Event Abstract

MMN reflections of language and attention: a neurocomputational model

  • 1 Medical Research Council – Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, United Kingdom
  • 2 Center for Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience, University of Plymouth, United Kingdom

Recent EEG and MEG studies have revealed that brain responses to the same speech sounds differ if the stimuli are presented in different task contexts: when subjects are not paying attention to the auditory input, their mismatch negativity (MMN) response is greater for words than for matched meaningless pseudowords. However, greater late N400 responses to pseudowords than to words emerge in tasks where subjects have to attend to the stimuli. We (Garagnani, Wennekers, & Pulvermüller, 2008) have recently proposed an explanation for these divergent patterns of results based on simulations obtained with a neural-network model mimicking areas of the human left perisylvian language cortex and their connectivity, along with known neurobiological mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. Repeated co-activation of the model’s primary motor and auditory cortex with predetermined patterns led to the spontaneous formation in the network of strongly connected distributed circuits (the possible brain-correlates of words) that exhibited input-specificity and functional discreteness. The resulting model was then used to simulate neurophysiological brain responses to meaningful familiar word and senseless unknown pseudoword stimuli under different amounts of processing resources. Variation of a single parameter, the network’s global inhibition feedback (the model correlate of attention) replicated and explained the divergence between MMN and N400 results, providing the first unifying account for these data. In particular, weak inhibition produced late activation differences, with stronger responses to pseudowords than to words (mirroring the N400 pattern). In contrast, strong inhibition led to early differences, with stronger responses to words than to pseudowords; this closely resembles the pattern seen in the MMN data. These dynamics were largely due to a modulation of the activation produced by the pseudoword stimuli: whereas such responses were strongly affected by the degree of inhibition/attention in the network, word activations were not. The discrete character of the neuronal circuits that developed for words lies at the basis of such differential modulation: changes in the inhibition/attention levels have little influence on the activation dynamics of functionally discrete assemblies; on the other hand, network responses to items (pseudowords) that have not been previously learned – and, therefore, lack a corresponding memory representation – are strongly modulated by the amount of inhibition/attention, for this mediates the amount of competition between the partially activated multiple memory circuits. Novel simulations obtained with the same model using oddball stimulation demonstrate how the MMN response may reflect both mechanisms of automatic change detection and long-term linguistic memory trace activation.

Conference: MMN 09 Fifth Conference on Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and its Clinical and Scientific Applications, Budapest, Hungary, 4 Apr - 7 Apr, 2009.

Presentation Type: Oral Presentation

Topic: Symposium 2: Predictive models within and of MMN

Citation: Garagnani M, Wennekers T and Pulvermüller F (2009). MMN reflections of language and attention: a neurocomputational model. Conference Abstract: MMN 09 Fifth Conference on Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and its Clinical and Scientific Applications. doi: 10.3389/conf.neuro.09.2009.05.041

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 23 Mar 2009; Published Online: 23 Mar 2009.

* Correspondence: Max Garagnani, Medical Research Council – Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom, M.Garagnani@gold.ac.uk