Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 28 March 2024
Sec. Synthetic Biology
Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1378873

Genome reduction in Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365 for chassis development

  • 1Institute of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
  • 2Institute of Bio-and Geosciences, IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
  • 3Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology and Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • 4Department of Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

The demand for highly robust and metabolically versatile microbes is of utmost importance for replacing fossil-based processes with biotechnological ones. Such an example is the implementation of Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365 as a novel platform organism for the production of value-added products such as 2,3-butanediol or exopolysaccharides. For this, a complete genome sequence is the first requirement towards further developing this host towards a microbial chassis. A genome sequencing project has just been reported for P. polymyxa DSM 365 showing a size of 5,788,318 bp with a total of 47 contigs. Herein, we report the first complete genome sequence of P. polymyxa DSM 365, which consists of 5,889,536 bp with 45 RNAs, 106 tRNAs, 5,370 coding sequences and an average GC content of 45.6%, resulting in a closed genome of P. polymyxa 365. The additional nucleotide data revealed a novel NRPS synthetase that may contribute to the production of tridecaptin. Building on these findings, we initiated the top-down construction of a chassis variant of P. polymyxa. In the first stage, single knock-out mutants of non-essential genomic regions were created and evaluated for their biological fitness. As a result, two out of 18 variants showed impaired growth. The remaining deletion mutants were combined in two genome-reduced P. polymyxa variants which either lack the production of endogenous biosynthetic gene clusters (GR1) or non-essential genomic regions including the insertion sequence ISPap1 (GR2), with a decrease of the native genome of 3.0% and 0.6%, respectively. Both variants, GR1 and GR2, showed identical growth characteristics to the wild-type. Endpoint titers of 2,3-butanediol and EPS production were also unaffected, validating these genome-reduced strains as suitable for further genetic engineering.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of biotechnology, the demand for new and unconventional microbial systems with sophisticated properties compared to established model organisms greatly increased (Blombach et al., 2021). Optimisations, to reach industrially relevant product titers and efficiencies, are of the highest interest. Genome reduction, using top-down strategies, is regarded as a valuable tool for the construction of future chassis for bio-based productions (LeBlanc and Charles, 2022). Many studies have shown several advantages such as improved product formation, minimised wasted energy, reduced complexity and simplified metabolic background, facilitating product identification or purification. The deletion of 15 native antibiotic gene clusters in Streptomyces albus improved the production of five heterologous expressed biosynthetic gene clusters of around 2-fold compared to the parent strain (Myronovskyi et al., 2018). In Pseudomonas chlororaphis the deletion of five antibiotic gene clusters and other 17 non-essential regions resulted in the increased production of the native phenazines, such as 4.4-fold higher 2-hydroxyphenazine (Shen et al., 2017). A genome-reduced Bacillus subtilis was engineered for the production of guanosine and thymidine showing 4.4-fold and 5.2-fold increases, respectively (Li et al., 2016). The latter study demonstrates how genome-reduced strains can be further genetically engineered for a specific product showing better traits than the parental strain. Unthan et al. also initially constructed several Corynebacterium glutamicum streamlined chassis which displayed a normal growth behaviour (Unthan et al., 2015). Further modifications resulted in C1* chassis that was then successfully engineered for the production of indole due to its higher tolerance towards this product compared to the WT (Baumgart et al., 2018; Mindt et al., 2022; Mindt et al., 2023).

Another advantage of genome reduction is the enhancement of genetic stability through the deletion of insertion sequences (IS) and prophages (Baumgart et al., 2013; Choi et al., 2015; Umenhoffer et al., 2017). Insertion sequences are well-known mobile elements which encode for transposase genes, capable of spreading to high relevance within a genome, strongly impacting genomic structure and function (Siguier et al., 2015). Choi et al. improved a C. glutamicum production strain by deleting two active IS elements, increasing the productivity and yield of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) and γ-aminobutyrate (Choi et al., 2015). The deletion of six copies of IS1236 in Acinetobacter baylyi enabled a 21-fold reduction of mutation rates and increased transformability (Suárez et al., 2017). Similarly, Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense deprived of IS elements displayed increased genetic stability and resilience, while maintaining normal growth behaviour and magnetosome production (Zwiener et al., 2021).

Paenibacillus polymyxa is a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic, non-pathogenic soil bacterium, mostly known for its use as a biocontrol agent and biofertilizer (Jeong et al., 2019). In particular, P. polymyxa DSM 365 has great potential as a new unconventional cell factory since various efficient tools for genetic and genomic engineering are established and it offers a broad native metabolic capability (production of antimicrobials and commercially relevant compounds, e.g., R,R-2,3-butanediol and exopolysaccharides) (Rütering et al., 2016, 2017; Schilling et al., 2020; Schilling et al.2021; Schilling et al., 2022; Schilling et al., 2023; Blombach et al., 2021; Meliawati et al., 2022b; Meliawati et al., 2022a). To significantly advance research towards a future chassis organism the completion of the published draft genome sequence was essential. Especially, for the targeted design of a streamlined genome by the use of the CRISPR-Cas technology.

In this study, we completed the genome sequence of P. polymyxa DSM 365 which enabled the identification of an unknown Non-Ribosomal Peptide Synthase (NRPS) and helped define deletion targets for the final construction of two genome-reduced strains. This research aimed to construct two platform strains for biotechnological application with reduced metabolic complexity and genetic instability while maintaining the physiological behaviour of the wild-type (WT). We first investigate the physiological effect of deleting single targets, through the assessment of the growth rate, an easily measurable parameter directly indicating unchanged or altered biological fitness. Finally, we combined the best-performing mutants in two genome-reduced strains, GR1 and GR2. In the controlled environment of a bioreactor, both strains showed a growth and metabolic behaviour comparable to the WT, validating them as future platform strains for industrial bioprocess development.

Materials and methods

Genome sequencing

P. polymyxa DSM 365 was obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Culture (DSMZ), Germany. Genomic DNA was extracted from the strain cultivated at 30°C 250 rpm in LB medium (10 g L-1 peptone, 5 g L-1 yeast extract, and 5 g L-1 NaCl) using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen). Nanopore sequencing was performed on the MinION with the ligation sequencing kit SQK-LSK109 and EXP-NBD104 without pore selection (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) and Illumina sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq kit v3 (Illumina, San Diego, USA). The sequencing data was assembled using Unicycler v0.4.9 (Wick et al., 2017). The genome was then annotated by RAST server online (Aziz et al., 2008) and further analysed using the computational tools: RNAmmer and tRNAscan-SE to identify coding RNAs, BLAST with Rfam database for non-coding RNAs, antiSMASH to determine biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), PHASTER to annotate prophage sequences, ISFinder to annotate insertion sequences and finally Islandviewer to annotate genomic islands (GIs) (Lowe and Eddy, 1997; Siguier et al., 2006; Lagesen et al., 2007; Gardner et al., 2009; Arndt et al., 2016; Blin et al., 2021). Manual curation and homology searching with other Paenibacillus species helped to define specific direct repeats (DRs) as well as inverted repeats (IRs) of each IS element.

Strains

Plasmid cloning and multiplication were performed in Escherichia coli turbo (New England Biolabs, USA) or TOP10 (Invitrogen). E. coli S17-1 (ATCC 47055) was used as a conjugative donor strain to mediate the transfer of plasmid DNA to P. polymyxa. The strains were cultivated in LB medium. For plate media, an additional 1.5% of agar were used. Whenever necessary, the media were supplemented with 50 μg mL-1 neomycin and 40 μg mL-1 polymyxin. The strains were stored as cryo-cultures in 24% glycerol and kept at −80 °C for longer storage.

Plasmid construction

All plasmids generated in this study were constructed by the isothermal assembly and transferred to P. polymyxa via conjugation, as previously described (Meliawati et al., 2022b). The genome modifications were facilitated by the CRISPR-Cas9-based system developed for P. polymyxa (Rütering et al., 2017). In brief, the guide RNA (gRNA) for targeted genome editing was designed by using the Benchling CRISPR design tool. Approximately 0.4–1 kb homologous regions upstream and downstream of the targeted sites were amplified from genomic DNA (gDNA) of P. polymyxa and provided as a repair template. After transformation, screening of the colonies was performed by colony PCR using GoTaq Polymerase (Promega). Subsequently, the plasmids were isolated and sent for sequencing to confirm the correct assembly. Next, chemically competent E. coli S17-1 was transformed with the correctly assembled plasmid for the following conjugational transfer to P. polymyxa. Synthesis of oligonucleotides and sequencing analysis were performed by Microsynth (Germany). In silico plasmid cloning was planned by the use of Geneious prime version 2020.2.5. The list of oligonucleotides and plasmids used in this study is provided in Supplementary Table S1, S2, respectively.

Conjugation

Conjugation was performed between P. polymyxa (recipient strain) and E. coli S17-1 harboring the plasmid of interest (donor strain). The cryo-cultures of both strains were streaked on LB plates containing suitable antibiotics, and if necessary, following overnight liquid cultures were prepared from the colonies obtained on the plates. The overnight cultures were diluted 1:100 in 3 mL LB media, with or without antibiotics, in 13 mL plastic culture tubes. Incubation was performed at 37°C, 250 rpm, for 4 h. Subsequently, 900 µL of the recipient strain was heat shocked at 42°C for 15 min and mixed with 300 µL of the donor culture. The mixture was centrifuged at 8,000 g for 3 min and the supernatant was discarded. The cell pellet was resuspended in 100 µL of LB media and the resuspension was dropped onto an LB agar plate. After overnight incubation at 30°C, the cells were scraped off the plate and resuspended in 100 µL of LB media. Afterwards, the resuspension was plated on an LB agar plate containing 50 μg mL-1 neomycin and 40 μg mL-1 polymyxin. If necessary, the resuspension was diluted with appropriate dilution to obtain countable colonies on the plates. The plate was incubated at 30°C for 48 h to obtain P. polymyxa exconjugants. Screening of the exconjugants was performed by colony PCR and sequencing of the resulting DNA fragments. Plasmid curing was performed by 1:100 diluted subcultivations every 24 h at 37°C.

Quantitative RT-PCR

RNA extraction of positive samples of the GFP fluorescence assay as well as the butanediol fermentation processes was performed using the Aurum Total RNA Mini Kit (BioRad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The synthesis of cDNA was conducted using iScript reverse transcriptase (BioRad) by use of 1 μg of total RNA as a template. The qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate in a CFX-96 thermocycler using SsoAdvanced universal SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad) using 5 ng of cDNA as a template in 10 μL reaction volume. Negative controls without reverse transcriptase during cDNA synthesis were used to evaluate the absence of gDNA contaminations. The relative gene expression levels were calculated based on the ΔΔCq method and gyrA was used as a reference gene (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). After qPCR, a melting curve analysis was performed to confirm the presence of a single PCR product for each target. The designed primers were analyzed by the OligoAnalyzer Tool (IDT) to avoid hairpin formation and self- and heterodimer formation with free energy values of more than 10 kcal mol−1. The oligonucleotides used for qPCR experiments are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Cultivation in microtiterplates

Growth analysis for evaluation of single knock-out mutants was performed in FlowerPlates in a BioLector (m2p-labs, Germany) with a total volume of 1 mL. A single colony was used for the inoculation of 4 mL preculture in 24 deep well plates and grown overnight at 1,000 rpm and 30°C in CASO Broth medium (17 g L-1 casein peptone, 3 g L-1 soy peptone, 5 g L-1 NaCl, 2.5 g L-1 K2HPO4, 2.5 g L-1 glucose). The next day a 1:5 dilution was performed, with a following 2 h incubation at the same conditions, OD600 measurements were then performed to start growth experiments in FlowerPlates at 1,000 rpm, 95% humidity, 30°C, and backscatter (BS) gain 20 with a starting OD600 of 0.1. For subsequent data analysis, each BS curve was first blanked by its initial value.

Batch fermentation

Batch fermentations were conducted in 1 L parallel DASGIP bioreactors (Eppendorf, Germany) with an initial volume of 550 mL fermentation medium from Schilling et al. (Schilling et al., 2020). A single colony from a freshly streaked plate was used to inoculate 100 mL in the pre-culture fermentation medium grown at 30°C with 160 rpm. After overnight incubation, the bioreactors were inoculated from these precultures growing exponentially to an initial OD600 of 0.1. Samples were taken regularly over the course of 48 h for OD600, CDW and metabolite analysis. Fermentation was performed at 35 °C and constant aeration of 0.5 vvm with constant stirring at 300 rpm. The pH value was maintained at 6.0 and automatically adjusted with 2 M NaOH or 1.35 M H3PO4. One % antifoam B (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was used for foam control.

Calculation of specific growth rate

Maximum specific growth rates during exponential growth were calculated from the slope of the semi-logarithmic plot of BS or OD600 against time. The obtained growth rates for all strains were analysed for significant changes compared to reference organisms (WT) with the two-sample t-test (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001).

Analytical methods

Cell growth was determined by measuring optical density at 600 nm (OD600). For cell dry weight (CDW) measurements, 10 mL of fermentation broth was centrifuged at 5,000 g for 20 min in already dried and pre-weight tubes. Cell pellets were washed twice with 0.9% NaCl and dried overnight at 100°C. Culture supernatants were obtained by centrifugation of 1 mL culture sample at 14,000 g for 5 min. After centrifugation, the resulting supernatant was filtered through 0.2 μm PTFE filters and utilized for HPLC-UV-RID analysis. Glucose and product concentrations were determined via a HPLC-UV-RID system (Dionex, USA) equipped with Rezex ROA-H+ organic acid column (300 mm × 7.8 mm, Phenomenex, USA). Column temperature was set to 70°C and 2.5 mM H2SO4 was used as the mobile phase with a flow rate of 0.5 mL min-1 and 40 min run time. EPS concentrations were determined by centrifugation (8.000 g, 15 min) of 100 mL aliquots of fermentation broth at the end of the cultivation process. The supernatant was slowly poured into 200 mL of isopropanol while stirring. Precipitated EPS was collected, and dried over-night in a vacuum oven (45°C and 40 mbar) (Heraeus, Germany) and following gravimetric weight determination.

Results and discussion

Genome sequencing of P. polymyxa DSM 365

The genome consists of a 5,889,536 bp chromosome, with a GC content of 45.6%. The assembled data showed an average coverage of 210.5-fold. Annotation of the genome revealed a total of 5,370 genes. Previously, the genome of P. polymyxa DSM 365 was also sequenced by Neng-Zhong Xie et al. and Kumar et al. Both sequences are presented as 84 and 47 contigs, respectively (Xie et al., 2015; Kumar and Ujor, 2022). The most recently published genome, consisting of 47 contigs, was compared to our sequenced genome. This comparison showed that our latest genome sequence has a higher number of base pairs which is 5,889,536 bp, compared to 5,788,318 bp (Table 1). Many of the contigs of the genome published by Kumar et al. are interrupted by repetitive sequences and a total of 101,218 bp is missing. These additional sequences include the repetitive sequences of rRNAs, tRNAs, NRPSs and IS. This allows the number of the rRNAs to be corrected to 42, compared to the 49 sequences reported previously. Such an overestimation is linked to poorly assembled gene sequences which are spread on different contigs, thus artificially increasing the number of gene copies. The complete genome contains 14 23S, 14 16S and 14 5S rRNA sequences, precisely 42 in total. The number and diversity of tRNAs was also underestimated: a total of 106 tRNAs were found, compared to 104 in the genome published by Kumar et al. In addition, about 23,300 bp of one of the NRPS of the tridecaptin cluster (triD) is missing, together with the sequence of another unknown NRPS of 42,306 bp (Lohans et al., 2014). This unknown NRPS sequence (unrps) piqued our curiosity and we analysed it further.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of genomic features of P. polymyxa DSM 365 genome of this study vs. P. polymyxa DSM 365 genome published by Kumar et al. (Kumar and Ujor, 2022).

Genome mining studies, unravelling a potential role of the unknown NRPS

The gene for the putative NRPS shows protein identities of 90.2% and 100% coverage with TriD, the main NRPS of the tridecaptin cluster. The sequence prediction from the adenylation domains of the unknown NRPS suggests the decapeptide D-Gly-D-Dab-D-Gly-D-Ser-D-Trp-L-Ser-L-Dab-D-Dab-L-Ile-L-Glu, which is the same expected decapeptide of the NRPS of tridecaptin M (TrmD) from Paenibacillus sp. M-152 and of the NRPS of the tridecaptin B (TrbD) from Paenibacillus polymyxa NRRL B-30507 (Cochrane et al., 2015; Jangra et al., 2019). The tridecaptin clusters (A, B and M) are known to present five genes encoding for the synthesis and secretion of the active peptide: triA (a putative thioesterase), triB and triC (ABC transporters), and triD and triE (NRPSs) (Lohans et al., 2014; Cochrane et al., 2015; Jangra et al., 2019). The triD gene encodes for a protein that assembles the first 10 amino acids of tridecaptin. The biosynthesis is then completed with the addition of the last three amino acids by TriE due to the presence of a thioesterase domain (TE). However, the NRPS we identified does not have this cluster of genes nearby. We therefore compared the genome with the genomes of other Paenibacilli, which also have the tridecaptin cluster to analyse if they also have a similar NRPS. To do this, we blasted our NRPS protein against the genomes of P. sp. M-152, Paenibacillus polymyxa CJX518, Paenibacillus polymyxa HY96-2 and Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 (Camacho et al., 2009). In the first two strains, but not in P. polymyxa HY96-2 and P. polymyxa E681, we identified an NRPS with 92.9% protein identities with 100% coverage, an even higher percentage compared to TriD. However, we did not find any conserved genes in the vicinity of the different synthetases, suggesting that there is no nearby gene involved in the synthesis or excretion of the molecules. Furthermore, these NRPSs do not show a thioesterase domain at their 3′-end (Figure 1). Consequently, the termination of the biosynthesis of the peptide is accomplished by either an external thioesterase free-enzyme or by TriE. In the latter case, these NRPS sequences, which present a high similarity with both TriD and TrmD and the synthesized decapeptide, might represent an additional copy required for the synthesis of tridecaptins contributing to tridecaptin´s diversity. To strengthen this hypothesis, we have compared the module 10 of the unknown NRPS with the one of TriD of P. polymyxa DSM 365 and we have found 93.1% protein identities with 100% coverage. Based on that, we consider the modules to be highly similar. To verify the theory of the unknown NRPS playing a role in tridecaptin synthesis, further studies should elucidate the effect of the deletion of the unknown NRPS more in general and on tridecaptin production.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Organization of the nearby genes of the new NRPSs from the genomes of P. polymyxa DSM 365, P. sp. M-152, P. polymyxa CJX518 and tridecaptin cluster from P. sp. M-152, P. polymyxa NRLL B-30507, and P. polymyxa DSM 365. The sequences of their peptide moieties were predicted by bioinformatic evaluation of the A-domains of their amino acid specific modules.

Determination of deletion targets and genome reduction strategies

The closed genome sequence was analysed by the use of different bioinformatic tools (antiSMASH, PHASTER, IslandViewer and ISfinder) (Siguier et al., 2006; Arndt et al., 2016; Bertelli et al., 2017; Blin et al., 2021). The predictions indicate the presence of 13 antibiotic biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) of which 4 are unknown, one incomplete prophage region, 16 genomic islands (GIs) and six different insertion sequences (IS) of which ISPap1 has six copies around the genome. This corrects a previous pangenome analysis in which P. polymyxa DSM 365 was reported to not include the paenilipoheptin and paenilan clusters (Wang et al., 2020). All antibiotic BGCs were selected as possible targets, aside bacillibactin due to its known role in iron uptake (May et al., 2001; Barona-Gómez et al., 2006). Additionally, the two known genomic regions encoding for the exopolisaccharides (EPS), paenan and levan, were also selected (Rütering et al., 2016, 2017; Schilling et al., 2022; 2023). The selected secondary metabolite encoding cluster, the incomplete prophage region, the EPS encoding sequences and the genomic islands were deleted individually and the resulting strain variants were characterised concerning fitness (Table 2). Following this, the first strategy for a genome-reduced strain variant was followed by consecutively deleting the EPSs and antibiotic targets to diminish the native metabolite background which competes for precursors and energy, leading to the designated GR1 variant (Figure 2). Precisely, paenan (32.8 kb), levan (1.60 kb, sacB gene), paenibacillin (11.9 kb), paenilan (12.5 kb), unknown pks 2 (40.2 kb), unknown pks 3 (24.5 kb), fusaricidin (31.0 kb), paenilipoheptin (17.4 kb, a part of this BGC) and paenicidin (6.46 kb, a part of this BGC) clusters were deleted. The second strategy aimed at generating an ISPap1-free mutant to enhance its genomic stability, which led to the designated GR2 variant (Figure 2). One copy of ISPap1 and of another IS, located in the same GI, were deleted as a single deletion (GI1). Another copy of the insertion sequence ISPap1 was identified in another genomic island. For this reason, this complete sequence was also deleted at once (GI2). Before deletion, both genomic islands were evaluated to not contain putative essential genes by analysing the whole-genome sequence by the use of DEG10 (Database of Essential Genes) (Luo et al., 2014). The open reading frames which were predicted in the GIs include mainly hypothetical proteins, possibly transcriptional regulators, and hydrolases. Based on DEG10 results, BLAST, and PFAM analysis, we hypothesized that the selected regions will not affect the fitness of our strain. The remaining four copies of ISPap1 were then stepwise deleted by use of the CRISPR-Cas9 approach (Table 3). Detailed information such as the coordinates of each of the deletions are given in Supplementary Table S3.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. List of the most important bacterial strains and strain variants used in this study.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. (A) Circular genome map of P. polymyxa DSM 365, targeted deletion regions of secondary metabolites were marked in green and targeted deletion of genomic islands (GI), prophage and insertion sequences (IS) were marked in violet on the physical localizations of the chromosome. (B) The genome-reduced strain GR1 shows the sequential deletion of several biosynthetic gene clusters (BGC). (C) The genome-reduced strain GR2 shows the sequential target deletions of two GIs and four copies of ISPap1.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Detailed information of deleted genomic regions of the constructed genome-reduced mutant strains of P. polymyxa via the two parallel strategies.

Growth characterization of single deletion variants

Each single mutant was first cultivated in CASO broth and characterised for putative effects on biological fitness via assessment of the maximum specific growth rate (μmax), which was determined from multiple replicates (n ≥ 4). Significantly altered μmax values were evaluated via the two-sided t-tests (p < 0.01) by comparing each mutant with the P. polymyxa WT (Figure 3). For the WT, a μmax of 1.00 ± 0.04 h–1 was determined, and the values for the single knockouts ranged between 0.53 ± 0.02 h–1 (S45115) and 1.04 ± 0.04 h–1 (S45167) (Figure 3). Strains S45115 (0.53 ± 0.02 h–1) and S45195 (0.88 ± 0.04 h–1), with deletions in the polymyxin and tridecaptin cluster, respectively, grew significantly slower than the WT and therefore were not considered further as deletion targets. Instead, all other mutants maintained the growth behaviour at the wild-type level. All growth curves of both the WT and the mutants are presented in Supplementary Figure S1.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Maximum growth rates (μmax) of single mutants of P. polymyxa in CASO broth medium (n ≥ 4). Strains with significant changes in maximum growth rate compared to the reference (WT) were determined via two sample t-test (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001) and are marked by asterisks.

Many genome reduction strategies have targeted the deletion of various antibiotics encoding BGCs, resulting in unaffected growth behaviour of these deletions (Gomez-Escribano and Bibb, 2011; Shen et al., 2017; Myronovskyi et al., 2018; Ahmed et al., 2020). Exceptions are reported for the deletion of siderophores and a Schlegelella brevitalea genome-reduced strain variants devoid of five–7 BGCs (DC5-DC7) (Barona-Gómez et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2021). In this study, strains S45115 and S45195, with the deletions of polymyxin and tridecaptin encoding clusters respectively, also represent one of these exceptions. Both clusters include genes which encode for NRPS and transporters for excretion of these specific products (Lohans et al., 2014; Tambadou et al., 2015). Shaheen et al. deleted the two genes pmxC and pmxD, each encoding for a transporter in the polymyxin cluster and showed a decreased production of both polymyxin and fusaricidin, demonstrating that both antibiotics are still exported by other transporters. Yet, no additional information on growth behaviour and strain fitness was presented by the authors (Shaheen et al., 2011). The deletion of the single NRPS of the two clusters (pmxE and triD) did not result in significant growth defects for these variants (Kim et al., 2014). This suggests that both polymyxin and tridecaptin play an essential role for growth under the applied conditions or that the deletion might have indirectly caused an impairment. Further experiments should elucidate these possibilities.

qPCR to check the transposase of ISPap1 transcriptional expression

As previously mentioned, genome sequencing revealed the presence of six copies of the insertion sequence ISPap1. Before deleting all these copies, which results in the strategy for GR2, we analysed if the transposase (tnp) is actually transcriptionally expressed. For this, we performed qPCR by targeting the first part of the transposase. As shown in Figure 4, we were able to demonstrate its expression and consequently assume a possible activity, which led us to proceed with the deletions. Studies of other transposases also show transcriptional expression and a related transposition activity at different conditions (Lee et al., 2019; Kirsch et al., 2023). Yet, further studies should elucidate if ISPap1 is truly active (Tavakoli and Derbyshire, 1999; Loessner et al., 2002). Finally, we have also analysed the expression levels of the tnp in S45246, which still possessed the final copy of ISPap1, compared to GR2, deprived of all the copies. As expected, a significant decrease of the expression levels was observed for S45246 compared to no expression at all for GR2. This suggests the full elimination of the IS activity in the genome.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. RT-qPCR of ISPap1 transposase (tnp) gene levels relative to the housekeeping gene gyrA in the WT, S45246 and GR2. *p < 0.05 was determined via two sample t-test of three biological replicates grown in CASO broth.

PCR amplification to track remaining ISPap1 copies after ISPap1 removal in the genome-reduced strain GR2

To further ensure that no jumping activity of ISPap1 occurred during the construction of GR2, the absence of the IS element in the genome of the respective strain was verified by PCR using primers annealing to a conserved region of the element. As given in Supplementary Figure S2, PCR control on GR2 did not result in any amplicon, indicating that all copies of the transposase were deleted. Genomic DNA of the WT and S45246 were used as positive controls, clearly indicating the expected fragment of 977 bp.

Growth and metabolite characterization of genome-reduced strains

To further characterise the two genome-reduced strain variants, both the cell growth and the metabolic capacity were analysed. The growth profiles of GR1 and GR2 were assessed by following the optical density OD600 and CDW of the cells cultured in fermentation medium in a bioreactor setting. A similar pattern was observed for all strains to the WT (Figure 5; Table 4). The μmax of the variants showed no significant differences with an average of 0.32 ± 0.02 (Table 4).

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Growth profiles of P. polymyxa DSM 365 WT and the genome-reduced strains (GR1 and GR2) during the course of the 48 h of controlled batch cultivation in DASGIP bioreactors applying microaerobic conditions (0.5 vvm).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Overview of process characteristics of P. polymyxa DSM 365 WT and the genome-reduced strains. Data are given for 48 h batch fermentations (n = 2).

The production of 2,3-BDL was chosen as a performance indicator for product formation. All strains showed a quite similar 2,3-BDL production within the exponential phase. At 24 h, GR1 reached a 1.2-fold higher titer compared to both the WT and GR2, indicating that the deletion of the selected BGCs caused fluctuations in the metabolism (Figure 6A). Previous studies have shown a correlation between 2,3-BDL and lipopeptide production. Pyruvate can be either directed towards the fermentation products such as of 2,3-BDL or diverted towards acetyl-CoA for fatty acids synthesis required for lipopeptides production, such as polymyxin (Supplementary Figure S3) (Dhali et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2020). Yuan et al. demonstrated that 2,3-butanediol could be produced at higher titers by a less polymyxin producing mutant of P. polymyxa CJX518 (Yuan et al., 2020). GR1 presents the deletion of several BGCs, including two known lipopeptides (Δphl and Δfus) and possibly two others (Δupks2 and Δupks3), which might have influenced 2,3-BDL production (Li et al., 2007; Vater et al., 2018). However, under the selected conditions, the overall titer and productivity of 2,3-BDL remained unaffected by the genome-reduced variants (Figure 6B). Several studies have shown that the sequential deletion of antibiotic clusters can improve the production of native and/or heterologous antibiotics by redirecting the precursor’s supply (Myronovskyi et al., 2018; Ahmed et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). Therefore, although we have not observed any effect on the production of 2,3-BDL, the deletion of these BGCs in GR1 might have an effect on antibiotic production. This prospect should be explored by further research.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. (A) 2,3-BDL production over the course of the 48 h fermentation. (B) Product profiles of P. polymyxa DSM 365 WT and the genome-reduced strains (GR1 and GR2) after 48 h of controlled batch cultivation in the 1 L parallel DASGIP bioreactors under microaerobic conditions (0.5 vvm). Product titers are the result of two independent fermentation processes, *p < 0.05 was determined via two sample t-test.

By the 2,3-BDL pathway only 1 mol of NADH is converted to NAD+ whereas 2 mols of NADH are formed during glycolysis. Therefore, to maintain redox balance, other redox neutral end products such as lactate or ethanol compete for the intermediate pyruvate and are formed via the fermentative pathway (Supplementary Figure S3) (Ji et al., 2011). In our experiment, all strains produced meso-BDL, lactate and ethanol, but no formate. Interestingly, GR2 showed significantly lower lactate and ethanol titers (1.4-fold and 1.2-fold, respectively). Owing to the deletion of several hypothetical proteins within the GIs, a conclusive explanation for this significant difference cannot be given. However, this discrepancy raises a topic for discussion.

In addition, we have examined EPS production at the end of the fermentation process. As expected, no EPS production was observed for GR1. Whereas GR2 maintained unaltered EPS titers compared to the WT (3.08 ± 0.45 and 2.57 ± 0.32 g L-1, respectively) as given in Figure 6B. Schilling et al. characterized P. polymyxa DSM 365 under similar conditions, employing a distinct aeration input of 0.075 vvm and extending the duration of the fermentation to 72 h (Schilling et al., 2020). We observed a comparable 2,3-BDL titer at 48 h of 18.44 ± 1.10 g L-1, with a corresponding productivity of 0.40 ± 0.02 g L-1 h-1. Notably, higher oxygen levels led to the production of meso-BDL, reduced lactate, no formate and increased EPS productions (Nakashimada et al., 1998; Rütering et al., 2016).

Conclusion

In our present study, we were able to close the sequence gaps of the genome of P. polymyxa DSM 365 with 5,889,536 bp, which is the prerequisite for further development of this promising non-model organism. Thereby, we identified an unknown NRPS for which we hypothesise a possible role in tridecaptin’s production, thus, providing new directions for future studies. We have also elucidated the antibiotic production capacity of this strain, with still four unknown BGCs. By specific knockout experiments, we have shown that the polymyxin and tridecaptin cluster are not essential but might be significantly affect P. polymyxa´s growth. In contrast we have also shown that several hypothetical proteins which are located in G1 and G2 do not have an impact on fitness. By deleting 178.5 kb and 38.5 kb we created two genome-reduced strains (GR1 and GR2). Although, no enhancement in 2,3-BDL formation was shown, both the growth characteristics and the desired product formation of the two strains were maintained at WT-level, an extremely important achievement and starting point for future targeted genetic modifications.

Data availability statement

The annotated genome sequence of P. polymyxa DSM 365 has been deposited in GenBank under the BioProject accession number PRJNA1051977, the BioSample accession number SAMN38818135. The complete genome sequence has been deposited under the accession number CP141264.

Author contributions

GR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. JL: Investigation, Writing–review and editing. M-FM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing–review and editing. AP: Investigation, Writing–review and editing, Methodology. RD: Investigation, Writing–review and editing. SN: Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing–review and editing. JK: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing–review and editing. JS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing–review and editing, Methodology, Writing–original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study is part of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) funded project Polymore with the No. 031B0855A. Further funding was received from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) with the no. 031B1134A, as part of the innovation lab “AutoBioTech”. We acknowledge support from open access publication fund of the University of Münster.

Conflict of interest

Authors M-FM and SN were employed by Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1378873/full#supplementary-material

References

Ahmed, Y., Rebets, Y., Estévez, M. R., Zapp, J., Myronovskyi, M., and Luzhetskyy, A. (2020). Engineering of Streptomyces lividans for heterologous expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters. Microb. Cell Fact. 19, 5. doi:10.1186/s12934-020-1277-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arndt, D., Grant, J. R., Marcu, A., Sajed, T., Pon, A., Liang, Y., et al. (2016). PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W16–W21. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barona-Gómez, F., Lautru, S., Francois-Xavier, F., Leblond, P., Pernodet, J. L., and Challis, G. L. (2006). Multiple biosynthetic and uptake systems mediate siderophore-dependent iron acquisition in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and Stremptomyces ambofaciens ATCC 23877. Microbiol. (N Y) 152, 3355–3366. doi:10.1099/mic.0.29161-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baumgart, M., Unthan, S., Kloß, R., Radek, A., Polen, T., Tenhaef, N., et al. (2018). Corynebacterium glutamicum chassis C1∗: building and testing a novel platform host for synthetic Biology and industrial biotechnology. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 132–144. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.7b00261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baumgart, M., Unthan, S., Rückert, C., Sivalingam, J., Grünberger, A., Kalinowski, J., et al. (2013). Construction of a prophage-free variant of Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 for use as a platform strain for basic research and industrial biotechnology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 6006–6015. doi:10.1128/AEM.01634-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bertelli, C., Laird, M. R., Williams, K. P., Lau, B. Y., Hoad, G., Winsor, G. L., et al. (2017). IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W30–W35. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blin, K., Shaw, S., Kloosterman, A. M., Charlop-Powers, Z., Van Wezel, G. P., Medema, M. H., et al. (2021). AntiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W29–W35. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab335

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blombach, B., Grunberger, A., Centler, F., Wierckx, N., and Schmid, J. (2021). Exploiting unconventional prokaryotic hosts for industrial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 40, 385–397. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., et al. (2009). BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinforma. 10, 421. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, J. W., Yim, S. S., Kim, M. J., and Jeong, K. J. (2015). Enhanced production of recombinant proteins with Corynebacterium glutamicum by deletion of insertion sequences (IS elements). Microb. Cell Fact. 14, 207. doi:10.1186/s12934-015-0401-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cochrane, S. A., Lohans, C. T., Van Belkum, M. J., Bels, M. A., and Vederas, J. C. (2015). Studies on tridecaptin B1, a lipopeptide with activity against multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Org. Biomol. Chem. 13, 6073–6081. doi:10.1039/c5ob00780a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dhali, D., Coutte, F., Arias, A. A., Auger, S., Bidnenko, V., Chataigné, G., et al. (2017). Genetic engineering of the branched fatty acid metabolic pathway of Bacillus subtilis for the overproduction of surfactin C14 isoform. Biotechnol. J. 12, 1600574. doi:10.1002/biot.201600574

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gardner, P. P., Daub, J., Tate, J. G., Nawrocki, E. P., Kolbe, D. L., Lindgreen, S., et al. (2009). Rfam: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D136–D140. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn766

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gomez-Escribano, J. P., and Bibb, M. J. (2011). Engineering Streptomyces coelicolor for heterologous expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters. Microb. Biotechnol. 4, 207–215. doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00219.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jangra, M., Kaur, M., Tambat, R., Rana, R., Maurya, S. K., Khatri, N., et al. (2019). Tridecaptin M, a new variant discovered in mud bacterium, shows activity against colistin-and extremely drug-resistant enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, 003388–e419. doi:10.1128/AAC.00338-19

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jeong, H., Choi, S. K., Ryu, C. M., and Park, S. H. (2019). Chronicle of a soil bacterium: Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 as a tiny guardian of plant and human health. Front. Microbiol. 10, 467. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00467

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ji, X. J., Huang, H., and Ouyang, P. K. (2011). Microbial 2,3-butanediol production: a state-of-the-art review. Biotechnol. Adv. 29, 351–364. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H. R., Park, S. Y., Kim, S. B., Jeong, H., Choi, S. K., and Park, S. H. (2014). Inactivation of the phosphoglucomutase gene pgm in Paenibacillus polymyxa leads to overproduction of fusaricidin. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41, 1405–1414. doi:10.1007/s10295-014-1470-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kirsch, J. M., Ely, S., Stellfox, M. E., Hullahalli, K., Luong, P., Palmer, K. L., et al. (2023). Targeted IS-element sequencing uncovers transposition dynamics during selective pressure in enterococci. PLoS Pathog. 19, e1011424. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011424

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., and Ujor, V. C. (2022). Complete genome sequence of Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365, a soil bacterium of agricultural and industrial importance. Microbiol. Resour. Announc 11, e0032922. doi:10.1128/mra.00329-22

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lagesen, K., Hallin, P., Rødland, E. A., Stærfeldt, H. H., Rognes, T., and Ussery, D. W. (2007). RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 3100–3108. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LeBlanc, N., and Charles, T. C. (2022). Bacterial genome reductions: tools, applications, and challenges. Front. Genome Ed. 4, 957289. doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.957289

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, C., Choi, N., Bae, M. K., Choo, K., and Lee, S. J. (2019). Transposition of insertion sequences was triggered by oxidative stress in radiation-resistant bacterium Deinococcus geothermalis. Microorganisms 7, 446. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7100446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Beatty, P. K., Shah, S., and Jensen, S. E. (2007). Use of PCR-targeted mutagenesis to disrupt production of fusaricidin-type antifungal antibiotics in Paenibacillus polymyxa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 3480–3489. doi:10.1128/AEM.02662-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Zhu, X., Zhang, X., Fu, J., Wang, Z., Chen, T., et al. (2016). Characterization of genome-reduced Bacillus subtilis strains and their application for the production of guanosine and thymidine. Microb. Cell Fact. 15, 94. doi:10.1186/s12934-016-0494-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Zhou, H., Yang, Z., Wang, X., Chen, H., Zhong, L., et al. (2021). Rational construction of genome-reduced Burkholderiales chassis facilitates efficient heterologous production of natural products from proteobacteria. Nat. Commun. 12, 4347. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24645-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Livak, K. J., and Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loessner, I., Dietrich, K., Dittrich, D., Hacker, J., and Ziebuhr, W. (2002). Transposase-dependent formation of circular IS256 derivatives in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 184, 4709–4714. doi:10.1128/JB.184.17.4709-4714.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lohans, C. T., Van Belkum, M. J., Cochrane, S. A., Huang, Z., Sit, C. S., McMullen, L. M., et al. (2014). Biochemical, structural, and genetic characterization of tridecaptin A 1, an antagonist of Campylobacter jejuni. ChemBioChem 15, 243–249. doi:10.1002/cbic.201300595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lowe, T. M., and Eddy, S. R. (1997). tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 0955–0964. doi:10.1093/nar/25.5.0955

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, H., Lin, Y., Gao, F., Zhang, C. T., and Zhang, R. (2014). DEG 10, an update of the database of essential genes that includes both protein-coding genes and noncoding genomic elements: table 1. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D574–D580. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

May, J. J., Wendrich, T. M., and Marahiel, M. A. (2001). The dhb operon of Bacillus subtilis encodes the biosynthetic template for the catecholic siderophore 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-glycine-threonine trimeric ester bacillibactin. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 7209–7217. doi:10.1074/jbc.M009140200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meliawati, M., May, T., Eckerlin, J., Heinrich, D., Herold, A., and Schmid, J. (2022a). Insights in the complex DegU, DegS, and Spo0A regulation system of Paenibacillus polymyxa by CRISPR-cas9-based targeted point mutations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 88, e0016422. doi:10.1128/aem.00164-22

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meliawati, M., Teckentrup, C., and Schmid, J. (2022b). CRISPR-Cas9-mediated Large cluster deletion and multiplex genome editing in Paenibacillus polymyxa. ACS Synth. Biol. 11, 77–84. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.1c00565

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mindt, M., Beyraghdar Kashkooli, A., Suarez-Diez, M., Ferrer, L., Jilg, T., Bosch, D., et al. (2022). Production of indole by Corynebacterium glutamicum microbial cell factories for flavor and fragrance applications. Microb. Cell Fact. 21, 45. doi:10.1186/s12934-022-01771-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mindt, M., Ferrer, L., Bosch, D., Cankar, K., and Wendisch, V. F. (2023). De novo tryptophanase-based indole production by metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 107, 1621–1634. doi:10.1007/s00253-023-12397-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Myronovskyi, M., Rosenkränzer, B., Nadmid, S., Pujic, P., Normand, P., and Luzhetskyy, A. (2018). Generation of a cluster-free Streptomyces albus chassis strains for improved heterologous expression of secondary metabolite clusters. Metab. Eng. 49, 316–324. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2018.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakashimada, Y., Kanai, K., and Nishio, N. (1998). Optimization of dilution rate, pH and oxygen supply on optical purity of 2, 3-butanediol produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa in chemostat culture. Biotechnol. Lett. 20, 1133–1138. doi:10.1023/A:1005324403186

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rütering, M., Schmid, J., Rühmann, B., Schilling, M., and Sieber, V. (2016). Controlled production of polysaccharides-exploiting nutrient supply for levan and heteropolysaccharide formation in Paenibacillus sp. Carbohydr. Polym. 148, 326–334. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schilling, C., Ciccone, R., Sieber, V., and Schmid, J. (2020). Engineering of the 2,3-butanediol pathway of Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365. Metab. Eng. 61, 381–388. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2020.07.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schilling, C., Klau, L. J., Aachmann, F. L., Rühmann, B., Schmid, J., and Sieber, V. (2022). Structural elucidation of the fucose containing polysaccharide Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365. Carbohydr. Polym. 278, 118951. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118951

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schilling, C., Klau, L. J., Aachmann, F. L., Rühmann, B., Schmid, J., and Sieber, V. (2023). CRISPR-Cas9 driven structural elucidation of the heteroexopolysaccharides from Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365. Carbohydr. Polym. 312, 120763. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120763

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schilling, C., Koffas, M. A. G., Sieber, V., and Schmid, J. (2021). Novel prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas12a-based tool for programmable transcriptional activation and repression. ACS Synth. Biol. 9, 3353–3363. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.0c00424

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shaheen, M., Li, J., Ross, A. C., Vederas, J. C., and Jensen, S. E. (2011). Paenibacillus polymyxa PKB1 produces variants of polymyxin B-type antibiotics. Chem. Biol. 18, 1640–1648. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.09.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, X., Wang, Z., Huang, X., Hu, H., Wang, W., and Zhang, X. (2017). Developing genome-reduced Pseudomonas chlororaphis strains for the production of secondary metabolites. BMC Genomics 18, 715. doi:10.1186/s12864-017-4127-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siguier, P., Perochon, J., Lestrade, L., Mahillon, J., and Chandler, M. (2006). ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D32–D36. doi:10.1093/nar/gkj014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suárez, G. A., Renda, B. A., Dasgupta, A., and Barrick, J. E. (2017). Reduced mutation rate and increased transformability of transposon-free Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1-ISx. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, 010255–e1117. doi:10.1128/AEM.01025-17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tambadou, F., Caradec, T., Gagez, A. L., Bonnet, A., Sopéna, V., Bridiau, N., et al. (2015). Characterization of the colistin (polymyxin E1 and E2) biosynthetic gene cluster. Arch. Microbiol. 197, 521–532. doi:10.1007/s00203-015-1084-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tavakoli, N. P., and Derbyshire, K. M. (1999). IS903 transposase mutants that suppress defective inverted repeats. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 1183–1195. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01260.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Umenhoffer, K., Draskovits, G., Nyerges, Á., Karcagi, I., Bogos, B., Csörg, B., et al. (2017). Genome-wide abolishment of mobile genetic elements using genome shuffling and CRISPR/Cas-assisted MAGE allows the efficient stabilization of a bacterial chassis. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 1471–1483. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.6b00378

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Unthan, S., Baumgart, M., Radek, A., Herbst, M., Siebert, D., Brühl, N., et al. (2015). Chassis organism from Corynebacterium glutamicum - a top-down approach to identify and delete irrelevant gene clusters. Biotechnol. J. 10, 290–301. doi:10.1002/biot.201400041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vater, J., Herfort, S., Doellinger, J., Weydmann, M., Borriss, R., and Lasch, P. (2018). Genome mining of the lipopeptide biosynthesis of Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 in combination with mass spectrometry: discovery of the lipoheptapeptide paenilipoheptin. ChemBioChem 19, 744–753. doi:10.1002/cbic.201700615

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, B., Cheng, H., Qian, W., Zhao, W., Liang, C., Liu, C., et al. (2020). Comparative genome analysis and mining of secondary metabolites of Paenibacillus polymyxa. Genes Genet. Syst. 95, 141–150. doi:10.1266/ggs.19-00053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wick, R. R., Judd, L. M., Gorrie, C. L., and Holt, K. E. (2017). Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005595. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, N. Z., Li, J. X., Song, L. F., Hou, J. F., Guo, L., Du, Q. S., et al. (2015). Genome sequence of type strain Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365, a highly efficient producer of optically active (R,R)-2,3-butanediol. J. Biotechnol. 195, 72–73. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.07.441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, Y., Xu, Q. M., Yu, S. C., Sun, H. Z., Cheng, J. S., and Yuan, Y. J. (2020). Control of the polymyxin analog ratio by domain swapping in the nonribosomal peptide synthetase of Paenibacillus polymyxa. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47, 551–562. doi:10.1007/s10295-020-02275-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, F., Huo, K., Song, X., Quan, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., et al. (2020). Engineering of a genome-reduced strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens for enhancing surfactin production. Microb. Cell Fact. 19, 223. doi:10.1186/s12934-020-01485-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zwiener, T., Dziuba, M., Mickoleit, F., Rückert, C., Busche, T., Kalinowski, J., et al. (2021). Towards a “chassis” for bacterial magnetosome biosynthesis: genome streamlining of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense by multiple deletions. Microb. Cell Fact. 20, 35. doi:10.1186/s12934-021-01517-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Paenibacillus polymyxa, genome reduction, chassis, BGCS, 2, 3-butanediol

Citation: Ravagnan G, Lesemann J, Müller M-F, Poehlein A, Daniel R, Noack S, Kabisch J and Schmid J (2024) Genome reduction in Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365 for chassis development. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 12:1378873. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1378873

Received: 30 January 2024; Accepted: 08 March 2024;
Published: 28 March 2024.

Edited by:

Si-Yu Li, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan

Reviewed by:

Xinglin Jiang, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
Xuewei Pan, Jiangnan University, China

Copyright © 2024 Ravagnan, Lesemann, Müller, Poehlein, Daniel, Noack, Kabisch and Schmid. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jochen Schmid, jochen.schmid@uni-muenster.de

Download