Multifunctional PEGylated Niosomal Nanoparticle-Loaded Herbal Drugs as a Novel Nano-Radiosensitizer and Stimuli-Sensitive Nanocarrier for Synergistic Cancer Therapy

Introduction

Irradiation therapy (Yi et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021), chemotherapy (Jiang et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021), surgery (Cui et al., 2021), and hormone therapy (Im et al., 2019) are the most common therapies used for the treatment of breast cancer. Nowadays, radiotherapy is used as first-line therapy in patients with breast cancer depending on the grade of the tumor used alone or along with surgery or chemotherapy (Garg et al., 2005). The main goal of radiotherapy is established on reducing the side effects on normal tissues by minimizing the irradiation dose while providing the maximum efficiency to induce cell death in tumors (Crokart et al., 2005). The combination of chemotherapeutic agents with some chemical radio-sensitizers increases the rate of targeted therapies (Goel & Aggarwal, 2010). The use of synthetic radio-sensitizers can cause nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and allergic reactions due to their toxicity, even in daily prescribed doses. Therefore, it is still necessary to identify new, non-toxic, effective, and suitable compounds to increase radiation sensitivity. Plants, as non-toxic (or low-toxic) agents, are readily available and appear to be the ideal low-cost solution. Curcumin is a potent chemosensitizer known as a radio-sensitizing agent in various types of cancer. It seems that the radiosensitizing effects of curcumin are mediated via the inhibition of NF-κB activity in colon cancer (Kunnumakkara et al., 2008; Hamzian et al., 2017; Hamzian et al., 2019), reducing the signaling pathways of AP-1 and NF-κB in brain cancer (Dhandapani et al., 2007), downregulation of Bcl-2 and MDM2 proteins in prostate cancer (Li et al., 2007; Ghaffari et al., 2021), reduction of extracellular regulated kinases (ERK1 and 2), overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in skin cancer (Park & Lee, 2007), and suppression of cells in the G2/M cell cycle phase in squamous cell carcinoma (Khafif et al., 2005). Overall, these investigations suggest that the combination of curcumin with irradiation is a potential treatment to increase the effectiveness of treatment regimens on breast cancers. On the other hand, curcumin is hydrophobic and insoluble in water and is poorly absorbed by the intestine, leading to the limited bioavailability and concentration of this compound in the serum after oral administration (Liu et al., 2016; Abtahi N. A. et al., 2021; Yaghoubi et al., 2021). In order to overcome these challenges, nanotechnology has provided a multifunctional nano-delivery system, which acts as a drug carrier, improving the in vivo stability, bioavailability, and biodistribution of curcumin (Sim & Wong, 2021). Nanoparticles may consist of silver, gold, and iron oxide nanoparticles (metallic nanoparticles) or could be made of liposome, noisome, and micelle (lipid nanoparticles). These nanoparticles are able to be loaded with different hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds. Metallic nanoparticles play an important role in radiosensitization as a result of having a high atomic number (Z) of metals, photoelectric absorption, and the production of hydroxyl radicals (Butterworth et al., 2013; Siddique & Chow, 2020). Encapsulation of curcumin in the form of nanoparticles at the nanoscale size leads to increased biocompatibility, cellular internalization, and water solubility, whereas decreases the side effects of the loaded compound in the process of cancer treatment. Several studies have demonstrated the radiosensitivity potential of curcumin encapsulated in metallic and lipidic nanoparticles (Minafra et al., 2019; Gao et al., 2022); however, the impact of curcumin-containing nanoniosomes on the radiosensitivity of cancer cells has not been evaluated. Niosomes have considerable advantages, including acceptable stability, long-lasting stability in the bloodstream, small size, high encapsulation efficacy, no special condition for the storage process, and low cast. In this study, to boost pharmacological properties, curcumin was encapsulated in the form of nanoniosomes, which are bilayer non-ionic surfactant-based vehicles. These particles are stable, non-toxic, and biodegradable at the nanoscale size and could be employed as a novel drug delivery system (Kalantari et al., 2019). Tween 60, with hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) of 14.9, is not appropriate as the main surfactant for the formulation of curcumin-containing nanoniosomes. So the presence of cholesterol in niosomal compounds provides high physical stability for these nanoparticles (Abtahi N. A. et al., 2021).

The current study evaluated the radiosensitizing effect of nanoniosomes containing curcumin. For this purpose, we developed cationic PEGylated nanoniosome-containing curcumin with high entrapment efficiency (EE%), nanoscale size, and a controlled release profile. In our study, the breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) was irradiated with ionizing beams in the presence or absence of Cur-Nio. The MTT assay and flow cytometry were applied to evaluate cell viability and apoptosis between cells treated with free curcumin and cationic PEGylated nanoniosome-containing curcumin (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Schematic view of synthesizing the PEGylated niosomal nanoformulation based on Tween 60, cholesterol, DOTAP, and DSPE-PEG at ratios of 70:30:10:5, respectively. The process of curcumin encapsulation was performed by the thin-film hydration method and then used in combination with radiotherapy.

Materials and Methods

The thin-film hydration method was used to synthesize nanoliposomes containing curcumin with desired vesicle size, high entrapment efficiency, and the controlled release rate. Cholesterol (Sigma-Aldrich, United States), DOTAP, Tween 60 (DaeJung Chemicals & Metals, South Korea), and DSPE-PEG2000 (Ludwigshafen, Germany) were dissolved in chloroform. Curcumin (Sigma-Aldrich, United States) at a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml was dissolved in methanol and poured into a container. In order to evaluate cellular uptake, 0.1% M of the fluorescent label Dil (Sigma, United States) was added to the lipid phase. The organic solvent was eliminated by using a rotary evaporator (Heidolph, Germany) at 45°C to form a dried lipid thin film. After that, it was hydrated with a suitable volume of phosphate-buffered saline for 60 min at 60°C. Sonication was performed using a microtip probe sonicator (model UP200St, Hielscher Ultrasonics GmbH, Germany) on ice for 30 min to reduce the particle size. Finally, a dialysis membrane (M.W. = 12 kDa, Sigma-Aldrich, United States) was utilized to separate the free drug from niosomal vesicles.

Particle Size and Zeta-Potential Values

The range of particle size distribution, as well as the peak particle size, was assessed by the dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique (the Brookhaven Instruments Corp). Nanoniosomes were diluted in distilled water and measured at an angle of 90°, and the laser light was emitted at a wavelength of 657 nm at 25 ± 1°C. Zeta potential values (ζ-potential) were evaluated at 25 ± 1°C by using a zeta-sizer instrument (the Brookhaven Instruments Corp).

Drug-Loading Capacity and Entrapment Efficiency Determination

The standard concentrations of curcumin were prepared by dissolving a serial concentration of curcumin in isopropanol, and their absorption was detected by using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (model T80+, P.G. Instruments, United Kingdom) at 429 nm. Also, nanoniosome-containing curcumin was dissolved in isopropanol with a certain dilution, and its absorption was obtained using a spectrophotometer at 429 nm. The entrapment efficiency of curcumin in nanoniosome was calculated based on the low formula using a standard curve:

EE % = drug concentration in nanocarrier (mg.ml⁻¹)/total drug (mg.ml⁻¹) ×100.

The loading capacity of curcumin was evaluated by using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Germany) at 429 nm as follows:

LC % = mass of drug in nanocarrier (mg)/mass of nanocarrier (mg)× 100.

In Vitro Drug Release Study

The in vitro release profile of nanoniosome-containing curcumin was measured using a dialysis bag with a molecular weight cut-off of 12,000–14,000 kDa against PBS while being stirred on a magnetic stirrer for 72 h at 37°C (pH = 7.4). In order to calculate the drug-released profile at different times, the dialysis medium was collected and immediately exchanged for an equal volume of the fresh PBS. The absorbance of specimens was measured at 429 nm using a UV–VIS spectrophotometer. Based on the total concentration of niosomal drugs, the release percentage at different time intervals was calculated.

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

The characterization of functional groups and chemical interactions between curcumin and nanoniosome components was analyzed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Model 8300, Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The FTIR spectrum was analyzed at the wavelength range of 400–4000 cm⁻¹ in samples dispersed in KBr pellets.

Irradiation Procedures

The source-to-axis distance (SAD) irradiations were conducted in a 20 × 20 cm² field, with the gantry angle being 180 and 5 cm deep in solid phantom equivalent to tissue. The monitor unit was performed by Panther three-dimensional treatment design software version 5.2 (Prowess-USA). In order to optimize the dosimetry condition, central wells of the plate were used for cell culture as much as possible, and the culture medium was added to empty wells. Then, irradiation was performed using X-rays of a linear accelerator photon beam (Compact-Electa, England) to assess the irradiation efficacy, thereby creating a dose-dependent curve (1, 3, 5, and 7 Gy).

Cell Culture

Human breast cancer (MCF-7), lung cancer (A549), osteosarcoma (Saos2), and prostate cancer (PC3) cell lines were purchased from the Pasteur Institute, Tehran, Iran. They were grown in DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, Gibco, Dublin, Ireland) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS Gibco) and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco) in a 5% CO₂ incubator at 37°C.

Cellular Uptake of Nanoniosome–Containing Curcumin

In order to determine and compare the cellular uptake behavior of Cur-Nio and free curcumin, MCF7, A549, Saos2, and PC3 cells were seeded on to 6-well plates at a density of 1.5 × 10⁵ cells/well. Then, the cells were incubated with free curcumin, Cur-Nio (20 μg ml⁻¹), and blank nanoniosomes. After 3 h, cells were washed twice with fresh cold PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed with the 96% ethanol solution. The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (0.15 μg ml⁻¹, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) and visualized under a fluorescence microscope (BX61, Olympus, Japan).

Cytotoxicity Assay

In order to examine whether curcumin could be considered a radio-sensitizing agent, the cytotoxicity effects of irradiation with or without curcumin and Cur-Nio on MCF7 cells were evaluated. The inhibitory concentration (IC10) of drugs, a concentration without obvious drug toxicity, and the lethal dose (LD50) of radiation, as a minimum dose with the highest efficacy and no toxicity, were determined. To this aim, 10⁴ cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate with five replicates for each treatment. After 24 h, the different doses of irradiation (1, 3, 5, and 7 Gy) or Cur-Nio at different concentrations (2, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 100 μg ml⁻¹) were treated with cancer cell lines. For combinational therapy, Cur-Nio at a dose of 20 μg ml⁻¹ (IC10) or free curcumin was treated with cell lines for 24 h before being irradiated at doses of 1 and 3 Gy (LD50). Untreated cells were considered the control cells. Finally, after 48 and 72 h of incubation, the cell culture media were removed, and 100 μl of the MTT solution [10 μl of the MTT reagent (0.5 mg/ml) + 90 μl culture media] was added to each well and incubated for 4 h at room temperature. The formazan crystals were dissolved in 150 µl DMSO. The absorbance of each well was read by using a spectrophotometer (Synergy HTX, Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT) instrument at a wavelength of 570 nm. The cell viability rate of different treatments was calculated compared with the control group.

Apoptosis Analysis

In order to examine the effect of curcumin-loaded nanoniosome and irradiation, either alone or in combination, Annexin-V and propidium iodide assays were carried out. In brief, in each well, 4×10⁴ MCF-7 cells were seeded onto a 24-well microplate. After 24 h, cells were divided into nine groups. In group 1, MCF-7 cells were left without being exposed to any treatments; MCF-7 cells in groups 2 and 3 were irradiated at doses of 1 and 3 Gy, respectively. In groups 4 and 5, MCF-7 cells were incubated with curcumin and Cur-Nio at a concentration of 20 μg/ml, respectively. In groups 6 and 7, MCF-7 cells were treated with curcumin and Cur-Nio at a concentration of 20 μg/ml and irradiated at a dose of 1 Gy. In groups 8 and 9, MCF-7 cells were treated with curcumin and Cur-Nio at a concentration of 20 μg/ml and irradiated at a dose of 3 Gy, following pretreatment. After 24 and 72 h, the total cells were isolated by 0.05% trypsin/EDTA, centrifuged, and rinsed in 100 µl binding buffer. Then, the cells were suspended with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (P.I.) as fluorescent dyes and incubated in a dark place without light for 20 min. The samples were analyzed by using a flow cytometer (B.D. Biosciences, United States).

Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed by GraphPad Prism version 8 software, and the obtained values were represented as the means and standard deviation (mean ± SD). The independent t-test was applied to compare two groups, while a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare multiple groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.

Results

Characterization of Synthesized Nanoparticles

The DLS analysis determined the mean hydrodynamic diameter, polydispersity index (PDI) of blank nanoniosomes, and Cur-Nio. As shown in Table 1 and Figures 2A,B, blank nanoniosomes and Cur-Nio exhibit average diameters of 117.5 and 108.7 nm and PDI values of 0.403 and 0.305, respectively. The zeta potential values of the blank nanoniosomes and Cur-Nio are shown in Figure 2. The great extent of the negative zeta potential and anionic nanoparticles enhanced the potential stability of the nanosystem solution. The two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and surface morphology of Cur-Nio were characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Figures 2C,D). All results were in accordance with the findings of the DLS analysis. The chemical structure of compounds in the synthesized nanoniosome and curcumin, as well as the molecular interaction of curcumin with a lipid membrane of nanoniosomes, was applied by FTIR spectroscopy. Figure 3A illustrates the FTIR spectra of the free curcumin. The absorption bands at 3510 cm⁻¹ were assigned for the O–H stretching bond; the absorption peak at 1509 cm⁻¹ corresponds to the aromatic ring, C=C stretching, and C=O stretching bonds at 1155 cm⁻¹. The absorption peak at 1155cm⁻¹ was assigned to the C–H stretching bond in the curcumin molecule. The blank nanoniosome exhibits various peaks of FTIR patterns for DOTAP, Tween-60, cholesterol, and DSPE-mPEG in a range of 4000–500 cm⁻¹ (Figure 3A). The peak at 3243 cm⁻¹ was assigned to the existence of the O–H stretching bond in phenols and N–H stretching in 2°-amines of cholesterol and Tween-60. The carbonyl group in Tween-60, DOTAP, and DSPE-mPEG demonstrated a strong peak at 1632 cm⁻¹, corresponding to the C=O stretching vibration.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Characterization of blank nanoniosomes and Cur-Nio.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. Particle size distribution and zeta potential values of blank nanoniosomes (A) and Cur-Nio (B). Two-dimensional (C) and three-dimensional (D) AFM images of Cur-Nio.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. FTIR spectra; a comparison of free curcumin, Cur-Nio, and blank nanoniosome (A). The in vitro release profile of curcumin from the nanoniosome system (B).

Additional drug bands were not visible in the FTIR diagram of nanoniosomes. This phenomenon results from the complete encapsulation of curcumin in niosomal spherical nanocarriers, and therefore, the functional groups of these compounds are masked. On the other hand, long fatty acid chains with abundant hydrocarbon functional groups overlap and eliminate other functional groups. Curcumin encapsulated in nanocarrier membranes did not form any chemical interactions between curcumin and PEGylated niosomes. Also, the loading of curcumin on PEGylated niosomes did not affect its structural characterization. The in vitro curcumin release from nanoniosomes was evaluated using the dialysis bag method against the PBS buffer at 37°C. As exhibited in Figure 3B, the release of loaded drugs was 65.9% after 6 h. The cumulative release profile of curcumin showed a biphasic pattern, the first phase with an initial burst release period followed by a slower release rate in the second phase.

Nanoniosomal Curcumin Cellular Uptake Experiments

The cellular uptake of PEGylated nanoniosomes was assessed by fluorescence microscopy to evaluate and compare the penetration and localization of the free curcumin and Cur-Nio. The fluorescence images of niosome uptake were taken after 3 h of continuous exposure of niosomes to the cells. As depicted in Figure 4, the intensity of green and cyan colors of nanoniosomal curcumin in cancer cells was much higher than that of the free curcumin. These findings exhibit that the amounts of Cur-Nio formulations inside cancer cells were significantly higher than those of the free curcumin. These results were in accordance with cytotoxicity and radio-sensitization results. Also, Figure 4 represents the successful internalization of DIL-labeled niosomes into cells.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. (Continued). Cellular uptake of the free curcumin, Cur-Nio, and blank-DIL-niosomes on PC3, SaOs₂, A549, and MCF7 cell lines (×60 magnification).

Cytotoxicity of the Modified Curcumin-Loaded Nanoniosomes

In order to examine whether there was a radio-sensitive effect in the use of free curcumin or Cur-Nio along with irradiation, the MTT assay was conducted. The LD50 value was calculated from the ir radiation dose-response curves acquired by the increase in concentrations of irradiation, using a second-order polynomial fitting analysis. The MTT assay exhibited that blank nanoniosomes had no significant cytotoxic effects on MCF-7 cells at concentrations used (Figure 5A). In order to assay the IC10 value of Cur-Nio and LD50 of irradiation against MCF7 cells, a dose-response experiment was performed. The IC10 value of Cur-Nio and the LD50 value of irradiation were reported to be 20 μg ml⁻¹ (Figure 5A) and 3 Gy (Figure 5B), respectively. As shown in Figures 5C,d, cell death and radio-sensitization effect were increased, following irradiation with Cur-Nio compared with exposure to 1 and 3 Gy (p < 0.05) alone. This result demonstrates that curcumin plays a major role in radio-sensitizing and irradiation-induced cell death. In the combined treatments, the level of cell viability is always significantly lower than that observed in samples exposed to irradiation alone, indicating the efficacy of the nano-delivery system in the potent induction of radio-sensitization. Also, a comparison of the dose enhancement ratios (DERs) of the free curcumin and Cur-Nio was calculated after 48 and 72 h at a dose of 3Gy irradiation. As illustrated in Tables 2, 3, such a ratio was 1.5 folds higher in Cur-Nio than that of the free curcumin after 48 and 72 h.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. Viability of MCF7 cells treated with blank nanoniosomes and Cur-Nio at 48 and 72 h (A). Dose-response curves of MCF7 cells that were exposed to increasing irradiation doses at 48 and 72 h (B). The viability of MCF7 cells treated with irradiation with or without 20 μg ml⁻¹ of free-Cur (C) and Cur-Nio. (D) NS stands for “not statistically significant;” **p < 0.01 and ****p < 0.0001.

TABLE 2

TABLE 2. Comparison of dose enhancement ratios (DER) between the free curcumin and Cur-Nio at a single dose of 3 Gy after 48 h.

TABLE 3

TABLE 3. Comparison of dose enhancement ratios (DER) between the free curcumin and Cur-Nio at a single dose of 3 Gy after 72 h.

Apoptosis Assay

Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the percentage of apoptosis and necrosis in MCF7 cells exposed to irradiation using a 6-MV linear accelerator at doses of 1 and 3 Gy alone or in combination with the free curcumin or Cur-Nio as radio-sensitizing agents after 24 and 48 h. The Annexin V-FITC marker was used for the assessment of apoptosis, while the P.I. dye was applied for the evaluation of necrosis. The percentages of necrotic and apoptotic cells, along with statistical analysis obtained from the application of different doses and incubation periods of 48 and 72 h, are shown in Figures 6, 7. As shown in Figures 8A,B, irradiation caused apoptosis in 1.98 ± 0.06% and 2.56 ± 0.08% of cells when utilized at a dose of 1 Gy and 3 Gy for 24 h, respectively. Such percentages were 1.98 ± 0.06% and 2.11 ± 0.11% of cells irradiated with 1 Gy and 3 Gy for 48 and 72 h, respectively. The treatment of MCF-7 cells with the free curcumin (20 μg ml⁻¹) caused apoptosis in 1.37 ± 0.12% and 1.32 ± 0.12% of cells irradiated with 1 Gy and 3 Gy at 24 h. Such percentages were reported to be 1.31 ± 0.07% and 1.45 ± 0.10% when the cells were exposed to Cur-Nio at 48 and 72 h, respectively. The combination therapy of cells with 20 μg ml⁻¹ free curcumin and irradiation at a dose of 1 Gy showed 2.58 ± 0.08% and 2.55 ± 0.09% apoptosis rates at 24 h. The apoptosis rates at a dose of 3 Gy were reported to be 3.25 ± 0.09% and 3.55 ± 0.11% at 48 and 72 h, respectively. The apoptosis percentages of the combined treatment of cancer cells with irradiation and Cur-Nio at a dose of 1 Gy were reported to be 3.25 ± 0.10% and 3.11 ± 0.08%, while at a dose of 3 Gy, such percentages were 4.03 ± 0.05% and 4.11 ± 0.08% at 48 and 72 h, respectively (Figures 8A,B). The results illustrated that the combination of irradiation with radio-sensitizing agents significantly increased apoptosis in cancer cells compared with the single use of each treatment. In addition, the rate of apoptosis was significantly higher in cells exposed to the encapsulated form of curcumin than that in the free form. Moreover, as shown in Figures 8C,D, the necrosis ratios were almost 1.4 folds at 1 Gy and 1.2 fold at 3 Gy for 48 h. Such ratios were 1.3 fold at 1 Gy and 1.2 fold at 3 Gy for 72 h when the cells were treated by the combination of irradiation and nanoniosome-containing curcumin compared with cells exposed to irradiation alone. The necrosis ratios of cells exposed to irradiation and free curcumin were 1.2 folds at 1 Gy and 1.1 fold at 3 Gy for 48 h. Also, such ratios were 1.1 fold at 1 Gy and 1.0 fold at 3 Gy for 72 h. On the other hand, the necrosis ratios of cells treated with Cur-Nio and irradiation were almost 1.2 fold at 1 Gy and one fold at 3 Gy compared with those exposed to free curcumin for 48 h. These results displayed not only higher percentages of apoptosis and necrosis in cells exposed to the combination of irradiation and irradiation-sensitizing agents but also showed higher efficacy of irradiation doses (1 Gy vs. 3 Gy) and encapsulated form of curcumin in the induction of cell death in cancer cells.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. Apoptosis assay using flow cytometry, following treatment of cells at 48 h.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7. Apoptosis assay using flow cytometry, following treatment of cells at 72 h.

FIGURE 8

FIGURE 8. Apoptosis rate of MCF7 cells treated with irradiation at doses of (A) 1 Gy and (B) 3 Gy with or without 20 μg ml⁻¹ of the free curcumin and Cur-Nio (****p < 0.0001). The necrosis rate of MCF7 cells treated with irradiation doses of (A) 1 Gy and (B) 3 Gy with or without 20 μg ml⁻¹ of the free curcumin and Cur-Nio (****p < 0.0001).

Discussion

The radioresistance of breast cancer cells leads to the neutralization of irradiation therapy as an adjuvant treatment. Studies demonstrated that curcumin is a radio-protectant agent with antioxidant activity and is known as a radio-sensitizing agent that damages the mitochondrial membrane and induces apoptosis in cancer cells (Chendil et al., 2004; Khafif et al., 2005; Girdhani et al., 2009). The main purpose of our study was to examine the effects of pre-treatment of curcumin-loaded PEGylated nanoniosome as a radiosensitizing agent, followed by irradiation on the MCF-7 cell line in comparison to free curcumin. First, we characterized the curcumin-loaded PEGylated nanoniosome using various techniques. The mean diameter of nanoparticles was almost 100 nm at the nanoscale size, which facilitates their entry to the blood barrier and increases their concentrations in cancer cells (Hemati et al., 2019b). The zeta potential value was reported to be negative, and there was an electrostatic repulsion between vesicles resulting in the stability and homogeneity of nanoniosomes (Chen et al., 2012; Spirou et al., 2018). Also, the accordance of AFM images with DLS results showed rounded and smooth shapes with rigid boundary nanostructures in the synthesized nanoniosomes. Hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) and phase transfer temperature are two essential parameters that affect entrapment efficiency. The higher transition temperature (Tc) of Tween 60 (55°C) and a lower HLB value (14.9) led to the highest entrapment efficiency of curcumin as a lipophilic drug (Palozza et al., 2006; Bnyan et al., 2018). Tween 60 has a high transfer temperature and an impermeable bilayer that reduces the release rate of curcumin and leads to a continuous release. Moreover, PEGylation of nanoniosomes improves their stability, enhances drug loading, reduces nanoparticle size, and decreases the drug-release rate in niosomal formulations (Haghiralsadat et al., 2017; Hemati et al., 2019a). The endocytosis mechanism of Cur-Nio plays a crucial role in penetrating and increasing the accumulation of curcumin into cells, causing a higher intensity in green and turquoise blue fluorescence. In other words, the nanoniosomal curcumin delivery system was more efficient in the delivery and localization of curcumin compared with the free one that crosses through the cell membrane by a diffusion process. These findings are in agreement with a number of studies conducted in this regard (Huang et al., 2014; Deljoo et al., 2019). Our results demonstrate that cells treated with irradiation produce intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to a decreased proliferation rate (∼50% at 3 Gy) in cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner compared with control cells. We examined irradiation doses (1 Gy and 3 Gy) in combination with free curcumin and Cur-Nio based on the IC10 values. Our findings indicated that concomitant use of the free curcumin or niosome-containing curcumin with irradiation increased cell death by ∼1 and ∼1.5 folds in comparison to cells exposed to irradiation alone, respectively. Accordingly, our results were in compliance with studies performed in this regard (Girdhani et al., 2009; Swati et al., 2009; Goel & Aggarwal, 2010; Yallapu et al., 2010; Shehzad et al., 2013b; Minafra et al., 2019). We found that the combined use of curcumin with irradiation increased the efficiency of radiotherapy against breast cancer cells. The radio-sensitivity of curcumin is attributed to its influences on various molecules involved in the cellular signaling pathway, including PI3-kinase, NF-κB, STAT3, COX2, Akt, MAPK, AMPK, p53, Nrf2, Notch-1, β-catenin, and the upregulation of genes responsible for cell death that induce apoptosis and inhibit proliferation of cancer cell (Shehzad & Lee, 2013a). We also showed that the presence of curcumin-containing PEGylated nanoniosomes increased the radiation efficiency (3Gy) compared to free curcumin in breast cancer cells, and cell death changed from 50% to% 68% at 72 h. This phenomenon might be due to the fact that nanoniosomes promote solubility, stability, and bioavailability of curcumin and enhance the cellular uptake and localization of curcumin in cancer cells (Kolter et al., 2019; Karimi et al., 2020). Minafra et al. (2019) evaluated the radio-sensitizing ability of curcumin-containing solid nanoparticles (Cur-SLN) in comparison to free curcumin at three concentrations with increasing irradiation doses. They demonstrated that Cur-SLN caused higher radio-sensitivity in MCF7 cells by increasing curcumin bioavailability in a synergistic manner (Minafra et al., 2019). Ahmed et al. assessed the impact of free curcumin as a radiosensitizer on breast cancer cells before gamma irradiation. They showed that the combination of curcumin and irradiation increased cancer cell death by 62% compared to the single-use of curcumin, causing 48% apoptosis in cancer cells (Girdhani et al., 2009). Xu et al. (2018)sensitized colorectal cancer cells to ionizing irradiation by developing curcumin-based supramolecular nanofibers (Cur-SNF) and found these structures caused higher radio-sensitivity in these cancer cells compared to those treated with the free curcumin. These structures reduced tumor volume in vivo by inhibiting irradiation-induced nuclear factor kappa B activation (Xu et al., 2018). Our results were consistent with these results. Also, Liang et al. determined the cell survival effect of combined and single curcumin and cisplatin with irradiation on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) A549 cells. The viability of these cells was reduced following treatment with curcumin, cisplatin, or curcumin + cisplatin with irradiation compared to a single dose of irradiation. These findings exhibited that curcumin and cisplatin promote radio-sensitivity of lung cancer cells through the inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-associated signaling pathway (Cai et al., 2019). Their results were in line with our findings.

Conclusion

In general, we have developed a new curcumin-containing PEGylated nanoniosome to enhance the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells instead of using the free curcumin. The results demonstrated that PEGylated nanoniosomes have nanoscale size, spherical shape, high entrapment efficiency, and a controlled release pattern. Our study highlights the significance of the application of curcumin in sensitizing breast cancer cells to irradiation, and PEGylated nanoniosome is a very promising system for cancer therapy in combination with radiotherapy through boosting solubility, bioavailability, and cellular uptake of curcumin.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author Contributions

SA performed the experimental procedures. FH, NH, AS, and SN drafted the manuscript. MS and MH wrote the manuscript. SN, BZ-D, NH, and AS revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the general discussion. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abtahi, N. A., Naghib, S. M., Ghalekohneh, S. J., Mohammadpour, Z., Nazari, H., Mosavi, S. M., et al. (2021a). Multifunctional Stimuli-Responsive Niosomal Nanoparticles for Co-delivery and Co-administration of Gene and Bioactive Compound: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Chem. Eng. J. 429, 132090. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.132090

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Abtahi, N. A., Naghib, S. M., Haghiralsadat, F., Reza, J. Z., Hakimian, F., Yazdian, F., et al. (2021b). Smart Stimuli-Responsive Biofunctionalized Niosomal Nanocarriers for Programmed Release of Bioactive Compounds into Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo. Nanotechnol. Rev. 10, 1895–1911. doi:10.1515/ntrev-2021-0119

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bnyan, R., Khan, I., Ehtezazi, T., Saleem, I., Gordon, S., O'Neill, F., et al. (2018). Surfactant Effects on Lipid-Based Vesicles Properties. J. Pharm. Sci. 107, 1237–1246. doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2018.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Butterworth, K., Mcmahon, S., Taggart, L., and Prise, K. (2013). Radiosensitization by Gold Nanoparticles: Effective at Megavoltage Energies and Potential Role of Oxidative Stress. Transl. Cancer Res. 2, 269–279.

Google Scholar

Cai, Y., Sheng, Z., and Liang, S. (2019). Radiosensitization Effects of Curcumin Plus Cisplatin on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer A549 Cells. Oncol. Lett. 18, 529–534. doi:10.3892/ol.2019.10364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Wu, Q., Zhang, Z., Yuan, L., Liu, X., and Zhou, L. (2012). Preparation of Curcumin-Loaded Liposomes and Evaluation of Their Skin Permeation and Pharmacodynamics. Molecules 17, 5972–5987. doi:10.3390/molecules17055972

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chendil, D., Ranga, R. S., Meigooni, D., Sathishkumar, S., and Ahmed, M. M. (2004). Curcumin Confers Radiosensitizing Effect in Prostate Cancer Cell Line PC-3. Oncogene 23, 1599–1607. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207284

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crokart, N., Radermacher, K., Jordan, B. F., Baudelet, C., Cron, G. O., Grégoire, V., et al. (2005). Tumor Radiosensitization by Antiinflammatory Drugs: Evidence for a New Mechanism Involving the Oxygen Effect. Cancer Res. 65, 7911–7916. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-1288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, G., Wu, J., Lin, J., Liu, W., Chen, P., Yu, M., et al. (2021). Graphene-based Nanomaterials for Breast Cancer Treatment: Promising Therapeutic Strategies. J. Nanobiotechnol 19, 211. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00902-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deljoo, S., Rabiee, N., and Rabiee, M. (2019). Curcumin-hybrid Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery System (Review). Asian J. Nanosci. Mater. 2, 66–91.

Google Scholar

Dhandapani, K. M., Mahesh, V. B., and Brann, D. W. (2007). Curcumin Suppresses Growth and Chemoresistance of Human Glioblastoma Cells via AP-1 and NFκB Transcription Factors. J. Neurochem. 102, 522–538. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04633.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, R., Gu, Y., Yang, Y., He, Y., Huang, W., Sun, T., et al. (2022). Robust Radiosensitization of Hemoglobin-Curcumin Nanoparticles Suppresses Hypoxic Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. nanobiotechnology 20, 1–15. doi:10.1186/s12951-022-01316-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garg, A. K., Buchholz, T. A., and Aggarwal, B. B. (2005). Chemosensitization and Radiosensitization of Tumors by Plant Polyphenols. Antioxidants redox Signal. 7, 1630–1647. doi:10.1089/ars.2005.7.1630

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghaffari, M., Kalantar, S. M., Hemati, M., Dehghani Firoozabadi, A., Asri, A., Shams, A., et al. (2021). Co-delivery of miRNA-15a and miRNA-16-1 Using Cationic PEGylated Niosomes Downregulates Bcl-2 and Induces Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer Cells. Biotechnol. Lett. 43, 981–994. doi:10.1007/s10529-021-03085-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Girdhani, S., Ahmed, M. M., and Mishra, K. P. (2009). Enhancement of Gamma Radiation-Induced Cytotoxicity of Breast Cancer Cells by Curcumin. Mol. Cell. Pharmacol. 1, 208–217.

Google Scholar

Goel, A., and Aggarwal, B. B. (2010). Curcumin, the Golden Spice From Indian Saffron, Is a Chemosensitizer and Radiosensitizer for Tumors and Chemoprotector and Radioprotector for Normal Organs. Nutr. cancer 62, 919–930. doi:10.1080/01635581.2010.509835

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haghiralsadat, F., Amoabediny, G., Sheikhha, M. H., Zandieh-Doulabi, B., Naderinezhad, S., Helder, M. N., et al. (2017). New Liposomal Doxorubicin Nanoformulation for Osteosarcoma: Drug Release Kinetic Study Based on Thermo and pH Sensitivity. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 90, 368–379. doi:10.1111/cbdd.12953

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamzian, N., Hashemi, M., Ghorbani, M., Aledavood, S. A., Ramezani, M., and Bahreyni Toosi, M. H. (2019). In-vitro Study of Multifunctional PLGA-SPION Nanoparticles Loaded with Gemcitabine as Radiosensitizer Used in Radiotherapy. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 18, 1694–1703. doi:10.22037/ijpr.2019.14050.12131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamzian, N., Hashemi, M., Ghorbani, M., Bahreyni Toosi, M. H., and Ramezani, M. (2017). Preparation, Optimization and Toxicity Evaluation of (SPION-PLGA) ±PEG Nanoparticles Loaded with Gemcitabine as a Multifunctional Nanoparticle for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 16, 8–21.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Hemati, M., Haghiralsadat, F., Jafary, F., Moosavizadeh, S., and Moradi, A. (2019a). Targeting Cell Cycle Protein in Gastric Cancer with CDC20siRNA and Anticancer Drugs (Doxorubicin and Quercetin) Co-loaded Cationic PEGylated Nanoniosomes. Int. J. Nanomedicine 14, 6575–6585. doi:10.2147/ijn.s211844

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hemati, M., Haghiralsadat, F., Yazdian, F., Jafari, F., Moradi, A., and Malekpour-Dehkordi, Z. (2019b). Development and Characterization of a Novel Cationic PEGylated Niosome-Encapsulated Forms of Doxorubicin, Quercetin and siRNA for the Treatment of Cancer by Using Combination Therapy. Artif. Cells, Nanomedicine, Biotechnol. 47, 1295–1311. doi:10.1080/21691401.2018.1489271

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, Q., Zhang, L., Sun, X., Zeng, K., Li, J., and Liu, Y.-N. (2014). Coating of Carboxymethyl Dextran on Liposomal Curcumin to Improve the Anticancer Activity. RSC Adv. 4, 59211–59217. doi:10.1039/c4ra11181h

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Im, S.-A., Lu, Y.-S., Bardia, A., Harbeck, N., Colleoni, M., Franke, F., et al. (2019). Overall Survival with Ribociclib Plus Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 307–316. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1903765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, Q., Liu, L., Li, Q., Cao, Y., Chen, D., Du, Q., et al. (2021). NIR-laser-triggered Gadolinium-Doped Carbon Dots for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Drug Delivery and Combined Photothermal Chemotherapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer. J. Nanobiotechnol 19, 64. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00811-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kalantari, E., Naghib, S. M., Iravani, N. J., Esmaeili, R., Naimi-Jamal, M. R., and Mozafari, M. (2019). Biocomposites Based on Hydroxyapatite Matrix Reinforced with Nanostructured Monticellite (CaMgSiO4) for Biomedical Application: Synthesis, Characterization, and Biological Studies. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 105, 109912. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.109912

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karimi, M., Gheybi, F., Zamani, P., Mashreghi, M., Golmohammadzadeh, S., Darban, S. A., et al. (2020). Preparation and Characterization of Stable Nanoliposomal Formulations of Curcumin with High Loading Efficacy: In Vitro and In Vivo Anti-tumor Study. Int. J. Pharm. 580, 119211. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119211

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khafif, A., Hurst, R., Kyker, K., Fliss, D. M., Gil, Z., and Medina, J. E. (2005). Curcumin: A New Radio-Sensitizer of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 132, 317–321. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kolter, M., Wittmann, M., Köll-Weber, M., and Süss, R. (2019). The Suitability of Liposomes for the Delivery of Hydrophobic Drugs - A Case Study with Curcumin. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 140, 20–28. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.04.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kunnumakkara, A. B., Diagaradjane, P., Guha, S., Deorukhkar, A., Shentu, S., Aggarwal, B. B., et al. (2008). Curcumin Sensitizes Human Colorectal Cancer Xenografts in Nude Mice to γ-Radiation by Targeting Nuclear Factor-κB-Regulated Gene Products. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 2128–2136. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-4722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, M., Zhang, Z., Hill, D. L., Wang, H., and Zhang, R. (2007). Curcumin, a Dietary Component, Has Anticancer, Chemosensitization, and Radiosensitization Effects by Down-Regulating the MDM2 Oncogene through the PI3K/mTOR/ETS2 Pathway. Cancer Res. 67, 1988–1996. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-3066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W., Cao, Z., Yu, L., Huang, Q., Zhu, D., Lu, C., et al. (2021). Hierarchical Drug Release Designed Au @PDA-PEG-MTX NPs for Targeted Delivery to Breast Cancer with Combined Photothermal-Chemotherapy. J. Nanobiotechnol 19, 143. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00883-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W., Zhai, Y., Heng, X., Che, F. Y., Chen, W., Sun, D., et al. (2016). Oral Bioavailability of Curcumin: Problems and Advancements. J. Drug Target 24, 694–702. doi:10.3109/1061186X.2016.1157883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Minafra, L., Porcino, N., Bravatà, V., Gaglio, D., Bonanomi, M., Amore, E., et al. (2019). Radiosensitizing Effect of Curcumin-Loaded Lipid Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer Cells. Sci. Rep. 9, 11134–11216. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47553-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palozza, P., Muzzalupo, R., Trombino, S., Valdannini, A., and Picci, N. (2006). Solubilization and Stabilization of β-carotene in Niosomes: Delivery to Cultured Cells. Chem. Phys. lipids 139, 32–42. doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2005.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, K., and Lee, J.-H. (2007). Photosensitizer Effect of Curcumin on UVB-Irradiated HaCaT Cells through Activation of Caspase Pathways. Oncol. Rep. 17, 537–540. doi:10.3892/or.17.3.537

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shehzad, A., and Lee, Y.-S. (2013a). Molecular Mechanisms of Curcumin Action: Signal Transduction. BioFactors 39, 27–36. doi:10.1002/biof.1065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shehzad, A., Park, J.-W., Lee, J., and Lee, Y.-S. (2013b). Curcumin Induces Radiosensitivity of In Vitro and In Vivo Cancer Models by Modulating Pre-mRNA Processing Factor 4 (Prp4). Chemico-biological Interact. 206, 394–402. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2013.10.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siddique, S., and Chow, J. C. L. (2020). Gold Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery and Cancer Therapy. Appl. Sci. 10, 3824. doi:10.3390/app10113824

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sim, S., and Wong, N. K. (2021). Nanotechnology and its Use in Imaging and Drug Delivery. Biomed. Rep. 14, 1–9. doi:10.3892/br.2021.1418

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spirou, S., Basini, M., Lascialfari, A., Sangregorio, C., and Innocenti, C. (2018). Magnetic Hyperthermia and Radiation Therapy: Radiobiological Principles and Current Practice ^†. Nanomaterials 8, 401. doi:10.3390/nano8060401

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Swati, G., Ahmed, M., and Mishra, K. (2009). Enhancement of Gamma Radiation-Induced Cytotoxicity of Breast Cancer Cells by Curcumin. Mol. Cell. Pharmacol. 1. doi:10.4255/mcpharmacol.09.25

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, H., Wang, T., Yang, C., Li, X., Liu, G., Yang, Z., et al. (2018). Supramolecular Nanofibers of Curcumin for Highly Amplified Radiosensitization of Colorectal Cancers to Ionizing Radiation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1707140. doi:10.1002/adfm.201707140

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yaghoubi, F., Naghib, S. M., Motlagh, N. S. H., Haghiralsadat, F., Jaliani, H. Z., Tofighi, D., et al. (2021). Multiresponsive Carboxylated Graphene Oxide-Grafted Aptamer as a Multifunctional Nanocarrier for Targeted Delivery of Chemotherapeutics and Bioactive Compounds in Cancer Therapy. Nanotechnol. Rev. 10, 1838–1852. doi:10.1515/ntrev-2021-0110

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yallapu, M. M., Maher, D. M., Sundram, V., Bell, M. C., Jaggi, M., and Chauhan, S. C. (2010). Curcumin Induces Chemo/radio-Sensitization in Ovarian Cancer Cells and Curcumin Nanoparticles Inhibit Ovarian Cancer Cell Growth. J. Ovarian Res. 3, 11. doi:10.1186/1757-2215-3-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yi, H., Lu, W., Liu, F., Zhang, G., Xie, F., Liu, W., et al. (2021). ROS-responsive Liposomes with NIR Light-Triggered Doxorubicin Release for Combinatorial Therapy of Breast Cancer. J. Nanobiotechnol 19, 134. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00877-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, P., Xu, Y., Ji, W., Zhou, S., Li, L., Qiu, L., et al. (2021). Biomimetic Black Phosphorus Quantum Dots-Based Photothermal Therapy Combined with Anti-PD-L1 Treatment Inhibits Recurrence and Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J. Nanobiotechnol 19, 181. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00932-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar