Event Abstract

Wernicke revisits Broca: a new look at language from intracranial recordings

  • 1 University of California at Berkeley, United States

Classic aphasiology posits a central role of Wernicke’s area in the posterior temporal lobe in language perception and Broca’s area in the frontal lobe in language production. The high gamma response (HG; 60-200 Hz) in the electrocorticogram precisely tracks auditory processing in the neocortex and can be used to assess sound, phoneme and word representation as well as the flow of information during language tasks. Using this approach we have been able to dissect the neural mechanisms of speech suppression, categorical representation and the timing of speech perception and production in peri-sylvian language regions. Presentation of a word to be repeated generates robust HG activity in Wernicke’s area onsetting at 50 msec. Surprisingly, the presentation of the word also reliably generates HG activity in Broca’s area at 200 msec. During repetition of the same word HG activity is evident in Broca’s area preceding speech articulation but no activity is observed in Broca’s area during actual speaking. These results reveal that both Wernicke’s and Broca’s areas are involved in speech perception. Broca’s area prepares the speech motor program but is not involved in the actual articulation of speech. These results suggest a more complex structure of language processing and highlight the value of electrocorticography in understanding human cognition.

Keywords: electrocorticography, language perception, Language production

Conference: XI International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON XI), Palma, Mallorca, Spain, 25 Sep - 29 Sep, 2011.

Presentation Type: Keynote Lecture

Topic: Keynote Lectures

Citation: Knight RT (2011). Wernicke revisits Broca: a new look at language from intracranial recordings. Conference Abstract: XI International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON XI). doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2011.207.00007

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 02 Nov 2011; Published Online: 08 Nov 2011.

* Correspondence: Dr. Robert T Knight, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, rtknight@berkeley.edu