Event Abstract

Time reference in agrammatic aphasia and probable Alzheimer’s disease: A cross-linguistic test of the PAst DIscourse LInking Hypothesis.

  • 1 University of Oslo, Norway
  • 2 University of Potsdam, Germany
  • 3 University of Padua, Italy
  • 4 University of Athens, Greece
  • 5 IRCCS S Camillo, Italy
  • 6 SCA Associates, Italy
  • 7 Evexia Rehabilitation Center, Greece
  • 8 University of Verona, Italy
  • 9 University of Patras, Greece
  • 10 University of Trento, Italy

Introduction Agrammatic aphasia is primarily characterized by (morpho)syntactic impairment in production, which is often selective not only across but also within different phenomena. Bastiaanse and colleagues, for example, consistently found past reference to be more impaired than present/future reference (e.g., Bastiaanse, 2008, 2013; Bastiaanse et al., 2011; Martínez-Ferreiro & Bastiaanse, 2013; Yarbay Duman & Bastiaanse, 2009). To account for this pattern, Bastiaanse et al. (2011) formulated the PAst DIscourse LInking Hypothesis (PADILIH), which posits that past reference is more demanding in terms of processing resources than present/future reference, because, unlike the latter, it involves discourse linking. Most of the evidence for PADILIH has been produced by using the Test for Assessing Reference of Time (TART) (Bastiaanse et al., 2008) in different languages. TART tests participants’ ability to “copy and paste” the tense feature from the source to the target sentence, and to retrieve the corresponding verb form/inflection. Therefore, it leaves unexplored the underlying ability to encode time reference-related abstract/prephonological features. Nevertheless, both encoding and retrieval abilities are involved in time reference (Faroqi-Shah & Thompson, 2007, and references therein). The present study investigates the validity of PADILIH by considering both encoding and retrieval abilities. Within a cross-linguistic and cross-population approach, aphasic speakers and individuals with probable Alzheimer’s disease (AD) were tested. Since both populations are known to present processing limitations due to reduced verbal working memory capacity (e.g., Kensinger et al., 2003; Kok et al., 2007), PADILIH would predict the same pattern for both at the group level. Methods Twenty-nine individuals with agrammatic aphasia (10 Italians, 11 Greeks, 8 Germans), 29 individuals with mild-to-moderate AD (13 Italians, 16 Greeks) and 10-16 age- and education-matched controls for each (language-neurological) group participated in the study. Participants were administered a transformational sentence completion task (similar to that used by Friedmann and Grodzinsky, 1997) containing 20 items tapping past reference and 20 tapping future reference. Results All aphasic and AD groups fared significantly worse than control groups (in all comparisons, Fisher’s exact test, p<.05). The Greek neurological groups performed significantly better on future than on past reference (in both comparisons, p<.05), while the German aphasic group exhibited the opposite pattern (p<.001). The Italian neurological groups were equally impaired in past and future reference (in both comparisons, p>.05) (Figure 1). Double dissociations emerged not only at the group but also at the individual level within all three aphasic groups and within the Italian AD group. Discussion The results do not lend cross-linguistic support to PADILIH, as only the data of the two Greek neurological groups were consistent with this hypothesis. The double dissociations within groups suggest that there are two different sources of difficulty for past reference and future reference that can differentially affect aphasic and AD speakers due to heterogeneity of associated deficits. Past reference may be impaired because it is discourse-linked and future reference because it refers to possible worlds, thus involving more abstract representations compared to past reference.

Figure 1

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship, awarded to the first author, within the 7th European Community Framework Programme.

References

References
Bastiaanse, R. (2008). Production of verbs in base position by Dutch agrammatic speakers: Inflection versus finiteness. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 104–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.006
Bastiaanse, R. (2013). Why reference to the past is difficult for agrammatic speakers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 27, 244–263. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.751626
Bastiaanse, R., Bamyaci, E., Hsu, C., Lee, J., Yarbay Duman, T., & Thompson, C. K. (2011). Time reference in agrammatic aphasia: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 652–673. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.07.001
Bastiaanse, R., Jonkers, R., & Thompson, C. K. (2008). Test for Assessing Reference of Time (TART). Groningen: University of Groningen.
Faroqi-Shah, Y., & Thompson, C. K. (2007). Verb inflections in agrammatic aphasia: Encoding of tense features. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 129–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.005
Friedmann, N., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1997). Tense and Agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56, 397–425. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1795
Kensinger, E. A., Shearer, D. K., Locascio, J. J., Growdon, J. H., & Corkin, S. (2003). Working memory in mild Alzheimer’s disease and early Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychology, 17, 230–239. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.230
Kok, P., van Doorn, A., & Kolk, H. (2007). Inflection and computational load in agrammatic speech. Brain and Language, 102, 273–283. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.001
Martínez-Ferreiro, S., & Bastiaanse, R. (2013). Time reference in Spanish and Catalan non-fluent aphasia. Lingua, 137, 88–105. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.003
Yarbay Duman, T. & Bastiaanse, R. (2009). Time reference through verb inflection in Turkish agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 108, 30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.009

Keywords: tense, time reference, Aphasia, Alzheimer's disease, PADILIH, Greek, Italian, German

Conference: 54th Annual Academy of Aphasia Meeting, Llandudno, United Kingdom, 16 Oct - 18 Oct, 2016.

Presentation Type: Platform Sessions

Topic: Academy of Aphasia

Citation: Fyndanis V, Arcara G, Arfani D, Burchert F, Burgio F, Cagnin A, Capasso R, Christidou P, Gandolfi M, Killmer H, Maculan A, Messinis L, Miceli G, Palla F, Panagea E, Papageorgiou S, Papathanasopoulos P, De Pellegrin S, Semenza C, Smania N, Varlokosta S and Wartenburger I (2016). Time reference in agrammatic aphasia and probable Alzheimer’s disease: A cross-linguistic test of the PAst DIscourse LInking Hypothesis.. Front. Psychol. Conference Abstract: 54th Annual Academy of Aphasia Meeting. doi: 10.3389/conf.fpsyg.2016.68.00097

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 29 Apr 2016; Published Online: 15 Aug 2016.

* Correspondence: Dr. Valantis Fyndanis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, valantis.fyndanis@gmail.com