The Effect of Fluoride and Iron Content on the Clinkering of Alite-Ye’elimite-Ferrite (AYF) Cement Systems

Alite–ye’elimite–ferrite (AYF) cement is a more sustainable alternative to Portland cement (PC) that may offer improved mechanical, rheological, and chemical performance. Using traditional raw materials and conventional clinker processing conditions, alite (C3S) and ye’elimite (C4A3$), the major phases in PC and calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) cements, respectively, cannot be coproduced. The typical formation temperature in the kiln for alite is >1350°C, but ye’elimite normally breaks down above 1300°C. However, with careful composition control and in the presence of fluoride, alite can be mineralized and formed at lower temperatures, thus enabling the production of AYF clinkers in a single stage. In this study, the production of AYF cement clinkers with different chemical compositions is attempted at 1250°C. The sensitivity of the fluoride content is initially assessed with a fixed target clinker composition to determine the optimal requirements. The effect of altering the target ferrite (C4AF) and alite (C3S) contents is also assessed followed by the effect of altering the target C4AF and C4A3$ contents. It is shown that AYF clinkers can be produced in a single stage through the careful control of the fluoride content in the mix; however, the formation/persistence of belite and mayenite could not be avoided under the conditions tested. It is also shown that ∼10 wt% ferrite in the target composition provides sufficient AYF clinker burnability and the amount of fluoride needs to be controlled to avoid stabilization of mayenite.


INTRODUCTION
Concrete is the most used building material worldwide, and its production is rising due to population growth and urbanization.Concrete consists of aggregates, water, and a binder/cement; the global production of cement for concrete is approximately 4 billion tons (Cembureau, 2019).The most used binder is Portland cement (PC), the production of which, due to large demand, is a major contributor to global CO 2 emissions that are threatening human life on Earth.The majority of these emissions are from the calcination of limestone (mostly CaCO 3 ) to obtain calcium oxide (CaO), which is a key ingredient in cement clinker production.The second major contributor is the burning of fossil fuels required to reach clinkering temperature.PC is usually produced at ∼1450 °C, which is required for the formation of the main clinker mineral, alite (C 3 S1 ) that is only thermodynamically stable above 1250 °C (Hewlett et al., 2019;Hanein et al., 2020) but starts to form in industrial kilns at temperatures >1350 °C (Telschow, 2012).The CaO content of clinkers needs to be reduced to minimize the chemical CO 2 required for clinkering, while the process energy needs to be minimized to reduce the CO 2 emissions stemming from fossil fuel combustion.Raw-material CO 2 reduces when lower CaO-bearing phases are used in the order of C 4 A 3 $ < C 4 AF < C 3 A < C 2 S < C 3 S (Gartner, 2004;Barcelo et al., 2014).
Alite-ye'elimite-ferrite (AYF) cement can combine the favorable characteristics of PC and ye'elimite-rich cements.AYF is an alternative/modified PC in which all the tricalcium aluminate (C 3 A) and some of the other clinker phases are replaced with ye'elimite (C 4 A 3 $); thus, it requires less calcareous source in the raw meal.The co-formation of ye'elimite and alite is challenging due to their different thermal stability ranges, but if appropriate processing conditions and raw materials are used, an AYF cement clinker can be produced in a single stage at ∼1250 °C, which is approximately 200 °C lower than that for conventional PC clinkers (Hanein et al., 2019).
The major drawback of AYF clinker manufacturing is the fact that clinkers with high sulfur content tend to have higher belite content (Herfort et al., 2010).S 6+ and Al 3+ can replace Si 4+ in belite, which lowers the free energy of belite in a way that the combined free energy of belite and free lime is lower than that of alite, which prevents alite to form at low temperatures (Herfort et al., 2010).The incorporation of minor elements in belite and alite depends on their charge, size, and site occupancy (Tran et al., 2009;Herfort et al., 2010).Sulfur is incorporated in belite and alite as S 6+ , which is small enough to replace Si 4+ and has a strong preference for belite (Herfort et al., 2010).The maximum solubility of sulfur into belite as SO 3 is 2% (Herfort et al., 2010).The formation temperature of alite can be decreased through increasing its thermodynamic stability by lowering the free energy of alite at low temperatures.A mineralizer (F, Mg, Zn, or Cu) can be used to counteract the stabilization effect of sulfates on belite (Herfort et al., 2010).Moreover, fluoride has a strong mineralizing effect, especially with the coupled substitution of F − for O2− and Al 3+ for Si 4+ (Tran et al., 2009).Previous studies have already proven the concept of producing AYF cements using fluoride as a mineralizer (Blanco-Varela et al., 1995;Duvallet, 2014;Chitvoranund et al., 2017;Londono-Zuluaga et al., 2017;Hanein et al., 2019;Zea-Garcia et al., 2019, 2020).It has been confirmed that fluoride enhances the formation of alite phase in CaO-SiO 2 -CaSO 4 -CaF 2 -Fe 2 O 3 (Blanco-Varela et al., 1995;Duvallet, 2014;Londono-Zuluaga et al., 2017;Hanein et al., 2019;Zea-Garcia et al., 2019), CaO-SiO 2 -CaF 2 -CaSO 4 (Giminez-Molina et al., 1992), CaO-SiO 2 -Al 2 O 3 -CaF 2 -CaSO 4 (Giminez-Molina et al., 1992;Giménez-Molina and Blanco-Varela, 1995), and SiO 2 -CaO-Al 2 O 3 -CaF 2 systems (Shame and Glasser, 1987).In the presence of fluoride, higher C 3 S formation yields are achieved because phase formation energy is decreased (Pajares et al., 2002).Also, CaSO 4 and CaF 2 in the raw mix leads to liquid formation that enhances the ion mobility, which is referred to as a fluxing effect (Giminez-Molina et al., 1992;Giménez-Molina and Blanco-Varela, 1995).It has also been discussed that alumina (Shame and Glasser, 1987) (coupled substitution) and iron (Hanein et al., 2019) (effective firing efficiency) have a positive effect on the formation of the alite phase at lower temperatures.Shame and Glasser (1987) have showed that Al and F can stabilize a solid solution of rhombohedral alite with a composition of Ca 3 Si 1-x Al x O 5-x F x in which the maximum substitution of fluoride was X 0.15 (see Figure 1).With the addition of fluoride, the minimum formation temperature of the alite solid solution decreases from 1250 °C (X 0) to 1050 °C (X 0.15).When producing a AYF clinker, SO 3 is also present, which can also lead to the formation of fluorellestadite (Ca 10 (SiO 4 ) 3 (SO 4 ) 3 F 2 ) (Pajares et al., 2002), which is reported to decompose at around 1250 °C into C 2 S, SO 2 , O 2 , and a liquid phase (Giminez-Molina et al., 1992;Blanco-Varela et al., 1995;Giménez-Molina and Blanco-Varela, 1995;Londono-Zuluaga et al., 2017;Hanein et al., 2019).Fluorellestadite has poor hydraulic characteristics and therefore is usually avoided in clinker production (ben Haha et al., 2019).Additionally, under normal processing conditions, ye'elimite decomposes at temperatures above 1300 °C (Hanein et al., 2015;Hanein, 2016); therefore, the ideal firing temperature in a standard fossil fuel combustion atmosphere or air for the production of a ye'elimite-rich clinker should be 1250-1300 °C.Iron is important for the burnability of the clinker, and it is known to improve the phase formation of calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) clinkers, that is, fewer unreacted raw materials persist.However, the addition of iron can lead to the decomposition of ye'elimite, as a loss of SO 2 already occurs at lower processing temperatures (Puertas et al., 1995;el Khessaimi et al., 2018;Bullerjahn et al., 2020;Yao et al., 2020).It is also reported that the iron content enhances the formation of alite at lower temperatures (Chabayashi et al., 2012;Lu et al., 2018;Hanein et al., 2019).
Mayenite is a typical minor phase in alite-ye'elimite clinkers (Londono-Zuluaga et al., 2017;Zea-Garcia et al., 2019).The mayenite group has a common formula of Ca 12 Al 14 O 32−x (OH) 3x [W 6−3x ], where X 0-2, and W can be occupied with anions OH − , F − , and Cl − or H 2 O ( Środek et al., 2018) In tetrahedral sites, Al 3+ can be replaced with, for example, Fe 3+ and Si 4+ (Galuskin et al., 2015;Środek et al., 2018).Synthetic crystalline mayenite has the structure Ca 12 Al 14 O 32 , but, as was shown in common formula, the presence of F − can lead to the stabilization of mayenite (Zhmoidin and Chatterjee, 1984;ben Haha et al., 2019) or the formation of fluormayenite Ca 12 Al 14 O 32 F 2 (Galuskin et al., 2015;Środek et al., 2018).(Hanein et al., 2019) prepared two relevant AYF clinkers with stoichiometric target compositions of C 3 S-C 4 A 3 $ and C 3 S-C 4 A 3 $-C 4 AF with and without a fluoride addition at 1250 °C.In their studies, they found that, with the fluoride addition to the C 3 S-C 4 A 3 $ clinker, the alite content increased from 0 to 12 wt%, and, when iron was present in the C 3 S-C 4 A 3 $-C 4 AF clinker, the alite content doubled to around 24 wt%.This indicates that iron also plays a role in enhancing alite formation.Duvallet et al. (2009), Duvallet (2014), andChitvoranund et al. (2017) prepared a clinker with 50 wt% C 3 S and 10 wt% C 4 A 3 $ at 1300 °C using 1 wt% calcium fluoride (CaF 2 ).They concluded that, with a 5 wt% anhydrite addition to the clinker, rapid hydration could be achieved, and the hydration products were calcium-silicate-hydrates (C-S-H), ettringite, monosulfate, and portlandite.In the studies of Duvallet et al. (2009) and Duvallet (2014), It was found that, with AYF clinkers produced at 1250-1275 °C with 5 wt% to 45 wt% of ferrite using industrial by-products and virgin raw materials, including CaF 2 , alite can be formed, but the hydration is reduced with an increasing ferrite content.
There is limited information in the literature regarding the optimal formation conditions of a clinker containing alite, ye'elimite, and ferrite as the major phases.Particularly, the sensitivity of fluctuations in the fluoride and iron content of the raw material mix is not fully understood.In the present study, 24 AYF cement clinkers were produced at 1250 °C in three test series.In the first series, a target of 50 wt% C 3 S, 30 wt% C 4 A 3 $, and 20 wt% C 4 AF was tested with seven compositions of fluoride (0 < x < 0.3 in Ca 3 Si 1-x Al x O 5-x F x ).For the second series, 50 wt% C 3 S, 32.5-50 wt% C 4 A 3 $, and 0-17.5 wt% C 4 AF with fixed fluoride contents were assessed.In the third series, a phase composition of 28 wt% C 4 A 3 $, 28-66 wt% C 3 S, 0-37 wt% C 4 AF, and 6 wt% C$ with fixed fluoride content was targeted.The changes in the phase composition were examined based on the intensity of the reflection peaks in the XRD (X-ray diffraction) patterns, and the trend of the phase content was further analyzed using Rietveld analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
The reagent-grade chemicals used were aluminum oxide, calcium fluoride, calcium oxide, calcium sulfate, iron (III) oxide, and silicon dioxide, as shown in Table 1.All reagent-grade chemicals-except CaF 2 -were dried in a 500 °C muffle furnace for 12 h.The chemical compositions for all three test series were calculated using the equations in Table 2.The target-phase compositions and the starting chemical composition of each test series are presented in Table 3.
The first test series was to determine the effect of adding fluoride to the clinkering with fixed phase contents.The phase composition was selected to be 50 wt% C 3 S, 30 wt% C 4 A 3 $, and 20 wt% C 4 AF, and the fluoride content was adjusted according to Ca 3 Si 1-x Al x O 5-x F x between 0 < X < 0.3.The second and third test series were used to determine how iron effects the alite formation; in these test series, the fluoride contents were set to 1.3 wt% CaF 2 in the raw mix.In the second test series, the target C 3 S content was fixed to 50 wt%, and the F content was also fixed (X 0.15); moreover, the target C 4 A 3 $ content was between 32.5 and 50 wt %, and the C 4 AF between 0 and 17.5 wt%.In the test series 3, the potential sulfur loss through fluorellestadite decomposition was compensated with additional CaSO 4 .Specifically, 1.3 wt% of CaF 2 (0.64 wt% F) theoretically can form 17 wt% of fluorellestadite (Ca 10 (SiO 4 ) 3 (SO 4 ) 3 F 2 ; 3C 2 S*3C$*CaF 2 ).If this occurs, it can decompose during firing at 1250 °C, leading to a sulfur loss of 4 wt% as SO 3 .In the third test series, the clinkers had a target C 3 S

CLINKERING PROCEDURE
To prepare the clinker batches, 25 g of each combination (see Table 3) were manually ground for ∼20 min using a mortar and pestle to obtain a homogenous mixture.From the mixtures, 5 g was weighed in 20 ml alumina crucibles and placed into a muffle furnace preheated to 800 °C; then, a 30-min hold was applied, followed by heating with a ramp of 5 °C/min to 1250 °C, at which the temperature was held for 90 min.After thermal treatment, the samples were removed from the furnace (at a clinkering temperature of 1250 °C) and then allowed to quench in the air at room temperature.The cooled clinkers were ground by hand with an agate mortar and pestle to fine powders for XRD analysis.

MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION
The diffractograms for each clinker were obtained using X-ray diffraction (Bruker D2 PHASER: Cu Kα1, λ 1.54184 Å).The parameters of the XRD analysis were a 2θ range of 10-70 °, a Cu  Kα radiation of 30 V and 10 mA, and a step size of 0.02 °with 0.4 s per step.The samples were back-loaded using PW1811 sample holders.During the XRD scan, the sample was rotated at 15 rpm, and a 1-mm divergence splitter was used while the Ni-K filter was removed.The lower discriminator was set to 0.19, and the upper discriminator to 0.28.First, the phases were identified from diffraction patterns using EVA software (Bruker), and further Rietveld analysis was done using PDXL 2 (Rigaku) software with the PDF-4+ 2020 RDB database to determine the changes in the phase trend in the samples.The preferred crystallographic information for the phase identification included C 4 AF (Redhammer et al., 2004), C 3 S (Mumme, 1995), C 12 A 7 (Palacios et al., 2008), C 4 A 3 $ (Cuesta et al., 2013), C$ (Morikawa et al., 1975), C 2 S (Mumme et al., 1995), CaO (Smith and Leider, 1968), fluorellestadite (Pajares et al., 2002), and Al 2 O 3 (Lewis et al., 1982)(ben Haha et al., 2019).

RESULTS
The  increases with the decrease in ye'elimite (peak at 23.56 °) instead that is shown in Figure 2E.Fluorellestadite (31.53 °) clearly appears when fluoride content increases to X > 0.15 (Figure 2G).With low amounts of fluoride in clinker, there was unreacted lime, which can be seen as intensity peaks at 2theta 37.25 °and 53.77 °(see Figure 2H).Alite content was close to zero in low fluoride-containing samples (see Figure 2I).From the fluoride content of X 0.075 upward, the amount of unreacted lime starts to decrease and the peak of alite appears at 51.5 °and grows up to X 0.225 (Figure 2I).An increase in fluoride content leads to liquid formation during firing.More liquid during firing allows more brownmillerite (peak at 12.09 °) to crystallize (ben Haha et al., 2019).The highest fluoride content led to the highest content of mayenite, fluorellestadite, and anhydrite together with the lowest content of ye'elimite.The trend of phase compositions of first test series is presented in Figure 3.The trend shows that target phases C 3 S, C 4 A 3 $, and C 4 AF are achieved in adequate levels when the fluoride content is around X 0.15, and thereby the fluoride content was selected also for test series 2.
Series 2: Effect of Target Ferrite/Ye'elimite Ratio in AYF Based on the results of test series 1, the fluoride content in series 2 was fixed to X 0.15.In this series, the silica and fluoride content was kept constant (CaF 2 1.29 wt%).The target phase compositions were C 3 S 50 wt%, C 4 A 3 $ 32.5-50 wt%, and C 4 AF 0-17.5 wt%.The  diffractograms (Figure 4A), as well as the magnified sections from (Figure 4B-K) the diffractogram, are shown.
In Figure 4, the sample 0 C 4 AF (50-50 C 4 A 3 $-C 3 S) has a clear peak of alite (at 51.5 °) that indicates fluoride alone can stabilize alite; however, the presence of unreacted CaO (Figure 4I) and Al 2 O 3 (Figure 4J) indicate that iron is required to enhance the burnability at 1250 °C, and only a small amount of iron content in the mix was required.Moreover, Al 2 O 3 disappears in the sample with a target of 2.5 wt% C 4 AF, and the peak of C$ completely disappears in the sample with a target of 7.5 wt% C 4 AF.The increase in iron content and decrease in sulfur content in the raw mix led to an increase in the mayenite/ye'elimite ratio.With the fixed fluoride content (X 0.15), there was no fluorellestadite present in any samples.The trend in the phase composition of the second test series is presented in Figure 5.The free lime content was the lowest in 10 C 4 AF, with a mayenite/ye'elimite ratio at an adequate level, when compared to target.However, the amount of produced alite in the 7.5 C 4 AF, 10 C 4 AF, and 12.5 C 4 AF samples was only around 45% of the target; the amount of alite in these samples was the highest of all the samples with iron.

Series 3: Effect of Target Ferrite/Alite Ratio in AYF
In test series 3, the sulfur contents in the raw material mixtures were kept constant, although alite content was changing.The sulfur content in raw mix was double when compared to test series 1 and 2 to see if extra sulfur has an effect on phase formation.The target phase compositions were 28 wt% of C 4 A 3 $, 28-66 wt% of C 3 S, 0-37 wt% of C 4 AF, and 6 wt% C$.In the test series 1 and 2, fluoride content was proportional to the alite content.In test series 3, the proportion of fluoride in alite is  changing as presented in Table 4.The XRD diffractograms are presented in Figure 6.
As highlighted in the magnified sections in Figure 6, both mayenite (Figure 6D) and anhydrite (Figure 6F) were observed in all samples.Also, as in series 2, the samples with a low iron content, 0 C 4 AF, and 5 C 4 AF had unreacted CaO (Figure 6I) and Al 2 O 3 (Figure 6J).When C 4 AF in the target composition increases, the content of unreacted CaO and Al 2 O 3 reduces, and C 4 AF peaks are observable at 12.1 °.As shown in series 1 and 2, iron content has an impact on the burnability of the constituents of the mixes.It is necessary to inhibit the persistence of uncombined CaO and other raw materials but only up to a certain extent, and a ferrite content of >10 wt% is not necessary for a complete reaction.
Unlike in series 1, ye'elimite content in series 3 remains constant in all the raw mixes.In series 1, the increasing fluoride content led to less ye'elimite.It seems that here in series 3, with constant fluoride (1.32 wt%) content in the raw mix, the ye'elimite also remains stable.Excess anhydrite remains unreacted that indicate excess sulfur is not the dominating factor to prevent decomposition of ye'elimite.The amount of belite is not increasing when compared to other test series that can be explained with maximum solubility of sulfur into belite (2% as SO 3 ) (Herfort et al., 2010).

ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION
In test series 1-3, it is shown that fluoride provides a sufficient driving force to the alite formation at 1250 °C-even though sulfur is present.It was shown in series 2 and 3 that alite can form when fluoride and alumina are present without iron, as also shown by Shame and Glasser (1987).As discussed in the introduction section, sulfur tends to stabilize belite, and, therefore, a mineralizer (fluoride) must be added to prevent belite formation to achieve alite formation.The percentage of alite formed compared to the target composition is presented in Table 5.It is shown that the alite content in the produced clinkers in series 2 and 3 when compared to the target composition was between 28 and 55 wt%.Further investigation and thermodynamic understanding of the system is necessary in order to design/formulate AYF clinkers.
It is known that iron can substitute for ye'elimite (Bullerjahn et al., 2020) and mayenite (Ruttanapun et al., 2018) as well as vary the alumina/iron ratio in the ferrite phase (Redhammer et al., 2004).Rigorous microstructural characterization was not the aim of this study, and the chemical substitution was not tested in the title study.The substitution of iron and fluoride should be further studied using spectroscopic techniques.Also, iron can substitute for alite and belite in small amounts.Results from series 2 suggest that fluoride can be assumed to substitute for alite phase and/ or mayenite (fluormayenite) ( Środek et al., 2018) since no fluorellestadite was formed.It is known that F does not substitute for belite, which is the key factor in fluoride working as a mineralizer for alite (Herfort et al., 2010;Hewlett et al., 2019).
As shown in the results, mayenite was formed in all clinkers and fluorellestadite in test series 1 and 3. Mayenite was present in all samples regardless of the amount of fluoride added.It has been found that, in CSA clinkers, a fast cooling rate can lead to mayenite formation, which could explain the formation of mayenite even without the presence of fluoride (x 0, series 1) (Dolenec et al., 2020).Another explanation might be the substitution of Fe or Si with Al, but this is out of the scope of the title study.Mayenite and fluorellestadite formation is not optimal for clinker hydration properties due to poor hydraulic characteristics.Moreover, it has been discussed that fluorellestadite has poor hydraulic characteristics (ben Haha et al., 2019) and should be avoided in clinkers, especially since it consumes valuable oxides from raw materials that could form more hydraulic phases.Mayenite is usually unfavorable because of its very fast hydration speed.The faster hydration speed of mayenite compared to ye'elimite is explained with its higher Ca/Al ratio (Hewlett et al., 2019;Bullerjahn et al., 2020).The formation of mayenite is not as disadvantageous in terms of hydration as the formation of fluorellestadite because it hydrates to form ettringite or monosulfate (Nguyen et al., 2019) and the hydration of mayenite can be controlled with the addition of retarders (Gijbels et al., 2019).Retarders, such as citric acid, have been proven to work in CSA cements (Moir, 1983;Gijbels et al., 2019), PC-CSA-C$ mix (Pelletier et al., 2010), and mayenite-rich ladle slag-phosphogypsum mix (Nguyen et al., 2019).Also, the presence of fluoride might produce a positive effect on the workability of the cement by retarding the fast-reacting clinker.Fluoride is known to have a retarding effect in CSA mixes (Jun et al., 2001;Liu et al., 2016) and in mayenite-rich ladle slag-phosphogypsum mix (Gijbels et al., 2019).Further, in PC, it is shown that fluoride first increases the hydration speed but has a retarding effect after a certain threshold (0.37 wt% fluoride in bulk composition) (Moir, 1983;Tran, 2011).The presence of fluoride slows down the hydration, but, with longer hydration times, the compressive strength reaches the same or a higher level as fluoride-free cement after complete hydration (Tran, 2011;Hanein et al., 2018;Gálvez-Martos et al., 2020).
In series 1, both the fluorellestadite and mayenite content increased with the higher fluoride content of the clinker.It was seen that with an adequate fluoride content (X 0.075-0.15),ye'elimite can coexist with alite and form a clinker with a high hydraulic cement-phase content.The SO 3 and fluoride content in the clinker raw mix seems to have a significant effect on the interactions between the mayenite-ye'elimite and fluorellestadite phases.In series 2, with an adequate CaSO 4 content for stoichiometric ye'elimite formation, fluorellestadite was not formed, but the mayenite content increased with the increasing iron content.In series 3, with the additional CaSO 4 introduced to the raw mix, fluorellestadite was present in increased amounts, but the mayenite and ye'elimite content were constant.The conclusions from series 2 and 3 were that the SO 3 content in the clinker mix needs to be optimized in a way that there is sufficient SO 3 in the ye'elimite formation to prevent mayenite formation-but not in a large excess that enables undesirable fluorellestadite formation/persistence in the final clinker.

BRIEF SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
The effect of a raw mix design on the CO 2 emissions of the AYF clinker compared to PC clinker is shown in Figure 8.It is shown that with the mix introduced in series 1, the CO 2 emissions combined from the fuel consumption of the manufacturing and CaCO 3 required for the raw mix are 18% less than with OPC; however, the total CO 2 emissions also depend on other factors, and, in particular, emissions from obtaining the raw materials can have a large influence on CO 2 emissions, especially if travelling long distances, as shown, for example, in the location of the bauxite source for the production of ye'elimite-rich cement (Hanein et al., 2018;Gálvez-Martos et al., 2020).It was noted in this study that increasing iron and fluoride contents made the clinkers more difficult to grind, which might cause extra manufacturing costs.The fluoride required for AYF clinker production can be provided using industrial waste materials, such as argon oxygen decarburization (AOD) slags or aluminum salt slags for use as clinker raw materials.These side streams also contain significant quantities of CaO, Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , and Fe 2 O 3 which are crucial for clinker production but usually avoided because of the presence of fluoride; however, this work suggests that these can be repurposed for use in AYF clinker manufacturing.

CONCLUSION
The target AYF composition was not achieved in any of the clinkers as the formation/persistence of belite and mayenite could not be avoided in the presence of sulfur, the belite phase is forming and appears to consume SiO 2 and CaO that were targeted for the alite formation.Minor phase mayenite was present, and its formation was increased with the fluoride content.The optimal fluoride content for the clinker was achieved with a target composition of 50 wt% C 3 S, 30 wt% C 4 A 3 $, and 20 wt% C 4 AF with fluoride content between 0.075 ≤ X ≤ 0.15 in Ca 3 Si 1-x Al x O 5-x F x .Fluoride has an important effect on the formation of alite when the clinker is produced at 1250 °C but can lead to the formation of fluorellestadite when excess sulfur is present in the clinker raw mix.A slight addition of fluoride (X 0.075) leads to the desired alite formation, but too much fluoride content reduces the ye'elimite content and leads to the formation of undesirable mayenite, fluorellestadite, and unreacted raw materials (anhydrite, CaO, or alumina).All clinkers with a fluoride content between x 0.075 and x 0.1 in Ca 3 Si 1-x Al x O 5-x F x had alite in their products.In series 3, almost all the excess anhydrite remained unreacted and did not further stabilize belite over alite.The effect of extra SO 3 on stabilization needs to be further studied.
Fe 2 O 3 is crucial to the burnability of AYF clinkers, but only to a certain extent.It was shown that 10 wt% C 4 AF as the target composition is sufficient to avoid unreacted raw materials.The effect of the amount of Fe 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 in the AYF system needs to be studied in further experiments, especially as the Fe content can be incorporated in both the ye'elimite and mayenite structures.Due to the complexity of the interactions in such clinkering systems, thermodynamic assessment and modeling will be crucial in their design.
The outcomes of this work improve understanding of low-carbon AYF cement clinker raw mix design and can promote waste valorization and circularization by enabling the use of fluoride-containing waste in cement clinker manufacturing.

FIGURE 3 |
FIGURE 3 | Target-phase composition (dashed lines) and the trend in the phase contents in the first test series acquired from the Rietveld analysis.The optimal phase content zone is marked with a dotted marker box.C 4 AF ferrite, C 3 S alite, C 12 A 7 mayenite, C 4 A 3 $ ye'elimite, C$ anhydrite, C 2 S larnite, CaO free lime, Al 2 O 3 free alumina, and 3C 2 S*3C$*CaF 2 fluorellestadite.

FIGURE 5 |
FIGURE 5 | Target phase composition (dashed lines) and the trend in the phase contents in the second test series acquired from the Rietveld analysis.The optimal phase content zone is marked with a dotted marker box.C 4 AF ferrite, C 3 S alite, C 12 A 7 mayenite, C 4 A 3 $ ye'elimite, C$ anhydrite, C 2 S larnite, CaO free lime, Al 2 O 3 free alumina, and 3C 2 S*3C$*CaF 2 fluorellestadite.

FIGURE 7 |
FIGURE 7 | Target-phase composition (dashed lines) and the phase content trend in the third test series was obtained from the Rietveld analysis.The optimal phase content zone is marked with a dotted marker box.C 4 AF ferrite, C 3 S alite, C 12 A 7 mayenite, C 4 A 3 $ ye'elimite, C$ anhydrite, C 2 S larnite, CaO free lime, Al 2 O 3 free alumina, and 3C 2 S*3C$*CaF 2 fluorellestadite.

TABLE 1 |
List of reagent-grade chemicals used for clinker synthesis.

TABLE 2 |
Equations to calculate the target phase composition.
a No corrections were made for possible elemental substitutions.In test series 3, extra CaSO 4 was added.

TABLE 4 |
Fluoride content according to alite content.

TABLE 5 |
Target alite content compared to alite content from the Rietveld analysis.