Event Abstract

Back to Event

Exploring the potential of digital resources as a source of social support in first time pregnancy

Nikki Newhouse1*
  • 1 University College London, Department of Computer Science, United Kingdom

Background First-time pregnancy is a significant life event and holistic maternal wellbeing is important. Dominant social narratives state that pregnancy is a time of fulfilment and stability but many women report feeling otherwise. Healthcare prioritises generic information relating to physical health and psychological support is often overlooked. Up to 20% of women experience clinical levels of anxiety or depression during pregnancy [1] and poor antenatal wellbeing is associated with negative outcomes for mother and baby [2]. Research suggests that standard antenatal care often does not meet women’s wellbeing needs [3] and that poor antenatal wellbeing in uncomplicated first time pregnancy is connected to issues of identity change and low perceived social support [4]. Social support in first time pregnancy is associated with better maternal health, relationship satisfaction, child outcomes and coping [5]. Satisfaction with social support protects against postpartum depressive symptoms and has a positive association with parental self-efficacy [6]. HCI research is starting to explore technology’s growing role in the experience of pregnancy [7]. Pregnant women seek out support in navigating new responsibilities through social connection offered via digital media. Internet and smartphone access and usage is ubiquitous within this group, and research confirms that pregnant women routinely source information and support via the Internet, particularly when they deem their antenatal care to be insufficient [8]. The potential for online resources to provide social connectedness and support to pregnant women is profound [9]. Pregnancy has unquestionably ‘gone wired’ [10]. However, a minority of antenatal digital resources focus specifically on social support: peer-to-peer contact is usually unmoderated and offered as an add-on to the main event of ‘pushed-out’ information dissemination. This is despite women consistently stating a desire to connect with other women ‘like them’ and acknowledgement of the benefits of well-designed online peer support in parenting. Aim This research seeks to answer the following question: Can online peer support during first time pregnancy improve subjective wellbeing? An exploratory approach is being followed with a focus on user studies guiding the development of a working prototype of an online peer support resource. Method / Results In order to answer the research objective, several sub-problems need to be addressed. The project follows the Medical Research Council’s iterative framework for the development of complex interventions [11]. Goal1: Evaluation of current evidence. Methods: The current state of the multidisciplinary evidence for the potential for digital resources to provide social support in first time pregnancy will be evaluated by means of a critical interpretive synthesis of the relevant literatures, to include computer science, digital sociology, perinatal care, wellbeing. Goal 2: Conceptual clarification of ‘wellbeing’ in first time pregnancy. Methods: (i) Conduct semi-structured interviews with pregnant women, mothers and health professionals; (ii) Analysis of the interview data will determine key features of antenatal wellbeing. Goal 3: Understanding what characteristics define those who are willing to engage with online peer support. Methods: (i) Conduct semi-structured interviews with pregnant women, mothers and health professionals; (ii) Analysis of the interview data will determine which group/s of women might find online peer support more useful than others. Goal 4: What are the user requirements of those who are willing to engage with online peer support? Methods: (i) Conduct semi-structured interviews with pregnant women, mothers and health professionals; (ii) Analysis of the interview data will provide basic user requirements which will inform the development of a preliminary prototype. (iii) Test these basic user requirements in subsequent participatory design development cycles. Goal 5: Understanding the impact of the intervention. Methods: (i) Evaluate the prototype ‘in the wild’, incorporating measures of satisfaction, acceptability and adherence. (ii) Conduct interviews with users. Findings from the critical interpretive synthesis and semi-structured interviews will be presented. Conclusions First-time pregnancy is a time of huge physical and emotional change and women often need support. One way of providing this is to provide wellbeing information. However, pregnant women are bombarded with information, much of it generic, conflicting or anecdotal. Large numbers of women look for information and advice online, increasingly engaging with alternative forms of ‘expert’ information, in the form of other people’s experiences. This context provides a unique opportunity for digital resources to act as preventative medicine: bringing women together in a safe online environment allows them to speak freely, develop practical skills and feel supported as they become parents. This in turn relieves healthcare burden by preventing negative maternal and neonatal outcomes. This project will determine the context-driven user needs and requirements of a unique group of people and demonstrates the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the development of pragmatic digital health solutions.

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC/516745).

References

[1] Goodman J, & Tyer-Viola L. (2010). Detection, Treatment, and Referral of Perinatal Depression and Anxiety by Obstetrical Providers. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(3), 447-490.
[2] Glover V, & O'Connor T. (2002). Effects of antenatal stress and anxiety: Implications for development and psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 389-391.
[3] Maternity Services in England. (2013). London: Department of Health
[4] Choi P, Henshaw C, Baker S, & Tree J. (2005). Supermum, superwife, supereverything: performing femininity in the transition to motherhood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 23(2), 167-180.
[5] Meadows S. (2011). The association between perceptions of social support and maternal mental health: a cumulative perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 181-208.
[6] Cutrona CE, & Troutman BR. (1986). Social support, infant temperament, and parenting self-efficacy: A mediational model of postpartum depression. Child Development, 57, 1507–18.
[7] Johnson SA. (2014). "Maternal Devices”, Social Media and the Self-Management of Pregnancy, Mothering and Child Health. Societies, 4, 330–350.
[8] Lagan B, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. (2010). Internet Use in Pregnancy Informs Women’s Decision Making: A Web-Based Survey. Birth, June;37(2),106-15.
[9] Jones C, & Jomeen J. (2014). The impact of peer support in the context of perinatal mental illness: A meta-ethnography. Midwifery, 30, 491–498.
[10] Madge C, & O'Connor H. (2006). Parenting gone wired: empowerment of new mothers on the Internet? Social & Cultural Geography, 7(02), 199-220.
[11] Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337:a1655.

Keywords: peer support, HCI, perinatal, wellbeing, Pregnancy, eHealth, Digital Health, intervention design, Motherhood

Conference: 2nd Behaviour Change Conference: Digital Health and Wellbeing, London, United Kingdom, 24 Feb - 25 Feb, 2016.

Presentation Type: Oral presentation

Topic: Academic

Citation: Newhouse N (2016). Exploring the potential of digital resources as a source of social support in first time pregnancy. Front. Public Health. Conference Abstract: 2nd Behaviour Change Conference: Digital Health and Wellbeing. doi: 10.3389/conf.FPUBH.2016.01.00051

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 02 Dec 2015; Published Online: 09 Jan 2016.

* Correspondence: Mrs. Nikki Newhouse, University College London, Department of Computer Science, London, WC1E 6EA, United Kingdom, nikki.newhouse.14@ucl.ac.uk