AN ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT NEED FOR A TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED REMOTE EXERCISE REHABILITATION PROGRAMME AMONG A CHRONIC ILLNESS POPULATION
-
1
Dublin City University, School of Health and Human Performance, Ireland
Background:
MedEx is a community-based chronic illness rehabilitation programme, located in Dublin City University, Ireland. The aim of MedEx is to provide exercise rehabilitation, supported by medical supervision, to people with a diverse range of chronic illnesses. Remote technology solutions for physical activity participation, adherence and monitoring, are potentially a new way to provide further support to individuals in their chronic illness management.
Aim:
The purpose of this study was to assess the level of interest and use of technology by individuals living with chronic illness in order to explore patient desire for the provision of a technology-enabled remote exercise rehabilitation programme.
Method:
A technology usage questionnaire based on a previous study investigating the role of technology and mHealth in a cardiovascular disease population was used (Dale et al., 2012) to ascertain the current level of technology use. This consisted of 8 questions about demographic and clinical characteristics, 9 questions about current technology usage and 13 questions about interests, needs and wants from a technology-based, virtual exercise intervention. Participants attending the community based exercise programme, known as MedEx, were invited to take part (N=156; M age = 64.75 years, SD= 9.81, Range= 28- 83 years old; Males =61%, Females=35% [4% missing]). This included participants from a wide range of illness specific classes from HeartSmart - a cardiac rehabilitation programme (52.6%), BreatheSmart - a pulmonary rehabilitation programme (18.6%), SmartSteps - a vascular rehabilitation programme (11.5%), Diabetes Health Steps - a programme for people with diabetes (3.2%), Move On - a 12 week cancer rehabilitation programme (10.37%) and a mixed group class (6.4%).
Results:
Technology usage was high with 61% of participants owning a smartphone. 50% of participants accessed the internet everyday, with a further 22.4% accessing the internet over three times per week. Participants endorsed the idea of technology enabled remote exercise rehabilitation, with 47.4% indicating that they would either ‘like to try’ or found the idea of remote exercise participation via a computer-based physical activity game ‘interesting/useful’. 73% were interested in receiving ongoing exercise rehabilitation support via their smartphones, 72.4% were interested in receiving ongoing exercise rehabilitation via the internet, and 47.4% of participants reported that they would like to monitor their heart rate using a wrist worn device during remote exercise participation.
Conclusion:
This study provides evidence of patient desire for a technology-enabled remote exercise rehabilitation programme. Further to this, the current study provides promising preliminary evidence for both the high level of technology use and capability among a cohort of people with chronic illness.
References
Dale L, Maddison R, Whittaker R, Eyles, H., NiMhurchu, C., Ball, K., Smith, N., and Maddison R. (2012) Cardiovascular disease self-management: Pilot testing of an mHealth Healthy Eating Program. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2014, 4, 88-101.
Keywords:
Technology use,
chronic illness,
physical activity,
Remote Sensing Technology,
Rehabilitation
Conference:
2nd Behaviour Change Conference: Digital Health and Wellbeing, London, United Kingdom, 24 Feb - 25 Feb, 2016.
Presentation Type:
Poster presentation
Topic:
Academic
Citation:
Walsh
D,
Woods
C,
Furlong
B and
McCaffrey
N
(2016). AN ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT NEED FOR A TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED REMOTE EXERCISE REHABILITATION PROGRAMME AMONG A CHRONIC ILLNESS POPULATION
.
Front. Public Health.
Conference Abstract:
2nd Behaviour Change Conference: Digital Health and Wellbeing.
doi: 10.3389/conf.FPUBH.2016.01.00101
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
29 Oct 2015;
Published Online:
09 Jan 2016.
*
Correspondence:
Dr. Deirdre Walsh, Dublin City University, School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin, Ireland, dmjwalsh@gmail.com