Event Abstract

Prefrontal firing rates reflect the number of stimuli processed for visual short-term memory

  • 1 Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Germany
  • 2 Technical University Berlin, Departement of Neural Information Processing, Germany
  • 3 Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Germany
  • 4 University of Glasgow, Center of Cognitive Neuroimaging, United Kingdom
  • 5 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Germany
  • 6 Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Germany

The way a system reacts to increased task demands can reveal information about its functional mechanism. We therefore assessed the question how non human primates process information about visual stimuli by driving two rhesus monkeys to their cognitive limits in a visual memory task. The monkeys were first trained to successfully perform the visual memory task (> 80% correct responses). Then the number of stimuli shown to the monkey (load) was increased to up to 4. The stimulus presentation period (SP) was 900 milliseconds long. Thus, in the load 4 condition each single stimulus was only shown for less than 225ms. After a three second delay period, a test stimulus was shown. The task of the monkey was then to decide via differential button press, whether the test stimulus matched any of the previously shown stimuli. Neuronal firing rates were recorded using up to 16 multi electrodes placed in the prefrontal cortex. For every trial in which the monkey responded correctly, the average multi unit rate during the SP was estimated.

We then assessed the question whether the firing rates in the SP during the distinct load conditions were significantly different. To minimize the effect of non-stationarities present in the data, we paired the data so that the trials of one pair were maximally 2.5 minutes apart. We tested against the null-hypothesis that the firing rates during the SP did not differ significantly among the load conditions using the nonparametric Friedman-test for paired data. For every recording site where we could reject the null-hypothesis (p<0.05), we investigated in which direction the rates of the different load conditions differed, correcting for multiple tests using the Tukey-Kramer-correction. A total of 12681 correct trials were recorded with a total of 160 recording positions (6 to 16 per session). In total, 23 positions showed significant effects from which 20 were consistent. The firing rate differences were called consistent if the difference compared to load 1 were stronger the higher the load. Out of these 20 consistent recording sites 14 showed a firing rate which monotonically increased with the load, 6 showed a monotonous decrease. This means that 12% of the recording sites in prefrontal cortex show a significant modulation of firing rates with respect to the load condition during a delayed match to sample task. However this modulation is not necessarily excitatory. Interestingly, it seems that the majority of sites showed a load-consistent modulation i.e. the higher the load, the stronger the modulation. This could be a possible mechanism to code the number of stimuli or their sequence.

Conference: Bernstein Conference on Computational Neuroscience, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 30 Sep - 2 Oct, 2009.

Presentation Type: Poster Presentation

Topic: Learning and plasticity

Citation: Franke F, Natora M, Waizel M, Muckli LF, Pipa G and Munk MH (2009). Prefrontal firing rates reflect the number of stimuli processed for visual short-term memory. Front. Comput. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: Bernstein Conference on Computational Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/conf.neuro.10.2009.14.106

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 27 Aug 2009; Published Online: 27 Aug 2009.

* Correspondence: Felix Franke, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany, felfranke@googlemail.com

© 2007 - 2020 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved