identified 22 PWA, with a suitable range in PEP (.03-.55), AQ (25-84), and lesion volume (8-376 cc) and ample phonological naming errors to analyze (Mn. 47; range18-94). Half had AOS (measured as in [4]). For each individual, we calculated several structure-change proportions: we counted how many of their phonological errors instantiated a particular syllable-structure change and divided the number by the opportunities for that change present in the PNT targets. We report on two changes affecting the pre-vocalic (onset) position of a syllable: • fills an empty onset (onset creation) (e.g., VC→CVC) – decreases complexity • deletes a filled onset (e.g., CVC→_VC) – increases complexity and two changes affecting consonant clusters: • deletes a consonant cluster (e.g., CVCC→CVC_) – decreases complexity • creates a consonant cluster (e.g., CV→CCV) – increases complexity Fig. 1 shows the median change proportions, broken down by locus of change (1st, 2nd, or 3rd syllable). Predictably, there were far fewer opportunities for changes that decrease syllable complexity (see insert), yet the corresponding change proportions (onset creation; cluster deletion) were found to be high relative to those that increase complexity. Moreover, onset creation and cluster deletion proportions correlated strongly (r=.66), suggesting a common underlying mechanism. To investigate this mechanism, we computed an overall effect size for complexity reduction, reflecting the difference between structure decreasing and structure increasing changes: (onset creation + cluster deletion) – (onset deletion + cluster creation) We then used simultaneous multiple regression to predict this effect size from PEP, WAB AQ and lesion volume. Adjusted R2 for the model was .50 (F = 7.8; p = .001), and the strongest predictor was PEP (beta = .73; t = 4.43; p < .001). WAB was marginally significant (p=.05). In conclusion, our study corroborates the influence of syllabic complexity on phonological errors in naming and shows that the tendency for errors to transform marked structures to unmarked ones correlates with the severity of the phonetic-articulatory involvement, after controlling for aphasia severity and lesion size. This has implications for the theoretical treatment of phonological error production and its relation to AOS. Figure legend Fig. 1. Median proportion of phonological naming errors that create or delete an onset or a cluster, relative to the opportunities (shown in insert) afforded by the naming targets.

Figure 1


Supported by grant #RO1DC000191 (MFS).


1. Romani, C., & Galluzzi, C. (2005). Effects of syllabic complexity in predicting accuracy of repetition and direction of errors in patients with articulatory and phonological difficulties Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 817-850.
2. Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., Guariglia, C., & Romani, C. (in press). Phonological simplifications, apraxia of speech and the interaction between phonological and phonetic processing. Neuropsychologia.
3. Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (2004). Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production in aphasia: It's the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 57-78.

Keywords: Aphasia, apraxia of speech, Phonological errors, syllabic complexity, markedness effects

Conference: Academy of Aphasia 53rd Annual Meeting, Tucson, United States, 18 Oct - 20 Oct, 2015.

Presentation Type: platform paper

Topic: Not student first author

Citation: Schwartz MF, Romani C, Brown D and Brecher A (2015). Syllabic complexity effects in phonological speech errors: The role of articulatory-phonetic impairment. Front. Psychol. Conference Abstract: Academy of Aphasia 53rd Annual Meeting. doi: 10.3389/conf.fpsyg.2015.65.00084

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 21 Apr 2015; Published Online: 24 Sep 2015.

* Correspondence: Dr. Myrna F Schwartz, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, 19027, United States, mschwart@einstein.edu