N2O emission reduction in the biological nitrogen removal process for wastewater with low C/N ratios: mechanisms and strategies

Urban wastewater, as the main influent type of Waste Water Treatment Plants (WWTPs), has the characteristic of low carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N). In the biological nitrogen removal (BNR) process, insufficient carbon source often affects the nitrogen removal efficiency and leads to more N2O emissions. We review recent researches on N2O emissions in the BNR process of wastewater with low C/N. The availability of carbon sources affects heterotrophic denitrification (HD) and autotrophic nitrification/denitrification processes, which are the main reasons for N2O emissions in BNR. For the sustainable development of BNR in WWTPs, we introduce strategies suitable for reducing N2O emissions in the BNR process of low C/N wastewater from two aspects: traditional process innovation and new process development. These strategies mainly include carbon source addition, adjustment of aeration strategy, optimization of oxidation ditch and biofilm facilities, and application of Anammox related processes. In the future, it is still necessary to further deepen this research direction through the normalization of N2O emission quantification standards, exploration of N2O metabolism mechanisms, assessment of environmental effects of emission reduction strategies, and practical application of new processes.


Introduction
With the rapid pace of urbanization, urban wastewater (also known as domestic wastewater) has become the primary type of wastewater in sewage treatment, characterized by low water pollution load.Especially in regions with abundant rainfall, like in southern China, rainwater gets mixed with sewage in the pipe network, coupled with the illegal discharge of industrial wastewater, resulting in the prevalent issue of low carbon and high nitrogen in sewage (Hu et al., 2019).In recent decades, the influent of most Waste Water Treatment Plants (WWTPs) has exhibited a low C (chemical oxygen demand; COD)/ N (total nitrogen; TN) ratio, indicating an insufficient carbon source (Zhang et al., 2018).
The average C/N ratios for major cities such as Shanghai and Beijing are 3.3 and 4.0, respectively (Jin et al., 2014;Hao et al., 2015;Sun et al., 2016).Based on the comprehensive investigation results, urban wastewater typically has a COD concentration of less than 200 mg/L and a C/N ratio of less than 4 (Liang et al., 2015).
Excessive discharge of nitrogen and phosphorus in sewage can lead to eutrophication of the water system and harm the water environment.Biological nitrogen removal (BNR) is a primary method for reducing nitrogen emissions in WWTPs.Denitrification microorganisms in BNR usually compete with phosphorus-accumulating organisms (PAOs) for available carbon sources (Meinhold et al., 1999).Therefore, the denitrification efficiency of low C/N ratio urban wastewater is inhibited, making it a crucial research focus in the field of BNR in recent years.In order to improve the efficiency of BNR, the more robust methods are the improved Anaerobic/Anoxic/Oxic (A 2 /O), multi-stage Anaerobic/ Oxic (A/O), Membrane Bio-Reactor (MBR) and Membrane Aeration Bioreactor (MABR) to support new BNR processes, such as partial nitrification (PN), partial denitrification (PD), simultaneous nitrification/denitrification, and anammox (Sun et al., 2010), which could reduce the addition of carbon source.Alternatively, adding carbon sources like brewery wastewater, kitchen waste leachate, and waste sludge can supplement the pretreated wastewater carbon sources (Bodik et al., 2009;Wang et al., 2021).
However, while improving nitrogen removal efficiency, the potential issue of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emission during BNR may have been overlooked in previous development processes, contributing to the global greenhouse effect (Bogner et al., 2008).According to the IPCC guidelines, global warming potentials (GWP) of N 2 O is 265 times that of CO 2 over a 100 years time span (Edenhofer et al., 2014), and even lower emission fluxes can generate a considerable amount of carbon footprint.The direct emissions of N 2 O caused by anaerobic decomposition of organic matter and BNR during sewage treatment contribute to 3% of its total global emissions (Zawartka et al., 2020).Therefore, N 2 O emission reduction is of great significance for the further development of BNR processes.
Urban wastewater with a low C/N ratio is more likely to produce N 2 O than wastewater with a high C/N ratio.For example, in an activated sludge sequencing batch reactor (SBR), under the operating condition of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD 5 )/TN ratio of 2.6, the total N 2 O emission in the denitrification stage is about 270 times higher than that when the BOD 5 /TN ratio is 4.5 (Kishida et al., 2004).For the A 2 /O process, increasing the influent C/N ratio significantly reduced N 2 O production during nitrification and denitrification (Yan et al., 2017).In the MBR, reducing the C/N ratio from 10 to 2 leads to a decrease in the efficiency of the denitrification process to 14.7% of the original, concurrently increasing N 2 O emissions in both gaseous and dissolved phases (Mannina et al., 2018a;Mannina et al., 2018b).
For new BNR methods that can improve the nitrogen removal efficiency of low C/N wastewater, like PN, some scholars found that N 2 O production in these methods may exceed the that of traditional BNR processes (Joss et al., 2009;Desloover et al., 2011;Domingo-Felez et al., 2014).Monitoring gas emissions from actual sized suspended sludge PN reactors, it can be known that N 2 O emissions account for 3.7% of the nitrogen load, while the formation of N 2 O during the anoxic stage accounts for 66% of N 2 O emissions (Mampaey et al., 2016).However, the maximum accumulation of N 2 O in the mainstream PD/A process was only 0.7% of the influent nitrogen, much lower than previously reported for conventional nitrification-denitrification or PN processes (Du et al., 2020).
Wastewater with a low C/N ratio is more likely to produce N 2 O during both traditional and new BNR processes.We aim to summarize the studies of N 2 O emission in BNR process of low C/N wastewater in recent years, clarify the impact and mechanism of the C/N ratio on N 2 O emission in different BNR methods, and provide suggestions for effective emission reduction strategies and future studies.

Effect of C/N ratio on N O emissions in biological nitrogen removal
In recent years, a multitude of studies have examined N 2 O emissions in the BNR process of wastewater with varying C/N ratios (Table 1).Because each BNR process has different reaction principles and characteristics, we have categorized them into three groups: complete nitrification/denitrification, partial nitrification-denitrification (PN-D), and new BNR processes for discussion, and summarized the patterns of N 2 O emission from wastewater with different C/N ratios in various processes.Experimental evidence that urban wastewater with low C/N may have more N 2 O emission will be provided, laying the foundation for scientifically mitigating N 2 O emissions in BNR processes.

Complete nitrification/denitrification
Researchers began to investigate the impact of the C/N ratio on N 2 O production during BNR as early as around 2000.At first, the influent of urban wastewater was simulated at a laboratory scale to measure N 2 O.During the denitrification process of the mixed flow reactor, when the COD/NO 3 − -N ratio was 1.5 or 2.5, 3%-12% of the influent NO 3 − -N was converted into N 2 O.When the COD/NO 3 − -N ratio was 3.5 or 4.5, however, the N 2 O conversion rate dropped below 4% (Table 1).Additionally, an insufficient sludge retention time (SRT) was also likely to enhance N 2 O emissions (Hanaki et al., 1992).Studies of cyclic operation demonstrate that for intermittent aeration wastewater treatment systems, the maximum N 2 O emission rate occurs during the initial aerobic stage, not the anaerobic stage (Park et al., 2000).
For the intermittent aeration BNR process of high concentration wastewater, in a bioreactor with an influent COD/N ratio less than 3.5, 20%-30% of the influent nitrogen is discharged in the form of N 2 O; However, with the increase of the C/N ratio to 5.0-5.5, the N 2 O conversion rate dropped below 1% (Itokawa et al., 2001).The nitrification/denitrification process of aquaculture wastewater also has a similar trend.When the C/N ratio of wastewater increased from 2.6 to 4.5, the conversion rate of N 2 O to influent nitrogen decreased from 17.7% to 1.71% (Kishida et al., 2004).
With the advancements of BNR process, the hydraulic retention time (HRT) for nitrification and denitrification has progressively decreased from a maximum of 10 days to less than 1 day.In the complete nitrification process carried by the A/O SBR reactor, when the influent C/N increased from 7.5 to 14.5, the removal rates of TN and NH 4 + slightly increased, but the conversion rate of N 2 O (N 2 O-N/TN removed ) decreased from 6.0% to 1.3% (Hu et al., 2013b).Researchers have also explored a broader range of C/N ratios.When the C/N ratios of synthetic wastewater were 6.5, 3.3, and 1.3, respectively, N 2 O accounts for 0.32%, 88.57%, and 16.97% of the nitrogen loss (TN loss ) respectively (Yang et al., 2021), indicating that N 2 O emissions do not increase monotonicity as the C/N ratio of influent water decreases, and further in-depth mechanism analysis may be needed to explain the tendency of wastewater with low C/N ratios to have higher N 2 O or overall GHG emissions.For the nitrification and denitrification separation system, the ratio of N 2 O production rate to NO 2 − accumulation rate is defined as the N 2 O conversion rate (rN 2 O-N/rNO 2 − -N).When the C/N ratio was 4 and 1, the N 2 O conversion rate was 11.98% and 22.63%, respectively (Wu et al., 2014).The N 2 O emission factor during the nitrification stage ranged from 0.24% to 0.78%, while that of the denitrification stage decreased as the C/N ratio increased, spanning from 12.0% to 26.6%.According to the research findings of other independent nitrification and denitrification processes (Hanaki et al., 1992;Alinsafi et al., 2008;Lee et al., 2019), it can also be observed that the N 2 O emissions from the denitrification process are generally greater than those from the nitrification process.Different studies have different nitrogen indicators compared to the generated N 2 O when defining the N 2 O conversion rate for different processes.Generally, influent nitrogen content (TN load ) and nitrogen removal (TN removed or TN loss ) are taken as reference.Considering that most studies employ different statistical units for N 2 O emissions and emission rates, the N 2 O conversion rate can serve as a relatively unified quantitative standard for N 2 O emissions in BNR processes.However, when comparing emissions across different studies, it is necessary to take into account the variations in the conversion rate based on nitrogen indicators for scientifically accurate comparisons.
In addition, monitoring the dynamic changes in N 2 O emission concentration at different stages of the nitrogen removal process and paying attention to emission peaks can provide insights into the emission situation in wastewater treatment with different C/N ratios.In the process of nitrite denitrification, when COD/N was 6, the cumulative amount and duration of N 2 O were significantly lower than that when COD/N is 1 or 4. The peak N 2 O concentrations at COD/N ratios of 6 and 1 were 1.976 and 9.028 mg/L, respectively (Wang et al., 2019).These values can serve as a basis for characterizing emission characteristics.
Recently, N 2 O emissions during BNR of actual wastewater with different C/N ratios have also been monitored.Continuous monitoring of N 2 O emissions from SBR reactors in sewage treatment plants for 1 year revealed a significant positive correlation between N 2 O emissions and influent COD/N (R 2 = 0.346, p = 0.044 < 0.05), except for August and September.A lower influent COD/N (less than 6) corresponded to a higher N 2 O emission (Sun et al., 2013).Similarly, in an A 2 /O bioreactor system, when the influent C/N decreased from 10.3/10.7 to 3.5/3.8,N 2 O-N conversion rate increased from 0.043%-0.061% to 6.15%-   1-3).It is important to note that these estimates are provided for reference purposes only.
9.18% (Ren et al., 2015).The research on A 2 /O system in 2017 also found that N 2 O emission and generation and the total conversion rate of N 2 O-N decreased significantly with the increase of influent C/N.And N 2 O was mainly produced through the denitrification process in anaerobic and anoxic ponds (Yan et al., 2017) (Figure 1A).

Partial nitrification/denitrification
In order to improve nitrogen removal efficiency and reduce resource input, partial nitrification/denitrification (PN-D) process (or shortcut biological nitrogen removal-denitrification, SBNR-D) came into being.The BNR process involves partially oxidizing ammonia to nitrite and directly reducing nitrite to nitrogen (N 2 ) without requiring complete oxidation through NO 3 − -N (Schmidt et al., 2003).PN reduces the oxygen required by 25%, and the carbon source required for denitrification by 40% (Tseng et al., 1998;Pollice et al., 2002), making it an economical alternative to the complete nitrification/denitrification process.Due to the low dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration and high NO 2 − concentration increasing N 2 O emissions in the PN process, which may attribute to heterotrophic denitrification.N 2 O emission characteristics may differ from those of the complete nitrification process (Gabarro et al., 2014).
In 2006, researchers measured N 2 O emissions from laboratory scale SBNR processes.For wastewater with a C/N ratio of 1, the process was able to remove 81.2% of TN.And its N 2 O is mainly produced in the anoxic denitrification section, but the emissions were over 90% lower than that of the complete nitrification process under the same conditions (Hwang et al., 2006).For the UASB reactor with a COD/NH 4 + ratio of 1.6 treating the effluent of concentrated black water, PN exhibits a similar effect, with the N 2 O conversion rate accounting for 1.9% of the TN load (de Graaff et al., 2010).In the continuous aeration PN process, for the wastewater with a C/N ratio of 6, the N 2 O emissions were found to range from 18.67 to 330.09 μg/h, and the conversion rate (N 2 O-N/ NH 4 + -N) was relatively low (0.42%) (Liu et al., 2021a), which also reflected the advantages of PN-D in reducing N 2 O emissions during wastewater treatment.

New BNR process
In recent years, in addition to complete nitrification/ denitrification and PN-D to improve efficiency, several new BNR processes have been developed, such as Completely Autotrophic Nitrogen removal Over Nitrite (CANON) process, Coupled Aerobic-anoxic Nitrous Decomposition Operation (CANDO), Anammox related process, n-DAMO (Nitrate-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation) process, etc.These new processes minimize the demand for organic carbon and the oxygen required for nitrification (Horstmeyer et al., 2017), making them more suitable for treating wastewater with low C/N ratios.
In the BNR process dominated by anammox, the enrichment of anammox bacteria by anaerobic carrier biofilm enhanced the denitrification efficiency under C/N = 2.7-5 (Li et al., 2019).However, A 2 /O process combined with denitrification and anammox increased the denitrification efficiency of actual wastewater with low COD/N by about 16.9%.With enhanced denitrification, N 2 O emissions remained relatively low.In the A 2 / O process combined with anoxic carrier biofilm (AM-A 2 /O), the actual N 2 O conversion rate for wastewater with C/N ratios ranging from 1.2 to 7.9 was only 0.02%-0.08%(Li et al., 2019).The maximum N 2 O emission during sewage treatment with low COD/N (2.7 ± 0.4) was only 0.15 mg/L (Li J W et al., 2020).Recently, researchers have combined nitrification, PN and anammox into a comprehensive process, called INPDA (integrated nitrification, partial denitrification and anammox).The TN removal rate of this process could reach 94.1%, and the N 2 O conversion rate (N 2 O-N/TN load ) for treating wastewater with a C/N of 2.5 is calculated to be 2.2% (Zhou et al., 2020).Compared with previous processes in A 2 /O or A/O sequencing batch biofilm reactors (SBBR), the above combined processes have lower N 2 O emissions when treating wastewater with low C/N.
For the CANDO process that focuses on eliminating NO 2 − , when the C/N ratio was 3, the N 2 O yield (N 2 O-N/NO 2 − -N) was 62.5%, and when the COD/N ratio was 5, the N 2 O yield decreased to 60.8%, accompanied by an increase in the nitrogen removal rate (Weissbach et al., 2018).In the unipolar CANON system, a similar pattern was observed.When the C/N ratio decreased from 1 to 0, the total N 2 O emissions increased from 1.32% to 1.62%.Comparisons reveal that carbon source has no significant impact on N 2 O emissions during hydroxylamine (NH 2 OH) oxidation and heterotrophic denitrification (HD).The enhancement of nitrifying bacteria denitrification in wastewater with lower C/N ratio is the primary reason for the rise in total N 2 O emissions in this process (Fang et al., 2020).
Summarizing the N 2 O emissions from BNR in different processes, it can be seen that the processes of low C/N wastewater treatment tend to result in higher N 2 O production, whereas new processes like anammox combined with PN or PD and treatment systems with added biofilm exhibit lower N 2 O conversion rates under low C/N conditions.

N 2 O emission mechanism of wastewater with low C/N ratio
Based on the monitoring and research results of emissions, we found that low C/N wastewater tends to emit more N 2 O in BNR compared to high C/N wastewater, greatly enhancing the greenhouse effect of BNR process.Consequently, it is imperative to investigate the factors responsible for this pattern and understand how the decreased carbon load in urban wastewater affects the metabolic pathway of N 2 O.

Heterotrophic denitrification
Microbial-mediated denitrification plays a crucial role in the denitrification of wastewater.Nitrate (NO 3

−
) are reduced to harmless nitrogen gas (N 2 ).This process is usually mediated by heterotrophic bacteria (HB), including four steps mediated by nitrate reductase (NAR), nitrite reductase (NIR), nitric oxide reductase (NOR) and nitrous oxide reductase (N 2 OR) respectively (Zumft, 1997).HB utilize carbon sources as electron donors.Specifically, after decomposing the carbon source in the environment, these denitrification bacteria can store the carbon source in the form of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) and glycogen in the anaerobic stage, as electron donor for endogenous denitrification, used for biomass production and anaerobic reduction of nitrogen oxides, and generate energy (Jetten et al., 1997;Oehmen et al., 2005;Miao et al., 2015).
When the denitrification process is not in optimal balance, the intermediate gaseous products nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) may be discharged into the environment.Among them, N 2 O is generated through the sequential action of NO 3 − , NO 2 − , and NO reductase (Richardson et al., 2009) (Figure 2).Taking Alcaligenes faecalis, a denitrification culture, as an example, N 2 O emissions are higher in the absence of carbon sources; When the electron donor is increased due to the addition of carbon source, the output of N 2 increases, but the production of N 2 O does not increase (Schalk-Otte et al., 2000), which proves that HB may not be able to complete the denitrification process under the condition of insufficient carbon source, and incomplete denitrification makes a large amount of intermediate N 2 O produced.However, the inclusion of a carbon source facilitates complete denitrification and the generation of the final product, N 2 .It was observed in batch experiments that N 2 O accumulated at C/N ratios of 1.28 and 2.57, while complete denitrification occurred at C/N ratios of 5.14 and 12.85 (Lee et al., 2019).
In the process of denitrification, when the electron supply rate of the oxidation process cannot meet the demand for electrons of the four reduction steps, electronic competition will occur between the four reduction steps (Richardson et al., 2009), so the availability of electrons can adjust the activities of various denitrification enzymes.In research, PHAs are commonly used as the primary endogenous electron donor, serving as a bridge between the external carbon source and the electron utilization of denitrification enzymes.The electronic availability in the system can be known by monitoring the PHAs content, and the PHAs will increase with the increase of influent C/N, which will alleviate the competition of each denitrification process for carbon to some extent (Ge et al., 2018).
Specifically, N 2 OR competes with NOR and NIR for electrons.An additional electron supply can enhance the electron pool of cytochrome C, thereby reducing competitive pressure and boosting N 2 OR activity (Schalk-Otte et al., 2000).Therefore, under different carbon load conditions, it may be the electronic competition intensity between denitrification reductases, rather than the C/N ratio itself, that determines the N 2 O accumulation in the process of denitrification (Lu and Chandran, 2010).
Further experiments have demonstrated that electronic competition occurs not only under carbon-limiting conditions but also in situations with excessive carbon sources.This is because the various denitrification processes are interrelated.In the traditional concept, BNR may be carried out by a variety of organisms in sequence, for example, one denitrification bacterium converts nitrate into nitrite, and then another denitrification bacterium converts nitrite into nitrogen (Zumft, 1997).Is there no electronic competition between nitrate reductase and other reductases in subsequent steps of denitrification?
The current view is limited.The fact is that over 60% of the colonies in the denitrification enrichment belong to Sphingobacteriales and Flavobacteriales, and the bacteria of this order have complete nitrogen removal pathways (Caspi et al., 2012).All denitrification enzymes compete for electrons from a common electronic supply system.As the carbon loading rate changes, electrons will be differentially distributed among various reductases, and when the electron flux of reducing nitrite is greater than that of reducing N 2 O, N 2 O will accumulate (Pan et al., 2013a).In the same year, the research team developed an electron carrier model, indicating that carbon oxidation provides electrons for carriers, and nitrogen oxides receive electrons from these carriers for reduction.The carbon oxidation process and nitrogen reduction process are closely connected.This model enhanced the prediction of N 2 O accumulation ability during denitrification by employing different affinity constants and reduction carriers to describe the relative competitive ability of electrons in each denitrification step (Pan et al., 2013b).
Nitrous oxide reductase (N 2 OR) is the sole enzyme responsible for catalyzing the decomposition of N 2 O into N 2 , and the structural gene nosZ encoding N 2 OR is co-transcribed with nosR.N 2 OR is not only influenced by the electronic competitive activity of other denitrification reductases but is also highly sensitive to DO in the environment.The anoxic and anaerobic enrichment conditions will also lead to N 2 O accumulation (Conthe et al., 2018).

Autotrophic nitrification/denitrification
In addition to the contribution of HB, N 2 O emission from BNR processes are partially attributed to ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia oxidizing archaea (AOA) during the nitrification process in the mixed system.Under low C/N conditions, it was found that the contributions of heterotrophic denitrification activity and autotrophic nitrification activity to N 2 O production were similar.Therefore, some researchers have created a process model that includes both heterotrophic and autotrophic denitrification paths, resulting in a slightly better prediction effect for N 2 O emissions compared to the single-path denitrification model (Domingo-Felez et al., 2017).In the process of AOB metabolism, the oxidation of NH 2 OH produces a byproduct N 2 O (Chandran et al., 2011); similarly to HB, it uses ammonia or hydrogen as the electron donor to reduce nitrite, resulting in the production of N 2 O (Figure 3).This autotrophic ammonia oxidizing bacteria with denitrification ability is primarily classified as Nitrosomonas (Bock et al., 1995), and N 2 O is the end product of its nitrogen metabolism (Kim et al., 2010;Law et al., 2012).The model shows that in most cases, the AOB denitrification pathway is dominant, while the NH 2 OH oxidation pathway becomes more significant at high DO levels (e.g., 3.5 mg O 2 /L) (Peng et al., 2015a).
Unlike heterotrophic organisms, the nitrogen metabolism pathway of autotrophic AOB bacteria is affected by the availability of inorganic carbon (IC).In nitrifying sludge rich in AOB and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB), autotrophic growth can lead to a lack of IC, which in turn limits the oxidation activity of AOB towards NH 3 (Todt and Dorsch, 2016).In the PN/A process, N 2 O is also produced through pathways associated with AOB.Decreasing IC/N will inhibit the activity of AOB, thereby enhancing N 2 O generation through NH 2 OH oxidation (Ma et al., 2015;Li L et al., 2020) (Figure 2).Enhancing the availability of IC will result in a higher reaction rate between AOB and related N 2 O (Peng et al., 2015b).However, further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism of N 2 O generation under different IC conditions, and more evidence is required to support the IC/N concentration that can achieve N 2 O emission reduction in actual wastewater treatment.
In the treatment of low C/N wastewater, certain specific conditions can cause an increase in N 2 O production of AOB.If the nitrite concentration in the influent is high, it will promote the denitrification of AOB and effectively convert nitrite to N 2 O (Colliver and Stephenson, 2000).However, the limited COD availability in low C/N wastewater will also cause nitrite accumulation (Hanaki et al., 1992), further enhancing the N 2 O generation pathway of AOB denitrification.Other conditions, such as low pH, can cause nitrification stress in AOB, leading to protonation of NO 2 − into HNO 2 .HNO 2 inhibits the activity of NOB in the mixed system, causing the accumulation of NO 2 − , which in turn promotes N 2 O production (Peng et al., 2015b).Additionally, nitrifying sludge is more likely to produce N 2 O from AOB under anaerobic conditions.Experiments have shown that the N 2 O generation rate reaches its maximum at a DO of 0.85 mg O 2 /L, while the N 2 O emission factor decreased with an increase in DO from 0.35 mg O 2 /L to 3.5 mg O 2 /L (Peng et al., 2015a).
In terms of metabolism and gene expression, the AOB denitrification pathway includes NIR that reduces NO 2 − to NO and NOR that reduces NO to N 2 O (Kozlowski et al., 2016b).Studies on bacteria, such as eutrophic Nitrosomonas europaea, have found that AOB requires NOR activity to convert NO into N 2 O during the processes of nitrification and denitrification, that is, it is not the nitrite reductase gene NirK that is necessary for N 2 O production, but the nitric oxide reductase gene NorB (Kozlowski et al., 2014;Kozlowski et al., 2016a).For oligotrophic AOB and AOA lacking NOR activity, it is more important that abiotic reactions (chemical denitrification) convert NO into N 2 O and discharge it in vitro (Kozlowski et al., 2016a).Recent experiments have proven that N 2 O in PN with higher nitrogen removal efficiency for low C/N wastewater was also produced by mixing biological and abiotic nitrosation (Terada et al., 2017).During the aerobic ammonia oxidation process, extracellular NH 2 OH undergoes a non-biological reaction with substances in the growth medium, which also serves as a pathway for N 2 O conversion (Liu et al., 2017).Previous studies may have underestimated N 2 O emissions caused by non-biological pathways.
The nitrification of AOB is achieved by the membrane-bound enzyme ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) oxidizing ammonia (NH 3 ) to produce NH 2 OH, which is then mediated by the periplasmic enzyme hydroxylamine dehydrogenase (HAO) to produce nitrite.The acidic conditions mentioned earlier (pH < 5) can induce partial inhibition of HAO, and the released NO can be further reduced to N 2 O, thereby enhancing the NH 2 OH oxidation pathway of N 2 O (Jiang and Bakken, 1999).
There remains a research gap regarding the N 2 O emission contribution of AOA in BNR of WWTPs.It is known that both AOA and AOB increase in high ammonium states in soil ecosystems, while AOA dominates in low ammonium states (Hink et al., 2018).The advantages of AOA can be demonstrated under conditions of low ammonium, hypoxia, long SRT, and high temperature, indicating that AOA may promote the generation of N 2 O to a certain extent under these conditions (Wu et al., 2020).However, currently only Castellano-Hinojosa et al. ( 2018) have reported a negative correlation between AOA abundance and N 2 O emissions in four aerobic sludge wastewater treatment plants in Spain.Therefore, they believe that AOA is unlikely to make a significant contribution to N 2 O generation.

Contribution of various factors to N 2 O emissions
For nitrogen removal systems with integrated functions of autotrophic and heterotrophic microorganisms, denitrification is the main contributor to N 2 O emissions.For example, in the SBBR reactor for treating low C/N (=0~1) wastewater, N 2 O emissions from hydroxylamine oxidation, AOB denitrification, and heterotrophic denitrification accounted for 5.4~7.6%,45.2~60.8% and 33.8~47.2% of the total N 2 O emissions, respectively.In reactors with varying C/N ratios, the contribution of denitrification to N 2 O production ranged from 90% to 96%.And with the decreases of the C/N ratios, the total amount of N 2 O in denitrification process increased (Domingo-Felez et al., 2017;Yan et al., 2019;Fang et al., 2020).However, NH 2 OH oxidation and AOB denitrification pathways are primarily found in the PN process (Ni and Yuan, 2015).In the aerobic stage, N 2 O generated by NH 2 OH oxidation accounts for 65% of the total N 2 O, and the N 2 O generated by AOB denitrification in the later stage is nearly identical to that generated by NH 2 OH oxidation (Rathnayake et al., 2013).In addition, N 2 O emissions from non-biological pathways account for 1.1% of the TN load (Soler-Jofra et al., 2016;Liu et al., 2018).
In the partial nitrification-anammox (PN/A) process, which enhances denitrification performance, anammox process also emits a small amount of N 2 O in addition to the contribution of PN.The most probable N 2 O emission path involves heterotrophic denitrification in anammox particles (Okabe et al., 2011).The research showed that in the primary PN/A particle reactor, 70% of N 2 O emissions occurred in the aerobic surface area dominated by AOB, and 30% occurred in the anoxic area dominated by anammox, and NH 2 OH oxidation and AOB denitrification had a similar proportion of contributions to N 2 O emissions from AOB related pathways (Ali et al., 2016).In the full-size two-stage PN/A reactor, N 2 O emissions in PN stage were high (1.2% of TN load ), and the emission source could be located in HD (Hausherr et al., 2022).Due to the fact that the majority of N 2 O (approximately 97.5%) was emitted by PN units, the emissions of N 2 O from anammox could be almost negligible (Desloover et al., 2011;Okabe et al., 2011) (Figure 1B).In addition, for the monopolar anaerobic nitrogen removal process dominated by Anammox, the batch experiment of 15 N isotope tracing and specific inhibitors demonstrated that when nitrite was the main nitrogen source, the N 2 O emissions of HD and AOB denitrification were 64% and 36%, respectively (Li et al., 2017).
Under aerobic conditions, little research is available on enzymebased N 2 O metabolism.The primary metabolic pathway of N 2 O is HD, with the majority of escaping N 2 O originating from AOB.This indicates that the rate of N 2 O consumption by HB is lower than that of N 2 O production by AOB, which is the main reason for N 2 O emission from aerobic phase (Yang et al., 2021).In SBR with intermittent aeration, it is also found that AOB denitrification is the main way to produce N 2 O, and HD is the sink of N 2 O (Liu et al., 2021a).
Due to the unclear correlation between microbial community abundance and N 2 O generation contribution, it is challenging to make a unified and clear judgment on the N 2 O generation mechanism under different denitrification processes for urban wastewater with low C/N ratios.Future research needs to start from multiple factors such as microbial community structure, N 2 O metabolic characteristics, enzyme activity, and more in-depth consideration of various N 2 O production pathways and their representative microbial contributions, in order to lay a solid scientific foundation for proposing N 2 O emission reduction strategies for low C/N wastewater treatment.In terms of methodological applications, emerging single cell metabolic phenotypes can be considered, whose single cell Raman spectroscopy (SCRS) can identify and select individual cells or functional bacterial populations (Jones et al., 2019;Liu et al., 2022), enabling in situ functional analysis.The key relationship between phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity of PAO populations in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) systems and the stability of the EBPR process has been investigated using SCRS, which cannot be solely determined through phylogenetic analysis (Li et al., 2018).Practical experience has shown that SCRS can be widely applied in the fields of biology and environment, addressing key limitations related to omicscentered environmental ecological research methods, such as a lack of cell-level resolution and limited capacity to infer gene functional relationships, especially for highly diverse and featureless ecosystems (Wang et al., 2020).If relevant cuttingedge technologies are employed to directly correspond different bacterial communities and their N 2 O production and reduction functions, it could provide a better understanding of the N 2 O metabolism mechanism in BNR systems.

N 2 O emission reduction strategy of traditional biological nitrogen removal process
The traditional BNR process, represented by complete nitrification/denitrification and PN-D, has been widely used in WWTPs.For the treatment of urban wastewater with low C/N, most efforts still focus on upgrading and renovating existing WWTPs.Therefore, it is particularly important to optimize emission reduction measures based on the N 2 O emission characteristics of low C/N wastewater for practical applications.

Carbon source dosing
For the denitrification process in SBR reactors, the N 2 O production characteristics of microbial systems established on different carbon sources vary.Lack of oxygen inhibits the production of NAR in the methanol carbon source system, leading to reduced N 2 O production in the anoxic and subsequent aerobic stages.However, in a carbon source system where ethanol is used, NAR is more resistant to oxygen limitations.The downstream N 2 OR is more sensitive to hypoxia and inhibition than other denitrification enzymes (Korner and Zumft, 1989), which makes N 2 O generated and accumulated in the subsequent aerobic stage.The above differences may be related to the distinct composition of microbial communities established by methanol and ethanol.Therefore, in the practical operation of WWTPs, strict control of ethanol addition to the anoxic zone is required to minimize the production and discharge of N 2 O in the downstream aerobic zone.For the modified Ludzak Ettinger (MLE) processes dominated by denitrification, changing the carbon source from methanol to acetate can reduce the N 2 O conversion rate from 3.0% to 1.0%, and the N 2 O reduction rate of acetate biomass is higher than that of methanol biomass (Table 2).The disparity in N 2 O reduction rate could be attributed to different bacterial communities enriched with different carbon sources (Song et al., 2015).Then some scholars used methanol, sodium acetate and glucose as external carbon sources to optimize C/N of denitrification biofilter.Through comprehensive comparison, it is also confirmed that sodium acetate is more suitable as an external carbon source (Xu et al., 2018).
Compared with one-time dosing, incremental addition of carbon sources enhanced nitrogen removal efficiency and could serve as a strategy for highly automated wastewater treatment systems to reduce N 2 O emissions (Chai et al., 2019).Furthermore, within the cyclic activated sludge system (CASS), consistent feeding can improve denitrification efficiency and decrease N 2 O emissions as compared to intermittent feeding.The carbon source in the continuous feeding alleviates the electronic competition between denitrification reductases in the non-aeration stage (Richardson et al., 2009).From a microbial community perspective, the continuous feeding system exhibits a high abundance of N 2 O reducing bacteria within the denitrification bacteria (Liang et al., 2015).There are significant differences in N 2 O emission reduction strategies among the different processes mentioned above, therefore, when designing emission reduction plans, it is necessary to optimize the design by categorizing the processes.This indicates that the substitution and addition strategy of additional carbon sources can improve the C/N ratio of wastewater, thereby enhancing denitrification efficiency while reducing N 2 O.It is a straightforward and more cost-effective strategy for reducing emissions in WWTPs.
In the combined denitrification process of CANON and denitrification, an appropriate carbon source (C/N = 1) could decrease the total N 2 O production by 16.7% compared to C/N = 0.This was due to the inhibition of the AOB denitrification process that consumed NO 2 − -N, which accounted for over 94.5% of N 2 O emissions (Yan et al., 2019).Based on the N 2 O emissions of wastewater with low C/N from various processes in Chapter 2, there are significant differences in carbon source dosage and C/N ratio for different processes to achieve emission reduction effects (Figure 4A).For the CANON system, primarily composed of autotrophic microorganisms, adding a small amount of carbon source with C/N ratio of 1 could achieve a significant reduction in N 2 O emission.If a large amount of carbon source (C/N > 1) is added, the heterotrophic NOB activity cannot be inhibited, disrupting the stability of the system (Zhang et al., 2017;Yan et al., 2019).Specifically, due to the predominance of autotrophic denitrification bacteria in this process, the main carbon source required is IC.Considering the weak inhibitory effect of IC/N on AOB activity and the strong inhibitory effect on anammox activity, some studies have shown that using influent with a C/N range of 1.2 to 1.5-2.0 in CANON can achieve stable denitrification effects (Zhang X J et al., 2016;Yue et al., 2018).This indirectly indicates that the CANON process is suitable for treating low C/N wastewater, but the relationship between N 2 O emissions and IC concentration requires further exploration.
In the CANDO that also eliminates NO 2 − , when the COD/N ratio increases to 5, the N 2 O yield decreases and the nitrogen removal rate increases compared to C/N = 3 or 4 (Weissbach et al., 2018).Considering the reduction of nitrogen removal efficiency, enzyme activity, and N 2 O emissions, it is more feasible to maintain the influent C/N of A/O SBR at around 6.5 (Yang et al., 2021).Similarly, in another anoxic aerobic BNR experiment, step feeding and additional carbon sources allow AOB (Nitrosomonas) to mitigate the denitrification effect of nitrifying bacteria, thereby reducing the N 2 O conversion rate by 66.6% and 12.0%, respectively, indicating that these two methods are effective in reducing N 2 O emissions during sewage treatment (Hu et al., 2013b).
In addition, for the system that simultaneously removes nitrogen and phosphorus, setting the C/N ratio to 4 will result in a minimum N 2 O conversion rate and an ideal nitrogen removal efficiency of 98.3%, but only 27.44% phosphorus can be removed.The phosphorus removal efficiency will reach the optimal value of 82.79% when C/N = 3.This also inspires future research on actual wastewater denitrification to consider the synergistic effects of multiple pollutants removal and N 2 O emission reduction (Ge et al., 2018).

Operating conditions
In the BNR process, the optimization of operating parameters is the key to reducing N 2 O emissions.In the treatment of low C/N (=6) wastewater, compared to continuous aeration, intermittent aeration had a higher TN removal efficiency (93.5% on average), and the N 2 O emission factor decreased from 0.42% of continuous aeration to 0.19%, which promoted PN-D.Among them, the complete ammonia oxidizer (comammox) was significantly enriched during intermittent aeration, and the quantitative results showed that their gene abundance reached 24.7%;The abundance of AOB bacteria significantly decreased (Liu et al., 2021a).Comammox lacks NO reductase, and nonbiotransformation emits much less N 2 O than AOB, showcasing its potential for reducing N 2 O emissions (Liu et al., 2017;Kits et al., 2019).Conversely, during the operation of the PN/A process, a transition from low aeration (or hypoxia) to high aeration will quickly increase the N 2 O emission rate, while increased continuous aeration will reduce the emission rate, proving that the continuous aeration strategy is effective in reducing N 2 O emissions in PN/A (Figure 4B) (Castro-Barros et al., 2015).
In the A 2 /O process, for actual domestic wastewater with low C/N (=4.4), when the internal circulation ratio of the process is reduced from 300% to 100%, the production of N 2 O increases from 9.81 × 10 −2 mg/L reduced to 3.47 × 10 −2 mg/L (Figure 4C).The primary reduction occurs in the form of N 2 O produced by denitrification in anoxic section.This phenomenon is due to the reduction of the volume of internal circulating liquid and the reduction of nitrate substrate and oxygen that can be used for denitrification.As mentioned in Chapter 4.1, N 2 OR is more sensitive to oxygen, thus, enhancing the activity of N 2 OR entering the anoxic zone, making it more conducive to the denitrification process of reducing N 2 O to N 2 .Experimental evidence indicated that the copy number of nosZ gene increased as the internal circulation ratio decreased from 300% to 100% (Yan et al., 2016).
In addition, electrical stimulation can optimize microbial population structure and enhance microbial autotrophic denitrification (Figure 4D).At the same time, the activity of NAR and NIR is increased to promote denitrification, so as to improve the removal efficiency of NO 3 − and reduce the accumulation of N 2 O.The removal rate of nitrate and TN can be increased by 20%, and the production of intermediate greenhouse gas N 2 O can be reduced by 62.6% when weak electric stimulation (0.2V) is added to the denitrification process of influent C/N = 3 (Dong et al., 2022).
This research suggests that future N 2 O emission reduction strategies can be developed based on N 2 O metabolism mechanisms, such as identifying operating conditions that promote N 2 OR activity or nosZ transcription initiation.
At present, more studies on BNR and N 2 O emission reduction only investigate the effects of individual parameters on emissions, making it difficult to compare the specific effects and overall impacts of various operating conditions.In light of this limitation, researchers have employed Plackett Burman (PB) multi-factor experimental design and response surface methodology (RSM) to explore emission reduction strategies for N 2 O in nitrifying granular sludge systems.The analysis revealed that at a temperature of 22.3 °C, the pH value of 7.1, and the aeration rate of 0.20 m 3 /h, the N 2 O emission during the denitrification process is minimal.The predicted results were confirmed using wastewater with COD/ NH 4 + = 5/3 (Liu et al., 2016).

Facility enhancement 4.3.1 Oxidation ditch system
In the complete nitrification/denitrification process, the N 2 O emission reduction effect in the BNR process related to oxidation ditch is very significant.In Carrousel oxidation ditch and related pre-anaerobic processes, for influent with C/N ratios of 2.57-5, N 2 O emissions were as low as 0.027%-0.14% of influent nitrogen (Table 3), which was significantly lower than in other complete nitrification and denitrification processes (Ren et al., 2013;Zheng et al., 2015), of which approximately 90% is attributed to nitrification and denitrification.And research on the impact of COD/N on its N 2 O emission characteristics showed that at lower COD/N ratio of 5, the N 2 O emission factor could reach a maximum value of 0.142%, which was higher than the 0.055% at a COD/N ratio of 7 (Zheng et al., 2021).Even though low C/N inflow can promote N 2 O emissions, the oxidation ditch system still plays a significant role in reducing emissions.
The primary reason why this process can reduce N 2 O emissions is that it can enrich the denitrification bacteria and NOB with a high abundance, which have lower N 2 O emissions (Zheng et al., 2015).However, further evaluation is necessary to determine the emission reduction potential of the process based on the actual operating mode.When the normal operation of the oxidation ditch system is impacted by ammonia overload or aeration failure, the production of N 2 O could significantly increase.Further optimization of operating conditions could also impact N 2 O emissions from the pilot oxidation ditch.The study found that properly extending the SRT to 25 days or immobilizing the aerobic denitrification bacteria PCN-1 on the polyurethane biological carrier to biologically strengthen the oxidation ditch can enrich more comammox belonging to Nitrospira in the system, effectively avoid the accumulation of NO 2 − , and the system will also express more abundant N 2 O reductase to achieve N 2 O emission reduction (Zhou et al., 2019;Tian et al., 2021).

Biofilm system
Biofilm systems can improve the efficiency of BNR, thereby reducing N 2 O emissions.For example, in a pilot-scale UCT (University of Cape Town) MBR reactor, when treating wastewater with a C/N ratio of 5, the average N 2 O discharge amounts to 0.5% of the influent nitrogen.The enhanced nitrogen removal efficiency of biofilm may be attributed to the coexistence of suspended and attached biomass, as well as the increased richness and diversity of biological communities, which enhance the nitrification and denitrification performance (Eldyasti et al., 2010;Mannina et al., 2018a;Sun et al., 2019).N 2 O can be produced during the oxidation of hydroxylamine and the reduction of nitrite.Due to the mediation and strong influence of microorganisms diffusing within and outside the biofilm on the process area, the thickness of the biofilm has a certain contribution to N 2 O emissions.In the denitrification fluidized bed bioreactor (DFBBR), at a COD/N ratio of 5, the N 2 O conversion rate of the DFBBR system with a biofilm thickness of 680 μm was 0.53% of the total influent nitrogen load, and when the biofilm thickness was 230 μm, the N 2 O conversion rate increased to 0.95%.The sevenfold increase in the concentration of liquid nitrite indicated that the increase in emissions was due to the limited reduction rate of NO 3 − to NO 2 − in thinner biofilms.
Therefore, increasing the thickness of the biofilm can reduce N 2 O emissions in granular biofilm processes (Eldyasti et al., 2014).
The biofilm system also promotes the formation of flocs within the system.The flocs of the denitrifying biofilm/flocs system can effectively reduce the total N 2 O accumulation by 32%.The flocs also promote a high proportion of electron distribution to N 2 OR, indicating that the flocs have strong N 2 O reduction ability (Liu Y R et al., 2023).
In addition, incorporating anoxic carrier biofilm in to actual WWTPs can facilitate in-situ enrichment of anammox and enhance the nitrogen removal efficiency of urban WWTPs.This process has been studied for treating urban wastewater with COD/N ratios ranging from 1.2 to 7.9.The proportion of N 2 O emissions (liquid and gaseous) from the anoxic zone to nitrogen loss is less than 0.08%.With the extension of reaction time, the proportion of N 2 O emissions to nitrogen loss further decreased to <0.02%, and the N 2 O conversion rate was significantly lower than the traditional denitrification process summarized in this article.This indicated that the addition of anammox could help reduce N 2 O emissions in BNR (Li et al., 2019).
5 New biological nitrogen removal process suitable for low C/N ratio wastewater to reduce N 2 O emissions 5.1 Anammox based processes

PN/A or PD/A process
Based on Section 2.3, it can be seen that the average N 2 O emission level of anammox related processes in treating urban wastewater is lower than that of traditional BNR processes.However, the combination of processes and operating conditions also significantly influence the N 2 O conversion rate.In combined processes, such as PN/A and partial denitrification/anammox (PD/ A), N 2 O accumulation is more significant.When the two-stage PN/ A process was employed to treat high ammonium synthesis wastewater or low C/N mainstream wastewater, the comprehensive N 2 O conversion rate ranged from 4.1% to 6.6%, with most of the emissions being contributed by the PN unit (Desloover et al., 2011;Okabe et al., 2011;Li L et al., 2020).The comprehensive discharge of unipolar PN/A when treating urban wastewater accounted for 0.35%-2.00% of the influent nitrogen load, thereby enhancing the N 2 O emission reduction performance to some extent (Ali et al., 2016;Yang et al., 2016;Zhou et al., 2020).
Summarizing multiple studies, it has been observed that the PD/ A process can achieve stable denitrification of mainstream wastewater with C/N ranging from 1.77 to 3.4 (Zhang et al., 2019).Comparing this process reveals that the maximum cumulative amount of N 2 O is 2.4% of influent nitrogen, which is lower than the traditional BNR or two-stage PN/A process (Du et al., 2020;Gao et al., 2022).The PN/A or PD/A combination process can help reduce N 2 O emissions during BNR of low C/N wastewater.

Unipolar anammox
Although there are anammox, nitrifying bacteria and denitrification bacteria in the unipolar anammox system, the abundance of anammox is the highest, and the theoretical N 2 O emission value is low.The experiment showed that when treating wastewater with a C/N of 0.3~1.4,the production of N 2 O was directly proportional to the filtration rate, with the N 2 O emission factor increasing from 0.012% at 1.0 m/h to 0.496% at 3.0 m/h.When the filtration rate was 1.5 m/h, both the removal rates of NH 4 + -N and NO 2 − -N reached 99%, and the N 2 O concentration was minimal.These conditions can be considered as the optimal reference for the process (Li et al., 2022).

Feammox
Iron based materials enhancing BNR are considered one of the potential methods for effectively treating low C/N ratio wastewater.And feammox is a novel BNR process that combines anammox with Fe(III) reduction.Feammox can utilize Fe (III) instead of NO 2 − -N as the electron acceptor to reduce NH 4 + -N to N 2 , NO 2 − -N and NO 3 − -N through microorganisms (Peng et al., 2021).Therefore, the theoretical avoidance of N 2 O producing from denitrification is achieved.The feammox process has been demonstrated to be applicable for low C/N wastewater treatment.The feammox process operating in the Multistage Feammox Bioreactor (MSFB) can effectively treat actual anaerobic digestion (AD) wastewater.When the C/N ratio was 2.5, the AD effluent performance of the reactor exhibited the best, with a TN removal rate of 99% (Nguyen et al., 2023).
During the batch test of feammox, it was detected that the total N 2 O production was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than N 2 , and N 2 O emissions were beneath the detection limit, thereby confirming the potential to reduce N 2 O emissions (Zhou et al., 2016).However, in practical wastewater treatment, there remains a dearth of monitoring N 2 O emissions within the feammox system and the analysis of the impact of iron on N 2 O metabolic pathways.

Denitrification anaerobic methane oxidation coupled with anammox process (DAMO-A)
In 2006, Islas-Lima S and Raghoebarsing found and obtained the concentration of n-DAMO for the first time.The n-DAMO group can be mainly divided into the DAMO archaea system of ANME-2d and the n-DAMO bacteria within the NC10 phylum.CH 4 can serve as the carbon source to facilitate the denitrification process, convertingNO 3 -to NO 2 − and NO 2 − to N 2 , respectively (Islas-Lima et al., 2004;Raghoebarsing et al., 2006).When co-cultured with anammox, a DAMO-A process can be formed.N-DAMO microorganisms are capable of oxidizing methane and releasing electrons during the reverse process of methane production.These electrons can be utilized as donors for denitrification, ultimately converting CH 4 into CO 2 .Additionally, anammox will transform the generated NO 2 − and NH 4 + into N 2 (Haroon et al., 2013).The reaction scheme of the system is as follows: The coupling process is an autotrophic system, and the functional microbial community n-DAMO and anammox mainly utilize inorganic carbon sources.Therefore, the low COD/N ratio of the influent should not affect the BNR performance, as it minimizes the likelihood of N 2 O generation through denitrification.Moreover, this process can simultaneously reduce CH 4 and N 2 O emissions, offering a synergistic effects of pollution reduction and carbon reduction, making it a promising choice for future green innovations in WWTPs.
However, limited systematic research exists on the emission and mechanism of N 2 O within the DAMO-A system.In 2015, it was reported that N 2 O was undetectable in the reactor on the 53rd, 115th, 199th, and 260th day (data not shown) (Hu et al., 2015).In 2019, researchers developed a new technology in MBfR that integrates PN, anammox, and methane dependent nitrite/nitrate reduction reactions, which can be abbreviated as PNAM process.The average TN removal rate achieved by this process was 98%, with a N 2 O emission factor of 0.34%, which is more likely related to AOB metabolism (Liu et al., 2019;Nie et al., 2020;Liu et al., 2021b).However, some scholars have pointed out that NC10 bacteria have a potential pathway to reduce NO to N 2 O, and the conversion rate of N 2 O is related to the external NO 2 − concentration and the nonspecific oxidation process of NH 4 + (Nie et al., 2019).Moreover, the genome of the DAMO-A system contains the gene of N 2 OR enzyme (Figure 5), but the specific role of this enzyme in the in-situ N 2 O conversion rate of the system has not been explored (Cogert et al., 2019).Therefore, in the future, it is still necessary to further quantify the gas emissions from this process in urban mainstream wastewater treatment, determine the N 2 O emission factors and its metabolic pathway of DAMO-A related BNR processes, and evaluate their comprehensive GHG emission reduction effects of eliminating CH 4 and reducing N 2 O.

Sludge-derived hydrochar (SDHC)
Recycling Sludge-derived hydrochar (SDHC) enhances the denitrification effect of secondary effluent from WWTPs with low C/N and reduce N 2 O emissions.When C/N ranges from 3.0 to 3.2, the nitrogen removal rate (NRR) in the enhanced denitrification process DN-SDHC is 3.6 times higher than that of denitrification alone (DN).The high conductivity of SDHC accelerates the extracellular electron transfer from the carbon source to denitrification bacteria.SDHC also promotes a significant increase in the nosZ gene encoding N 2 OR, which is beneficial for reducing N 2 O accumulation (Hao et al., 2022).

New strains used to strengthen BNR process
Aerobic environments are usually not conducive to reducing N 2 O emissions in WWTPs.Researchers have isolated a new strain Pseudomonas sp.YR02 that can reduce N 2 O under aerobic conditions.The successful amplification of four denitrification genes proved its complete denitrification ability.YR02 exhibited excellent performance in treating wastewater with high ammonia nitrogen and dissolved N 2 O.Although the strain achieves maximum inorganic nitrogen (IN) removal efficiency (>98%) under higher C/N conditions (C/N = 15), it was more conducive at reducing N 2 O emissions when the C/N ratio is 5. YR02 could reduce N 2 O emissions by 98.7% and increase NRE by 32% in WWTPs, demonstrating its potential for alleviating N 2 O emissions (Wang et al., 2023).
Pseudomonas sp.GZWN4, another species of the same genus, exhibits excellent aerobic denitrification performance across a wide range of C/N ratios for 5 to 20.This strain was isolated from seaweed aquaculture wastewater and is suitable for enhancing the treatment of ordinary or saline aquaculture water.GZWN4 carries the nosZ gene, indicating its ability to reduce N 2 O (Su et al., 2021).In addition, Achromobacter sp.HNDS-1 and Enterobacter sp.HNDS-6possess Nxr, narG, nirK, norB, and nosZ genes involved in the denitrification pathway, allowing them to effectively remove mixed nitrogen under C/N = 5 conditions.However, the N 2 O emission reduction effects of these three strains in actual sewage treatment have not been evaluated (Liu X et al., 2023).
For environments with low C/N ratios, Bacillus thuringiensis strain WXN-23, isolated from aquaculture filtrate, has stronger adaptability.Batch tests showed that the bacterium can achieve a TN removal rate of 95.996% at a C/N ratio of 5.91.Moreover, it has a relatively complete nitrification and denitrification pathway (NH 4 (Xu et al., 2021), which promotes N 2 O reduction.Therefore, strain WXN-23 holds potential as a powerful strain for enhancing the green process in low C/N wastewater treatment.
Adding new bacterial strains to existing processes to enhance BNR performance has emerged as a research hotspot in recent years.Many new strains are isolated from environmental systems, sludge, or sewage treatment facilities and optimized for cultivation conditions.Before applying new bacterial strains, it is essential to assess their safety.There have been reports indicating that certain bacteria can produce hemolysin, which can cause toxic effects like cell membrane damage and lysis (Mogrovejo et al., 2020;Su et al., 2021).The presence of hemolysin production in a strain can serve as a crucial criterion for evaluating its safety.
However, if we want to apply this approach to enhance the process of sewage treatment plants and solve the problem of N 2 O emission reduction in low C/N wastewater, more in-depth experiments and research are still needed.For example, how to better maintain the strain in the system without loss with effluent.In actual sewage, there is a presence of diverse organisms, including predatory protozoa and phage, which can hinder the survival of introduced strains and potentially lead to the failure of bioaugmentation (Ma et al., 2022).To address this challenge, it is possible to select specific strains with BNR capabilities, such as the denitrifying strain Alcaligenes aquatilis AS1 (Cao et al., 2023).These strains can help enhance the interaction within microbial networks and promote the stability of microbial communities.Another approach to ensure the survival of selected strains involves immobilizing them using gel particles or other immobilized redox mediator granules (IRMG), which prevents competitioninduced destruction.The application of this biological immobilization technology can enhance the survival capacity of the strains (Han et al., 2021;Shi et al., 2022;Sun et al., 2023).It is also important that the majority of aerobic denitrification strains thrive in environments with an ample carbon source.Therefore, when evaluating the trade-off between NRE and the reduction of N 2 O emissions in low C/N environments, this factor must be taken into account.

Conclusion
Based on the characteristics of biological nitrogen removal (BNR) processes, such as complete nitrification/denitrification, partial nitrification/denitrification, and anammox, it has been observed that treating domestic wastewater with a generally low C/N ratio leads to higher N 2 O emissions.The insufficient carbon sources and a low carbon loading rate in low C/N wastewater intensify the competition among denitrification enzymes, affecting the production and consumption of N 2 O and resulting in its accumulation.Additionally, the limitation of inorganic carbon (IC) in autotrophic nitrification/denitrification systems restricts the oxidation activity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) towards NH 4 + and contributes to increased N 2 O emissions.To effectively reduce N 2 O emissions in low C/N wastewater, adjusting the type or dosage of the carbon source has proven to be effective.Furthermore, during the upgrade process of sewage treatment plants, comprehensive optimization of aeration methods, internal circulation ratio, and other conditions, as well as the implementation of oxidation ditch systems and biofilm systems, can be implemented to reduce N 2 O emissions.The development of new BNR processes, particularly autotrophic anammox-related processes such as unipolar PN/A, PD/A, unipolar Anammox, and Feammox, shows promise in reducing the demand for organic carbon and achieving deep denitrification and N 2 O emission reduction in low C/N wastewater.Notably, the DAMO-A system can utilize CH 4 while reducing N 2 O production.However, there is still a lack of systematic research on the emission factors and metabolic mechanisms of N 2 O in these processes, which would provide theoretical support for emission reduction.

Future outlook
The perspective of this review focuses on N 2 O emission reduction through BNR of low C/N wastewater.We have proposed some directions and suggestions to enhance our understanding and develop solutions for mitigating N 2 O emissions in low C/N wastewater: consideration should be given to the economic and costeffectiveness of measures such as adding carbon sources and changing feeding methods.These measures should not only provide environmental benefits but also be evaluated in terms of emission reduction scenarios, such as carbon footprint.Conducting a comprehensive review of emission reduction plans will facilitate their practical application.• Further investigation into novel processes, such as the unipolar and two-stage systems driven by Anammox, is warranted.Of particular interest is the DAMO-A process, which has the potential to simultaneously reduce CH 4 and N 2 O emissions.This process mainly focuses on autotrophic DAMO microorganisms and Anammox bacteria.In the future, rapid enrichment methods need to be developed to explore their N 2 O emission levels and mechanisms as application support.
In summary, the scientific issues addressed in this article are of great significance in the context of global warming.As an essential aspect of sustainable social development, sewage treatment must strive to achieve the objective of coordinated pollution reduction and carbon reduction.For urban wastewater that has large displacement, we need to pay attention to the powerful influencing factors of its low C/N ratio, and further analyze the impact and mechanism of this characteristic on N 2 O emissions in the BNR process.Research should not be limited solely to monitoring emissions on a macro-scale.In order to address this challenging issue, it is necessary to develop more robust functional analysis methods, surpass the limitations posed by the complexity of environmental microbial systems and various BNR processes, and expand future research in this direction.
FIGURE 1 N 2 O generation and emission in different processes.(A) Complete nitrification/denitrification (A 2 /O); (B) Partial nitrification/ anammox (PN/A).The proportions of N 2 O emissions from each reactor depicted in the figure are average values based on measured values found in the relevant literature (refer to Tables1-3).It is important to note that these estimates are provided for reference purposes only.

FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2The Mechanism of carbon source regulating nitrogen metabolism in heterotrophic denitrification.

FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3The main pathway of N 2 O emission and the role of carbon sources in autotrophic nitrification/denitrification.

FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4 Optimization of process strategies for reducing N 2 O emissions in low C/N wastewater.(A) Carbon source regulation; (B) Aeration; (C) Internal recycle rate; (D) Weak electrical stimulation.

FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5Carbon and nitrogen conversion process of DAMO-A.Solid line: a known process, dashed line: an unproven and possibly existing process.

TABLE 1
Summary of N 2 O emissions and denitrification efficiency of wastewater with lower and higher C/N ratios in BNR processes.

TABLE 1 (
Continued) Summary of N 2 O emissions and denitrification efficiency of wastewater with lower and higher C/N ratios in BNR processes.

TABLE 1 (
Continued) Summary of N 2 O emissions and denitrification efficiency of wastewater with lower and higher C/N ratios in BNR processes.

TABLE 2
Optimization strategies for N 2 O emission reduction operation of various BNR processes for low C/N wastewater treatment.

TABLE 3
New system/process to reduce N 2 O emissions in BNR of low C/N wastewater.

•
Develop N 2 O emission evaluation indicators for WWTPs or BNR processes.This includes measuring the N 2 O conversion rate of the process and establishing standardized measurement methods for different nitrogen-based unit conversion rates.Additionally scientific methods should be established to compare the effectiveness of N 2 O emission reduction strategies across different processes.• Explore the application of emerging methodologies such as SCRS in studying microbial N 2 O metabolism.This approach can help analyze the N 2 O production and reduction functions of individual functional microbial communities in complex microbial systems involved in BNR.It is advisable to consider multiple factors such as microbial community structure, N 2 O metabolic characteristics, the relationship between electricity competition caused by carbon source limitation and enzyme activity.More in-depth consideration of various N 2 O production pathways and the contributions of representative microorganisms should be formed to address the limitations of N 2 O metabolism research in low C/N wastewater treatment.• When proposing N 2 O emission reduction strategies, more