Microbiome-Mediated Immune Signaling in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colorectal Cancer: Support From Meta-omics Data

Introduction

The community of microorganisms that inhabit the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract and their collective genetic material are referred to as the gut microbiome. The composition and function of the gut microbiome have been widely implicated in human health and disease, particularly in GI diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and colorectal cancer (CRC), where specific alteration of the gut microbiome is associated with pathology (Sobhani et al., 2011; Knox et al., 2019b; Kaplan et al., 2019). The global incidence of IBD, including component diseases Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and IBD-unclassified (IBD-U), has risen considerably in recent decades (Molodecky et al., 2012; Kaplan et al., 2019; El-Matary and Bernstein, 2020). Increasing rates of pediatric-onset IBD in North America are of particular concern not only because disease in younger patients is more extensive and can lead to a range of developmental issues (Carroll et al., 2019) but also because of associated long-term cancer risk (Akimoto et al., 2020; El-Matary and Bernstein, 2020). Chronic intestinal inflammation is a precursor to CRC, and IBD is an established risk factor for developing both early- and late-onset CRC (Akimoto et al., 2020; Gausman et al., 2020).

Recent advances in culture-independent techniques for studying microbial communities have enabled extensive characterization of the healthy human gut microbiome (Human Microbiome Project Consortium, 2012; Méndez-García et al., 2018) and provide context for the host-microbiome interactions within the gut microenvironment. Although perturbations in the microbial community composition—dysbiosis—have been characterized in both IBD and CRC, the cause and effect relationship between inflammation and dysbiosis remains unclear. A variety of other host-mediated factors such as genetic susceptibility, epigenetics, diet, antibiotic use, and smoking status have been associated with IBD or CRC risk or both (Glória et al., 1996; Jostins et al., 2012; Kaplan et al., 2019; Lorzadeh et al., 2021), yet no exact trigger has been identified. The gut microbiome is thought to be directly implicated in the etiopathogenesis of both IBD and CRC (Sellon et al., 1998; Peloquin and Nguyen, 2013); current theories hypothesize that alterations in the normal gut microbiome, caused by some environmental exposure [for example, antibiotic use (Ungaro et al., 2014)], can trigger an inflammatory immune response that persists in the genetically susceptible host (Yang and Jobin, 2017; Knox et al., 2019b; Kaplan et al., 2019; Szamosi et al., 2020).

The intestinal epithelium is a crucial interface for host-microbiome interactions. In a healthy gut, the host’s immune system must be able to recognize and tolerate commensal organisms while retaining its ability to defend against pathogens. For example, microbial taxa that are considered protective stimulate CD4⁺ T regulatory (T_reg) cell proliferation and maintenance of gut immune homeostasis (Atarashi et al., 2011; Knox et al., 2019b), whereas pathogenic organisms are recognized by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs) on CD4⁺ T cells, resulting in a coordinated adaptive immune response (Himmel et al., 2008). Similarly, the gut microbiota responds to host immune activation and local inflammation by altering gene expression and metabolite production (Becattini et al., 2021). Gathering a better understanding of this complex, bi-directional signaling is the basis for untargeted microbiome functional characterization.

Techniques for characterizing entire microbial communities and their physiological contributions (termed meta-omics) have now grown beyond taxonomic identification and genome mapping as studied via metataxonomics and metagenomics, respectively, into new fields of research (Figure 1). Metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, and metabolomics are omics approaches that allow for further characterization of the gut microbiome in health and disease (Figure 1). Metagenomics describes the genetic content of a microbial community within a sample (typically stool or intestinal biopsy in the case of the GI microbiome), whereas metatranscriptomics utilizes reverse transcription to evaluate gene expression patterns from microbial messenger RNA (mRNA). Both techniques involve shotgun sequencing of nucleic acids isolated from a biological specimen and allow for prediction of downstream functional activity (Figure 1). Metaproteomics generally uses liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to isolate and quantify proteins, which are then evaluated to identify potential biomarkers of disease. Lastly, metabolomics can be used to search for a wide range of biomarkers, including amino acids, fatty acids, sugars, and vitamins. Using this approach, metabolites are detected through either nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or MS coupled with chromatography, the latter offering a wider range of detection and higher sensitivity. Stool is frequently used as a proxy for the luminal GI microbiome; however, the mucosal-associated microbiome—captured through endoscopic biopsy—will differ from that of the lumen and can provide site-specific evidence. Likewise, many microbiome studies focus on the bacterial component of the microbiome as a proxy for the entire community, which additionally contains eukaryotes and/or viruses. Meta-omics approaches may be used individually or in combination to study the microbiome. The application of multiple techniques to samples from the same cohort yields correlated functional profiles (Lloyd-Price et al., 2019), supporting the usefulness of microbial sequence data for downstream prediction of functional activity (Figure 1). Uncovering particular taxonomic and metabolic contributions in the context of IBD and CRC using these approaches gives insight into the metabolic microenvironment of the gut and the role of microorganisms within that environment. The potential of stool meta-omics techniques as non-invasive screening and detection tools is especially attractive. While this review focuses on microbiome-mediated signaling specifically, meta-omics can also be used to profile and predict disease-specific, location-specific, or longitudinal changes in microbial communities and many such studies have provided valuable insights into microbial community dynamics (Gevers et al., 2014; Hall et al., 2017; Schirmer et al., 2018).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Meta-omics techniques for studying the human gut microbiome. Microbial communities can be characterized based on their collective gene content (metataxonomics or metagenomics), gene transcripts (metatranscriptomics), protein pool (metaproteomics), or metabolite pool (metabolomics). Additionally, sequence data can be used to predict downstream expression of proteins or metabolites (dashed arrows). Abbreviations: WGS: Whole-genome sequencing; LC: Liquid chromatography; MS: Mass Spectrometry; GC: Gas chromatography; NMR: Nuclear magnetic resonance.

Investigators face several challenges when using meta-omics data for microbiome research as well as for disease investigation in a clinical setting. Prior to data generation there are a number of ways in which bias may be introduced during sample collection and storage (Alberti et al., 2014; Reck et al., 2015; Neuberger-Castillo et al., 2021). Furthermore, due to the dynamic and compositional nature of microbiomes, many of the techniques described above require large sample sizes and result in even larger datasets that must be properly assessed for quality before their interpretation (Zhang et al., 2021a). Accurate reference-based taxonomic assignment of sequences depends on the quality of database that is used and achieving statistical significance, in differential expression analysis for example, can be challenging (Zhang et al.,2021b). There is considerable interest in evaluating individual GI microbiomes within a clinical setting to aid screening and diagnosis using a personalized approach (Knox et al., 2019a). However, many of the techniques discussed above require a substantial computational effort and corresponding technical expertise, making them difficult to implement routinely in a clinical setting. Readers are referred to the following discussions regarding specific challenges associated with meta-omics techniques (Wishart 2016; Quince et al., 2017; Shakya et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Krassowski et al., 2020).

Meta-Omic Explorations of the Gut Microbiome in IBD and CRC Reveal Common Patterns of Metabolic Dysregulation

The implication of the gut microbiome in CRC and IBD etiology has prompted many researchers to employ meta-omics to study microbiome function and activity (Franzosa et al., 2019; Lloyd-Price et al., 2019; Ocvirk et al., 2020). Indeed, IBD serves as a model disease for the integrative human microbiome project (iHMP), which began in 2014 and collects host and microbiome-associated data using multiple meta-omics strategies (The Integrative HMP (iHMP) Research Network Consortium, 2014; Lloyd-Price et al., 2019). Results from the iHMP and other studies reporting statistically significant changes in the microbiome between health and disease are shown in Table 1. Extensive characterization of CRC-associated (Wirbel et al., 2019) and IBD-associated (Lloyd-Price et al., 2019) microbiomes has demonstrated that although the dysbiotic communities differ on a taxonomic level (i.e., biomarker species), there are similarities between the two diseases at the functional level (e.g., depletion of butyrate-producers, bile acid dysregulation). Consequently, in this review we restrict our discussion to the functional potential and activity of disease-associated microbiomes, rather than focusing on their taxonomic composition.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Meta-omic studies reporting statistically significant changes in the GI microbiome in CRC or IBD. Abbreviations: healthy controls (HC); irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); high-resolution magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (HR-MAS NMR); gas chromatography (GC); capillary electrophoresis (CE); ion cyclotron resonance Fourier transform mass spectrometry (ICR-FT/MS); time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ToFMS); liquid chromatography (LC); high performance LC (HPLC); ultra-performance LC (UPLC); medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA); long-chain fatty acids (LCFA).

Meta-omics studies have revealed that microbial dysbiosis in IBD and CRC goes beyond taxonomic imbalance. While there are discrepancies regarding the differential expression of specific proteins or metabolites between cohorts, the research collectively paints a picture of systemic dysregulation of multiple microbe-mediated compounds in disease. For example, amino acid and fatty acid metabolism are commonly dysregulated in IBD or CRC compared to healthy controls (Table 1), although the pattern of dysregulation is inconsistent. Other biochemical classes and pathways significantly dysregulated in a subset of studies include bile acids, vitamins B3 and B5, and sphingolipids. Interestingly, a similar pattern of metabolic dysregulation was apparent in the metabolome of a healthy CRC high-risk population (based on heritage and diet) compared to a healthy low-risk population (Ocvirk et al., 2020) (Table 1), suggesting that dysbiotic microbiomes are present before disease manifestation and contribute to CRC development. These shared patterns of dysregulation could indicate a shared etiology between IBD and CRC. The remainder of this review will summarize the biochemical significance of commonly dysregulated metabolites and pathways in the context of chronic inflammation and host immunity from in vitro and in vivo experimental research.

Microbiome-Mediated Mechanisms and Impact on Homeostasis

Amino Acid Metabolism and Polyamines

Many amino acids have an essential role in host immune signaling, and some are precursors for tumour-promoting compounds such as polyamines, which are capable of modulating systemic and mucosal adaptive immunity (Rooks and Garrett, 2016; Thomas et al., 2019). Genes involved in amino acid degradation were found to be enriched in a meta-analysis of CRC metagenomic profiles (Wirbel et al., 2019), and differential abundances of specific amino acids and related pathways are prevalent in IBD and CRC meta-omics studies (Table 1).

Both host and microbial cells utilize the essential amino acid tryptophan. Catabolism of tryptophan by macrophages leads to suppressed T cell proliferation in vitro (Munn et al., 1999). Tryptophan degradation has also been shown to modulate the differentiation of T cell subsets, affecting mucosal immunity and epithelial barrier integrity (Shapiro et al., 2014). Microbial metabolism of tryptophan can result in the production of kynurenines and indole-3-aldehyde, metabolites with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects including aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation promoting T_reg cell development and local IL-22 production (Zelante et al., 2013). Both tryptophan and kynurenic acid were found to be depleted in newly diagnosed, treatment-naive pediatric IBD patients (Kolho et al., 2017), whereas patients with remissive IBD displayed increased levels of tryptophan in stool compared to healthy controls (Jansson et al., 2009; Jacobs et al., 2016), supporting an immunoprotective role. Decreased tryptophan degradation in CD patients has also been predicted from deep sequencing of fecal metagenomes (Vich Vila et al., 2018). In contrast, kynurenine levels were elevated in mucosal biopsy samples of treatment-naive UC patients compared to healthy controls (Diab et al., 2019), as well as in stool from late-stage CRC patients (Yachida et al., 2019). Whether these discrepancies result from differing sample types or the contradictory effects of bioactive kynurenines (Rossi et al., 2019) is not yet understood.

Polyamines putrescine, spermidine, and spermine are derived from the amino acids arginine and ornithine in bacterial and mammalian cells (Gerner and Meyskens, 2004; Pegg, 2016; Rooks and Garrett, 2016). Other polyamines, such as trimethylamine (TMA), are synthesized by bacteria from the quaternary ammonium compounds choline and carnitine (Gerner and Meyskens, 2004; Thomas et al., 2019). Polyamines are essential metabolites for both the host and the microbiota. They are present at high levels in the GI tract, where they enable rapid turnover of intestinal epithelial cells and regulate specific eukaryotic gene expression among many other functions. For many decades now, polyamines have been implicated in tumorigenesis, including CRC (Gerner and Meyskens, 2004; Peng et al., 2021), due to their essential role in cell proliferation. Bacterial TMA production has also been linked to the consumption of red meat (a source of carnitine) and cardiovascular disease (Koeth et al., 2014).

In meta-omic CRC studies, levels of choline and choline-containing compounds (precursors of TMA) were found to be elevated in colorectal tumour biopsies relative to normal tissue from the same patients (Chan et al., 2009) and in stool from a high-risk group for CRC compared to a low-risk group (Ocvirk et al., 2020). Yachida et al. (2019) reported differentially abundant acetylated and diacetylated derivates of spermine, which have been previously proposed as tumour markers (Kawakita and Hiramatsu, 2006), at different stages of CRC. Of note, the polyamine putrescine and certain carnitine derivatives were reported to be differentially abundant in IBD compared to healthy controls (Diab et al., 2019; Lloyd-Price et al., 2019), supporting a role for polyamine metabolism in the etiology of IBD as well as CRC. Carnitine additionally serves as an organic compatible solute (osmoprotectant) for bacterial cells under osmotic stress (Meadows and Wargo, 2015). Hyperosmolarity is correlated to inflammation and serves as the primary inflammatory mechanism for DSS and other chemically-induced colitis models (Schwartz et al., 2009).

Levy et al. (2015) described altered amino acid and polyamine metabolism in the gut microbiome of NLRP6 inflammasome-deficient mice. Taurine—a bile acid conjugate—was depleted and shown to induce NLRP6-dependent IL-18 secretion by triggering intestinal inflammasome activation in vitro. The authors propose taurine as a microbiota-dependent positive inflammasome/IL-18 modulator and the polyamine spermine as an inflammasome/IL-18 suppressor. Epithelial IL-18 secretion leads to downstream antimicrobial peptide production, which in turn affects the intestinal microenvironment. The addition of taurine, histamine, or spermine to drinking water induced compositional changes in the gut microbiome of wild-type mice, but not in inflammasome-deficient mice nor anaerobic cultures, suggesting that the capacity of these molecules to alter the gut microbial balance depends on host signaling via NLRP6. When dysbiotic microbiota from inflammasome-deficient mice was transferred into a wild-type host, the authors observed dominance of the dysbiotic microbiota, leading to inflammasome suppression and reduced levels of colonic IL-18. These results highlight the complex interplay of host and microbial metabolism and the delicate inflammatory balance in the gut microenvironment. Patterns of dysregulation regarding amino acid metabolism in IBD (particularly in CD), are inconsistent with those observed in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) patients (Vich Vila et al., 2018), suggesting a disease-specific mechanism.

Bile Acids

In healthy states, primary bile acids (BAs), including cholate and chenodeoxycholate, are synthesized from cholesterol in the liver and conjugated with glycine or taurine before excretion. The majority of primary BAs are reabsorbed in the ileum; however, a small proportion (approximately 5%) enter the colon where they are deconjugated and converted to secondary BAs, including deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid, respectively, by the microbiota (Peng et al., 2021). Dominant members of the healthy stool microbiome (Human Microbiome Project Consortium, 2012), namely Firmicutes (including Clostridium spp., Ruminococcus gnavus and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii) and Bacteroidetes, are potent BA deconjugators and secondary BA transformation is attributed to metabolic activity by the genera Bacteroides, Clostridium, Eubacterium, Lactobacillus, and Escherichia (Duboc et al., 2013; Jia et al., 2018). In this regard, metabolism by the microbiome determines the composition of the BA pool in the gut. Bile acids in the intestine act primarily as detergents, facilitating the absorption of lipids and fat-soluble compounds. However, they can also act like hormones, regulating nutrient metabolism by activating specific nuclear and G protein-coupled receptors. They have also been shown to act as antimicrobial agents in the gut through their detergent activity (Shapiro et al., 2014; Ridlon et al., 2016). Ridlon et al. (2014, 2016) present in-depth reviews of bile acid metabolism and the gut microbiome.

Bile acids have been implicated in tumorigenesis, and particularly in CRC, through their capacity to induce oxidative stress and DNA damage at high concentrations (Bernstein et al., 2009; Ajouz et al., 2014; Jia et al., 2018). Increased levels of secondary BAs, specifically hydrophobic deoxycholic acid, have been correlated with the presence of colorectal adenomas (precursor lesions for CRC) and are capable of promoting intestinal tumorigenesis in experimental mouse models (Bernstein et al., 2009; Yachida et al., 2019; Peng et al., 2021). Bilophilia wadsworthia, whose growth is stimulated by the conjugated primary BA taurocholate, was enriched in patients with multiple polypoid adenomas and significantly correlated with the concentration of deoxycholic acid in stool (Yachida et al., 2019). Dietary fat intake positively influences secondary BA production, and Western-style diets with high fat intake have been implicated in the etiology of CRC (Bernstein et al., 2009; Ajouz et al., 2014). Metagenomic meta-analysis of the gut microbiome in CRC has indicated that genes for secondary BA conversion are consistently enriched in disease (Wirbel et al., 2019), and deoxycholic acid, along with cholate and chenodeoxycholate, were found to be enriched in a metabolomic analysis of a CRC high-risk cohort (Ocvirk et al., 2020). Another metabolomic analysis reported significantly elevated levels of glycine and taurine conjugates of cholate in early-stage CRC (Yachida et al., 2019). Metaproteomic analysis of CRC by Long et al. (2020) revealed elevated abundance of genera involved in BA metabolism and enrichment of DNA repair proteins and superoxide dismutases, indicating oxidative stress response (Jia et al., 2018; Long et al., 2020) (Table 1).

Despite their link to carcinogenesis, non-sulphated secondary BAs have been shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects in vitro (Duboc et al., 2013). Signaling via the main BA receptors, G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) TGR5 and nuclear receptor farnesoid X receptor (FXR), leads to downstream inhibition of NF-κB mediated pro-inflammatory innate immune response (Shapiro et al., 2014). FXR activation has been shown to protect mice from induced colitis via the downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Gadaleta et al., 2011). It has also been demonstrated to play a role in maintaining intestinal epithelium integrity by preventing bacterial overgrowth (Inagaki et al., 2006). Conversely, inactivation of FXR and subsequent BA dysregulation has been associated with increased colon cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in mice fed a Western-style diet (Dermadi et al., 2017). Individual BAs have variable ability to activate FXR and TGR5; unconjugated BAs are considered to have a greater FXR activation potential than their conjugated counterparts, and secondary BAs (including conjugated forms) are potent activators of TGR5 (Jia et al., 2018). Meta-omics of IBD indicates that primary conjugated and unconjugated BAs are enriched, and secondary BAs are depleted in disease (Jansson et al., 2009; Jacobs et al., 2016; Franzosa et al., 2019; Lloyd-Price et al., 2019). This pattern has likewise been observed in IBD serum metabolomics (Duboc et al., 2013), indicating systemic disruption. These results support a disease model in which gut dysbiosis alters the BA pool in favour of primary BAs. The subsequent reduction in secondary BAs drives host immune signaling toward an inflammatory phenotype.

Fatty Acids

Fatty acids, especially short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), have received a great deal of attention in GI health. Colonocytes use SCFAs derived from gut microbial fermentation of dietary polysaccharides as an important source of energy (Shapiro et al., 2014; Rooks and Garrett, 2016; Hanus et al., 2021). These microbial metabolites can also contribute to host immunostasis through GPCR signaling and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition, promoting an anti-inflammatory phenotype in the gut and strengthening the intestinal barrier (Shapiro et al., 2014; Rooks and Garrett, 2016). In particular, the SCFA butyrate and butyrate-producing bacteria, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Roseburia hominis, are considered to be beneficial, and their depletion is characteristic of IBD dysbiosis (Machiels et al., 2014; Patterson et al., 2017; Forbes et al., 2018; Alameddine et al., 2019). Butyrate is thought to contribute to intestinal health through a variety of mechanisms, including promotion of T_reg differentiation and macrophage polarization, inhibition of LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine production, promotion of apoptosis in colonocytes, and strengthening intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) barrier function (Alameddine et al., 2019; Knox et al., 2019b; Silva et al., 2020; Hanus et al., 2021).

The protective role of SCFAs in CRC has also been suggested via their ability to epigenetically modulate tumour suppressor gene translation through HDAC inhibition and activation of GPCR signaling pathways resulting in colon adenoma and carcinoma cell apoptosis (Ou et al., 2013; Hanus et al., 2021; Peng et al., 2021). Although most of the meta-omic explorations of CRC discussed in this review did not report statistically significant differences in SCFAs between disease and controls, butyrate-producing species such as Lachnospira multipara and Eubacterium eligens were significantly (p < 0.005) depleted in CRC for one study, which also reported significant elevation of phenylpropionate in late-stage CRC, specifically (Yachida et al., 2019). Butyrate was found to be significantly less abundant in the high-risk CRC population described (Ocvirk et al., 2020) compared to the low-risk population. Similar results have been reported in another CRC-risk cohort study (Ou et al., 2013). The observation that butyrate and butyrate-producing species are depleted in both IBD and CRC suggests a metabolic link between diseases and possible mechanism for increased risk of CRC development among IBD patients via epigenetics.

The gut microbiota has also been implicated in the metabolism of a wide range of FAs, such as the polyunsaturated FAs arachidonic acid and linoleic acid, since conjugation and transformation of these metabolites was found to be dependent on the gut microbiota (Kishino et al., 2013). Linoleic and arachidonic acid are essential for the production of prostaglandins (PGs) and other eicosanoids, molecules that contribute to immune signaling and inflammation via cytokine production (Jansson et al., 2009). Increased production of PGs drives chronic intestinal inflammation and has been identified in the intestinal mucosa of IBD patients (Raab et al., 1995). However, there also exists a role for PGs in the maintenance and repair of intestinal epithelium (Wang et al., 2005). In CRC, arachidonic and linoleic acid were decreased in some cohorts (Chan et al., 2009; Phua et al., 2014), while others reported decreases in global lipid metabolism (Long et al., 2020).

Elevated levels of arachidonic acid were observed in IBD cohorts (Jansson et al., 2009; Diab et al., 2019; Lloyd-Price et al., 2019). A decrease in arachidonic acid metabolism and subsequent PG production, as observed in Jansson et al. (2009), may explain the accumulation of this FA in the IBD environment. Overall, the meta-omics data indicates broad disruptions in FA metabolism in disease, especially in IBD, where depletion of short-, medium-, and long-chain FAs has been consistently reported. Further experimental characterization of the complex interactions of FAs and their metabolites with host immune regulation in the context of gut inflammation may help to elucidate the precise role of FA metabolism in pathogenesis.

Vitamins B3 & B5

B vitamins are key intermediates in essential cofactor metabolism and are indispensable for cellular life. These essential micronutrients are obtained from dietary sources, bacterial sources, or both. A deficiency of these vitamins from increased cellular demand or absorption defect leads to various physiological disruptions. Many, but not all, members of the gut microbiota are prototrophic for B vitamin synthesis (Peterson et al., 2020). It has been suggested that auxotrophic human gut bacteria rely on B vitamin sharing within the GI microenvironment for survival, as humanized gnotobiotic mice supported B vitamin auxotroph survival for at least 4 weeks regardless of dietary vitamin intake (Sharma et al., 2019).

Vitamin B3, also known as niacin or nicotinic acid, is a precursor of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), an essential cofactor involved in cellular redox reactions. Bacteria synthesize niacin from aspartic acid or tryptophan via the kynurenine pathway, ultimately resulting in NAD production. Human cells can also synthesize NAD via niacin-independent salvage pathways. In addition to its role in essential redox reactions, NAD plays a role in epigenetic enzyme regulation and genomic stability, as well as reactive oxygen species inhibition (Peterson et al., 2020). Administration of niacin disrupts NF-κB signaling, leading to suppression of inflammatory cytokines; its effects have been investigated in the context of several human diseases, including atherosclerosis, fatty liver disease, and Parkinson’s disease (Su et al., 2015; Peterson et al., 2020). Niacin is also known to affect fatty acid synthesis via NAD, and niacin or tryptophan deficiency can result in Pellagra, a disease whose symptoms include skin inflammation, diarrhea, and dementia. In mice, a diet supplemented with niacin and tryptophan was associated with increased expression of intestinal antimicrobial peptides and administration of this diet to colitis-susceptible mutant mice shifted the composition of the gut microbiota toward that of wild-type mice (Hashimoto et al., 2012). The receptor for niacin, GPR109A, is present on monocytes and macrophages and, notably, is also a receptor for the SCFA butyrate. Activation of GPR109A has been shown to suppress colonic inflammation and carcinogenesis via targeted T cell differentiation in mice and was deemed essential for butyrate-mediated IL-18 expression in the colonic epithelium (Singh et al., 2014).

Regarding meta-omics, niacin was reported to be decreased in CRC compared to healthy controls (Phua et al., 2014). The low-risk CRC cohort revealed elevated levels of niacin compared to the high-risk group (Ocvirk et al., 2020). In the same study, nicotinamide, a vitamer of niacin with anti-inflammatory properties (Peterson et al., 2020), and other niacin metabolites were enriched in the high-CRC-risk population (Ocvirk et al., 2020). Nicotinamide is suggested to play a role in cancer chemoprevention via enhanced DNA repair and suppression of pro-inflammatory mediators (Nikas et al., 2020). Loss of niacin-producing organisms in the gut could thus decrease the bioavailability of niacin to IECs, promoting inflammation and carcinogenesis. In IBD, vitamin B3 and associated metabolites appear to be differentially expressed in disease (Table 1). However, the pattern of dysregulation is inconsistent between cohorts (Kolho et al., 2017; Diab et al., 2019; Lloyd-Price et al., 2019). Differences in the type of biological sample(s) used, as well as cohort design, likely contribute to these inconsistencies. As already discussed, the stool and mucosal GI metabolic profiles can provide distinct contextual information (e.g., increased metabolite utilization or reabsorption in the GI tract mucosa may result in decreased stool concentrations or vice versa). The interpretation of these results is additionally challenging since niacin/NAD metabolism affects many cellular processes.

Vitamin B5, pantothenic acid, is essential for coenzyme A (CoA) synthesis and is abundant in a large variety of foods, so deficiency is rare (Peterson et al., 2020). The sodium-dependent multivitamin transporter (SMVT) facilitates the uptake of vitamins B5 and B7. It has been demonstrated to play a role in gut permeability in mice (Sabui et al., 2018), implicating one or both of these vitamins in gut homeostasis. While there is a lack of evidence for the pantothenic acid disruption in CRC meta-omics, three relatively large-scale IBD studies reported significantly depleted vitamin B5 in disease compared to healthy controls (Vich Vila et al., 2018; Franzosa et al., 2019; Lloyd-Price et al., 2019) (Table 1). Depletion of pantothenic acid in the gut may be a symptom of IBD-related dysbiosis and the loss of B5-producing organisms; however, further investigation into the role of vitamin B5 in IBD is needed to understand the cause and effects of this perturbation.

Sphingolipids

Sphingolipids such as sphingomyelin (SM) and glycosphingolipids (GSLs) are essential structural components of IEC membranes. In addition to a direct role in maintaining epithelial barrier integrity, sphingolipids and related metabolites have also been demonstrated to participate in immune signaling and modulation of inflammation (An et al., 2014; Abdel Hadi et al., 2016). In a mouse model, early-life exposure to microbial sphingolipids was shown to reduce invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cell proliferation and protect the adult host from iNKT cell-mediated colitis (An et al., 2014). Sphingolipid metabolism is complex and is reviewed in detail elsewhere (Abdel Hadi et al., 2016).

Sphingosine and ceramide are sphingolipids that, when accumulated on the surface of IECs, increase epithelial permeability and disrupt normal barrier function; ceramide was additionally found to induce either pro- or anti-inflammatory effects depending on its enzymatic origin (Abdel Hadi et al., 2016). The production of PGs from arachidonic acid, as previously discussed, can also be modulated by sphingolipid composition in cellular membranes (Nakamura and Murayama, 2014). Meta-omics of IBD reveals enrichment of sphingolipids (specifically, ceramide and sphingomyelin) and sphingolipid metabolism in disease (Kolho et al., 2017; Franzosa et al., 2019) (Table 1), supporting their role as pro-inflammatory mediators. No significant differences in sphingolipid metabolism were reported for CRC (Table 1). However, disruptions in arachidonic acid metabolism and PG production (Chan et al., 2009) may indicate undetected upstream changes in sphingolipid composition. Experimental evidence has tied sphingolipid receptor expression to tumour suppression in CRC (Petti et al., 2020). Due to their role in intestinal epithelial barrier maintenance and their varied capability for immune signaling, further characterization of sphingolipids in intestinal disease is warranted. Notably, further experimentation with early-life exposure to microbial sphingolipids and the resulting effects on host immune development could have implications related to the hygiene hypothesis (see below) and IBD development.

Summary

Technological advancements in recent decades have enabled extensive characterization of the human gut microbiome via meta-omics techniques. IBD, in particular, is commonly modelled in microbiome research, and the association with CRC is thought to indicate some degree of shared etiology between the two diseases. Genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors are thought to contribute to disease development; however, the mechanisms by which they do so are complex and not fully understood (Sobhani et al., 2011; Carroll et al., 2019). The intestinal microbiota have been implicated in the pathogenesis of both IBD and CRC. In the absence of a directly causative agent, the microbial community within the gut is being investigated as a mutualistic pseudo-organ capable of influencing homeostasis in its host.

It has been suggested that increased urbanization and hygienic behaviours (e.g., household use of disinfectants) results in reduced colonization by commensal organisms in early life and that this lack of exposure directly affects immune system development, resulting in a predisposition to aberrant immune responses—i.e., IBD—later in life (Weinstock and Elliott, 2009). Much support for this “hygiene hypothesis” comes from experimental studies regarding helminth and parasite colonization; however, these organisms are not typically captured in microbiome studies. Given the impact of the early-life environment on individual microbiome development and subsequent health outcomes (Nielsen et al., 2020; Boutin et al., 2021), the role of commensal bacteria in immune development and sensitization should not be ignored. Meta-omic cohort studies can provide insights into the mechanisms of aberrant immune response in disease and identify key metabolites whose role in immune development warrants further study.

An advantage of functional meta-omics is the potential to discover molecular biomarkers of disease that can aid in non-invasive screening and diagnosis, or in the case of IBD, distinguishing component diseases from one another. Meta-omic characterization of IBD and CRC in human cohorts has revealed similar patterns of metabolic dysregulation that implicate a disruption in host-microbiota cross-talk leading to aberrant immune response and inflammation. Dysregulated metabolism of amino acids, polyamines, bile acids, fatty acids, and B vitamins has been reported in both IBD and CRC cohorts, supporting a degree of shared microbiome-mediated etiology between the diseases. Several of these metabolites directly or indirectly affect NF-κB activation, a key transcription factor within the intestinal tumour microenvironment (Schwitalla et al., 2013). Protective microbially-mediated compounds such as tryptophan and butyrate have been shown to impact T_reg cell proliferation, and their relative decrease in disease not only reflects the loss of beneficial organisms, but also potentially drives autoinflammation through imbalanced T cell differentiation (Dominguez-Villar and Hafler, 2018). Although IBD are risk factors for CRC, not all IBD patients develop malignancies. Changes in the GI microbiome have been associated with cancer development in animal studies; however, the precise role of the microbiome in mediating carcinogenesis has yet to be discovered.

The human genetic landscape is one of many health determinants that can influence the development of individual gut microbiomes (Goodrich et al., 2014). Alternatively, studies in mice have revealed that dysbiotic fecal microbiota from a genetically susceptible (e.g., Nod2 or Asc deficient) host can be dominantly transferred to healthy, wild-type recipients and is sufficient to increase sensitivity to DSS-induced colitis and tumorigenesis (Couturier-Maillard et al., 2013; Levy et al., 2015), indicating that dysbiotic communities have the capacity to increase disease risk in wild-type recipients via molecular signaling (e.g., cytokine modulation) under these experimental conditions. These data support a model whereby inflammation and disease susceptibility depend on critical communication between the microbiome and the immune system of the host. Dysbiosis may be driven by a multitude of factors, including genetic susceptibility, diet, antibiotic usage, smoking status and other environmental exposures, which could have individual as well as cumulative effects on the gut microenvironment, including epithelial barrier integrity and inflammation. Despite these diverse influences, there appears to be some degree of shared microbially-mediated metabolic dysregulation in IBD and CRC, supporting a common etiology related to the GI microbiome. The discovery of significant metabolic differences between the microbiomes of healthy individuals in either high- or low-risk CRC cohorts suggests a model of dysbiotic metabolism in asymptomatic individuals leading to enhanced risk of immune imbalance and symptomatic disease.

Due to a high degree of variability in meta-omics data, systematic meta-analyses can be particularly useful in revealing disease-specific microbiome signatures across cohorts (Wirbel et al., 2019). Future research directions include longitudinal metabolic characterization of the IBD microbiome, including quantification of specific metabolites discussed here, toward development of CRC in order to identify why some IBD patients develop CRC and others do not. The role of microbial metabolites in infant immune system development may also provide valuable insights into immune modulation and disease susceptibility. Additionally, data produced from downstream meta-omics techniques (i.e., metaproteomics and metabolomics) can be used to confirm or contradict predicted functional activity from the plethora of available metataxonomics, metagenomics, or metatranscriptomics research. Even if consistent changes in gut meta-omics are found that are predictive of persons with IBD who develop CRC there remains the issue of determining cause and effect. Future studies will benefit from large cohort sizes, detailed metadata, considerate sample collection and storage techniques, and robust statistical approaches in order to address the many challenges associated with meta-omics research. However, there are studies that show that colon neoplasia is most likely to develop in the setting of active inflammation and is unlikely to develop in the absence of inflammation (Rubin et al., 2013; Shaffer et al., 2021; Yvellez et al., 2021). The association of meta-omics changes with other non-IBD chronic immune mediated inflammatory diseases suggests that the intestinal microbial milieu may drive systemic inflammation (Forbes et al., 2018). An evolving paradigm of gut microbial changes driving inflammation and the knowledge that gut inflammation can drive neoplasia development, makes it realistic to consider that microbial changes may underlie the ultimate development of neoplasia in persons with IBD and identifying these changes early on can be a mechanism to interrupt the inflammation-neoplasia paradigm in IBD. As the field continues to expand, overcoming barriers to clinical implementation of meta-omics will pave the way for personalized approaches to diagnosis and screening.

Author Contributions

MP participated in developing the idea for the article, drafting the article, and participated in the final editing. JF participated in developing the idea for the article and participated in the final editing. NK participated in developing the idea for the article and participated in the final editing. CB participated in developing the idea for the article and participated in the final editing. GV participated in developing the idea for the article and participated in the final editing.

Funding

We acknowledge support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Visual and Automated Disease Analytics (VADA) CREATE grant (funding reference number 498021).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abdel Hadi, L., Di Vito, C., and Riboni, L. (2016). Fostering Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Sphingolipid Strategies to Join Forces. Mediators Inflamm. 13, 1. doi:10.1155/2016/3827684

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ajouz, H., Mukherji, D., and Shamseddine, A. (2014). Secondary Bile Acids: an Underrecognized Cause of colon Cancer. World J. Surg. Onc 12, 1–5. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-12-164

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Akimoto, N., Ugai, T., Zhong, R., Hamada, T., Fujiyoshi, K., Giannakis, M., et al. (2020). Rising Incidence of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer - a Call to Action. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 18, 230–243. doi:10.1038/s41571-020-00445-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alameddine, J., Godefroy, E., Papargyris, L., Sarrabayrouse, G., Tabiasco, J., Bridonneau, C., et al. (2019). Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii Skews Human DC to Prime IL10-Producing T Cells through TLR2/6/JNK Signaling and IL-10, IL-27, CD39, and Ido-1 Induction. Front. Immunol. 10. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alberti, A., Belser, C., Engelen, S., Bertrand, L., Orvain, C., Brinas, L., et al. (2014). Comparison of Library Preparation Methods Reveals Their Impact on Interpretation of Metatranscriptomic Data. BMC Genomics 15, 912. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

An, D., Oh, S. F., Olszak, T., Neves, J. F., Avci, F. Y., Erturk-Hasdemir, D., et al. (2014). Sphingolipids from a Symbiotic Microbe Regulate Homeostasis of Host Intestinal Natural Killer T Cells. Cell 156, 123–133. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Atarashi, K., Tanoue, T., Shima, T., Imaoka, A., Kuwahara, T., Momose, Y., et al. (2011). Induction of Colonic Regulatory T Cells by Indigenous Clostridium Species. Science 331, 337–341. doi:10.1126/science.1198469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Becattini, S., Sorbara, M. T., Kim, S. G., Littmann, E. L., Dong, Q., Walsh, G., et al. (2021). Rapid Transcriptional and Metabolic Adaptation of Intestinal Microbes to Host Immune Activation. Cell Host & Microbe 29, 378–393. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2021.01.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bernstein, H., Bernstein, C., Payne, C. M., and Dvorak, K. (2009). Bile Acids as Endogenous Etiologic Agents in Gastrointestinal Cancer. Wjg 15, 3329–3340. doi:10.3748/wjg.15.3329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boutin, R. C., Petersen, C., Woodward, S. E., Serapio-Palacios, A., Bozorgmehr, T., Loo, R., et al. (2021). Bacterial-fungal Interactions in the Neonatal Gut Influence Asthma Outcomes Later in Life. eLife 10. doi:10.7554/eLife.67740

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carroll, M. W., Kuenzig, M. E., Mack, D. R., Otley, A. R., Griffiths, A. M., Kaplan, G. G., et al. (2019). The Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada 2018: Children and Adolescents with IBD. J. Can. Assoc. Gastroenterol. 2, S49–S67. doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chan, E. C. Y., Koh, P. K., Mal, M., Cheah, P. Y., Eu, K. W., Backshall, A., et al. (2009). Metabolic Profiling of Human Colorectal Cancer Using High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (HR-MAS NMR) Spectroscopy and Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). J. Proteome Res. 8, 352–361. doi:10.1021/pr8006232

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Couturier-Maillard, A., Secher, T., Rehman, A., Normand, S., De Arcangelis, A., Haesler, R., et al. (2013). NOD2-mediated Dysbiosis Predisposes Mice to Transmissible Colitis and Colorectal Cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 700–711. doi:10.1172/JCI62236

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dermadi, D., Valo, S., Ollila, S., Soliymani, R., Sipari, N., Pussila, M., et al. (2017). Western Diet Deregulates Bile Acid Homeostasis, Cell Proliferation, and Tumorigenesis in Colon. Cancer Res. 77, 3352–3363. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2860

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Diab, J., Hansen, T., Goll, R., Stenlund, H., Jensen, E., Moritz, T., et al. (2019). Mucosal Metabolomic Profiling and Pathway Analysis Reveal the Metabolic Signature of Ulcerative Colitis. Metabolites 9, 291. doi:10.3390/metabo9120291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dominguez-Villar, M., and Hafler, D. A. (2018). Regulatory T Cells in Autoimmune Disease. Nat. Immunol. 19, 665–673. doi:10.1038/s41590-018-0120-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duboc, H., Rajca, S., Rainteau, D., Benarous, D., Maubert, M.-A., Quervain, E., et al. (2013). Connecting Dysbiosis, Bile-Acid Dysmetabolism and Gut Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gut 62, 531–539. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302578

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

El-Matary, W., and Bernstein, C. N. (2020). Cancer Risk in Pediatric-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Pediatr. 8. doi:10.3389/fped.2020.00400

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Forbes, J. D., Chen, C.-y., Knox, N. C., Marrie, R.-A., El-Gabalawy, H., de Kievit, T., et al. (2018). A Comparative Study of the Gut Microbiota in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases-Does a Common Dysbiosis Exist? Microbiome 6, 221. doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0603-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Franzosa, E. A., Sirota-Madi, A., Avila-Pacheco, J., Fornelos, N., Haiser, H. J., Reinker, S., et al. (2019). Gut Microbiome Structure and Metabolic Activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 293–305. doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0306-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gadaleta, R. M., van Erpecum, K. J., Oldenburg, B., Willemsen, E. C. L., Renooij, W., Murzilli, S., et al. (2011). Farnesoid X Receptor Activation Inhibits Inflammation and Preserves the Intestinal Barrier in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gut 60, 463–472. doi:10.1136/gut.2010.212159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gausman, V., Dornblaser, D., Anand, S., Hayes, R. B., O'Connell, K., Du, M., et al. (2020). Risk Factors Associated with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 2752–2759. e2. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gerner, E. W., and Meyskens, F. L. (2004). Polyamines and Cancer: Old Molecules, New Understanding. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 781–792. doi:10.1038/nrc1454

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gevers, D., Kugathasan, S., Denson, L. A., Vázquez-Baeza, Y., Van Treuren, W., Ren, B., et al. (2014). The Treatment-Naive Microbiome in New-Onset Crohn's Disease. Cell Host & Microbe 15, 382–392. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glória, L., Cravo, M., Pinto, A., de Sousa, L. S., Chaves, P., Leitão, C. N., et al. (1996). DNA Hypomethylation and Proliferative Activity Are Increased in the Rectal Mucosa of Patients with Long-Standing Ulcerative Colitis. Cancer 78, 2300–2306. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19961201)78:11<2300:aid-cncr5>3.0.co;2-q

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goodrich, J. K., Waters, J. L., Poole, A. C., Sutter, J. L., Koren, O., Blekhman, R., et al. (2014). Human Genetics Shape the Gut Microbiome. Cell 159, 789–799. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hall, A. B., Yassour, M., Sauk, J., Garner, A., Jiang, X., Arthur, T., et al. (2017). A Novel Ruminococcus Gnavus Clade Enriched in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients. Genome Med. 9, 103. doi:10.1186/s13073-017-0490-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hanus, M., Parada-Venegas, D., Landskron, G., Wielandt, A. M., Hurtado, C., Alvarez, K., et al. (2021). Immune System, Microbiota, and Microbial Metabolites: The Unresolved Triad in Colorectal Cancer Microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 12. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.612826

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hashimoto, T., Perlot, T., Rehman, A., Trichereau, J., Ishiguro, H., Paolino, M., et al. (2012). ACE2 Links Amino Acid Malnutrition to Microbial Ecology and Intestinal Inflammation. Nature 487, 477–481. doi:10.1038/nature11228

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Himmel, M. E., Hardenberg, G., Piccirillo, C. A., Steiner, T. S., and Levings, M. K. (2008). The Role of T-Regulatory Cells and Toll-like Receptors in the Pathogenesis of Human Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Immunology 125, 145–153. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02939.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012). Structure, Function and Diversity of the Healthy Human Microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214. doi:10.1038/nature11234

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Inagaki, T., Moschetta, A., Lee, Y.-K., Peng, L., Zhao, G., Downes, M., et al. (2006). Regulation of Antibacterial Defense in the Small Intestine by the Nuclear Bile Acid Receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 3920–3925. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509592103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jacobs, J. P., Goudarzi, M., Singh, N., Tong, M., McHardy, I. H., Ruegger, P., et al. (2016). A Disease-Associated Microbial and Metabolomics State in Relatives of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2, 750–766. doi:10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jansson, J., Willing, B., Lucio, M., Fekete, A., Dicksved, J., Halfvarson, J., et al. (2009). Metabolomics Reveals Metabolic Biomarkers of Crohn's Disease. PLoS ONE 4, e6386. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006386

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, W., Xie, G., and Jia, W. (2018). Bile Acid-Microbiota Crosstalk in Gastrointestinal Inflammation and Carcinogenesis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 111–128. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jostins, L., Ripke, S., Weersma, R. K., Duerr, R. H., McGovern, D. P., Hui, K. Y., et al. (2012). Host-microbe Interactions Have Shaped the Genetic Architecture of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nature 491, 119–124. doi:10.1038/nature11582

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaplan, G. G., Bernstein, C. N., Coward, S., Bitton, A., Murthy, S. K., Nguyen, G. C., et al. (2019). The Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada 2018: Epidemiology. J. Can. Assoc. Gastroenterol. 2, S6–S16. doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kawakita, M., and Hiramatsu, K. (2006). Diacetylated Derivatives of Spermine and Spermidine as Novel Promising Tumor Markers. J. Biochem. 139, 315–322. doi:10.1093/jb/mvj068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kishino, S., Takeuchi, M., Park, S.-B., Hirata, A., Kitamura, N., Kunisawa, J., et al. (2013). Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Saturation by Gut Lactic Acid Bacteria Affecting Host Lipid Composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 17808–17813. doi:10.1073/pnas.1312937110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Knox, N. C., Forbes, J. D., Peterson, C.-L., Van Domselaar, G., and Bernstein, C. N. (2019b). The Gut Microbiome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Lessons Learned from Other Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 114, 1051–1070. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Knox, N. C., Forbes, J. D., Van Domselaar, G., and Bernstein, C. N. (2019a). The Gut Microbiome as a Target for IBD Treatment: Are We There yet? Curr. Treat. Options. Gastro 17, 115–126. doi:10.1007/s11938-019-00221-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koeth, R. A., Levison, B. S., Culley, M. K., Buffa, J. A., Wang, Z., Gregory, J. C., et al. (2014). γ-Butyrobetaine Is a Proatherogenic Intermediate in Gut Microbial Metabolism of L -Carnitine to TMAO. Cel Metab. 20, 799–812. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2014.10.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kolho, K.-L., Pessia, A., Jaakkola, T., de Vos, W. M., and Velagapudi, V. (2017). Faecal and Serum Metabolomics in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Eccojc 11, jjw158–334. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krassowski, M., Das, V., Sahu, S. K., and Misra, B. B. (2020). State of the Field in Multi-Omics Research: From Computational Needs to Data Mining and Sharing. Front. Genet. 11, 610798. doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.610798

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levy, M., Thaiss, C. A., Zeevi, D., Dohnalová, L., Zilberman-Schapira, G., Mahdi, J. A., et al. (2015). Microbiota-Modulated Metabolites Shape the Intestinal Microenvironment by Regulating NLRP6 Inflammasome Signaling. Cell 163, 1428–1443. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lloyd-Price, J., Arze, C., Arze, C., Ananthakrishnan, A. N., Schirmer, M., Avila-Pacheco, J., et al. (2019). Multi-omics of the Gut Microbial Ecosystem in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Nature 569, 655–662. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1237-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Long, S., Yang, Y., Shen, C., Wang, Y., Deng, A., Qin, Q., et al. (2020). Metaproteomics Characterizes Human Gut Microbiome Function in Colorectal Cancer. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 6. doi:10.1038/s41522-020-0123-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lorzadeh, A., Romero-Wolf, M., Goel, A., and Jadhav, U. (2021). Epigenetic Regulation of Intestinal Stem Cells and Disease: A Balancing Act of DNA and Histone Methylation. Gastroenterology 160, 2267–2282. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.03.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Machiels, K., Joossens, M., Sabino, J., De Preter, V., Arijs, I., Eeckhaut, V., et al. (2014). A Decrease of the Butyrate-Producing speciesRoseburia hominisandFaecalibacterium Prausnitziidefines Dysbiosis in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. Gut 63, 1275–1283. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304833

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meadows, J. A., and Wargo, M. J. (2015). Carnitine in Bacterial Physiology and Metabolism. Microbiology 161, 1161–1174. doi:10.1099/mic.0.000080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Méndez-García, C., Barbas, C., Ferrer, M., and Rojo, D. (2018). Complementary Methodologies to Investigate Human Gut Microbiota in Host Health, Working towards Integrative Systems Biology. J. Bacteriol. 200. doi:10.1128/JB.00376-17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Molodecky, N. A., Soon, I. S., Rabi, D. M., Ghali, W. A., Ferris, M., Chernoff, G., et al. (2012). Increasing Incidence and Prevalence of the Inflammatory Bowel Diseases with Time, Based on Systematic Review. Gastroenterology 142, 46–54. e42. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Munn, D. H., Shafizadeh, E., Attwood, J. T., Bondarev, I., Pashine, A., and Mellor, A. L. (1999). Inhibition of T Cell Proliferation by Macrophage Tryptophan Catabolism. J. Exp. Med. 189, 1363–1372. doi:10.1084/jem.189.9.1363

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakamura, H., and Murayama, T. (2014). The Role of Sphingolipids in Arachidonic Acid Metabolism. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 124, 307–312. doi:10.1254/jphs.13r18cp

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neuberger-Castillo, L., Ammerlaan, W., and Betsou, F. (2021). Fitness for Purpose of Stabilized Stool Samples for Bile Acid Metabolite Analyses. Sci. Rep. 11, 7904. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86784-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nielsen, C. C., Gascon, M., Osornio-Vargas, A. R., Shier, C., Guttman, D. S., Becker, A. B., et al. (2020). Natural Environments in the Urban Context and Gut Microbiota in Infants. Environ. Int. 142, 105881. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105881

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nikas, I. P., Paschou, S. A., and Ryu, H. S. (2020). The Role of Nicotinamide in Cancer Chemoprevention and Therapy. Biomolecules 10, 477. doi:10.3390/biom10030477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ocvirk, S., Wilson, A. S., Posma, J. M., Li, J. V., Koller, K. R., Day, G. M., et al. (2020). A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Gut Microbial Co-metabolism in Alaska Native and Rural African People at High and Low Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 111, 406–419. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqz301

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ou, J., Carbonero, F., Zoetendal, E. G., DeLany, J. P., Wang, M., Newton, K., et al. (2013). Diet, Microbiota, and Microbial Metabolites in colon Cancer Risk in Rural Africans and African Americans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 98, 111–120. doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.056689

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patterson, A. M., Mulder, I. E., Travis, A. J., Lan, A., Cerf-Bensussan, N., Gaboriau-Routhiau, V., et al. (2017). Human Gut Symbiont Roseburia Hominis Promotes and Regulates Innate Immunity. Front. Immunol. 8. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pegg, A. E. (2016). Functions of Polyamines in Mammals. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 14904–14912. doi:10.1074/jbc.R116.731661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peloquin, J. M., and Nguyen, D. D. (2013). The Microbiota and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Insights from Animal Models. Anaerobe 24, 102–106. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.04.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, Y., Nie, Y., Yu, J., and Wong, C. C. (2021). Microbial Metabolites in Colorectal Cancer: Basic and Clinical Implications. Metabolites 11, 159. doi:10.3390/metabo11030159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peterson, C. T., Rodionov, D. A., Osterman, A. L., and Peterson, S. N. (2020). B Vitamins and Their Role in Immune Regulation and Cancer. Nutrients 12, 3380. doi:10.3390/nu12113380

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petti, L., Rizzo, G., Rubbino, F., Elangovan, S., Colombo, P., Restelli, S., et al. (2020). Unveiling Role of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 2 as a Brake of Epithelial Stem Cell Proliferation and a Tumor Suppressor in Colorectal Cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 39, 253. doi:10.1186/s13046-020-01740-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Phua, L. C., Chue, X. P., Koh, P. K., Cheah, P. Y., Ho, H. K., and Chan, E. C. Y. (2014). Non-invasive Fecal Metabonomic Detection of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 15, 389–397. doi:10.4161/cbt.27625

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quince, C., Walker, A. W., Simpson, J. T., Loman, N. J., and Segata, N. (2017). Shotgun Metagenomics, from Sampling to Analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 833–844. doi:10.1038/nbt.3935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raab, Y., Sundberg, C., Hällgren, R., Knutson, L., and Gerdin, B. (1995). Mucosal Synthesis and Release of Prostaglandin E2 from Activated Eosinophils and Macrophages in Ulcerative Colitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 90, 614–620.

Google Scholar

Reck, M., Tomasch, J., Tomasch, J., Deng, Z., Jarek, M., Husemann, P., et al. (2015). Stool Metatranscriptomics: A Technical Guideline for mRNA Stabilisation and Isolation. BMC Genomics 16. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1694-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ridlon, J. M., Harris, S. C., Bhowmik, S., Kang, D.-J., and Hylemon, P. B. (2016). Consequences of Bile Salt Biotransformations by Intestinal Bacteria. Gut Microbes 7, 22–39. doi:10.1080/19490976.2015.1127483

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ridlon, J. M., Kang, D. J., Hylemon, P. B., and Bajaj, J. S. (2014). Bile Acids and the Gut Microbiome. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 30, 332–338. doi:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rooks, M. G., and Garrett, W. S. (2016). Gut Microbiota, Metabolites and Host Immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 341–352. doi:10.1038/nri.2016.42

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rossi, F., Miggiano, R., Ferraris, D. M., and Rizzi, M. (2019). The Synthesis of Kynurenic Acid in Mammals: An Updated Kynurenine Aminotransferase Structural KATalogue. Front. Mol. Biosci. 6. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2019.00007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rubin, D. T., Huo, D., Kinnucan, J. A., Sedrak, M. S., McCullom, N. E., Bunnag, A. P., et al. (2013). Inflammation Is an Independent Risk Factor for Colonic Neoplasia in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: a Case-Control Study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, 1601e1–16084. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sabui, S., Kapadia, R., Ghosal, A., Schneider, M., Lambrecht, N. W. G., and Said, H. M. (2018). Biotin and Pantothenic Acid Oversupplementation to Conditional SLC5A6 KO Mice Prevents the Development of Intestinal Mucosal Abnormalities and Growth Defects. Am. J. Physiology-Cell Physiol. 315, C73–C79. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00319.2017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schirmer, M., Franzosa, E. A., Lloyd-Price, J., McIver, L. J., Schwager, R., Poon, T. W., et al. (2018). Dynamics of Metatranscription in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Gut Microbiome. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 337–346. doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0089-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwartz, L., Guais, A., Pooya, M., and Abolhassani, M. (2009). Is Inflammation a Consequence of Extracellular Hyperosmolarity? J. Inflamm. 6, 21. doi:10.1186/1476-9255-6-21

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwitalla, S., Fingerle, A. A., Cammareri, P., Nebelsiek, T., Göktuna, S. I., Ziegler, P. K., et al. (2013). Intestinal Tumorigenesis Initiated by Dedifferentiation and Acquisition of Stem-cell-like Properties. Cell 152, 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sellon, R. K., Tonkonogy, S., Schultz, M., Dieleman, L. A., Grenther, W., Balish, E., et al. (1998). Resident Enteric Bacteria Are Necessary for Development of Spontaneous Colitis and Immune System Activation in Interleukin-10-Deficient Mice. Infect. Immun. 66, 5224–5231. doi:10.1128/IAI.66.11.5224-5231.1998

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shaffer, S. R., Erondu, A. I., Traboulsi, C., Rai, V., Krugliak Cleveland, N., Israel, A., et al. (2021). Achieving Histologic Normalization in Ulcerative Colitis Is Associated with a Reduced Risk of Subsequent Dysplasia. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. izab130. doi:10.1093/ibd/izab130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shakya, M., Lo, C.-C., and Chain, P. S. G. (2019). Advances and Challenges in Metatranscriptomic Analysis. Front. Genet. 10, 904. doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shapiro, H., Thaiss, C. A., Levy, M., and Elinav, E. (2014). The Cross Talk between Microbiota and the Immune System: Metabolites Take center Stage. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 30, 54–62. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2014.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, V., Rodionov, D. A., Leyn, S. A., Tran, D., Iablokov, S. N., Ding, H., et al. (2019). B-vitamin Sharing Promotes Stability of Gut Microbial Communities. Front. Microbiol. 10. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, Y. P., Bernardi, A., and Frozza, R. L. (2020). The Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids from Gut Microbiota in Gut-Brain Communication. Front. Endocrinol. 11. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, N., Gurav, A., Sivaprakasam, S., Brady, E., Padia, R., Shi, H., et al. (2014). Activation of Gpr109a, Receptor for Niacin and the Commensal Metabolite Butyrate, Suppresses Colonic Inflammation and Carcinogenesis. Immunity 40, 128–139. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sobhani, I., Tap, J., Roudot-Thoraval, F., Roperch, J. P., Letulle, S., Langella, P., et al. (2011). Microbial Dysbiosis in Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Patients. PLoS ONE 6, e16393. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016393

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, G., Sun, G., Liu, H., Shu, L., Zhang, J., Guo, L., et al. (2015). Niacin Suppresses Progression of Atherosclerosis by Inhibiting Vascular Inflammation and Apoptosis of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Med. Sci. Monit. 21, 4081–4089. doi:10.12659/MSM.895547

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szamosi, J. C., Forbes, J. D., Copeland, J. K., Knox, N. C., Shekarriz, S., Rossi, L., et al. (2020). Assessment of Inter-laboratory Variation in the Characterization and Analysis of the Mucosal Microbiota in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Front. Microbiol. 11, 2028. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.02028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

The Integrative HMP iHMP Research Network Consortium (2014). The Integrative Human Microbiome Project: Dynamic Analysis of Microbiome-Host Omics Profiles during Periods of Human Health and Disease. Cell Host Microbe 16, 276–289. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2014.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thomas, A. M., Manghi, P., Asnicar, F., Pasolli, E., Armanini, F., Zolfo, M., et al. (2019). Metagenomic Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Datasets Identifies Cross-Cohort Microbial Diagnostic Signatures and a Link with Choline Degradation. Nat. Med. 25, 667–678. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0405-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ungaro, R., Bernstein, C. N., Gearry, R., Hviid, A., Kolho, K.-L., Kronman, M. P., et al. (2014). Antibiotics Associated with Increased Risk of New-Onset Crohn's Disease but Not Ulcerative Colitis: a Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 109, 1728–1738. doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.246

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vich Vila, A., Imhann, F., Collij, V., Jankipersadsing, S. A., Gurry, T., Mujagic, Z., et al. (2018). Gut Microbiota Composition and Functional Changes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaap8914. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aap8914

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, D., Mann, J. R., and Dubois, R. N. (2005). The Role of Prostaglandins and Other Eicosanoids in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Gastroenterology 128, 1445–1461. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weinstock, J. V., and Elliott, D. E. (2009). Helminths and the IBD Hygiene Hypothesis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 15, 128–133. doi:10.1002/ibd.20633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wirbel, J., Pyl, P. T., Kartal, E., Zych, K., Kashani, A., Milanese, A., et al. (2019). Meta-analysis of Fecal Metagenomes Reveals Global Microbial Signatures that Are Specific for Colorectal Cancer. Nat. Med. 25, 679–689. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0406-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wishart, D. S. (2016). Emerging Applications of Metabolomics in Drug Discovery and Precision Medicine. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 473–484. doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.32

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yachida, S., Mizutani, S., Shiroma, H., Shiba, S., Nakajima, T., Sakamoto, T., et al. (2019). Metagenomic and Metabolomic Analyses Reveal Distinct Stage-specific Phenotypes of the Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer. Nat. Med. 25, 968–976. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0458-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., and Jobin, C. (2017). Novel Insights into Microbiome in Colitis and Colorectal Cancer. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 33, 422–427. doi:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000399

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yvellez, O. V., Rai, V., Sossenheimer, P. H., Hart, J., Turner, J. R., Weber, C., et al. (2021). Cumulative Histologic Inflammation Predicts Colorectal Neoplasia in Ulcerative Colitis: A Validation Study. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 27, 203–206. doi:10.1093/ibd/izaa047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zelante, T., Iannitti, R. G., Cunha, C., De Luca, A., Giovannini, G., Pieraccini, G., et al. (2013). Tryptophan Catabolites from Microbiota Engage Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and Balance Mucosal Reactivity via Interleukin-22. Immunity 39, 372–385. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Li, L., Butcher, J., Stintzi, A., and Figeys, D. (2019). Advancing Functional and Translational Microbiome Research Using Meta-Omics Approaches. Microbiome 7, 154. doi:10.1186/s40168-019-0767-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Thompson, K. N., Branck, T., Yan Yan, Y., Nguyen, L. H., Franzosa, E. A., et al. (2021a). Metatranscriptomics for the Human Microbiome and Microbial Community Functional Profiling. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 4, 279–311. doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-031121-103035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Thompson, K. N., Huttenhower, C., and Franzosa, E. A. (2021b). Statistical Approaches for Differential Expression Analysis in Metatranscriptomics. Bioinformatics 37, i34–i41. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab327

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar