The Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchor: A Linchpin for Cell Surface Versatility of Trypanosomatids

Introduction

Cell membranes are the interface between cells and their environment. Therefore, the architecture of the cell membrane that is exposed to the environment defines how the cell interacts with external influences. Membranes are covered with a plethora of different proteins that can be attached to the lipid bilayer in different ways. While integral proteins are inserted into the membrane via intrinsic hydrophobic regions and usually, but not always, span the entire membrane, peripheral proteins are entirely exposed at the cytoplasmic or extracellular face of the plasma membrane, where they are attached via weak interactions or a covalently bound lipid anchor, which integrates into one leaflet of the lipid bilayer (Singer and Nicolson, 1972; Stillwell, 2016). Whereas integration into the cytoplasmic side of the plasma membrane is mediated for instance by myristoyl, palmitoyl, and prenyl groups, there is only one structure that attaches proteins to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, which is the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (Stillwell, 2016). This anchor is preassembled and attached post-translationally to several hundred known proteins and it is considered to be ubiquitous among eukaryotes (Kinoshita, 2020; Liu and Fujita, 2020). GPI-anchored proteins have diverse functions, including regulation of the complement system and acting as receptors, antigens and enzymes (Paulick and Bertozzi, 2008; Kinoshita, 2020). Hence, defects in the biosynthesis of GPI-anchored proteins cause severe diseases known as inherited GPI deficiencies (IGDs) (reviewed in Bellai-Dussault et al., 2019).

Despite the essential roles of GPI-anchored proteins in both mammals and yeast, these proteins constitute only a minor proportion of the proteome of these organisms. In mammalian cells, the total number of GPI-anchored proteins rarely exceeds 10⁵ molecules (Ferguson et al., 1994). In contrast, the pathogens Trypanosoma brucei, Trypanosoma cruzi and species of the Leishmania genus are covered by a dense glycocalyx of GPI-anchored molecules, which function as key virulence factors (Ferguson et al., 2015). In the bloodstream of the vertebrate host, the surface coat of T. brucei consists nearly entirely of homodimeric variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) made up of an impressive number of 10⁷ monomers, which constitutes around 10% of the proteome and 90–95% of proteins found on the cells surface, therefore highlighting the importance of this GPI-anchored protein to the parasite (Cross, 1975; Jackson et al., 1985; Bartossek et al., 2017). Furthermore, the great variety of GPI-anchored molecules in T. cruzi and Leishmania spp. (El-Sayed et al., 2005) and evidence for prevalence of GPI-anchored surface molecules in other trypanosomatids suggests that GPIs might be linked to the success of parasitism in this large family of unicellular eukaryotes.

Trypanosomes and Leishmania spp. are causative agents of neglected tropical diseases (WHO, 2020) and are also found in wildlife, where they infect a vast range of vertebrates and invertebrates. For the genus Trypanosoma alone at least 500 species have been described that infect all classes of vertebrates (Spodareva et al., 2018). The close interaction between human populations and parasite reservoirs (Hamill et al., 2013; Jansen et al., 2018; Medkour et al., 2019, 2020), along with the disruption of the ecological equilibrium, can cause the spread of the previously confined wildlife parasites to humans (Thompson, 2013; Cable et al., 2017). This, for example, is considered to be the starting point for human trypanosomiasis in the Americas (reviewed in Jansen et al., 2020). Thus, infections by trypanosomatids are a prime example of the One Health concept (Gruetzmacher et al., 2021), which recognizes the impact of the interaction of all living organisms and the surrounding environment on human health.

This review aims to highlight the importance of GPI anchored molecules, which form the interface between the trypanosomatids and their environment, as an essential factor for their evolutionary success. For this purpose, we first describe the biochemistry of GPI synthesis in T. brucei in comparison to that in mammalian and yeast cells. Then we consider the relationship/interaction of the GPI-anchored molecules found in the human pathogens T. brucei, T. cruzi, and Leishmania spp. with their distinct host microenvironments. Finally, we summarize the current knowledge of GPI-anchored molecules in other species of Trypanosoma.

GPI Anchors

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins were discovered in mammalian cells in the late 1970s, as a result of their hydrolytic release mediated by phospholipase (PLC) (Ikezawa et al., 1976; Low and Finean, 1977). The release of proteins without cell lysis led to the suggestion that these molecules were covalently attached to the outer leaflet of the lipid bilayer via a phosphatidylinositol molecule. In 1985, the chemical compositions of two GPI anchors were published; one, that of the VSG found in T. brucei, the other, that of Thy-1 found in rat brains (Ferguson et al., 1985; Tse et al., 1985). The first structural details of these GPI-anchors followed in 1988, when the complete structures were determined using a combination of different methods, including NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (Ferguson et al., 1988; Homans et al., 1988).

The Composition and Structure of GPI Anchors

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors consist of a glycan and a lipid part. With the single exception of Entamoeba proteophosphoglycan (Moody-Haupt et al., 2000), all known protein-linked GPI anchors possess the same conserved core glycan structure composed of mannose(α1-2)mannose(α1-6)mannose(α1-4)glucosamine(α1-6)myo-inositol (Figure 1A). The core glycan can be modified by side chains, with the nature of these modifications varying between species and even within different life cycle stages of the same organism (Ferguson et al., 2015). Further, the extent of some of these modifications can also be protein specific (Ferguson et al., 2015). Typical modifications are mannose, galactose, and phosphoethanolamine residues as well as sialic acids. Figure 1B summarizes the GPI anchor modifications of prominent surface molecules of mammals and human infective trypanosomatids. For example, T. brucei adds different amounts of galactose side chains to nearly all GPI anchors of VSGs (Zamze et al., 1991), whereas branched poly-N-acetyllactosamine (poly-NAL) repeats capped by sialic acid residues are added to the anchor of procyclins, which form the major surface coat in a different life cycle stage (Engstler et al., 1993; Ferguson et al., 1993; Treumann et al., 1997; Mehlert et al., 1998). In T. cruzi, the attachment of aminoethylphosphonic acid to the core glucosamine represents a modification that is exclusive to this species (Macrae et al., 2005; Paulick and Bertozzi, 2008). Furthermore, a fourth mannose is found in all T. cruzi GPI anchors (Heise et al., 1996; Ferguson et al., 2015), a feature also present in the anchors of yeast and some mammalian proteins (Paulick and Bertozzi, 2008; Ferguson et al., 2015). The purpose of these modifications remains to be elucidated. In contrast, Leishmania species entirely lack side chain modifications of the GPI anchor (Ferguson et al., 2015).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. General structure of the GPI anchor and their side chain modifications. (A) Structure of the conserved glycan core with the different side chain modifications. The respective positions of the modifications are indicated by R_x. (B) Comparison of different side chain modifications (R_x) and lipid moieties for selected GPI anchored proteins in mammals, Trypanosoma brucei, Trypanosoma cruzi, and Leishmania. The positions of R1-7 and the lipids in the GPI anchor are indicated in panel (A). The nature and position of linkage of an additional hexose (*) at the first mannose of the GPI anchor of T. cruzi mucins is not yet known (Serrano et al., 1995). This figure was modified from Figure 1 of a review by Fujita and Kinoshita (2010).

The GPI anchor is generally linked to the protein through a peptide bond between the amino group of phosphoethanolamine (EtN-P) and the C-terminal carboxyl group of the polypeptide (Ferguson et al., 1988). However, an alternative attachment via aminoethyl phosphonate (AEP) instead of EtN-P has been identified for proteins in T. cruzi (Heise et al., 1996).

At the opposite end of the GPI anchor, a phospholipid mediates attachment to the cell membrane by insertion of its tail into the membrane’s outer leaflet. The composition of this tail depends on the species of origin and varies between diacylglycerols, lyso-acylglycerols, alkylacylglycerols or ceramides (McConville and Ferguson, 1993). In addition, the lipids vary in length, ranging from 14 to 26 carbons, and can be either saturated or unsaturated (Ferguson et al., 2015). In some cases an additional fatty acid may be attached to the 2-hydroxyl of the inositol residue, which is known as inositol acylation (Ferguson et al., 2015). This modification can be found in several mammalian GPI anchors and it is also present in some GPI anchors of trypanosomatids (Figure 1) (Ferguson et al., 2015). Interestingly, GPI anchors containing an inositol acylation are resistant to PLC cleavage (Roberts et al., 1988).

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchoring is not restricted to proteins, underlining the versatility of this mode of attachment. Non-protein linked GPI molecules include glycoinositolphospholipids (GIPLs) and lipophosphoglycans (LPGs), with anchors that are either identical to those of protein-linked GPIs or contain compositional and structural modifications. For example, type-1 GIPLs contain the Manα1-2Manα1-6Manα1-4GlcNα1-6PI sequence common to the protein-linked GPIs whereas type-2 GIPLs contain a Manα1-3Manα1-4GlcNα1-6PI motif and others possess hybrid structures presenting the branched motif (Manα1-6)Manα1-3Manα1-4GlcNα1-6PI (Figure 2) (McConville and Ferguson, 1993). While GIPLs in mammalian cells likely follow the same structural remodeling pathway as protein-linked GPIs (Wang et al., 2019), GIPLs in Leishmania and T. cruzi may share a common precursor but most likely represent the product of different biosynthetic pathways (Heise et al., 1996; Ralton and McConville, 1998; Ilgoutz and McConville, 2001).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. General structures of free GPIs (GIPLs) and LPGs. The dashed lines indicate smaller GIPL species in Leishmania (McConville and Ferguson, 1993). M_X indicates the number of mannoses and iM the unusual α1-3 binding of these mannoses. The number of phosphosaccharide repeats (n) of Leishmania LPGs is stage and species specific (Forestier et al., 2014). (A) Trypanosoma cruzi Type-1 GIPL, (B) Leishmania Type-1 GIPLs, (C) Leishmania Type-2 GIPLs, (D) Leishmania hybrid GIPLs, and (E) Leishmania LPGs.

GPI Biosynthesis

Current understanding of GPI biosynthesis has been gained mostly from studies on mammalian and yeast cells. This bias can be explained by the traditional focus on opisthokont models. Moreover, the mutations of GPI biosynthetic enzymes, used to elucidate these biosynthetic pathways, are lethal in other organisms, such as bloodstream form T. brucei (Nagamune et al., 2000). Therefore, we first summarize the current knowledge of GPI biosynthesis in mammals and then compare this mammalian pathway to that found in trypanosomatids. As GPI assembly in T. brucei is much better understood than in any other trypanosomatid species, we will mainly focus on T. brucei and, whenever possible, provide information available on T. cruzi and Leishmania.

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis is a sequential addition of sugars and ethanolamine to phosphatidylinositol (PI). While the initial steps take place on the outer membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the final assembly is performed on the luminal side of the ER (Kinoshita and Fujita, 2016; Liu and Fujita, 2020). Once the GPI precursor has been synthesized inside the ER, it is attached en bloc to a protein in exchange for its GPI-signal sequence (Kinoshita and Fujita, 2016; Liu and Fujita, 2020). Following this, maturation of the GPI anchor includes lipid remodeling reactions and side chain glycosylation, which can occur at different time points and either in the ER or the Golgi apparatus, depending on the organisms (Ferguson, 1999; Fujita and Kinoshita, 2010; Kinoshita and Fujita, 2016).

In mammals, GPI biosynthesis starts on the cytoplasmic side of the ER membrane with the transfer of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) from uridine-diphosphate-N-acetylglucosamine to PI, generating GlcNAc-PI (Figure 3A, step 1). This step is catalyzed by the multi-subunit enzyme GPI-GlcNAc transferase (PIG-A, PIG-C, PIG-H, PIG-P, PIG-Q, PIG-Y, and DPM2) (Fujita and Kinoshita, 2010). Once GlcNAc-PI has been formed, it is deacylated to glucosaminyl-PI (GlcN-PI) by an N-deacetylase, PIG-L (Figure 3A, step 2) (Nakamura et al., 1997; Watanabe et al., 1999). GlcN-PI is then flipped to the luminal side of the ER, an energetically costly process (Pomorski and Menon, 2006). Although flipping has been demonstrated to be bidirectional and independent of ATP (Vishwakarma and Menon, 2005) no GPI flippase has yet been identified. The most promising candidate, ARV1, has been described for Saccharomyces cerevisiae with evidence suggesting that ARV1-linked human diseases result from defective GPI anchor synthesis (Okai et al., 2020).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis pathway up to the point of protein attachment. (A) Mammalian GPI biosynthesis steps at and within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The reaction steps are numbered and are described in detail in the text: (1) transfer of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) to phosphatidylinositol (PI), (2) deacylation of GlcNAc-PI, (3) flipping of GlcN-PI into the ER lumen, (4) inositol acylation, (5) lipid remodeling, visualized by the color change from red to black, (6–7) addition of mannose, (8) addition of ethanolamine phosphate (EtN-P), (9) addition of mannose, (10) addition of EtN-P, (11) addition of EtN-P, (12) attachment of the GPI anchor to the protein. The occasionally observed addition of a fourth mannose is not depicted. (B) GPI biosynthesis steps at and within the ER in Trypanosoma brucei. The reaction steps are numbered and are described in detail in the text: (1) transfer of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) to phosphatidylinositol (PI), (2) deacylation of GlcNAc-PI, (3) flipping of GlcN-PI into the ER lumen, (4–6) addition of mannose, (7) addition of EtN-P, (8) lipid remodeling, (9) attachment of the GPI anchor to the protein. The broad solid arrows indicate reactions for which direct evidence exists. The dashed arrows indicate conversions that may exist. The light solid arrows indicate reactions that are not frequently observed. The curved arrows indicate the flipping reaction into the ER lumen.

After flipping into the ER lumen (Figure 3A, step 3), GlcN-PI is acylated by an acyltransferase, PIG-W, at the 2-hydroxyl residue of the inositol ring (Figure 3A, step 4) (Doerrler et al., 1996; Murakami et al., 2003). Subsequent lipid remodeling reactions occur on GlcN-(acyl)-PI, leading to the replacement of the diacyl PI moiety (displayed in red in Figure 3A) with 1-alkyl-2-acyl-PI (visualized in black in Figure 3A), with the mechanism and enzymes involved remaining elusive (Figure 3A, step 5) (Kanzawa et al., 2009). The following steps are the sequential transfer of two mannose molecules from dolichol-phosphate-mannose to GPI intermediates via different glycosidic linkages (DeGasperi et al., 1990). The first mannose is transferred by GPI mannosyltransferase I, PIG-M and PIG-X, to the 4-hydroxyl residue of GlcN (Figure 3A, step 6) (Maeda et al., 2001; Ashida et al., 2005), and the second mannose is transferred by GPI mannosyltransferase II, PIG-V, to the 6-hydroxyl residue of the first mannose (Figure 3A, step 7) (Kang et al., 2005). Following the transfer of the second mannose, the first mannose receives an EtN-P side chain modification, at the 2-hydroxyl residue (Figure 3A, step 8). This step is catalyzed by GPI-EtN-P transferase I, PIG-N (Hong et al., 1999). Following this, a third mannose is transferred by mannosyltransferase III, PIG-B, to the 2-hydroxyl residue of the second mannose (Figure 3A, step 9) (Takahashi et al., 1996). The third mannose is then modified by GPI-EtN-P transferase III (PIG-O and PIG-F) which transfers the “bridging” EtN-P that later connects the GPI anchor to the protein (Figure 3A, step 10) (Inoue et al., 1993; Hong et al., 2000). The resulting EtN-P-Man-Man-(EtN-P)Man-GlcN-(acyl)PI, also known as H7, is now ready for protein attachment (Hirose et al., 1992), though usually another EtN-P is attached to the second mannose to generate EtN-P-Man-(EtN-P)Man-(EtN-P)Man-GlcN-(acyl)PI, known as H8 (Hirose et al., 1992). This reaction is mediated by GPI-EtN-P transferase II, PIG-G and PIG-F (Figure 3A, step 11) (Shishioh et al., 2005). A fourth mannose may be attached to the 2-hydroxyl residue of the third mannose by mannosyltransferase IV, PIG-Z (not shown in Figure 3A) (Taron et al., 2004).

Attachment of the GPI anchor to a protein is mediated by an enzyme complex termed GPI transamidase, which consists of PIG-K, GPAA1, PIG-S, PIG-T and PIG-U (Figure 3A, step 12) (Hamburger et al., 1995; Yu et al., 1997; Ohishi et al., 2000, 2001; Hong et al., 2003). The complex can recognize and cleave the C-terminal GPI signal sequence of the protein and replace it with the preassembled GPI anchor. Once the GPI anchor has been attached to a protein, further lipid and glycan remodeling reactions take place. Most of these occur within the Golgi apparatus (reviewed in Kinoshita, 2020; Liu and Fujita, 2020), but inositol deacylation (Liu et al., 2018) and EtN-P removal (Fujita et al., 2009) are performed in the ER lumen.

This completes the summary of events that lead to GPI-anchoring of a protein in mammals. How does this process differ in trypanosomatids?

In T. brucei, the first two steps (Figure 3B, steps 1–2) of GPI biosynthesis are comparable with those in mammals. Several homologs of the GPI-GlcNAc transferase subunits have been reported, including TbGPI1, TbGPI2, TbGPI3, and TbGPI19 (Fujita and Kinoshita, 2010). The GlcNAc-PI de-N-acetylase homolog in T. brucei is TbGPI12 (Chang et al., 2002). After the precursor has been flipped to the luminal side of the ER (Figure 3B, step 3), the pathways diverge. Inositol acylation occurs only after the first mannosylation, indicating a different substrate specificity for the mannosyltransferase I, TbGPI14, in this parasite (Figure 3B, step 4) (Güther and Ferguson, 1995). In addition, it has been shown that the inositol acyltransferase requires a hydroxyl group at the fourth position on the first mannose and a free amine on the glucosamine residue (Urbaniak et al., 2008). The same requirement for mannosylation was also reported for Leishmania (Smith et al., 1997).

The transfer of the second mannose is mediated by the homolog of mannosyltransferase II, TbGPI18 (Figure 3B, step 5) (Fujita and Kinoshita, 2010), and TbGPI10, the homolog of mannosyltransferase III, transfers the third mannose (Figure 3B, step 6) (Nagamune et al., 2000). Among trypanosomatids, the addition of a fourth mannose seems to be unique to T. cruzi, but no homologs for a mannosyltransferase IV have been identified so far. In T. brucei, several GPI intermediates bearing one to three mannoses are in a dynamic equilibrium between inositol acylated and non-acylated states (Menon et al., 1990; Güther and Ferguson, 1995) (Figure 3B, equilibrium arrows). The equilibrium is maintained by a diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP)-sensitive inositol deacylase together with a phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)-sensitive inositol acyltransferase (Güther and Ferguson, 1995). Whether such an equilibrium exists in Leishmania and T. cruzi is still controversial (Heise et al., 1996; Ralton and McConville, 1998; Hilley et al., 2000; Bertello et al., 2004).

Following the assembly of the mannoses, an EtN-P bridge is added to the third mannose (Figure 3B, step 7). This reaction might be mediated by TbGPI13, which has been suggested to be an EtN-P transferase III homolog (Fujita and Kinoshita, 2010). Inositol acylation of the Man₃GlcN-PI intermediate has been reported to enhance the efficiency of EtN-P addition (Güther and Ferguson, 1995). Subsequently, fatty acid remodeling reactions occur (Figure 3B, step 8) that can be described as sequential deacylations and reacylations. In addition, inositol deacylation is thought to be a prerequisite for complete fatty acid remodeling (Güther and Ferguson, 1995). In the bloodstream form of T. brucei the remodeling of the GPI anchor was studied for its major surface protein, the VSG. It is initiated by removal of the sn-2 fatty acid followed by acylation of myristate using myristoyl-CoA as the donor (Masterson et al., 1990; Hong and Kinoshita, 2009). The following steps of sn-1 deacylation and a second myristate incorporation lead to the formation of the mature GPI precursor (Masterson et al., 1990; Hong and Kinoshita, 2009). So far, this exclusive use of myristate has only been found in T. brucei (Ferguson et al., 1988). TbGup1, was shown to mediate the myristate transfer steps during the remodeling reactions (Jaquenoud et al., 2008). The GPI anchor of procyclin, the abundant surface molecule of T. brucei procyclic forms, retains the inositol acylation throughout synthesis and in the mature form (Treumann et al., 1997; Hong et al., 2006). Lipid remodeling has also been reported for T. cruzi (Heise et al., 1996) and Leishmania (Ralton and McConville, 1998). In T. cruzi, two different remodeling reactions occur: conversion of glycerolipid to ceramide and fatty acid remodeling (Heise et al., 1996; Bertello et al., 2004; De Lederkremer et al., 2011). The metacyclic forms of T. cruzi contain inositolphosphoceramide in the lipid part of their GPI anchored glycoproteins, which represents a stage specific modification (Serrano et al., 1995). Another organism that utilizes inositolphosphoceramide rather than glycerolipids in their GPI anchors is S. cerevisiae (Conzelmann et al., 1992). In this organism, the ceramide conversion most likely takes place after the GPI anchor is transferred to the protein (Sipos et al., 1997). Both chronology and location of ceramide conversion in T. cruzi remain unclear.

As in mammals, the preassembled GPI anchor is attached to the protein by a GPI transamidase complex (Figure 3B, step 9). In T. brucei, this complex is formed by two trypanosome-specific components, TAA1 and TAA2, plus three subunits that have homologs in mammals and yeast, TbGAA1, TbGPI8, and TbGPI16 (Nagamune et al., 2003). A direct comparison of homologous key enzymes in selected organisms is provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Table 1. List of proteins involved in the GPI biosynthesis pathway.

Clearly, several steps involved in GPI biosynthesis are common to mammals, yeast and trypanosomatids, though there are also marked differences. These include the chronological order of inositol acylation and lipid remodeling as well as the details of further modifications in the Golgi apparatus. In mammals and yeast, lipid remodeling occurs after inositol acylation in the ER as well as in later steps in the Golgi apparatus (reviewed in Kinoshita, 2020; Liu and Fujita, 2020). In contrast, lipid remodeling in trypanosomatids has been reported to take place on GPI precursors within the ER and, except for ceramide remodeling in T. cruzi, occurs directly before protein attachment (Masterson et al., 1990; Hong and Kinoshita, 2009; De Lederkremer et al., 2011). Interestingly, an alternative myristoylation pathway, called lipid exchange, has been identified exclusively in the bloodstream form of T. brucei (Buxbaum et al., 1994, 1996). This pathway was reported to be mechanistically similar to lipid remodeling but involves a distinct set of enzymes and appears to operate in a post-ER secretory compartment, possibly the Golgi (Paul et al., 2001). The authors suggested that lipid exchange might be a proofreading mechanism to ensure that all lipids on the VSG anchor consist of myristate. This may highlight once again the importance of this fatty acid for the VSG GPI anchor. Although the GPI biosynthesis steps are well studied, we pinpointed some questions that remain unanswered, especially for trypanosomatids.

The Influence of the Biophysical Properties of GPI Anchors on Their Respective Proteins

The function of GPI anchors does not solely lie in connecting proteins to the membrane. In fact, this anchor has been implicated in increasing lateral mobility of proteins and in targeting of proteins to special microdomains, named lipid rafts, as well as being subject to cleavage mediated by activation of specific GPI cleaving enzymes (GPIases), which leads to the release of the surface protein.

Early studies using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) on GPI-anchored proteins, such as Thy-1, placental alkaline phosphatase and Ly6E, reported diffusion coefficients comparable to those of membrane lipids and 2- to 5-times faster than those of transmembrane proteins (Ishihara et al., 1987; Zhang et al., 1991). In T. brucei, the lateral mobility of the VSG was found to be comparable to the mobility of other membrane-bound glycoproteins, but slower than that of phospholipids (Bülow et al., 1988). However, FRAP measurements are limited by poor spatial resolution, inherent averaging of the dynamics of multiple individual molecules, and a possible convolution of diffusion and protein interactions (Saha et al., 2016). To resolve these inherent limitations of the FRAP technique, studies of the dynamics of single molecules or small groups thereof have been employed to gain a more accurate picture of the diffusion process. Pioneering single particle tracking (SPT) studies on GPI-anchored proteins, such as Thy-1 and NCAM-125, revealed different diffusion modes for these molecules, as evidenced by their individual trajectories (Sheets et al., 1995; Sheets et al., 1997). In T. brucei, the trajectories revealed that single VSG molecules diffused freely in artificial membranes, as well as on living cells (Hartel et al., 2016). In addition, the authors were able to detect a specific molecular crowding threshold that limits diffusion and affects protein function. To the best of our knowledge, no data on surface molecule mobility has been reported to date for T. cruzi or Leishmania spp.

Although several different experiments have suggested that GPI-anchored proteins diffuse freely as individual molecules over large length scales, a dynamic partitioning into lipid rafts has also been proposed (Simons and Ikonen, 1997; Kenworthy et al., 2004; Komura et al., 2016; Kinoshita et al., 2017). Lipid rafts are microdomains enriched with sphingolipids and cholesterol (Simons and Ikonen, 1997; reviewed in Levental et al., 2020). Saturated lipid chains are critical for the lipid-lipid interactions between sphingolipids and GPI anchors (Schroeder et al., 1994, 1998). As the GPI anchor does not extend through the lipid bilayer, lipid rafts might function as binding hubs for GPI-anchored proteins and receptors involved in intracellular signaling pathways (Stefanova et al., 1991). Other postulated functions include apical and basolateral sorting as well as export mechanisms of GPI-anchored proteins from the trans-Golgi network in polarized cells (Lisanti et al., 1988; Muniz and Riezman, 2016; Lebreton et al., 2019). It has been suggested that, during Golgi transit, where the sterol content increases, proteins with shorter anchors are retained and ultimately targeted for ER-associated degradation, while the ones with longer anchors progress toward the plasma membrane (Bagnat et al., 2000; Simons and Sampaio, 2011; Spira et al., 2012). Studies on lipid rafts in protozoan parasites indicate that they may be possible factors involved in parasite–host interactions, including host cell signaling, cell adhesion and invasion as well as vesicle trafficking, release and motility (Goldston et al., 2012). In T. cruzi, an increasingly popular hypothesis describes the surface coat as a rather highly organized “patchwork quilt”-like structure, instead of a continuum of glycoconjugates (Mucci et al., 2017). The proposed structure is composed of multiple nanoscale membrane domains (10–150 nm) bearing different compositions of proteins and probably also of lipids (Lantos et al., 2016; Mucci et al., 2017). However, the size, function, lifespan, and even existence of such domains, in general, remains controversial (reviewed in Levental et al., 2020).

Another important characteristic of GPI-anchored proteins is their controlled shedding from the cell surface through the action of specific GPIases (Kinoshita, 2020). The shedding of GPI-anchored proteins triggers diverse responses and is implicated in essential cellular functions, such as neuronal differentiation (Sabharwal et al., 2011; Park et al., 2013), promotion of endothelial cell migration (Watanabe et al., 2007), and fertilization competence of spermatozoa (Fujihara et al., 2013; Fujihara et al., 2014).

In T. brucei, soluble VSG (sVSG) is shed from the cell surface by GPI-PLC mediated hydrolysis of the GPI-anchor (Bülow et al., 1989; Garrison et al., 2021). In addition, membrane form VSG (mfVSG) containing the intact GPI-anchor is released via direct shedding (Garrison et al., 2021). Although GPI-PLC is involved in VSG turnover, its exact function and even localization is still unclear. While the locations reported in the literature include the cytoplasmic leaflet of the plasma membrane (Cardoso De Almeida et al., 1999), the flagellar membrane (Grab et al., 1987; Hanrahan et al., 2009; Sunter et al., 2013), and the cell surface of short-stumpy forms (Gruszynski et al., 2003), the proposed functions include the stimulation of endocytosis of the transferrin receptor (TfR) (Subramanya et al., 2009), cleavage of misfolded GPI-anchored proteins prior to ER-associated degradation (Tiengwe et al., 2018), and VSG release during differentiation (Gruszynski et al., 2003). In contrast, the shedding of mfVSG containing an intact GPI anchor might be a direct consequence of the unusual lipid composition of the VSG GPI anchor, which exclusively contains dimyristoyl glycerol (Ferguson et al., 1988). This lipid shows a high off rate from biological membranes at 37°C (Silvius and Leventis, 1993; Silvius and Zuckermann, 1993; Garrison et al., 2021), which might explain why VSG molecules have been found to integrate into the plasma membrane of erythrocytes (Rifkin and Landsberger, 1990).

While the evolutionary advantage of enzymatic shedding of trypanosomatid surface molecules is still not clear, the release of virulence factors in extracellular vesicles has been shown to influence parasite–host-interactions (reviewed in Szempruch et al., 2016). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that VSG shedding from doomed cells is a final attempt to modulate host defenses, with the released antigens acting as a decoy to bind antibodies, thus rendering the latter refractory to interacting with VSGs in living cells. Such altruistic behavior has recently been demonstrated for Escherichia coli populations, in which mass cell suicide was detected as a defense strategy in bacterial warfare (Granato and Foster, 2020). It has already been speculated that an altruistic form of programmed cell death has a function in life cycle progression of African trypanosomes (Duszenko et al., 2006; Welburn et al., 2006). However, it remains to be determined whether a unicellular organism can undergo a process that is considered altruistic.

Surface Molecules of the Human Pathogenic Trypanosomatids

While the majority of trypanosomatids are monoxenic parasites of insects, Trypanosoma and Leishmania species have largely adopted a dixenic lifestyle by successfully infecting and proliferating in vertebrate hosts (Lukeš et al., 2014, 2018; Adl et al., 2019). The dixenic lifestyle can be seen as beneficial to the parasites, which started exploiting an additional host that provides different nutrient resources and, potentially, less competition (Ricklefs, 2010; Lukeš et al., 2014). However, living in such distinct microenvironments represents a challenge that requires constant adaptation from the parasites for their survival.

Within the vertebrate host, pathogens are exposed to a complex and orchestrated immune response. As a result, trypanosomatids have developed a range of strategies to overcome the attack by humoral and cellular components of both the innate and adaptive immune systems of their hosts and to maximize the probability of being transmitted to another host (Cardoso et al., 2015; Geiger et al., 2016). Inside the invertebrate host, trypanosomatids are confronted with harsh physiological conditions (acidic pH as well as proteolytic and hydrolytic activities), have to handle innate immune responses and must cross physical barriers to ensure infection of a specific tissue (e.g., gut, salivary glands) that enhances the chance of further transmission (Caljon et al., 2016). The microbiome of the vector and symbiotic associations are likely to play an additional role in infection resistance (Cirimotich et al., 2011; Weiss and Aksoy, 2011). Thus, parasites must overcome several bottlenecks to successfully complete their life cycle.

In all life cycle stages, with their vastly varying microenvironments, it is the cell surface of the parasite that represents the interface for interactions with the host or insect vector. Therefore, one hallmark of trypanosome developmental progression is the changing of the molecular composition of their glycocalyx (Acosta-Serrano et al., 2007; de Souza et al., 2010). In the following subsections we give an overview of the life cycles of different human infective trypanosomatids, after which we indicate how the parasites employ GPI-anchored surface molecules to adapt to their diverse microenvironments in order to facilitate endurance in such contrasting surroundings. Since the repertoire of expressed surface molecules varies greatly, we will focus on highly abundant GPI-anchored molecules.

Trypanosoma brucei

The Life Cycle

Inside the vertebrate host, T. brucei is found exclusively in extracellular fluids and in two morphologically distinct forms: the proliferative slender and the cell cycle arrested stumpy trypomastigotes. Infection of the tsetse starts when the fly takes a bloodmeal from an infected mammalian host and ingests these bloodstream forms. Classically, the stumpy form has been described as ‘preadapted’ to survive in the fly and, hence, was long considered to be the only fly infective form (Robertson and Bradford, 1912; Rico et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2017; Szöőr et al., 2020). However, recent findings have shown slender forms to be equally competent for tsetse passage (Schuster et al., 2021). Once inside the fly, trypanosomes pass through the crop to the tsetse midgut. Here, they elongate and differentiate into the proliferative procyclic forms (Vickerman, 1969; Turner et al., 1988). After having established themselves in the midgut as procyclics, the trypanosomes must then cross the peritrophic matrix, a protective, chitinous barrier that separates the bloodmeal from the midgut tissue (Lehane et al., 1996; Rose et al., 2014; Rogerson et al., 2018). In order to cross this barrier, procyclic trypanosomes must swim back in the direction they came from, to reach the site of peritrophic matrix synthesis, the proventriculus. Here, they can swim through the peritrophic matrix in its immature state (Rose et al., 2020). After entering the endotrophic space, procyclic trypanosomes can either continue to colonize the ectotrophic midgut or elongate in the anterior midgut to become cell-cycle arrested mesocyclic trypanosomes, which then invade the proventriculus (Vickerman, 1985; Van Den Abbeele et al., 1999). In the proventriculus, trypanosomes develop into the long, proliferative epimastigote forms (Vickerman, 1985; Van Den Abbeele et al., 1999; Sharma et al., 2008; Rose et al., 2020). While undergoing an asymmetric division to create a long and a short daughter cell, the epimastigote forms migrate to the salivary glands. Though very difficult to confirm experimentally, it is thought that upon entry into the salivary gland, the long daughter cell dies while the short daughter cell attaches to the gland epithelium via its flagellum (Vickerman, 1969). Once attached, the trypanosomes either divide symmetrically to generate more attached epimastigotes, or they undergo an asymmetric division. This asymmetric division results in the formation of the cell cycle arrested, free-swimming metacyclic form. With the next bite of the tsetse fly, the metacyclic trypomastigotes infect the mammalian host and subsequently differentiate to the proliferative slender bloodstream stage (Vickerman, 1985; Schuster et al., 2017; Szöőr et al., 2020). An overview of the life cycle showing the parasite stages in their mammalian hosts and respective insect vectors can be found in Figure 4A.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Schematic overview of the life cycles of human-infective trypanosomatids together with their most abundant GPI-anchored molecules. (A) Trypanosoma brucei, (B) Trypanosoma cruzi, and (C) Leishmania. The replicative stages are indicated by a circular arrow (orange). GPI-anchored surface molecules: variant surface glycoprotein (VSG), transferrin receptor (TfR), GP63, procyclin, trans-sialidase (TS), brucei alanine rich protein (BARP), mucin, glycoinositolphospholipid (GIPL), mucin-associated surface protein (MASP), lipophosphoglycan (LPG), proteophosphoglycan (PPG).

GPI-Anchored Molecules in Mammalian Host Stages

The mammalian host reacts to infections by African trypanosomes with the full spectrum of immune responses, activating both cellular and humoral components (reviewed in Onyilagha and Uzonna, 2019). However, due to the extracellular lifestyle of these trypanosomes, humoral responses constitute the most prominent line of defense against the parasite. To outwit the host defenses, the parasite employs a sophisticated mechanism of antigenic variation and antibody clearance revolving around its GPI-anchored major surface glycoprotein, the VSG (Table 2), which forms a dense monolayer on the cell surface. VSG monomers in T. brucei have a molecular mass of approximately 55 kDa (Cross, 1975). Based on studies on the VSG N-terminal domain from the 1990s, VSGs were long thought to invariably form homodimers of very similar structure (Freymann et al., 1990; Blum et al., 1993) with a more recently solved VSG structure also showing very similar structural traits (Bartossek et al., 2017). Other recent findings, however, suggest that the members of the large VSG family are structurally more diverse than previously thought, with some believed to form trimers on the cell surface (Pinger et al., 2018; Umaer et al., 2021; Zeelen et al., 2021). VSG homodimers are attached to the plasma membrane via two GPI anchors, with each one covalently linked to the C-terminus of one monomer (Ferguson et al., 1988). Usually, each monomer carries at least one N-linked oligosaccharide (Zamze, 1991; Mehlert et al., 1998).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored surface molecules of trypanosomatids.

The cell surface of the bloodstream form of T. brucei is covered by a glycocalyx composed of about 10⁷ VSG monomers, creating a dense monolayer (Cross, 1975). The amino-terminal domains of the VSGs, which constitute about 75% of the mature protein, show high sequence diversity. This diversity is ensured by a large repertoire (>1000) of VSG coding genes, of which approximately 80% are pseudogenes or incomplete genes that are used to expand the variability through recombination events (Cross et al., 2014). Out of this variety, the parasites express just one VSG at a time, and sporadic switches in VSG expression form the basis for antigenic variation (Mugnier et al., 2016). The process of VSG switching is thought to represent the only occasion when more than one VSG isoform is displayed on the cell surface (Horn, 2014). Furthermore, the VSG molecules are randomized on the cell surface by lateral diffusion (Hartel et al., 2016) and conformational changes in VSG molecules have been suggested to contribute to an adaptive packing (Bartossek et al., 2017). The latter mechanism ensures that the covering of the plasma membrane is not compromised by slight fluctuations of the amount of proteins in the VSG surface coat, as might occur during antigenic variation and during the course of the cell cycle (Bartossek et al., 2017). In this way, the flexible and dense VSG coat always shields the plasma membrane and invariant molecules efficiently from immune recognition.

The high VSG mobility conferred by the GPI-anchor is also essential for antibody clearance. The incessant and directional movement of trypomastigotes generates hydrodynamic flow forces on the cell surface that drag VSG-antibody complexes to the posterior region of the cell (Engstler et al., 2007), where they are internalized through the flagellar pocket by a very efficient endocytosis machinery (reviewed in Overath and Engstler, 2004; Link et al., 2021). Another important skill for any parasite is nutrient scavenging from the host. For example, the transferrin receptor (TfR) (Table 2) is responsible for iron uptake in T. brucei. TfR is a heterodimer consisting of ESAG6 and ESAG7 and is attached to the plasma membrane by a single GPI anchor on ESAG6 (Trevor et al., 2019). The localization of TfR is usually restricted to the flagellar pocket (FP), but under iron starvation TfR expression has been shown to be upregulated and the receptors escape from the FP and cover the entire cell surface (Mussmann et al., 2003, 2004). In this scenario, it is likely that T. brucei employs the same principle of GPI-anchor mobility for iron endocytosis. Interestingly, a study that analyzed TfR trafficking was able to highlight the importance of the GPI anchor as an intracellular sorting signal in trypanosomes (Tiengwe et al., 2017). The authors showed that ESAG7 homodimers, which contain no GPI anchor, are transported to the lysosome while ESAG6 homodimers, which display two GPI anchors, are carried to the cell surface. In addition, they created a modified TfR heterodimer with two GPI anchors, which was found to localize to the cell surface. These results indicate that the attachment of two GPI anchors might be a requirement for proteins to be translocated to the cell surface in T. brucei.

Although other stage-specific surface proteins exist, their detection is hampered by the high abundance of VSG molecules (Shimogawa et al., 2015). Due to the lethality of VSG deletion to the parasite, the biological role of most of these other molecules is still not understood.

GPI-Anchored Molecules in Invertebrate Host Stages

In the tsetse fly midgut, the ingested bloodstream forms of T. brucei are exposed to proteases that promote the differentiation to procyclic forms (Sbicego et al., 1999). During differentiation, it is assumed that the GPI anchored GP63 (or major surface protease - MSP) and GPI-PLC synergistically cleave VSG from the surface (Table 2) (Bülow et al., 1989; Gruszynski et al., 2003, 2006; LaCount et al., 2003; Grandgenett et al., 2007). Simultaneously, a new, stage-specific coat consisting of GPI-anchored procyclins (Table 2) is established (Bülow et al., 1989; Gruszynski et al., 2003, 2006; Grandgenett et al., 2007). Distinct classes and isoforms of procyclins are differentially expressed by the trypanosomes. The EP procyclins contain repeats of a dipeptide composed of glutamic acid (E) and proline (P), while the GPEET procyclins consist of pentapeptide repeats of glycine (G), proline (P), two glutamic acids (EE), and threonine (T) (Roditi et al., 1998). While the polypeptide backbone of the procyclins may be modified with phosphate groups (Bütikofer et al., 1999; Mehlert et al., 1999), the C-terminal GPI anchor is furnished with large and branched poly-NAL glycans (Ferguson et al., 1993) and its inositol acylation makes it resistant to cleavage by GPI-PLC (Field et al., 1991). The poly-NAL chains on the GPI anchor are further capped with sialic acid by a GPI anchored trans-sialidase (TS; Table 2), conferring additional negative charges to the procyclin coat (Engstler et al., 1993; Pontes de Carvalho et al., 1993). However, it has not yet been demonstrated whether sialic acid capping is important for parasite survival.

All procyclin isoforms are resistant to cleavage by GP63 and tsetse midgut proteases (Acosta-Serrano et al., 2001b; Liniger et al., 2003) and their expression is temporally regulated. Directly after differentiation is induced, all three EP isoforms (EP1, EP2, EP3) and GPEET are expressed (Vassella et al., 2001). In the first days, GPEET synthesis is increased, making it the predominant component of the early procyclic surface coat (Acosta-Serrano et al., 2001b; Vassella et al., 2001). After a few days, GPEET is repressed, indicating the transition to late procyclic forms (Vassella et al., 2001). These findings led to the postulation that GPEET might be important for survival in the midgut, while EP represents a better coat for parasite survival on the way to the salivary glands. However, experiments with EP/GPEET null mutants indicated that procyclins are not essential for procyclic forms in vitro (Vassella et al., 2003) and cyclical transmission by the tsetse fly was also not negatively affected (Haenni et al., 2006; Vassella et al., 2009). Interestingly, analysis of the null mutant revealed that in the absence of procyclin polypeptide precursors, free GPI anchors formed a glycocalyx on the surface (Vassella et al., 2003). Thus, the concrete functions of procyclins remain elusive, but it might be possible that they are required for infections in the wild, where infection levels are very low. In addition, they might be important for migration to the salivary glands, as EP procyclins are also expressed by the mesocyclic forms in the anterior midgut, and by trypomastigotes in the proventriculus (Sharma et al., 2008).

Another stage-specific molecule anchored by GPI is known as the T. brucei alanine-rich protein (BARP) (Table 2). BARPs are expressed by epimastigotes attached to the epithelium of the salivary glands, but their biological role is still unknown (Urwyler et al., 2007).

Trypanosoma cruzi

The Life Cycle

Trypanosoma cruzi infects the mammalian host when the metacyclic trypomastigotes, which are present in the feces of the triatomine vector, enter the body through wounds or mucosa. In contrast to African trypanosomes, the metacyclic forms of T. cruzi attach to and invade a variety of host cells (Chagas, 1909; Schenkman et al., 1991b; Yoshida, 2006). The strategies used by T. cruzi for cell entry are diverse (reviewed in Walker et al., 2014). Once inside the cells, they are initially confined within a membrane-bound compartment, the parasitophorous vacuole, which later fuses with the lysosome, facilitating the escape of the parasites to the cell cytoplasm and triggering the differentiation into amastigotes (Andrews, 1993). In the cytoplasm, amastigotes proliferate and differentiate into the intracellular trypomastigotes (Chagas, 1909). During differentiation, an intracellular epimastigote-like stage is observed, which represents an intermediate stage preceding the maturation into trypomastigotes (Almeida-de-Faria et al., 1999). The intracellular amastigotes and trypomastigotes can escape to the extracellular environment where they can infect neighboring host cells (Dvorak and Hyde, 1973; Ferreira et al., 2012; Arias-Del-Angel et al., 2020). In addition, trypomastigotes can invade the bloodstream, where they are accessible for uptake by the hematophagous triatomine vectors (Salassa and Romano, 2019). After ingestion, most of the trypomastigotes are broken down in the stomach of the insect while the surviving parasites differentiate into epimastigotes (Ferreira et al., 2016). Epimastigotes move to the intestine where they proliferate, attach to the perimicrovillar membranes, and pass through metacyclogenesis, which is the transformation of non-infective epimastigotes into highly infective metacyclic trypomastigotes (Schaub, 1989; Goncalves et al., 2018). There is evidence suggesting that a microenvironmental shift in the concentration of oxidants and antioxidants may influence both the proliferation of epimastigotes and the differentiation into metacyclics (Nogueira et al., 2015). A schematic overview of the T. cruzi life cycle is provided in Figure 4B.

GPI-Anchored Molecules in Mammalian Host Stages

In contrast to T. brucei, T. cruzi also invades cells of their vertebrate host next to being found in the bloodstream. Cell invasion is a well-known strategy to avoid humoral immune responses. Nevertheless, hiding inside a cell triggers other components of host immunity: effectors of the cellular response, such as CD8⁺ cells (reviewed in Cardoso et al., 2015).

The major surface glycoprotein of all life-cycle stages of T. cruzi is the mucin (also known as mucin-like glycoprotein). Mucins (Table 2) are GPI anchored, distributed over the entire plasma membrane and play a key role in parasite protection, infectivity and immune modulation during all T. cruzi life cycle stages (Mortara et al., 1992; Moreno et al., 1994; Ruiz et al., 1998; Acosta-Serrano et al., 2001a; Almeida and Gazzinelli, 2001; Buscaglia et al., 2006). These molecules contain a polypeptide backbone with Thr-rich domains that are extensively modified with short O-linked glycans (Schenkman et al., 1993; Almeida et al., 1994; Pereira-Chioccola et al., 2000). Two major gene families, called TcSMUG and TcMUC encode for mucins (Di Noia et al., 1995; Buscaglia et al., 2006). When in the mammalian host, genes of the TcMUC family are expressed (Campo et al., 2004; Buscaglia et al., 2006; Urban et al., 2011; Pech-Canul et al., 2017).

Mucin molecules of mammalian stages range from 60 to 200 kDa in molecular weight, share the sialic acid containing epitope Ssp-3, and present terminal Gal(α1,3)Gal epitopes (Schenkman et al., 1991a; Almeida et al., 1994; Tomlinson et al., 1994; Buscaglia et al., 2006). The Ssp-3 epitope is implicated in mammalian cell attachment and invasion and has been suggested to be involved in diverting the complement cascade (Schenkman et al., 1991a; Tomlinson et al., 1994; Buscaglia et al., 2006). The terminal Gal(α1,3)Gal epitopes are a main target of antibody responses. To evade the vertebrate immune response, these saccharides are masked by sialic acid molecules scavenged from the host (Previato et al., 1985; Pereira-Chioccola et al., 2000). In addition, the sialylation of mucins inside the parasitophorous vacuole transfers sialic acid from LAMP proteins to the parasite, which contributes to the rupture of the vacuole and invasion of the cytoplasm by the parasite (Hall et al., 1992; Albertti et al., 2010; Cardoso et al., 2015). The GPI anchor of most mammal-derived mucins contains alkylacylglycerol with predominantly unsaturated fatty acids at the sn-2 position (Serrano et al., 1995). This feature most likely correlates with an induced production of proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-12 (IL-12) and tumor-necrosis factor α (TNFα) (Almeida et al., 2000; Almeida and Gazzinelli, 2001; Previato et al., 2004). In contrast, approximately 70% of the GPI anchor of metacyclic mucins contain inositolphosphoceramide in their phospholipid tail, which is thought to increase the mucin shedding rate (Schenkman et al., 1993; Serrano et al., 1995). Mucin shedding was hypothesized to play a role in the clearance of surface immunocomplexes (Buscaglia et al., 2006). In the metacyclic trypomastigote, mucins have also been proposed to have a function in cell attachment and invasion of mammalian host cells, including induction of intracellular Ca²⁺ signaling (Moreno et al., 1994; Ruiz et al., 1998).

Another important component of the T. cruzi surface is TS (Table 2). Like mucins, these GPI anchored glycoproteins are distributed over the entire plasma membrane of T. cruzi (Frevert et al., 1992; Lantos et al., 2016). Although all life cycle stages show TS at the cell surface, the functions vary immensely (Pech-Canul et al., 2017). The bloodstream trypomastigotes possess proteins with TS and/or neuraminidase activities (Schenkman et al., 1991a, 1992). The TS activity is responsible for the transfer of sialic acid from host glycoconjugates to mainly mucin O-linked glycans, enabling epitopes to be camouflaged (Schenkman et al., 1993; Pereira-Chioccola et al., 2000), as explained above in the context of mucins. The neuraminidase activity is used to remove sialic acids from the parasite surface and/or from the host cells, thereby facilitating the internalization of the parasite (Velge et al., 1988; Schenkman et al., 1992). Interestingly, the inhibition of TS activity in metacyclic trypomastigotes reduced the activation of Ca²⁺ signaling pathways (Ruiz et al., 1998). Considering that mucins have been linked to Ca²⁺ activity during cell invasion, it is likely that the orchestrated work of TS and mucins contributes to cell invasion through this pathway. This mechanism is activated by protein tyrosine phosphorylation (Favoreto et al., 1998). The TS of mammalian host stages are GPI anchored while the TS presented by insect stage epimastigotes are predicted to have a transmembrane domain (Briones et al., 1995b). Although the GPI anchoring of this molecule may be an adaptation of the mammalian host stages (Briones et al., 1995a; Rubin-de-Celis et al., 2006), the biological implications of this are still not clear. In amastigotes, SA85 is one of the few characterized TS molecules. This molecule is a ligand for the mannose receptor of macrophages, which has been suggested to increase the amastigote’s potential for cell invasion (Kahn et al., 1995).

As is the case for mucins and TS, the GPI-anchored surface metalloprotease, also termed GP63 (or major surface protease; Table 2), is present in all life cycle stages of T. cruzi (Cuevas et al., 2003). However, it is more abundant in amastigotes than in epimastigotes or trypomastigotes (Grandgenett et al., 2000; Cuevas et al., 2003). Although this suggests different functional importance, the major role of GP63 is still elusive (Grandgenett et al., 2000; Cuevas et al., 2003; Kulkarni et al., 2009).

The fourth group of surface molecules belongs to the MASP multigenic family (Table 2) which is specific to T. cruzi and contains more than 1300 genes characterized by conserved N- and C-termini and a highly variable central region (El-Sayed et al., 2005). Although preferentially expressed in the bloodstream trypomastigotes, all life cycle stages express members of the MASP family (Atwood et al., 2005; De Pablos et al., 2011; De Pablos and Osuna, 2012). The well characterized MASP52 is upregulated in metacyclic and bloodstream trypomastigotes. Assays using antibodies raised against the ATP/GTP binding motif decreased cell invasion by T. cruzi in vitro (De Pablos et al., 2011). The predicted GPI anchoring of MASP was confirmed by its release following PLC treatment (Bartholomeu et al., 2009). Although little is known about MASPs, their release into the extracellular environment can trigger a humoral immune response (De Pablos et al., 2016), which suggests it could have a similar role in host evasion to that of TS.

The last group of surface molecules of T. cruzi are the GIPLs. Initially called lipopeptidophosphoglycans (LPPGs; Table 2) (De Lederkremer et al., 1976), these molecules were originally not considered to be GIPLs due to co-extraction with NETNES glycoprotein (Macrae et al., 2005) giving the impression that these molecules were not “naked.” Interestingly, all GIPLs, characterized in T. cruzi, contain a type 1 conserved glycan core (Figure 2), like that found in GPI-anchored glycoproteins (Previato et al., 1990; de Lederkremer et al., 1991). Immunoassays with anti-GIPL serum demonstrated that the expression of this molecule is significantly decreased and heterogeneously distributed in the trypomastigote population when compared to the epimastigote stage (Golgher et al., 1993). This suggests a developmental regulation of its expression. The concrete function of mammalian-stage derived GIPLs is not completely understood but they may act in TNF-α induced neutrophil recruitment (Oliveira et al., 2004; Medeiros et al., 2007).

GPI-Anchored Molecules in Invertebrate Host Stages

Whereas the mammalian stages of T. cruzi express mucins of the TcMUC family, the insect stages express mucins from the TcSMUG family (Campo et al., 2004; Buscaglia et al., 2006; Urban et al., 2011; Gonzalez et al., 2013; Pech-Canul et al., 2017). These mucins are smaller, ranging between 35 and 50 kDa in molecular weight, and have a significant similarity in their amino-acid and carbohydrate composition (Yoshida et al., 1989; Mortara et al., 1992; Schenkman et al., 1993; Previato et al., 1994; Acosta-Serrano et al., 2001a). Epimastigote mucins do not act as sialic acid acceptors (Urban et al., 2011; De Pablos and Osuna, 2012). This correlates with different TS activities (Frasch, 2000) and might indicate that sialic acids are required for immune evasion within the mammalian host and play a less important role within the insect vector. Epimastigote mucins primarily have a protective role against proteases that are present in the intestinal tract of the insect vector (Mortara et al., 1992).

The role of GP63 in the invertebrate host has been studied less than in the mammalian host (d’Avila-Levy et al., 2014). A recent study investigated the effect of metal chelators as well as the effect of antibodies raised against GP63 on the interaction of T. cruzi with its principal triatomine vector Rhodnius prolixus. Both treatments reduced the interaction of the parasite with the explanted guts of the insect, indicating a possible function of GP63 in adhesion (Rebello et al., 2019). However, the precise molecular mechanism of the vector interaction remains elusive.

Glycoinositolphospholipids molecules are abundant on the cell surface of T. cruzi epimastigotes (Golgher et al., 1993). Immunoelectron microscopy has shown that GIPLs form a homogeneous surface coat with an estimated number of 1.5 × 10⁷ molecules/cell (de Lederkremer et al., 1991; Golgher et al., 1993). GIPLs are likely to be one of the components involved in the adhesion of T. cruzi to the luminal insect midgut surface and possibly one of the determinants of parasite infection in the insect vector (Nogueira et al., 2007).

Surprisingly, purified GIPLs from T. cruzi were reported specifically to suppress nitric oxide (NO) production within the salivary glands of the triatomine vector (Gazos-Lopes et al., 2012). Since salivary glands play no part in the life cycle of T. cruzi, the actual biological role remains unclear.

Leishmania spp.

The Life Cycle

The major transmission route for Leishmania is mediated by sand flies of the genera Lutzomyia and Phlebotomus (Marinkelle, 1980; Killick-Kendrick, 1999). Flies become infected by the ingestion of macrophages harboring amastigotes (Alexander and Russell, 1992; Bates, 2018). The environmental changes experienced by these parasite stages in the fly midgut, such as shifts in temperature and pH, stimulate their differentiation into promastigotes. Due to morphological differences found in the promastigote population, the insect forms are subdivided into procyclic, nectomonad, leptomonad, haptomonad, and metacyclic promastigotes. The first form found in the midgut is the procyclic form, a proliferative stage with a short flagellum and weak motility. After 48–72 h of proliferation, these forms differentiate into nectomonad promastigotes, a life cycle stage with a longer flagellum and higher motility (Rogers et al., 2002). The nectomonad forms migrate to the anterior portion of the midgut, where they differentiate into leptomonad promastigotes (Walters, 1993). These forms can either initiate further cycles of proliferation or differentiate into haptomonad promastigotes, which attach to the surface of the anterior midgut, or metacyclic promastigotes, the infective forms for vertebrates (Sacks, 1989; Dostalova and Volf, 2012; Bates, 2018). Interestingly, in all sand flies examined to date a gel-like plug, the parasite-derived promastigote secretory gel, blocks the anterior midgut, which forces infected insects to regurgitate parasites into the skin before they can take a blood meal (Rogers et al., 2004). Recently, it has been suggested for Leishmania infantum and Leishmania major that metacyclic promastigotes, which were not transmitted into the mammalian host de-differentiate into retroleptomonads, which starts a new cycle of proliferation and differentiation, which enhances the parasitic load and the potential for transmission (Bates, 2018; Serafim et al., 2018). This boost is likely to be important for infections in the wild, where flies will initially become infected with very small numbers of parasites by feeding on an infected vertebrate host (Doehl et al., 2017). Finally, inside the vertebrate hosts, the metacyclic promastigotes will be phagocytosed by macrophages where they differentiate into the proliferative and fly infective amastigotes (Barak et al., 2005; Rogers et al., 2009; Mollinedo et al., 2010). The life cycle is shown in Figure 4C.

GPI-Anchored Molecules in Mammalian Host Stages

In Leishmania, LPG (Table 2) is one of the major surface glycoconjugates of promastigotes (5 × 10⁶ copies/cell) (Turco and Descoteaux, 1992; Forestier et al., 2014). Structurally, LPG is a highly complex macromolecule with four domains: a type-2 GIPL anchor, a glycan core, a linear phosphoglycan chain and a terminal oligosaccharide cap (Figure 2E) (Turco and Descoteaux, 1992; McConville et al., 1993; McConville and Ferguson, 1993; Forestier et al., 2014). The anchor possesses only one saturated C24-26 aliphatic chain (Forestier et al., 2014). The attached glycan core comprises two galactopyranosides, one galactofuranoside and one mannose. The phosphoglycan chain contains 15–40 phosphodisaccharide (Galβ1-4Manα1-PO₄) units (Forestier et al., 2014) with species-specific side chain modifications (Turco et al., 2001; de Assis et al., 2012). Lastly, a species-specific di-, tri-, or tetrasaccharide cap structure assembled as Manα1-2Manα1 or Galβ1-4(Manα1-2)Manα1 is attached (Forestier et al., 2014). Inside the vertebrate host, the long LPG of metacyclic promastigotes gives them an advantage in avoiding lysis by the complement system (Puentes et al., 1988, 1989). In promastigotes, LPG also delays phagosome maturation and acidification by impairing recruitment of lysosomal markers. This prevents the parasite from being killed inside macrophages, which allows their differentiation into the resistant amastigotes (Desjardins and Descoteaux, 1997; Holm et al., 2001; Vinet et al., 2009). In amastigotes, the expression of LPG is downregulated (Moody et al., 1993; Ilg, 2000).

Another important GPI-anchored surface molecule belongs to the proteophosphoglycans (PPGs; Table 2). PPGs contain a large polypeptide backbone, which is modified with a range of complex phosphoglycan chains (Ilg et al., 1999a, b). While some PPGs contain a GPI anchor and are present at the cell surface (mPPG), others lack a GPI attachment signal (Lovelace and Gottlieb, 1986; Stierhof et al., 1994; Ilg et al., 1995) and are secreted (sPPG), sometimes as large filamentous complexes (fPPG) that are assembled in the flagellar pocket (Stierhof et al., 1994). These different forms of PPGs have an important role in the establishment of Leishmania infections, including macrophage recruitment and modulation of host arginase activity to inhibit the production of harmful NO (Rogers et al., 2009). In addition, sPPG was found to increase interferon-γ (INF-γ) stimulated NO production (Piani et al., 1999). This suggests that PPG, on the one hand, may contribute to binding of Leishmania to host cells and, on the other hand, may play a role in downregulation of macrophage pro-inflammatory responses.

The zinc-dependent and GPI-anchored metalloprotease GP63 (also called leishmanolysin, MSP, or PSP; Table 2) represents another major surface antigen of Leishmania species (Bouvier et al., 1985; Bianchini et al., 2006). GP63 is a 60 kDa enzyme modified with N-glycosylated high mannose glycans (Ilgoutz and McConville, 2001). The structure predominantly contains β-sheets (Schlagenhauf et al., 1998). The N-terminal domain of GP63 displays the catalytic domain of a zinc proteinase while the C-terminal domain is connected to the GPI anchor (Schlagenhauf et al., 1998). While GP63 is abundant in promastigotes (approximately 5 × 10⁵ copies/cell), it is downregulated in amastigotes (Bouvier et al., 1985; Schneider et al., 1992; Bianchini et al., 2006). However, due to the simultaneous absence of LPG on the amastigote surface, the GP63 enzymes might have better access to their target molecules and therefore may be sufficient for modulation of host responses (Pimenta et al., 1991). Given its presence on both parasite forms combined with different expression levels, it is likely that GP63 fulfills a number of different functions, depending on the parasite stage. For example, the presence of GP63 on the metacyclic promastigote surface is connected to resistance to complement lysis by conversion of C3b into C3bi (Brittingham et al., 1995). C3bi is a ligand to CR3 complement receptors on the surface of macrophages, which is important for facilitating the parasite’s entry into these cells as well as for inhibiting the interleukin-12 production leading to a deficiency in intracellular pathogen responses (Blackwell et al., 1985; Kimura and Griffin, 1992; Carter et al., 2009). In addition, GP63 can interact with the fibronectin receptor of mammalian cells, indicating that the receptors for complement and fibronectin may cooperate to mediate the efficient adhesion of parasites to macrophages (Brittingham et al., 1999). In amastigotes, GP63 plays a role in protection from phagolysosomal degradation (Chaudhuri et al., 1989; Seay et al., 1996; Chen et al., 2000) as well as alteration of macrophage signaling thereby favoring Leishmania survival and persistence within the host (Olivier et al., 2005, 2012). Consequently, this molecule not only actively protects the parasites in the extracellular environment, but also has a role in invasion and survival of Leishmania inside macrophages, which is essential for life cycle progression and a successful infection.

Glycoinositolphospholipids (Table 2) are also present on the Leishmania cell surface. These molecules have a similar abundance as LPGs (McConville and Bacic, 1990). These glycolipids may form a densely packed glycocalyx on the plasma membrane. The amount and type of GIPL displayed by Leishmania can vary according to the species of the parasite (McConville et al., 1990; McConville and Blackwell, 1991; McConville and Ferguson, 1993; Schneider et al., 1993, 1994; Winter et al., 1994). Their anchors can have the same structure as the GPI protein anchor (type 1), the LPG anchor (type 2) or contain motifs in common with both anchors (hybrid type) (Figure 2). In contrast to LPG or GPI-anchored glycoproteins, GIPL expression remains high in amastigotes indicating a possible function in intracellular survival (McConville and Blackwell, 1991; Bahr et al., 1993). GIPLs effectively deactivate the protein kinase C (PKC) cascade, which impairs the production of reactive oxygen species that could kill the parasites inside macrophages (Chawla and Vishwakarma, 2003). In addition, 85% of Leishmania braziliensis GIPLs are present in membrane microdomains and disruption of these domains leads to a significantly decreased macrophage infectivity (Yoneyama et al., 2006). Another report also indicated that glycosylation of GIPLs in L. major might be important for invasion of macrophages (Suzuki et al., 2002).

GPI-Anchored Molecules in Invertebrate Host Stages

Studies on surface molecules that might play a role in defending the parasite against the hostile conditions within the sand fly have mainly focused on glycoconjugates, including LPG and PPG. The LPG of Leishmania promastigotes can show stage specific adaptations. For example, in L. major and L. donovani the average length of the LPG phosphoglycan chain is more than doubled when proliferative procyclics differentiate to non-dividing metacyclics (McConville et al., 1992). The stage and species dependent changes in LPG structure are thought to be important for the attachment of haptomonad promastigotes to epithelial cells in the sand fly midgut, which is essential for avoiding elimination by peristaltic forces during colonization of non-permissive vectors (Pimenta et al., 1992; Butcher et al., 1996; Secundino et al., 2010; Dostalova and Volf, 2012; Volf et al., 2014). Subsequently, metacyclic LPGs were shown to be subject to conformational changes that impair efficient binding to the sand fly midgut, a key step in the release of mammalian infective forms (Sacks et al., 1995). It is tempting to speculate that the detachment of parasites from the midgut during development might also be explained by enzyme driven shedding of the LPG that is involved in binding.

In the insect stages of Leishmania, the PPGs have also been reported to be important factors for life cycle progression. The fPPGs were described as mucin-like glycoproteins which are one component of the gel-like matrix that blocks the passage to the midgut of the flies forcing them to regurgitate between blood meals, thus increasing the efficiency of transmission (Ilg, 2000; Rogers et al., 2004). In contrast, mPPG was reported to be a key molecule, protecting the fully developed procyclic promastigotes by conferring resistance to the activity of digestive enzymes present in the sand fly midgut (Secundino et al., 2010).

Despite the considerable amount of GP63 molecules present in promastigotes the deletion of this molecule in L. major did not alter the growth and development of the parasite within the insect vector (Joshi et al., 1998). Thus, GP63 does not appear to be needed to confer resistance to proteolytic enzymes in the gut.

Evolution and Cell Surface Composition of Trypanosoma

As discussed in the previous section, the medically relevant trypanosomatids exploit their surface molecules to interact with both vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. It is clear that these parasites rely on their diverse repertoires of GPI-anchored molecules to survive and thrive while residing in very different microenvironments during the course of their respective life cycles. Interestingly, their glycocalyces seem to be composed of a mixture of very specific molecules, such as VSGs, mucins and LPGs, as well as ubiquitous molecules, such as TS and GP63 (Figure 4). To increase our understanding of host-parasite interactions and gain insight into the essential features that were positively selected for over time, it is necessary to analyze the glycocalyx composition of species that are usually not in the spotlight. Thus, by broadening our perspective we can begin to comprehend the factors leading to the success of parasitism of trypanosomatids. In the following, we aim to give an overview of the glycocalyx composition of other Trypanosoma species, focusing on their GPI-anchored molecules (Table 2) and correlating their surface composition with the evolutionary story of the group.

Trypanosoma is a monophyletic genus that can be divided into 17 subgenera of two lineages: aquatic and terrestrial (Kostygov et al., 2021). The human parasites T. brucei and T. cruzi are both of terrestrial lineage and have independent evolutionary stories (Hamilton and Stevens, 2017; Borges et al., 2021; Kostygov et al., 2021). This independence can be observed to a certain extent in their specific repertoires of surface molecules, which are related to their distinct lifestyles, survival strategies, and interactions with their hosts.

Closely related to T. brucei, other African trypanosomes are of socio-economic importance, such as Trypanosoma congolense, Trypanosoma vivax, Trypanosoma evansi, and Trypanosoma equiperdum (Hoare, 1972; Stevens and Gibson, 1999; Borges et al., 2021; Kostygov et al., 2021). Due to phylogenetic similarities, T. evansi and T. equiperdum were suggested to be subspecies of T. brucei (Lai et al., 2008; Carnes et al., 2015; Kamidi et al., 2017; Borges et al., 2021). However, such a taxonomical change is not allowed by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, 1999; Molinari and Moreno, 2018). Thus, in this review, we will adhere to the conventionally used species names.

A common, and specific, characteristic of the African trypanosomes is the VSG coat that covers the cell surface of their bloodstream forms (Uzcanga et al., 2004; Jackson et al., 2013, 2015; Carnes et al., 2015; Carrasquel et al., 2017). Due to the close relationship between T. brucei, T. evansi, and T. equiperdum, a high degree of similarity in their surface molecules is not unexpected. For example, while VSGs of T. congolense and T. vivax lack a C-terminal domain (Rausch et al., 1994; Gardiner et al., 1996), T. evansi and T. brucei possess a conserved C-terminal domain through which the VSG is connected to the GPI anchor (Carrington et al., 1991; Chattopadhyay et al., 2005; Jones et al., 2008; Jia et al., 2011). In addition, the VSG repertoire as well as all VSG N-terminal subtypes are conserved between T. evansi and T. brucei (Carnes et al., 2015). However, the C-terminal structure of T. evansi VSGs can differ from T. brucei VSGs by the absence of cysteine residues (Jia et al., 2011). Larger differences in this coat can be found in T. vivax, an African trypanosome with earlier divergence and the highest evolutionary rates (Stevens and Rambaut, 2001).

In T. vivax, for instance, VSG transcript abundance, though high, has been reported to be lower than in T. brucei (Greif et al., 2013; Jackson et al., 2013, 2015). In addition, the VSG-coat of T. vivax is probably less dense than that of other African trypanosomes as suggested by the successful immunization of mice using an invariant surface protein of T. vivax (Autheman et al., 2021). Furthermore, the reduced recombination of T. vivax VSG genes (Silva Pereira et al., 2020) and the presence of T. vivax-specific putative membrane protein families in its bloodstream forms (Jackson et al., 2013, 2015) indicate other means of interaction between this parasite and the vertebrate host. The positive selection of VSGs and the expansion of VSG genes in T. congolense and T. brucei/T. evansi (Silva Pereira et al., 2020) advocates the importance of this GPI-anchored molecule for survival in the vertebrate host. Interestingly, T. evansi and T. equiperdum lost their capacity to infect and reproduce inside an invertebrate host, becoming the only known examples of monoxenic trypanosomes (Borst et al., 1987; Lai et al., 2008; Desquesnes et al., 2013). This specialization to the vertebrate host is linked to partial or total loss of maxicircles of kinetoplast DNA (kDNA), which carry information on the respiratory chain components that are required for mitochondrial metabolism and ATP production in the insect forms (Vickerman, 1965; Flynn and Bowman, 1973; Borst et al., 1987; Lai et al., 2008; Dewar et al., 2018).

Despite reports of mechanical transmission through distinct vectors, T. congolense and T. vivax are mainly transmitted by the tsetse fly, i.e., by the same invertebrate host as T. brucei (Peacock et al., 2012; Ooi et al., 2016). The insect stages of T. congolense produce the species-specific molecules T. congolense epimastigote-specific protein (CESP) and glutamic acid and alanine-rich protein (GARP), which is analogous to T. brucei’s BARP. CESP is exclusively expressed in epimastigotes and has been suggested to contribute to the adhesion of these stages to the proboscis, where the differentiation into metacyclics occurs (Sakurai et al., 2008; Peacock et al., 2012; Jackson et al., 2013). GARP is found in epimastigotes, procyclics, and metacyclics and has been proposed to protect the parasites against digestion in the midgut as well as to influence the migration of the parasites to different organs, but no concrete evidence for these biological function exists so far (Beecroft et al., 1993; Hehl et al., 1995; Sakurai et al., 2008; Eyford et al., 2011; Jackson et al., 2013). Procyclin homologs were found in T. congolense but not in T. vivax (Jackson et al., 2013, 2015), suggesting that procyclins appeared later in the evolution of African trypanosomes. Considering that T. vivax development in the tsetse fly is restricted to the mouth parts (Ooi et al., 2016) while T. congolense and T. brucei pass through the midgut and other organs (Peacock et al., 2012; Schuster et al., 2017, 2021; Rose et al., 2020), it is likely that procyclin is related to the development of a complex life cycle inside the fly. Because T. vivax possesses BARP/GARP-like genes (Jackson et al., 2013, 2015) these proteins may have an important biological role, at least, for the passage through the mouth parts of the fly. The presence of GP63 and TS has also been detected in the genome of both T. vivax and T. congolense (Jackson et al., 2013, 2015), and genes for both are annotated in the genome of T. evansi in TriTrypDB¹, pointing at a wide distribution in trypanosomatids beyond the medically relevant species. The presence of MASP-like proteins, similar to the abundantly expressed MASP of metacyclic stages of T. cruzi, was also detected in T. vivax (Jackson et al., 2013, 2015). However, their biological role is still unknown.

The other important human pathogen, T. cruzi, is closely related to other parasites of mammals, such as Trypanosoma rangeli and Trypanosoma conorhini (Hoare, 1972; Stevens and Gibson, 1999; Borges et al., 2021; Kostygov et al., 2021). Genomic analyses of T. rangeli and T. conorhini strains revealed a similar number of GPI-anchored proteins and the presence of multigene families. As in T. cruzi, the surface molecules with the highest gene expansion in both species were TS and GP63 (Wagner et al., 2013; Bradwell et al., 2018). However, the presence of mucin genes was less frequent and no homology to other multigenic families present in T. cruzi was detected (Wagner et al., 2013; Bradwell et al., 2018). The proposed biological roles of mucins in T. cruzi vary from cell invasion in the vertebrate host to protection against lysis in the invertebrate host (see section “Trypanosoma cruzi”). Considering the extracellular lifestyle of T. rangeli and T. conorhini in the vertebrate host, it is tempting to suggest that the protective role of mucins represents an ancestral characteristic linked to survival inside the triatomine host. In this scenario, the role in cell invasion would be the result of a change of function promoted by the genetic expansion of mucins in T. cruzi. The presence of GIPLs on the cell surface of T. rangeli was also detected and it has been shown to downregulate NO synthesis (Gazos-Lopes et al., 2012), which is one of the key mechanisms of invertebrate immune response.

Trypanosoma theileri is a ubiquitous parasite of cattle and is closely related to crocodilian trypanosomes and ancestral to T. cruzi, T. rangeli, and T. conorhini (Hamilton et al., 2009; Kelly et al., 2017). The genome of T. theileri contains homologs of GP63-like surface protease and TS, but no mucin orthologs were detected (Kelly et al., 2017), suggesting the appearance of mucin in a later differentiation event and highlighting, once more, TS and GP63 as common GPI-anchored proteins among trypanosomes. In addition, four large groups of proteins, putatively containing conserved N-terminal signals and C-terminal GPI-addition sequences, were found. These proteins are considered to be exclusive to T. theileri and were provisionally named T. theileri putative surface protein (TTPSP) (Kelly et al., 2017). Together, these TTPSP and GP63-like proteins account for approximately 10% of the genome (Kelly et al., 2017).

Trypanosoma grayi is an extracellular parasite found in the bloodstream of crocodiles and is transmitted by the feces of tsetse flies (Hoare, 1931; Kelly et al., 2014). It occurs in Africa but is closely related to other crocodilian trypanosomes from South America, such as Trypanosoma kaiowa (Fermino et al., 2019). Phylogenomic and phylogenetic analyses show that this species is more closely related to T. cruzi than to African trypanosomes (Kelly et al., 2014). BLAST and OrthoMCL analyses of the genome sequence and predicted gene models did not reveal the presence of VSG surface antigens or mucin (Kelly et al., 2014). The hypothesis of independent evolution of African trypanosomes suggests separate events of colonization of the tsetse fly during the evolution of Trypanosoma (Hamilton and Stevens, 2017). The lack of VSG in a tsetse transmitted trypanosome corroborates this hypothesis. While the position of T. grayi in Trypanosoma is still under debate, the lack of mucins suggests that it may have diverged earlier than T. cruzi, T. rangeli, and T. conorhini. Genes coding for TS and GP63 are annotated in the T. grayi reference strain ANR4 in TriTrypDB (see footnote 1).

So far, we have focused on trypanosomes of the terrestrial lineage. Compared to these, even less is known of species of the aquatic lineage. An electron microscopy study of Trypanosoma fallisi, an anuran trypanosome, suggested that surface coat components were secreted inside vesicles detected around and within the flagellar pocket (Martin and Desser, 1990). However, these components were not characterized further. The presence of polysaccharides on the surface of epimastigotes of Trypanosoma rotatorium, another anuran trypanosome, was observed using Thiery’s silver proteinate method (Desser, 1976), but no other information on the nature of these molecules is available. Trypanosoma carassii is a fish parasite with a glycocalyx composed of GPI-anchored mucin-like proteins similar to T. cruzi (Lischke et al., 2000; Overath et al., 2001; Aguero et al., 2002). The mucin-like molecules of T. carassii are sialylated (Lischke et al., 2000) with reported activity of TS, which transfers sialic acids from sialyllactose to a lactose acceptor in cell fraction extracts (Aguero et al., 2002). However, detailed analyses on the functional groups of T. carassii TS are lacking. Due to the extracellular lifestyle of T. carassii (Dóró et al., 2019), it is possible to suggest that the mucin-like coat of T. carassii acts only in parasite protection. Although still under debate, it is likely that the aquatic lineage has diverged later in the evolution of Trypanosoma as a split from a terrestrial species (Hamilton and Stevens, 2017; Borges et al., 2021). The presence of mucin-like proteins in T. carassii could be explained by this hypothesis, but this can only be confirmed by ancestral character reconstruction.

Ancestral reconstruction studies are still at an early stage for trypanosomatids. However, by reviewing the GPI-anchored molecules displayed by trypanosomes we could highlight parallels with the evolutionary story of the group. In addition, it is evident that a set of surface molecules has been maintained during evolution and is shared among different species, namely the GP63 proteases and TS (Bouvier et al., 1985; Schenkman et al., 1991a; Cuevas et al., 2003; Engstler et al., 1993; LaCount et al., 2003; Jackson et al., 2013; Wagner et al., 2013; Bradwell et al., 2018). From the above, it is clear that a broader focus on understanding the molecular composition of the cell surface of different trypanosome species could help to fill in the gaps in the evolutionary story of this group, which has a direct impact on developmental cell biology research and could also influence evolution-based drug discovery. However, studies connecting the biochemical composition of the cell surface with the evolutionary story of the group are ongoing. An expansion of such a perspective, including Leishmania and other genera, could contribute even more to the knowledge of this important group of parasites and we encourage the scientific community to adopt such an approach.

Conclusion

Since the discovery of the GPI anchor (Ferguson et al., 1985; Tse et al., 1985), a plethora of reviews have summarized information on biosynthesis, trafficking, structure, and functions of this anchor. However, the majority of these have emphasized the relationship between GPI deficiency and disease development in mammals.

Compared to mammalian cells, the cell surface of trypanosomatids contains exceptionally high numbers of GPI-anchored molecules making it reasonable to suggest that this anchor has brought advantages to the parasites. One of these advantages is the rapid transport of these molecules to the cell surface promoted by the en bloc transfer of the GPI anchor to the C-terminal residue of the polypeptide, enabling high production rates of the wide range of surface molecules. In addition, the biophysical properties of the anchor can be extended to the anchored molecules and can be exploited by the parasites in different ways, such as antibody clearance through endocytosis (facilitated by mobility of the anchor) or overstimulation of the immune system (connected to the shedding of anchored molecules). Hence, by relying on GPIs, trypanosomatids have ensured a fast, stable, and efficient way to assemble a range of different molecules on their cell surfaces.

The GPI-anchored proteins of trypanosomatids are diverse and the genetic expansion of such molecules is usually linked to multigenic families providing variability inside the population. Despite the very little information available for wildlife trypanosomatids, it is evident that GPI-anchored molecules expressed by the human pathogens, such as GP63 and TS, are shared by many other species. The importance of these molecules becomes evident when we consider their positive selection and their presence in a range of different trypanosomatid species. Homologs of GP63 (Table 2) are found in the monoxenic trypanosomatids Paratrypanosoma and Crithidia (Inverso et al., 1993; Cuevas et al., 2003; El-Sayed et al., 2005; Venkatesh et al., 2018) as well as in the free-living kinetoplastid Bodo saltans (Jackson et al., 2016). The presence of GP63 is less enriched in B. saltans (Table 2) than in trypanosomes, suggesting a possible change of function of this ancestral protease in parasites, which could be related to their survival inside the invertebrate host (Jackson et al., 2016). The biological role of TS in the transfer of sialic acid to mucin molecules is well-exploited by T. cruzi, as discussed above (see section “Trypanosoma cruzi”). However, other species only have a few or no mucin-like genes. This apparent lack of mucins can indicate either a different function for TS in these organisms or low conservation of mucin-like genes in these species. Another biological role of TS is in cell-to-cell interaction, facilitating the invasion of macrophages by T. cruzi (see section “Trypanosoma cruzi”). In this sense, the attachment of T. carassii to blood vessels and other cells (Dóró et al., 2019) could be related to TS, but suggests that this molecule alone is not enough to guarantee cell invasion. Thus, the genetic expansion of both GP63 and TS in some species could mirror their functional diversity and is likely linked to the trypanosomatids’ adaptation to different microenvironments.

The macroevolution of trypanosomatids is likely to be accompanied by host-switching and geographical dispersion (Hoberg and Brooks, 2008; Lukeš et al., 2014). Notably, host switches are considered to be one of the major processes in the emergence of zoonotic diseases (Webster et al., 2016). Thus, it is intriguing that these parasites are still being overlooked by the research community. Although infections caused by protozoans represent only around 10% of the emerging infectious disease cases, once the infection barrier is crossed, diseases caused by these organisms tend to become established in the population due to difficulties in developing vaccination strategies or lack of efficient drug treatment to completely eliminate the parasite (Robertson et al., 2014). Last, but not least, molecular evidence indicating cattle infections by T. grayi on the African continent could be indicative of an imminent host switch (Ngomtcho et al., 2017; Paguem et al., 2019).

Overall, the widespread distribution of trypanosomatids and their adaptation to diverse vertebrate host species are the result of an unprecedented evolutionary success story. These parasites have found opportunities to pass to new hosts by acquiring means to survive and proliferate inside these and ultimately adapting to allow the coexistence of host and parasite (Araujo et al., 2015). This review has summarized how trypanosomatids synthesize and utilize one biochemical feature, namely the GPI anchor, to mediate the attachment of a staggering variety of proteins that form the respective cell surface coats. This fascinating example of evolutionary click-chemistry might have contributed to the astonishing adaptive radiation of trypanosomatids. The vast repertoire of surface molecules combined with the biophysical properties of the GPI anchors might have maximized their chance of success inside different hosts. Unraveling their complete biological roles is necessary for a complete understanding of parasite–host interactions, which might impact the development of drugs by turning “their weapons against them.”

Author Contributions

AB and FL wrote the manuscript. FL and AB designed the figures and tables. ME and NJ provided conceptual input and contributed to writing. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

A Ph.D. scholarship was granted to AB by Brazilian agency CAPES (program: CAPES/DAAD - Call No. 22/2018; process 88881.199683/2018-01). ME is supported by DFG grants EN305, SPP1726 (Microswimmers – From Single Particle Motion to Collective Behaviour), GIF grant I-473-416.13/2018 (Effect of extracellular Trypanosoma brucei vesicles on collective and social parasite motility and development in the tsetse fly) and GRK2157 (3D Tissue Models to Study Microbial Infections by Obligate Human Pathogens). ME is a member of the Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen Center for Complex Material Systems (RCCM). This publication was supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Würzburg.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jaime Lisack, Thomas Müller, and Mariana Fonseca Rossi for advice and discussion.

Footnotes

1. ^ http://tritrypdb.org

References

Acosta-Serrano, A., Almeida, I. C., Freitas-Junior, L. H., Yoshida, N., and Schenkman, S. (2001a). The mucin-like glycoprotein super-family of Trypanosoma cruzi: structure and biological roles. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 114, 143–150. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(01)00245-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Acosta-Serrano, A., Hutchinson, C., Nakayasu, E. S., Almeida, I. C., and Carrgington, M. (2007). “Comparison and evolution of the surface architecture of trypanosomatid parasites,” in Trypanosomes: After the Genome: Horizon Bioscience, eds D. Barry, R. McCulloch, J. Mottram, and A. Acosta-Serrano (Glasgow: W.C.f.M.P. University of Glasgow).

Google Scholar

Acosta-Serrano, A., Vassella, E., Liniger, M., Kunz Renggli, C., Brun, R., Roditi, I., et al. (2001b). The surface coat of procyclic Trypanosoma brucei: programmed expression and proteolytic cleavage of procyclin in the tsetse fly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 1513–1518. doi: 10.1073/pnas.041611698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Adl, S. M., Bass, D., Lane, C. E., Lukes, J., Schoch, C. L., Smirnov, A., et al. (2019). Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 66, 4–119. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12691

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aguero, F., Campo, V., Cremona, L., Jager, A., Di Noia, J. M., Overath, P., et al. (2002). Gene discovery in the freshwater fish parasite Trypanosoma carassii: identification of trans-sialidase-like and mucin-like genes. Infect. Immun. 70, 7140–7144. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.7140-7144.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Albertti, L. A., Macedo, A. M., Chiari, E., Andrews, N. W., and Andrade, L. O. (2010). Role of host lysosomal associated membrane protein (LAMP) in Trypanosoma cruzi invasion and intracellular development. Microbes Infect. 12, 784–789. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.05.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alexander, J., and Russell, D. G. (1992). The interaction of Leishmania species with macrophages. Adv. Parasitol. 31, 175–254. doi: 10.1016/s0065-308x(08)60022-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Almeida, I. C., and Gazzinelli, R. T. (2001). Proinflammatory activity of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors derived from Trypanosoma cruzi: structural and functional analyses. J. Leukoc. Biol. 70, 467–477.

Google Scholar

Almeida, I. C., Camargo, M. M., Procopio, D. O., Silva, L. S., Mehlert, A., Travassos, L. R., et al. (2000). Highly purified glycosylphosphatidylinositols from Trypanosoma cruzi are potent proinflammatory agents. EMBO J. 19, 1476–1485. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.7.1476

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Almeida, I. C., Ferguson, M. A., Schenkman, S., and Travassos, L. R. (1994). Lytic anti-alpha-galactosyl antibodies from patients with chronic Chagas’ disease recognize novel O-linked oligosaccharides on mucin-like glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoproteins of Trypanosoma cruzi. Biochem. J. 304, 793–802. doi: 10.1042/bj3040793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Almeida-de-Faria, M., Freymuller, E., Colli, W., and Alves, M. J. (1999). Trypanosoma cruzi: characterization of an intracellular epimastigote-like form. Exp. Parasitol. 92, 263–274. doi: 10.1006/expr.1999.4423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andrews, N. W. (1993). Living dangerously: how Trypanosoma cruzi uses lysosomes to get inside host cells, and then escapes into the cytoplasm. Biol. Res. 26, 65–67.

Google Scholar

Araujo, S. B., Braga, M. P., Brooks, D. R., Agosta, S. J., Hoberg, E. P., von Hartenthal, F. W., et al. (2015). Understanding host-switching by ecological fitting. PLoS One 10:e0139225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arias-Del-Angel, J. A., Manning-Cela, R. G., and Santillan, M. (2020). Dynamics of mammalian cell infection by Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes. Front. Microbiol. 11:559660. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.559660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ashida, H., Hong, Y., Murakami, Y., Shishioh, N., Sugimoto, N., Kim, Y. U., et al. (2005). Mammalian PIG-X and yeast Pbn1p are the essential components of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-mannosyltransferase I. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 1439–1448. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-09-0802

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Atwood, J. A. III, Weatherly, D. B., Minning, T. A., Bundy, B., Cavola, C., Opperdoes, F. R., et al. (2005). The Trypanosoma cruzi proteome. Science 309, 473–476. doi: 10.1126/science.1110289

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Autheman, D., Crosnier, C., Clare, S., Goulding, D. A., Brandt, C., Harcourt, K., et al. (2021). An invariant Trypanosoma vivax vaccine antigen induces protective immunity. Nature 595, 96–100. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03597-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bagnat, M., Keranen, S., Shevchenko, A., Shevchenko, A., and Simons, K. (2000). Lipid rafts function in biosynthetic delivery of proteins to the cell surface in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 3254–3259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.060034697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bahr, V., Stierhof, Y. D., Ilg, T., Demar, M., Quinten, M., and Overath, P. (1993). Expression of lipophosphoglycan, high-molecular weight phosphoglycan and glycoprotein 63 in promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania mexicana. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 58, 107–121. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90095-f

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barak, E., Amin-Spector, S., Gerliak, E., Goyard, S., Holland, N., and Zilberstein, D. (2005). Differentiation of Leishmania donovani in host-free system: analysis of signal perception and response. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 141, 99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.02.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bartholomeu, D. C., Cerqueira, G. C., Leao, A. C., daRocha, W. D., Pais, F. S., Macedo, C., et al. (2009). Genomic organization and expression profile of the mucin-associated surface protein (masp) family of the human pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 3407–3417. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bartossek, T., Jones, N. G., Schafer, C., Cvitkovic, M., Glogger, M., Mott, H. R., et al. (2017). Structural basis for the shielding function of the dynamic trypanosome variant surface glycoprotein coat. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1523–1532. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0013-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bates, P. A. (2018). Revising Leishmania’s life cycle. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 529–530. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0154-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beecroft, R. P., Roditi, I., and Pearson, T. W. (1993). Identification and characterization of an acidic major surface glycoprotein from procyclic stage Trypanosoma congolense. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 61, 285–294. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90074-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bellai-Dussault, K., Nguyen, T. T. M., Baratang, N. V., Jimenez-Cruz, D. A., and Campeau, P. M. (2019). Clinical variability in inherited glycosylphosphatidylinositol deficiency disorders. Clin. Genet. 95, 112–121. doi: 10.1111/cge.13425

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bertello, L. E., Alves, M. J., Colli, W., and de Lederkremer, R. M. (2004). Inositolphosphoceramide is not a substrate for the first steps in the biosynthesis of glycoinositolphospholipids in Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 133, 71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2003.09.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bianchini, G., Bocedi, A., Ascenzi, P., Gavuzzo, E., Mazza, F., and Aschi, M. (2006). Molecular dynamics simulation of Leishmania major surface metalloprotease GP63 (leishmanolysin). Proteins 64, 385–390. doi: 10.1002/prot.21009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blackwell, J. M., Ezekowitz, R. A., Roberts, M. B., Channon, J. Y., Sim, R. B., and Gordon, S. (1985). Macrophage complement and lectin-like receptors bind Leishmania in the absence of serum. J. Exp. Med. 162, 324–331. doi: 10.1084/jem.162.1.324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blum, M. L., Down, J. A., Gurnett, A. M., Carrington, M., Turner, M. J., and Wiley, D. C. (1993). A structural motif in the variant surface glycoproteins of Trypanosoma brucei. Nature 362, 603–609. doi: 10.1038/362603a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borges, A. R., Engstler, M., and Wolf, M. (2021). 18S rRNA gene sequence-structure phylogeny of the Trypanosomatida (Kinetoplastea, Euglenozoa) with special reference to Trypanosoma. Eur. J. Protistol. 81:125824. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2021.125824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borst, P., Fase-Fowler, F., and Gibson, W. C. (1987). Kinetoplast DNA of Trypanosoma evansi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 23, 31–38. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(87)90184-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bouvier, J., Etges, R. J., and Bordier, C. (1985). Identification and purification of membrane and soluble forms of the major surface protein of Leishmania promastigotes. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 15504–15509.

Google Scholar

Bradwell, K. R., Koparde, V. N., Matveyev, A. V., Serrano, M. G., Alves, J. M. P., Parikh, H., et al. (2018). Genomic comparison of Trypanosoma conorhini and Trypanosoma rangeli to Trypanosoma cruzi strains of high and low virulence. BMC Genomics 19:770. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5112-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Briones, M. R., Egima, C. M., Eichinger, D., and Schenkman, S. (1995a). Trans-sialidase genes expressed in mammalian forms of Trypanosoma cruzi evolved from ancestor genes expressed in insect forms of the parasite. J. Mol. Evol. 41, 120–131. doi: 10.1007/BF00170663

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Briones, M. R., Egima, C. M., and Schenkman, S. (1995b). Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase gene lacking C-terminal repeats and expressed in epimastigote forms. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 70, 9–17. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(95)00004-k

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brittingham, A., Chen, G., McGwire, B. S., Chang, K. P., and Mosser, D. M. (1999). Interaction of Leishmania gp63 with cellular receptors for fibronectin. Infect. Immun. 67, 4477–4484. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.9.4477-4484.1999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brittingham, A., Morrison, C. J., McMaster, W. R., McGwire, B. S., Chang, K. P., and Mosser, D. M. (1995). Role of the Leishmania surface protease gp63 in complement fixation, cell adhesion, and resistance to complement-mediated lysis. J. Immunol. 155, 3102–3111.

Google Scholar

Bülow, R., Nonnengasser, C., and Overath, P. (1989). Release of the variant surface glycoprotein during differentiation of bloodstream to procyclic forms of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 32, 85–92. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(89)90132-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bülow, R., Overath, P., and Davoust, J. (1988). Rapid lateral diffusion of the variant surface glycoprotein in the coat of Trypanosoma brucei. Biochemistry 27, 2384–2388. doi: 10.1021/bi00407a020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buscaglia, C. A., Campo, V. A., Frasch, A. C., and Di Noia, J. M. (2006). Trypanosoma cruzi surface mucins: host-dependent coat diversity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 229–236. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Butcher, B. A., Turco, S. J., Hilty, B. A., Pimenta, P. F., Panunzio, M., and Sacks, D. L. (1996). Deficiency in beta1,3-galactosyltransferase of a Leishmania major lipophosphoglycan mutant adversely influences the Leishmania-sand fly interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20573–20579. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bütikofer, P., Vassella, E., Ruepp, S., Boschung, M., Civenni, G., Seebeck, T., et al. (1999). Phosphorylation of a major GPI-anchored surface protein of Trypanosoma brucei during transport to the plasma membrane. J. Cell Sci. 112(Pt 11), 1785–1795.

Google Scholar

Buxbaum, L. U., Milne, K. G., Werbovetz, K. A., and Englund, P. T. (1996). Myristate exchange on the Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoprotein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 1178–1183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buxbaum, L. U., Raper, J., Opperdoes, F. R., and Englund, P. T. (1994). Myristate exchange. A second glycosyl phosphatidylinositol myristoylation reaction in African trypanosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30212–30220.

Google Scholar

Cable, J., Barber, I., Boag, B., Ellison, A. R., Morgan, E. R., Murray, K., et al. (2017). Global change, parasite transmission and disease control: lessons from ecology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 372:20160088. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caljon, G., De Muylder, G., Durnez, L., Jennes, W., Vanaerschot, M., and Dujardin, J. C. (2016). Alice in microbes’ land: adaptations and counter-adaptations of vector-borne parasitic protozoa and their hosts. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 40, 664–685. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuw018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campo, V., Di Noia, J. M., Buscaglia, C. A., Aguero, F., Sanchez, D. O., and Frasch, A. C. (2004). Differential accumulation of mutations localized in particular domains of the mucin genes expressed in the vertebrate host stage of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 133, 81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2003.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cardoso De Almeida, M. L., Geuskens, M., and Pays, E. (1999). Cell lysis induces redistribution of the GPI-anchored variant surface glycoprotein on both faces of the plasma membrane of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Sci. 112(Pt 23), 4461–4473.

Google Scholar

Cardoso, M. S., Reis-Cunha, J. L., and Bartholomeu, D. C. (2015). Evasion of the immune response by Trypanosoma cruzi during acute infection. Front. Immunol. 6:659. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00659

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carnes, J., Anupama, A., Balmer, O., Jackson, A., Lewis, M., Brown, R., et al. (2015). Genome and phylogenetic analyses of Trypanosoma evansi reveal extensive similarity to T. brucei and multiple independent origins for dyskinetoplasty. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9:e3404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carrasquel, L. M., Escalona, J. L., Acosta-Serrano, A., Guo, Y., and Bubis, J. (2017). Identification of potential protein partners that bind to the variant surface glycoprotein in Trypanosoma equiperdum. Parasitology 144, 923–936. doi: 10.1017/S003118201700004X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carrington, M., Miller, N., Blum, M., Roditi, I., Wiley, D., and Turner, M. (1991). Variant specific glycoprotein of Trypanosoma brucei consists of two domains each having an independently conserved pattern of cysteine residues. J. Mol. Biol. 221, 823–835. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80178-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carter, C. R., Whitcomb, J. P., Campbell, J. A., Mukbel, R. M., and McDowell, M. A. (2009). Complement receptor 3 deficiency influences lesion progression during Leishmania major infection in BALB/c mice. Infect. Immun. 77, 5668–5675. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00802-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chagas, C. (1909). Nova tripanozomiaze humana: estudos sobre a morfolojia e o ciclo evolutivo do Schizotrypanum cruzi n. gen., n. sp., ajente etiolojico de nova entidade morbida do homem. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1, 159–218. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02761909000200008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, T., Milne, K. G., Guther, M. L., Smith, T. K., and Ferguson, M. A. (2002). Cloning of Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania major genes encoding the GlcNAc-phosphatidylinositol de-N-acetylase of glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis that is essential to the African sleeping sickness parasite. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 50176–50182. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208374200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chattopadhyay, A., Jones, N. G., Nietlispach, D., Nielsen, P. R., Voorheis, H. P., Mott, H. R., et al. (2005). Structure of the C-terminal domain from Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoprotein MITat1.2. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 7228–7235. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410787200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaudhuri, G., Chaudhuri, M., Pan, A., and Chang, K. P. (1989). Surface acid proteinase (gp63) of Leishmania mexicana. A metalloenzyme capable of protecting liposome-encapsulated proteins from phagolysosomal degradation by macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7483–7489.

Google Scholar

Chawla, M., and Vishwakarma, R. A. (2003). Alkylacylglycerolipid domain of GPI molecules of Leishmania is responsible for inhibition of PKC-mediated c-fos expression. J. Lipid Res. 44, 594–600. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M200296-JLR200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, D. Q., Kolli, B. K., Yadava, N., Lu, H. G., Gilman-Sachs, A., Peterson, D. A., et al. (2000). Episomal expression of specific sense and antisense mRNAs in Leishmania amazonensis: modulation of gp63 level in promastigotes and their infection of macrophages in vitro. Infect. Immun. 68, 80–86.

Google Scholar

Cirimotich, C. M., Ramirez, J. L., and Dimopoulos, G. (2011). Native microbiota shape insect vector competence for human pathogens. Cell Host Microbe 10, 307–310. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Conzelmann, A., Puoti, A., Lester, R. L., and Desponds, C. (1992). Two different types of lipid moieties are present in glycophosphoinositol-anchored membrane proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 11, 457–466.

Google Scholar

Cross, G. A. (1975). Identification, purification and properties of clone-specific glycoprotein antigens constituting the surface coat of Trypanosoma brucei. Parasitology 71, 393–417. doi: 10.1017/s003118200004717x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cross, G. A., Kim, H. S., and Wickstead, B. (2014). Capturing the variant surface glycoprotein repertoire (the VSGnome) of Trypanosoma brucei Lister 427. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 195, 59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cuevas, I. C., Cazzulo, J. J., and Sanchez, D. O. (2003). gp63 homologues in Trypanosoma cruzi: surface antigens with metalloprotease activity and a possible role in host cell infection. Infect. Immun. 71, 5739–5749. doi: 10.1128/iai.71.10.5739-5749.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

d’Avila-Levy, C. M., Altoe, E. C., Uehara, L. A., Branquinha, M. H., and Santos, A. L. (2014). GP63 function in the interaction of trypanosomatids with the invertebrate host: facts and prospects. Subcell. Biochem. 74, 253–270. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7305-9_11

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Assis, R. R., Ibraim, I. C., Nogueira, P. M., Soares, R. P., and Turco, S. J. (2012). Glycoconjugates in New World species of Leishmania: polymorphisms in lipophosphoglycan and glycoinositolphospholipids and interaction with hosts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1820, 1354–1365. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Lederkremer, R. M., Agusti, R., and Docampo, R. (2011). Inositolphosphoceramide metabolism in Trypanosoma cruzi as compared with other trypanosomatids. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 58, 79–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00533.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Lederkremer, R. M., Alves, M. J., Fonseca, G. C., and Colli, W. (1976). A lipopeptidophosphoglycan from Trypanosoma cruzi (epimastigota). Isolation, purification and carbohydrate composition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 444, 85–96. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(76)90226-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Lederkremer, R. M., Lima, C., Ramirez, M. I., Ferguson, M. A., Homans, S. W., and Thomas-Oates, J. (1991). Complete Structure of the Glycan of Lipopeptidophosphoglycan from Trypanosoma cruzi Epimastigotes. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 23670–23675.

Google Scholar

De Pablos, L. M., and Osuna, A. (2012). Conserved regions as markers of different patterns of expression and distribution of the mucin-associated surface proteins of Trypanosoma cruzi. Infect. Immun. 80, 169–174. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05859-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Pablos, L. M., Diaz Lozano, I. M., Jercic, M. I., Quinzada, M., Gimenez, M. J., Calabuig, E., et al. (2016). The C-terminal region of Trypanosoma cruzi MASPs is antigenic and secreted via exovesicles. Sci. Rep. 6:27293. doi: 10.1038/srep27293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Pablos, L. M., Gonzalez, G. G., Solano Parada, J., Seco Hidalgo, V., Diaz Lozano, I. M., Gomez Samblas, M. M., et al. (2011). Differential expression and characterization of a member of the mucin-associated surface protein family secreted by Trypanosoma cruzi. Infect. Immun. 79, 3993–4001. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05329-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Souza, W., de Carvalho, T. M., and Barrias, E. S. (2010). Review on Trypanosoma cruzi: host cell interaction. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2010:295394. doi: 10.1155/2010/295394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

DeGasperi, R., Thomas, L. J., Sugiyama, E., Chang, H. M., Beck, P. J., Orlean, P., et al. (1990). Correction of a defect in mammalian GPI anchor biosynthesis by a transfected yeast gene. Science 250, 988–991. doi: 10.1126/science.1978413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Desjardins, M., and Descoteaux, A. (1997). Inhibition of phagolysosomal biogenesis by the Leishmania lipophosphoglycan. J. Exp. Med. 185, 2061–2068. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.12.2061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Desquesnes, M., Dargantes, A., Lai, D. H., Lun, Z. R., Holzmuller, P., and Jittapalapong, S. (2013). Trypanosoma evansi and surra: a review and perspectives on transmission, epidemiology and control, impact, and zoonotic aspects. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013:321237. doi: 10.1155/2013/321237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Desser, S. S. (1976). The ultrastructure of the epimastigote stages of Trypanosoma rotatorium in the leech Batracobdella picta. Can. J. Zool. 54, 1712–1723. doi: 10.1139/z76-198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dewar, C. E., MacGregor, P., Cooper, S., Gould, M. K., Matthews, K. R., Savill, N. J., et al. (2018). Mitochondrial DNA is critical for longevity and metabolism of transmission stage Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Pathog. 14:e1007195. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Di Noia, J. M., Sanchez, D. O., and Frasch, A. C. (1995). The protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi has a family of genes resembling the mucin genes of mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24146–24149. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.41.24146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doehl, J. S. P., Bright, Z., Dey, S., Davies, H., Magson, J., Brown, N., et al. (2017). Skin parasite landscape determines host infectiousness in visceral leishmaniasis. Nat. Commun. 8:57. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00103-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doerrler, W. T., Ye, J., Falck, J. R., and Lehrman, M. A. (1996). Acylation of glucosaminyl phosphatidylinositol revisited. Palmitoyl-CoA dependent palmitoylation of the inositol residue of a synthetic dioctanoyl glucosaminyl phosphatidylinositol by hamster membranes permits efficient mannosylation of the glucosamine residue. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27031–27038. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.43.27031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dóró, E., Jacobs, S. H., Hammond, F. R., Schipper, H., Pieters, R. P., Carrington, M., et al. (2019). Visualizing trypanosomes in a vertebrate host reveals novel swimming behaviours, adaptations and attachment mechanisms. eLife 8:e48388. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dostalova, A., and Volf, P. (2012). Leishmania development in sand flies: parasite-vector interactions overview. Parasit. Vectors 5:276. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-276

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duszenko, M., Figarella, K., Macleod, E. T., and Welburn, S. C. (2006). Death of a trypanosome: a selfish altruism. Trends Parasitol. 22, 536–542. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dvorak, J. A., and Hyde, T. P. (1973). Trypanosoma cruzi: interaction with vertebrate cells in vitro. 1. Individual interactions at the cellular and subcellular levels. Exp. Parasitol. 34, 268–283. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(73)90087-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

El-Sayed, N. M., Myler, P. J., Blandin, G., Berriman, M., Crabtree, J., Aggarwal, G., et al. (2005). Comparative genomics of trypanosomatid parasitic protozoa. Science 309, 404–409. doi: 10.1126/science.1112181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Engstler, M., Pfohl, T., Herminghaus, S., Boshart, M., Wiegertjes, G., Heddergott, N., et al. (2007). Hydrodynamic flow-mediated protein sorting on the cell surface of trypanosomes. Cell 131, 505–515. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Engstler, M., Reuter, G., and Schauer, R. (1993). The developmentally regulated trans-sialidase from Trypanosoma brucei sialylates the procyclic acidic repetitive protein. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 61, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90153-o

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eyford, B. A., Sakurai, T., Smith, D., Loveless, B., Hertz-Fowler, C., Donelson, J. E., et al. (2011). Differential protein expression throughout the life cycle of Trypanosoma congolense, a major parasite of cattle in Africa. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 177, 116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2011.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Favoreto, S. Jr., Dorta, M. L., and Yoshida, N. (1998). Trypanosoma cruzi 175-kDa protein tyrosine phosphorylation is associated with host cell invasion. Exp. Parasitol. 89, 188–194. doi: 10.1006/expr.1998.4285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferguson, M. A. (1999). The structure, biosynthesis and functions of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors, and the contributions of trypanosome research. J. Cell Sci. 112(Pt 17), 2799–2809.

Google Scholar

Ferguson, M. A. J., Hart, G. W., and Kinoshita, T. (2015). “Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchors,” in Essentials of Glycobiology, eds A. Varki, R. D. Cummings, J. D. Esko, P. Stanley, G. W. Hart, M. Aebi, et al. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), 137–150.

Google Scholar

Ferguson, M. A., Brimacombe, J. S., Cottaz, S., Field, R. A., Guther, L. S., Homans, S. W., et al. (1994). Glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol molecules of the parasite and the host. Parasitology 108(Suppl.), S45–S54. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000075715

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferguson, M. A., Homans, S. W., Dwek, R. A., and Rademacher, T. W. (1988). Glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol moiety that anchors Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoprotein to the membrane. Science 239, 753–759. doi: 10.1126/science.3340856

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferguson, M. A., Low, M. G., and Cross, G. A. (1985). Glycosyl-sn-1,2-dimyristylphosphatidylinositol is covalently linked to Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 14547–14555.

Google Scholar

Ferguson, M. A., Murray, P., Rutherford, H., and McConville, M. J. (1993). A simple purification of procyclic acidic repetitive protein and demonstration of a sialylated glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol membrane anchor. Biochem. J. 291(Pt 1), 51–55. doi: 10.1042/bj2910051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fermino, B. R., Paiva, F., Viola, L. B., Rodrigues, C. M. F., Garcia, H. A., Campaner, M., et al. (2019). Shared species of crocodilian trypanosomes carried by tabanid flies in Africa and South America, including the description of a new species from caimans, Trypanosoma kaiowa n. sp. Parasit. Vectors 12:225. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3463-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferreira, E. R., Bonfim-Melo, A., Mortara, R. A., and Bahia, D. (2012). Trypanosoma cruzi extracellular amastigotes and host cell signaling: more pieces to the puzzle. Front. Immunol. 3:363. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferreira, R. C., Kessler, R. L., Lorenzo, M. G., Paim, R. M., Ferreira Lde, L., Probst, C. M., et al. (2016). Colonization of Rhodnius prolixus gut by Trypanosoma cruzi involves an extensive parasite killing. Parasitology 143, 434–443. doi: 10.1017/S0031182015001857

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Field, M. C., Menon, A. K., and Cross, G. A. (1991). A glycosylphosphatidylinositol protein anchor from procyclic stage Trypanosoma brucei: lipid structure and biosynthesis. EMBO J. 10, 2731–2739.

Google Scholar

Flynn, I. W., and Bowman, I. B. (1973). The metabolism of carbohydrate by pleomorphic African trypanosomes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 45, 25–42. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(73)90281-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Forestier, C. L., Gao, Q., and Boons, G. J. (2014). Leishmania lipophosphoglycan: how to establish structure-activity relationships for this highly complex and multifunctional glycoconjugate? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4:193. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frasch, A. C. (2000). Functional diversity in the trans-sialidase and mucin families in Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasitol. Today 16, 282–286. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(00)01698-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frevert, U., Schenkman, S., and Nussenzweig, V. (1992). Stage-specific expression and intracellular shedding of the cell surface trans-sialidase of Trypanosoma cruzi. Infect. Immun. 60, 2349–2360. doi: 10.1128/IAI.60.6.2349-2360.1992

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Freymann, D., Down, J., Carrington, M., Roditi, I., Turner, M., and Wiley, D. (1990). 2.9 A resolution structure of the N-terminal domain of a variant surface glycoprotein from Trypanosoma brucei. J. Mol. Biol. 216, 141–160. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80066-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujihara, Y., Okabe, M., and Ikawa, M. (2014). GPI-anchored protein complex, LY6K/TEX101, is required for sperm migration into the oviduct and male fertility in mice. Biol. Reprod. 90:60. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.112888

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujihara, Y., Tokuhiro, K., Muro, Y., Kondoh, G., Araki, Y., Ikawa, M., et al. (2013). Expression of TEX101, regulated by ACE, is essential for the production of fertile mouse spermatozoa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 8111–8116. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222166110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujita, M., and Kinoshita, T. (2010). Structural remodeling of GPI anchors during biosynthesis and after attachment to proteins. FEBS Lett. 584, 1670–1677. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujita, M., Maeda, Y., Ra, M., Yamaguchi, Y., Taguchi, R., and Kinoshita, T. (2009). GPI glycan remodeling by PGAP5 regulates transport of GPI-anchored proteins from the ER to the Golgi. Cell 139, 352–365. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gardiner, P. R., Nene, V., Barry, M. M., Thatthi, R., Burleigh, B., and Clarke, M. W. (1996). Characterization of a small variable surface glycoprotein from Trypanosoma vivax. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 82, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(96)02687-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garrison, P., Khan, U., Cipriano, M., Bush, P. J., McDonald, J., Sur, A., et al. (2021). Turnover of Variant surface glycoprotein in Trypanosoma brucei is a bimodal process. mBio 12:e0172521. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01725-21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gazos-Lopes, F., Mesquita, R. D., Silva-Cardoso, L., Senna, R., Silveira, A. B., Jablonka, W., et al. (2012). Glycoinositolphospholipids from Trypanosomatids subvert nitric oxide production in Rhodnius prolixus salivary glands. PLoS One 7:e47285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Geiger, A., Bossard, G., Sereno, D., Pissarra, J., Lemesre, J. L., Vincendeau, P., et al. (2016). Escaping deleterious immune response in their hosts: lessons from trypanosomatids. Front. Immunol. 7:212. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00212

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goldston, A. M., Powell, R. R., and Temesvari, L. A. (2012). Sink or swim: lipid rafts in parasite pathogenesis. Trends Parasitol. 28, 417–426. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2012.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Golgher, D. B., Colli, W., Souto-Padron, T., and Zingales, B. (1993). Galactofuranose-containing glycoconjugates of epimastigote and trypomastigote forms of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 60, 249–264. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90136-l

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goncalves, C. S., Avila, A. R., de Souza, W., Motta, M. C. M., and Cavalcanti, D. P. (2018). Revisiting the Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclogenesis: morphological and ultrastructural analyses during cell differentiation. Parasit. Vectors 11:83. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2664-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gonzalez, M. S., Souza, M. S., Garcia, E. S., Nogueira, N. F., Mello, C. B., Canepa, G. E., et al. (2013). Trypanosoma cruzi TcSMUG L-surface mucins promote development and infectivity in the triatomine vector Rhodnius prolixus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7:e2552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002552

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grab, D. J., Webster, P., Ito, S., Fish, W. R., Verjee, Y., and Lonsdale-Eccles, J. D. (1987). Subcellular localization of a variable surface glycoprotein phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase-C in African trypanosomes. J. Cell Biol. 105, 737–746. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.2.737

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Granato, E. T., and Foster, K. R. (2020). The evolution of mass cell suicide in bacterial warfare. Curr. Biol. 30, 2836–2843.e2833. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.05.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grandgenett, P. M., Coughlin, B. C., Kirchhoff, L. V., and Donelson, J. E. (2000). Differential expression of GP63 genes in Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 110, 409–415. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(00)00275-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grandgenett, P. M., Otsu, K., Wilson, H. R., Wilson, M. E., and Donelson, J. E. (2007). A function for a specific zinc metalloprotease of African trypanosomes. PLoS Pathog. 3:1432–1445. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Greif, G., Ponce de Leon, M., Lamolle, G., Rodriguez, M., Pineyro, D., Tavares-Marques, L. M., et al. (2013). Transcriptome analysis of the bloodstream stage from the parasite Trypanosoma vivax. BMC Genomics 14:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-149

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gruetzmacher, K., Karesh, W. B., Amuasi, J. H., Arshad, A., Farlow, A., Gabrysch, S., et al. (2021). The Berlin principles on one health - Bridging global health and conservation. Sci. Total Environ. 764, 142919. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142919

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gruszynski, A. E., DeMaster, A., Hooper, N. M., and Bangs, J. D. (2003). Surface coat remodeling during differentiation of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 24665–24672. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301497200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gruszynski, A. E., van Deursen, F. J., Albareda, M. C., Best, A., Chaudhary, K., Cliffe, L. J., et al. (2006). Regulation of surface coat exchange by differentiating African trypanosomes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 147, 211–223. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.02.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Güther, M. L., and Ferguson, M. A. (1995). The role of inositol acylation and inositol deacylation in GPI biosynthesis in Trypanosoma brucei. EMBO J. 14, 3080–3093.

Google Scholar

Haenni, S., Renggli, C. K., Fragoso, C. M., Oberle, M., and Roditi, I. (2006). The procyclin-associated genes of Trypanosoma brucei are not essential for cyclical transmission by tsetse. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 150, 144–156. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hall, B. F., Webster, P., Ma, A. K., Joiner, K. A., and Andrews, N. W. (1992). Desialylation of lysosomal membrane glycoproteins by Trypanosoma cruzi: a role for the surface neuraminidase in facilitating parasite entry into the host cell cytoplasm. J. Exp. Med. 176, 313–325. doi: 10.1084/jem.176.2.313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamburger, D., Egerton, M., and Riezman, H. (1995). Yeast Gaa1p is required for attachment of a completed GPI anchor onto proteins. J. Cell Biol. 129, 629–639. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.3.629

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamill, L. C., Kaare, M. T., Welburn, S. C., and Picozzi, K. (2013). Domestic pigs as potential reservoirs of human and animal trypanosomiasis in Northern Tanzania. Parasit. Vectors 6:322. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamilton, P. B., Adams, E. R., Njiokou, F., Gibson, W. C., Cuny, G., and Herder, S. (2009). Phylogenetic analysis reveals the presence of the Trypanosoma cruzi clade in African terrestrial mammals. Infect. Genet. Evol. 9, 81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamilton, P. B., and Stevens, J. R. (2017). “Classification and phylogeny of Trypanosoma cruzi,” in American Trypanosomiasis Chagas Disease, 2nd Edn, eds J. Telleria and M. Tibayrenc (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 321–344.

Google Scholar

Hanrahan, O., Webb, H., O’Byrne, R., Brabazon, E., Treumann, A., Sunter, J. D., et al. (2009). The glycosylphosphatidylinositol-PLC in Trypanosoma brucei forms a linear array on the exterior of the flagellar membrane before and after activation. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000468. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000468

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hartel, A. J., Glogger, M., Jones, N. G., Abuillan, W., Batram, C., Hermann, A., et al. (2016). N-glycosylation enables high lateral mobility of GPI-anchored proteins at a molecular crowding threshold. Nat. Commun. 7:12870. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12870

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hehl, A., Pearson, T. W., Barry, J. D., Braun, R., and Roditi, I. (1995). Expression of GARP, a major surface glycoprotein of Trypanosoma congolense, on the surface of Trypanosoma brucei: characterization and use as a selectable marker. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 70, 45–58. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(95)00003-j

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heise, N., Raper, J., Buxbaum, L. U., Peranovich, T. M., and de Almeida, M. L. (1996). Identification of complete precursors for the glycosylphosphatidylinositol protein anchors of Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16877–16887. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.28.16877

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hilley, J. D., Zawadzki, J. L., McConville, M. J., Coombs, G. H., and Mottram, J. C. (2000). Leishmania mexicana mutants lacking glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) protein transamidase provide insights into the biosynthesis and functions of GPI-anchored proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1183–1195. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.4.1183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirose, S., Prince, G. M., Sevlever, D., Ravi, L., Rosenberry, T. L., Ueda, E., et al. (1992). Characterization of putative glycoinositol phospholipid anchor precursors in mammalian cells. Localization of phosphoethanolamine. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16968–16974.

Google Scholar

Hoare, C. A. (1931). Studies on Trypanosoma grayi. III. Life-Cycle in the Tsetse-fly and in the Crocodile. Parasitology 23, 449–484. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000013858

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoare, C. A. (1972). The Trypanosomes of Mammals: a Zoological Monograph. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

Google Scholar

Hoberg, E. P., and Brooks, D. R. (2008). A macroevolutionary mosaic: episodic host-switching, geographical colonization and diversification in complex host–parasite systems. J. Biogeogr. 35, 1533–1550. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01951.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Holm, A., Tejle, K., Magnusson, K. E., Descoteaux, A., and Rasmusson, B. (2001). Leishmania donovani lipophosphoglycan causes periphagosomal actin accumulation: correlation with impaired translocation of PKCalpha and defective phagosome maturation. Cell. Microbiol. 3, 439–447. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2001.00127.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Homans, S. W., Ferguson, M. A., Dwek, R. A., Rademacher, T. W., Anand, R., and Williams, A. F. (1988). Complete structure of the glycosyl phosphatidylinositol membrane anchor of rat brain Thy-1 glycoprotein. Nature 333, 269–272. doi: 10.1038/333269a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, Y., and Kinoshita, T. (2009). Trypanosome glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis. Korean J. Parasitol. 47, 197–204. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2009.47.3.197

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, Y., Maeda, Y., Watanabe, R., Inoue, N., Ohishi, K., and Kinoshita, T. (2000). Requirement of PIG-F and PIG-O for transferring phosphoethanolamine to the third mannose in glycosylphosphatidylinositol. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 20911–20919. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001913200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, Y., Maeda, Y., Watanabe, R., Ohishi, K., Mishkind, M., Riezman, H., et al. (1999). Pig-n, a mammalian homologue of yeast Mcd4p, is involved in transferring phosphoethanolamine to the first mannose of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 35099–35106. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.49.35099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, Y., Nagamune, K., Morita, Y. S., Nakatani, F., Ashida, H., Maeda, Y., et al. (2006). Removal or maintenance of inositol-linked acyl chain in glycosylphosphatidylinositol is critical in trypanosome life cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 11595–11602. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513061200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, Y., Ohishi, K., Kang, J. Y., Tanaka, S., Inoue, N., Nishimura, J., et al. (2003). Human PIG-U and yeast Cdc91p are the fifth subunit of GPI transamidase that attaches GPI-anchors to proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 1780–1789. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-12-0794

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Horn, D. (2014). Antigenic variation in African trypanosomes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 195, 123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

ICZN (1999). International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. London: The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.

Google Scholar

Ikezawa, H., Yamanegi, M., Taguchi, R., Miyashita, T., and Ohyabu, T. (1976). Studies on phosphatidylinositol phosphodiesterase (phospholipase C type) of Bacillus cereus: I. Purification, properties and phosphatase-releasing activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 450, 154–164.

Google Scholar

Ilg, T. (2000). Proteophosphoglycans of Leishmania. Parasitol. Today 16, 489–497. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(00)01791-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ilg, T., Handman, E., and Stierhof, Y. D. (1999a). Proteophosphoglycans from Leishmania promastigotes and amastigotes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 27, 518–525. doi: 10.1042/bst0270518

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ilg, T., Montgomery, J., Stierhof, Y. D., and Handman, E. (1999b). Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel repeat-containing Leishmania major gene, ppg1, that encodes a membrane-associated form of proteophosphoglycan with a putative glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31410–31420. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.44.31410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ilg, T., Stierhof, Y. D., McConville, M. J., and Overath, P. (1995). Purification, partial characterization and immunolocalization of a proteophosphoglycan secreted by Leishmania mexicana amastigotes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 66, 205–215.

Google Scholar

Ilgoutz, S. C., and McConville, M. J. (2001). Function and assembly of the Leishmania surface coat. Int. J. Parasitol. 31, 899–908. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00197-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Inoue, N., Kinoshita, T., Orii, T., and Takeda, J. (1993). Cloning of a human gene, PIG-F, a component of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor biosynthesis, by a novel expression cloning strategy. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 6882–6885.

Google Scholar

Inverso, J. A., Medina-Acosta, E., O’Connor, J., Russell, D. G., and Cross, G. A. (1993). Crithidia fasciculata contains a transcribed leishmanial surface proteinase (gp63) gene homologue. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 57, 47–54. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90242-p

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ishihara, A., Hou, Y., and Jacobson, K. (1987). The Thy-1 antigen exhibits rapid lateral diffusion in the plasma membrane of rodent lymphoid cells and fibroblasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 1290–1293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.5.1290

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jackson, A. P. (2015). Genome evolution in trypanosomatid parasites. Parasitology 142(Suppl. 1), S40–S56. doi: 10.1017/S0031182014000894

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jackson, A. P., Allison, H. C., Barry, J. D., Field, M. C., Hertz-Fowler, C., and Berriman, M. (2013). A cell-surface phylome for African trypanosomes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7:e2121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jackson, A. P., Goyard, S., Xia, D., Foth, B. J., Sanders, M., Wastling, J. M., et al. (2015). Global gene expression profiling through the complete life cycle of Trypanosoma vivax. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9:e0003975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jackson, A. P., Otto, T. D., Aslett, M., Armstrong, S. D., Bringaud, F., Schlacht, A., et al. (2016). Kinetoplastid phylogenomics reveals the evolutionary innovations associated with the origins of parasitism. Curr. Biol. 26, 161–172. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jackson, D. G., Owen, M. J., and Voorheis, H. P. (1985). A new method for the rapid purification of both the membrane-bound and released forms of the variant surface glycoprotein from Trypanosoma brucei. Biochem. J. 230, 195–202. doi: 10.1042/bj2300195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jansen, A. M., Xavier, S., and Roque, A. L. R. (2018). Trypanosoma cruzi transmission in the wild and its most important reservoir hosts in Brazil. Parasit. Vectors 11:502. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3067-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jansen, A. M., Xavier, S., and Roque, A. L. R. (2020). Landmarks of the knowledge and Trypanosoma cruzi biology in the wild environment. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10:10. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jaquenoud, M., Pagac, M., Signorell, A., Benghezal, M., Jelk, J., Butikofer, P., et al. (2008). The Gup1 homologue of Trypanosoma brucei is a GPI glycosylphosphatidylinositol remodelase. Mol. Microbiol. 67, 202–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06043.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, Y., Zhao, X., Zou, J., and Suo, X. (2011). Trypanosoma evansi: identification and characterization of a variant surface glycoprotein lacking cysteine residues in its C-terminal domain. Exp. Parasitol. 127, 100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.06.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, N. G., Nietlispach, D., Sharma, R., Burke, D. F., Eyres, I., Mues, M., et al. (2008). Structure of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored domain from a trypanosome variant surface glycoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 3584–3593. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706207200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joshi, P. B., Sacks, D. L., Modi, G., and McMaster, W. R. (1998). Targeted gene deletion of Leishmania major genes encoding developmental stage-specific leishmanolysin (GP63). Mol. Microbiol. 27, 519–530. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00689.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kahn, S., Wleklinski, M., Aruffo, A., Farr, A., Coder, D., and Kahn, M. (1995). Trypanosoma cruzi amastigote adhesion to macrophages is facilitated by the mannose receptor. J. Exp. Med. 182, 1243–1258. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.5.1243

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kamidi, C. M., Saarman, N. P., Dion, K., Mireji, P. O., Ouma, C., Murilla, G., et al. (2017). Multiple evolutionary origins of Trypanosoma evansi in Kenya. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 11:e0005895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, J. Y., Hong, Y., Ashida, H., Shishioh, N., Murakami, Y., Morita, Y. S., et al. (2005). PIG-V involved in transferring the second mannose in glycosylphosphatidylinositol. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 9489–9497. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413867200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanzawa, N., Maeda, Y., Ogiso, H., Murakami, Y., Taguchi, R., and Kinoshita, T. (2009). Peroxisome dependency of alkyl-containing GPI-anchor biosynthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 17711–17716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904762106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kelly, S., Ivens, A., Manna, P. T., Gibson, W., and Field, M. C. (2014). A draft genome for the African crocodilian trypanosome Trypanosoma grayi. Sci. Data 1:140024. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2014.24

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kelly, S., Ivens, A., Mott, G. A., O’Neill, E., Emms, D., Macleod, O., et al. (2017). An alternative strategy for trypanosome survival in the mammalian bloodstream revealed through genome and transcriptome analysis of the ubiquitous bovine parasite Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) theileri. Genome Biol. Evol. 9, 2093–2109. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kenworthy, A. K., Nichols, B. J., Remmert, C. L., Hendrix, G. M., Kumar, M., Zimmerberg, J., et al. (2004). Dynamics of putative raft-associated proteins at the cell surface. J. Cell Biol. 165, 735–746. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200312170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Killick-Kendrick, R. (1999). The biology and control of phlebotomine sand flies. Clin. Dermatol. 17, 279–289. doi: 10.1016/s0738-081x(99)00046-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kimura, M., and Griffin, F. M. Jr. (1992). C3bi/CR3 is a main ligand-receptor interaction in attachment and phagocytosis of C3-coated particles by mouse peritoneal macrophages. Scand. J. Immunol. 36, 183–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1992.tb03090.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kinoshita, M., Suzuki, K. G., Matsumori, N., Takada, M., Ano, H., Morigaki, K., et al. (2017). Raft-based sphingomyelin interactions revealed by new fluorescent sphingomyelin analogs. J. Cell Biol. 216, 1183–1204. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201607086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kinoshita, T. (2020). Biosynthesis and biology of mammalian GPI-anchored proteins. Open Biol. 10, 190290. doi: 10.1098/rsob.190290

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kinoshita, T., and Fujita, M. (2016). Biosynthesis of GPI-anchored proteins: special emphasis on GPI lipid remodeling. J. Lipid Res. 57, 6–24. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R063313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klatt, S., Simpson, L., Maslov, D. A., and Konthur, Z. (2019). Leishmania tarentolae: Taxonomic classification and its application as a promising biotechnological expression host. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13:e0007424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007424

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Komura, N., Suzuki, K. G., Ando, H., Konishi, M., Koikeda, M., Imamura, A., et al. (2016). Raft-based interactions of gangliosides with a GPI-anchored receptor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 402–410. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kostygov, A. Y., Karnkowska, A., Votypka, J., Tashyreva, D., Maciszewski, K., Yurchenko, V., et al. (2021). Euglenozoa: taxonomy, diversity and ecology, symbioses and viruses. Open Biol. 11:200407. doi: 10.1098/rsob.200407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kulkarni, M. M., Olson, C. L., Engman, D. M., and McGwire, B. S. (2009). Trypanosoma cruzi GP63 proteins undergo stage-specific differential posttranslational modification and are important for host cell infection. Infect. Immun. 77, 2193–2200. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01542-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LaCount, D. J., Gruszynski, A. E., Grandgenett, P. M., Bangs, J. D., and Donelson, J. E. (2003). Expression and function of the Trypanosoma brucei major surface protease (GP63) genes. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 24658–24664. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301451200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lai, D. H., Hashimi, H., Lun, Z. R., Ayala, F. J., and Lukes, J. (2008). Adaptations of Trypanosoma brucei to gradual loss of kinetoplast DNA: Trypanosoma equiperdum and Trypanosoma evansi are petite mutants of T. brucei. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 1999–2004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711799105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lantos, A. B., Carlevaro, G., Araoz, B., Ruiz Diaz, P., Camara Mde, L., Buscaglia, C. A., et al. (2016). Sialic acid glycobiology unveils Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigote membrane physiology. PLoS Pathog. 12:e1005559. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005559

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lebreton, S., Paladino, S., and Zurzolo, C. (2019). Clustering in the Golgi apparatus governs sorting and function of GPI-APs in polarized epithelial cells. FEBS Lett. 593, 2351–2365. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lehane, M. J., Allingham, P. G., and Weglicki, P. (1996). Composition of the peritrophic matrix of the tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans morsitans. Cell Tissue Res. 283, 375–384. doi: 10.1007/s004410050548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levental, I., Levental, K. R., and Heberle, F. A. (2020). Lipid rafts: controversies resolved, mysteries remain. Trends Cell Biol. 30, 341–353. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liniger, M., Acosta-Serrano, A., Van Den Abbeele, J., Kunz Renggli, C., Brun, R., Englund, P. T., et al. (2003). Cleavage of trypanosome surface glycoproteins by alkaline trypsin-like enzyme(s) in the midgut of Glossina morsitans. Int. J. Parasitol. 33, 1319–1328. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(03)00182-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Link, F., Borges, A. R., Jones, N. G., and Engstler, M. (2021). To the surface and back: exo- and endocytic pathways in Trypanosoma brucei. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:720521. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.720521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lisanti, M. P., Sargiacomo, M., Graeve, L., Saltiel, A. R., and Rodriguez-Boulan, E. (1988). Polarized apical distribution of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in a renal epithelial cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 9557–9561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lischke, A., Klein, C., Stierhof, Y. D., Hempel, M., Mehlert, A., Almeida, I. C., et al. (2000). Isolation and characterization of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored, mucin-like surface glycoproteins from bloodstream forms of the freshwater-fish parasite Trypanosoma carassii. Biochem. J. 345(Pt 3), 693–700.

Google Scholar

Liu, Y. S., and Fujita, M. (2020). Mammalian GPI-anchor modifications and the enzymes involved. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 48, 1129–1138. doi: 10.1042/BST20191142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y. S., Guo, X. Y., Hirata, T., Rong, Y., Motooka, D., Kitajima, T., et al. (2018). N-Glycan-dependent protein folding and endoplasmic reticulum retention regulate GPI-anchor processing. J. Cell Biol. 217, 585–599. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201706135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lovelace, J. K., and Gottlieb, M. (1986). Comparison of extracellular acid phosphatases from various isolates of Leishmania. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 35, 1121–1128. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.1121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Low, M. G., and Finean, J. B. (1977). Non-lytic release of acetylcholinesterase from erythrocytes by a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C. FEBS Lett. 82, 143–146. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80905-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lukeš, J., Butenko, A., Hashimi, H., Maslov, D. A., Votypka, J., and Yurchenko, V. (2018). Trypanosomatids are much more than just trypanosomes: clues from the expanded family tree. Trends Parasitol. 34, 466–480. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.03.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lukeš, J., Skalicky, T., Tyc, J., Votypka, J., and Yurchenko, V. (2014). Evolution of parasitism in kinetoplastid flagellates. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 195, 115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.05.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Macrae, J. I., Acosta-Serrano, A., Morrice, N. A., Mehlert, A., and Ferguson, M. A. (2005). Structural characterization of NETNES, a novel glycoconjugate in Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 12201–12211. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412939200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maeda, Y., Watanabe, R., Harris, C. L., Hong, Y., Ohishi, K., Kinoshita, K., et al. (2001). PIG-M transfers the first mannose to glycosylphosphatidylinositol on the lumenal side of the ER. EMBO J. 20, 250–261. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.1.250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marinkelle, C. J. (1980). The control of leishmaniases. Bull. World Health Organ. 58, 807–818.

Google Scholar

Martin, D. S., and Desser, S. S. (1990). A light and electron microscopic study of Trypanosoma fallisi N. Sp. in toads (Bufo americanus) from Algonquin Park, Ontario. J. Protozool. 37, 199–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1990.tb01128.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Masterson, W. J., Raper, J., Doering, T. L., Hart, G. W., and Englund, P. T. (1990). Fatty acid remodeling: a novel reaction sequence in the biosynthesis of trypanosome glycosyl phosphatidylinositol membrane anchors. Cell 62, 73–80. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90241-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McConville, M. J., and Bacic, A. (1990). The glycoinositolphospholipid profiles of two Leishmania major strains that differ in lipophosphoglycan expression. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 38, 57–67. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(90)90205-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McConville, M. J., and Blackwell, J. M. (1991). Developmental changes in the glycosylated phosphatidylinositols of Leishmania donovani. Characterization of the promastigote and amastigote glycolipids. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15170–15179.

Google Scholar

McConville, M. J., and Ferguson, M. A. (1993). The structure, biosynthesis and function of glycosylated phosphatidylinositols in the parasitic protozoa and higher eukaryotes. Biochem. J. 294(Pt 2), 305–324. doi: 10.1042/bj2940305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McConville, M. J., Collidge, T. A., Ferguson, M. A., and Schneider, P. (1993). The glycoinositol phospholipids of Leishmania mexicana promastigotes. Evidence for the presence of three distinct pathways of glycolipid biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15595–15604.

Google Scholar

McConville, M. J., Homans, S. W., Thomas-Oates, J. E., Dell, A., and Bacic, A. (1990). Structures of the glycoinositolphospholipids from Leishmania major. A family of novel galactofuranose-containing glycolipids. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 7385–7394.

Google Scholar

McConville, M. J., Turco, S. J., Ferguson, M. A., and Sacks, D. L. (1992). Developmental modification of lipophosphoglycan during the differentiation of Leishmania major promastigotes to an infectious stage. EMBO J. 11, 3593–3600.

Google Scholar

Medeiros, M. M., Peixoto, J. R., Oliveira, A. C., Cardilo-Reis, L., Koatz, V. L., Van Kaer, L., et al. (2007). Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-dependent proinflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of the glycoinositolphospholipid (GIPL) from Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Leukoc. Biol. 82, 488–496. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0706478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Medkour, H., Davoust, B., Dulieu, F., Maurizi, L., Lamour, T., Marie, J. L., et al. (2019). Potential animal reservoirs (dogs and bats) of human visceral leishmaniasis due to Leishmania infantum in French Guiana. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13:e0007456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007456

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Medkour, H., Laidoudi, Y., Lafri, I., Davoust, B., Mekroud, A., Bitam, I., et al. (2020). Canine vector-borne protozoa: Molecular and serological investigation for Leishmania spp., Trypanosoma spp., Babesia spp., and Hepatozoon spp. in dogs from Northern Algeria. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 19:100353. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2019.100353

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mehlert, A., Treumann, A., and Ferguson, M. A. (1999). Trypanosoma brucei GPEET-PARP is phosphorylated on six out of seven threonine residues. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 98, 291–296. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(98)00168-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mehlert, A., Zitzmann, N., Richardson, J. M., Treumann, A., and Ferguson, M. A. (1998). The glycosylation of the variant surface glycoproteins and procyclic acidic repetitive proteins of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 91, 145–152. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(97)00187-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Menon, A. K., Schwarz, R. T., Mayor, S., and Cross, G. A. (1990). Cell-free synthesis of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol precursors for the glycolipid membrane anchor of Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoproteins. Structural characterization of putative biosynthetic intermediates. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9033–9042.

Google Scholar

Molinari, J., and Moreno, S. A. (2018). Trypanosoma brucei Plimmer & Bradford, 1899 is a synonym of T. evansi (Steel, 1885) according to current knowledge and by application of nomenclature rules. Syst. Parasitol. 95, 249–256. doi: 10.1007/s11230-018-9779-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mollinedo, F., Janssen, H., de la Iglesia-Vicente, J., Villa-Pulgarin, J. A., and Calafat, J. (2010). Selective fusion of azurophilic granules with Leishmania-containing phagosomes in human neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 34528–34536. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.125302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moody, S. F., Handman, E., McConville, M. J., and Bacic, A. (1993). The structure of Leishmania major amastigote lipophosphoglycan. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18457–18466.

Google Scholar

Moody-Haupt, S., Patterson, J. H., Mirelman, D., and McConville, M. J. (2000). The major surface antigens of Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites are GPI-anchored proteophosphoglycans. J. Mol. Biol. 297, 409–420. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3577

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moreno, S. N., Silva, J., Vercesi, A. E., and Docampo, R. (1994). Cytosolic-free calcium elevation in Trypanosoma cruzi is required for cell invasion. J. Exp. Med. 180, 1535–1540. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.4.1535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mortara, R. A., da Silva, S., Araguth, M. F., Blanco, S. A., and Yoshida, N. (1992). Polymorphism of the 35- and 50-kilodalton surface glycoconjugates of Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclic trypomastigotes. Infect. Immun. 60, 4673–4678. doi: 10.1128/IAI.60.11.4673-4678.1992

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mucci, J., Lantos, A. B., Buscaglia, C. A., Leguizamon, M. S., and Campetella, O. (2017). The Trypanosoma cruzi surface, a nanoscale patchwork quilt. Trends Parasitol. 33, 102–112. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2016.10.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mugnier, M. R., Stebbins, C. E., and Papavasiliou, F. N. (2016). Masters of disguise: antigenic variation and the VSG Coat in Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Pathog. 12:e1005784. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005784

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Muniz, M., and Riezman, H. (2016). Trafficking of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchored proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cell surface. J. Lipid Res. 57, 352–360. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R062760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murakami, Y., Siripanyapinyo, U., Hong, Y., Kang, J. Y., Ishihara, S., Nakakuma, H., et al. (2003). PIG-W is critical for inositol acylation but not for flipping of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 4285–4295. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-03-0193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mussmann, R., Engstler, M., Gerrits, H., Kieft, R., Toaldo, C. B., Onderwater, J., et al. (2004). Factors affecting the level and localization of the transferrin receptor in Trypanosoma brucei. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 40690–40698. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404697200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mussmann, R., Janssen, H., Calafat, J., Engstler, M., Ansorge, I., Clayton, C., et al. (2003). The expression level determines the surface distribution of the transferrin receptor in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Microbiol. 47, 23–35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03245.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nagamune, K., Nozaki, T., Maeda, Y., Ohishi, K., Fukuma, T., Hara, T., et al. (2000). Critical roles of glycosylphosphatidylinositol for Trypanosoma brucei. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 10336–10341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.180230697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nagamune, K., Ohishi, K., Ashida, H., Hong, Y., Hino, J., Kangawa, K., et al. (2003). GPI transamidase of Trypanosoma brucei has two previously uncharacterized (trypanosomatid transamidase 1 and 2) and three common subunits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 10682–10687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1833260100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakamura, N., Inoue, N., Watanabe, R., Takahashi, M., Takeda, J., Stevens, V. L., et al. (1997). Expression cloning of PIG-L, a candidate N-acetylglucosaminyl-phosphatidylinositol deacetylase. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15834–15840. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.25.15834

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ngomtcho, S. C. H., Weber, J. S., Ngo Bum, E., Gbem, T. T., Kelm, S., and Achukwi, M. D. (2017). Molecular screening of tsetse flies and cattle reveal different Trypanosoma species including T. grayi and T. theileri in northern Cameroon. Parasit. Vectors 10:631. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2540-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nogueira, N. F. S., Gonzalez, M. S., Gomes, J. E., de Souza, W., Garcia, E. S., Azambuja, P., et al. (2007). Trypanosoma cruzi: involvement of glycoinositolphospholipids in the attachment to the luminial midgut surface of Rhodnius prolixus. Exp. Parasitol. 116, 120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2006.12.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nogueira, N. P., Saraiva, F. M., Sultano, P. E., Cunha, P. R., Laranja, G. A., Justo, G. A., et al. (2015). Proliferation and differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi inside its vector have a new trigger: redox status. PLoS One 10:e0116712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116712

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohishi, K., Inoue, N., and Kinoshita, T. (2001). PIG-S and PIG-T, essential for GPI anchor attachment to proteins, form a complex with GAA1 and GPI8. EMBO J. 20, 4088–4098. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.15.4088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohishi, K., Inoue, N., Maeda, Y., Takeda, J., Riezman, H., and Kinoshita, T. (2000). Gaa1p and gpi8p are components of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) transamidase that mediates attachment of GPI to proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1523–1533. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.5.1523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okai, H., Ikema, R., Nakamura, H., Kato, M., Araki, M., Mizuno, A., et al. (2020). Cold-sensitive phenotypes of a yeast null mutant of ARV1 support its role as a GPI flippase. FEBS Lett. 594, 2431–2439. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13843

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oliveira, A. C., Peixoto, J. R., de Arruda, L. B., Campos, M. A., Gazzinelli, R. T., Golenbock, D. T., et al. (2004). Expression of functional TLR4 confers proinflammatory responsiveness to Trypanosoma cruzi glycoinositolphospholipids and higher resistance to infection with T. cruzi. J. Immunol. 173, 5688–5696. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.9.5688

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olivier, M., Atayde, V. D., Isnard, A., Hassani, K., and Shio, M. T. (2012). Leishmania virulence factors: focus on the metalloprotease GP63. Microbes Infect. 14, 1377–1389. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2012.05.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olivier, M., Gregory, D. J., and Forget, G. (2005). Subversion mechanisms by which Leishmania parasites can escape the host immune response: a signaling point of view. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18, 293–305. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.2.293-305.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Onyilagha, C., and Uzonna, J. E. (2019). Host immune responses and immune evasion strategies in African trypanosomiasis. Front. Immunol. 10:2738. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02738

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ooi, C. P., Schuster, S., Cren-Travaille, C., Bertiaux, E., Cosson, A., Goyard, S., et al. (2016). The cyclical development of Trypanosoma vivax in the tsetse fly involves an asymmetric division. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 6:115. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Overath, P., and Engstler, M. (2004). Endocytosis, membrane recycling and sorting of GPI-anchored proteins: Trypanosoma brucei as a model system. Mol. Microbiol. 53, 735–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04224.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Overath, P., Haag, J., Lischke, A., and O’HUigin, C. (2001). The surface structure of trypanosomes in relation to their molecular phylogeny. Int. J. Parasitol. 31, 468–471. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00152-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paguem, A., Abanda, B., Ndjonka, D., Weber, J. S., Ngomtcho, S. C. H., Manchang, K. T., et al. (2019). Widespread co-endemicity of Trypanosoma species infecting cattle in the Sudano-Sahelian and Guinea Savannah zones of Cameroon. BMC Vet. Res. 15:344. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2111-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, S., Lee, C., Sabharwal, P., Zhang, M., Meyers, C. L., and Sockanathan, S. (2013). GDE2 promotes neurogenesis by glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor cleavage of RECK. Science 339, 324–328. doi: 10.1126/science.1231921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paul, K. S., Jiang, D., Morita, Y. S., and Englund, P. T. (2001). Fatty acid synthesis in African trypanosomes: a solution to the myristate mystery. Trends Parasitol. 17, 381–387. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(01)01984-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paulick, M. G., and Bertozzi, C. R. (2008). The glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor: a complex membrane-anchoring structure for proteins. Biochemistry 47, 6991–7000. doi: 10.1021/bi8006324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peacock, L., Cook, S., Ferris, V., Bailey, M., and Gibson, W. (2012). The life cycle of Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense in the tsetse fly. Parasit. Vectors 5:109. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pech-Canul, A. C., Monteon, V., and Solis-Oviedo, R. L. (2017). A brief view of the surface membrane proteins from Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Parasitol. Res. 2017:3751403. doi: 10.1155/2017/3751403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pereira-Chioccola, V. L., Acosta-Serrano, A., Correia de Almeida, I., Ferguson, M. A., Souto-Padron, T., Rodrigues, M. M., et al. (2000). Mucin-like molecules form a negatively charged coat that protects Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes from killing by human anti-α-galactosyl antibodies. J. Cell Sci. 113, 1299–1307.

Google Scholar

Piani, A., Ilg, T., Elefanty, A. G., Curtis, J., and Handman, E. (1999). Leishmania major proteophosphoglycan is expressed by amastigotes and has an immunomodulatory effect on macrophage function. Microbes Infect. 1, 589–599. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(99)80058-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pimenta, P. F., Saraiva, E. M., and Sacks, D. L. (1991). The comparative fine structure and surface glycoconjugate expression of three life stages of Leishmania major. Exp. Parasitol. 72, 191–204. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(91)90137-l

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pimenta, P. F., Turco, S. J., McConville, M. J., Lawyer, P. G., Perkins, P. V., and Sacks, D. L. (1992). Stage-specific adhesion of Leishmania promastigotes to the sandfly midgut. Science 256, 1812–1815. doi: 10.1126/science.1615326

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pinger, J., Nesic, D., Ali, L., Aresta-Branco, F., Lilic, M., Chowdhury, S., et al. (2018). African trypanosomes evade immune clearance by O-glycosylation of the VSG surface coat. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 932–938. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0187-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pomorski, T., and Menon, A. K. (2006). Lipid flippases and their biological functions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63, 2908–2921. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6167-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pontes de Carvalho, L. C., Tomlinson, S., Vandekerckhove, F., Bienen, E. J., Clarkson, A. B., Jiang, M. S., et al. (1993). Characterization of a novel trans-sialidase of Trypanosoma brucei procyclic trypomastigotes and identification of procyclin as the main sialic acid acceptor. J. Exp. Med. 177, 465–474. doi: 10.1084/jem.177.2.465

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Previato, J. O., Andrade, A. F., Pessolani, M. C., and Mendonca-Previato, L. (1985). Incorporation of sialic acid into Trypanosoma cruzi macromolecules. A proposal for a new metabolic route. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 16, 85–96. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(85)90051-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Previato, J. O., Gorin, P. A., Mazurek, M., Xavier, M. T., Fournet, B., Wieruszesk, J. M., et al. (1990). Primary structure of the oligosaccharide chain of lipopeptidophosphoglycan of epimastigote forms of Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 2518–2526.

Google Scholar

Previato, J. O., Jones, C., Goncalves, L. P., Wait, R., Travassos, L. R., and Mendonca-Previato, L. (1994). O-glycosidically linked N-acetylglucosamine-bound oligosaccharides from glycoproteins of Trypanosoma cruzi. Biochem. J. 301, 151–159. doi: 10.1042/bj3010151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Previato, J. O., Wait, R., Jones, C., DosReis, G. A., Todeschini, A. R., Heise, N., et al. (2004). Glycoinositolphospholipid from Trypanosoma cruzi: structure, biosynthesis and immunobiology. Adv. Parasitol. 56, 1–41. doi: 10.1016/s0065-308x(03)56001-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Puentes, S. M., Dwyer, D. M., Bates, P. A., and Joiner, K. A. (1989). Binding and release of C3 from Leishmania donovani promastigotes during incubation in normal human serum. J. Immunol. 143, 3743–3749.

Google Scholar

Puentes, S. M., Sacks, D. L., da Silva, R. P., and Joiner, K. A. (1988). Complement binding by two developmental stages of Leishmania major promastigotes varying in expression of a surface lipophosphoglycan. J. Exp. Med. 167, 887–902. doi: 10.1084/jem.167.3.887

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ralton, J. E., and McConville, M. J. (1998). Delineation of three pathways of glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis in Leishmania mexicana. Precursors from different pathways are assembled on distinct pools of phosphatidylinositol and undergo fatty acid remodeling. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4245–4257. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.7.4245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rausch, S., Shayan, P., Salnikoff, J., and Reinwald, E. (1994). Sequence determination of three variable surface glycoproteins from Trypanosoma congolense. Conserved sequence and structural motifs. Eur. J. Biochem. 223, 813–821. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb19057.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raymond, F., Boisvert, S., Roy, G., Ritt, J. F., Legare, D., Isnard, A., et al. (2012). Genome sequencing of the lizard parasite Leishmania tarentolae reveals loss of genes associated to the intracellular stage of human pathogenic species. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 1131–1147. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr834

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rebello, K. M., Uehara, L. A., Ennes-Vidal, V., Garcia-Gomes, A. S., Britto, C., Azambuja, P., et al. (2019). Participation of Trypanosoma cruzi gp63 molecules on the interaction with Rhodnius prolixus. Parasitology 146, 1075–1082. doi: 10.1017/S0031182019000441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ricklefs, R. E. (2010). Host-pathogen coevolution, secondary sympatry and species diversification. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365, 1139–1147. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0279

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rico, E., Rojas, F., Mony, B. M., Szoor, B., Macgregor, P., and Matthews, K. R. (2013). Bloodstream form pre-adaptation to the tsetse fly in Trypanosoma brucei. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 3:78. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rifkin, M. R., and Landsberger, F. R. (1990). Trypanosome variant surface glycoprotein transfer to target membranes: a model for the pathogenesis of trypanosomiasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 801–805. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.2.801

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roberts, W. L., Myher, J. J., Kuksis, A., Low, M. G., and Rosenberry, T. L. (1988). Lipid analysis of the glycoinositol phospholipid membrane anchor of human erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase. Palmitoylation of inositol results in resistance to phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 18766–18775.

Google Scholar

Robertson, L. J., Utaaker, K. S., Goyal, K., and Sehgal, R. (2014). Keeping parasitology under the One Health umbrella. Trends Parasitol. 30, 369–372. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.06.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robertson, M., and Bradford, J. R. (1912). Notes on certain aspects of the development of Trypanosoma gambiense in Glossina palpalis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Containing Pap. Biol. Character 85, 241–248. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1912.0048

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roditi, I., Furger, A., Ruepp, S., Schurch, N., and Butikofer, P. (1998). Unravelling the procyclin coat of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 91, 117–130. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(97)00195-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, M. E., Chance, M. L., and Bates, P. A. (2002). The role of promastigote secretory gel in the origin and transmission of the infective stage of Leishmania mexicana by the sandfly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Parasitology 124, 495–507. doi: 10.1017/s0031182002001439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, M. E., Ilg, T., Nikolaev, A. V., Ferguson, M. A., and Bates, P. A. (2004). Transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis by sand flies is enhanced by regurgitation of fPPG. Nature 430, 463–467. doi: 10.1038/nature02675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, M., Kropf, P., Choi, B. S., Dillon, R., Podinovskaia, M., Bates, P., et al. (2009). Proteophosophoglycans regurgitated by Leishmania-infected sand flies target the L-arginine metabolism of host macrophages to promote parasite survival. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000555. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000555

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogerson, E., Pelletier, J., Acosta-Serrano, A., Rose, C., Taylor, S., Guimond, S., et al. (2018). Variations in the peritrophic matrix composition of heparan sulphate from the Tsetse Fly, Glossina morsitans morsitans. Pathogens 7:32. doi: 10.3390/pathogens7010032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rose, C., Belmonte, R., Armstrong, S. D., Molyneux, G., Haines, L. R., Lehane, M. J., et al. (2014). An investigation into the protein composition of the teneral Glossina morsitans morsitans peritrophic matrix. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8:e2691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002691

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rose, C., Casas-Sanchez, A., Dyer, N. A., Solorzano, C., Beckett, A. J., Middlehurst, B., et al. (2020). Trypanosoma brucei colonizes the tsetse gut via an immature peritrophic matrix in the proventriculus. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 909–916. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0707-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rubin-de-Celis, S. S., Uemura, H., Yoshida, N., and Schenkman, S. (2006). Expression of trypomastigote trans-sialidase in metacyclic forms of Trypanosoma cruzi increases parasite escape from its parasitophorous vacuole. Cell. Microbiol. 8, 1888–1898. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00755.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruiz, R. C., Favoreto, S. Jr., Dorta, M. L., Oshiro, M. E., Ferreira, A. T., Manque, P. M., et al. (1998). Infectivity of Trypanosoma cruzi strains is associated with differential expression of surface glycoproteins with differential Ca2+ signalling activity. Biochem. J. 330(Pt 1), 505–511. doi: 10.1042/bj3300505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sabharwal, P., Lee, C., Park, S., Rao, M., and Sockanathan, S. (2011). GDE2 regulates subtype-specific motor neuron generation through inhibition of Notch signaling. Neuron 71, 1058–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.07.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sacks, D. L. (1989). Metacyclogenesis in Leishmania promastigotes. Exp. Parasitol. 69, 100–103. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(89)90176-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sacks, D. L., Pimenta, P. F., McConville, M. J., Schneider, P., and Turco, S. J. (1995). Stage-specific binding of Leishmania donovani to the sand fly vector midgut is regulated by conformational changes in the abundant surface lipophosphoglycan. J. Exp. Med. 181, 685–697. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.2.685

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saha, S., Anilkumar, A. A., and Mayor, S. (2016). GPI-anchored protein organization and dynamics at the cell surface. J. Lipid Res. 57, 159–175. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R062885

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakurai, T., Sugimoto, C., and Inoue, N. (2008). Identification and molecular characterization of a novel stage-specific surface protein of Trypanosoma congolense epimastigotes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 161, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salassa, B. N., and Romano, P. S. (2019). Autophagy: a necessary process during the Trypanosoma cruzi life-cycle. Virulence 10, 460–469. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1543517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sbicego, S., Vassella, E., Kurath, U., Blum, B., and Roditi, I. (1999). The use of transgenic Trypanosoma brucei to identify compounds inducing the differentiation of bloodstream forms to procyclic forms. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 104, 311–322. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(99)00157-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schaub, G. A. (1989). Trypanosoma cruzi: quantitative studies of development of two strains in small intestine and rectum of the vector Triatoma infestans. Exp. Parasitol. 68, 260–273. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(89)90108-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schenkman, S., Ferguson, M. A., Heise, N., de Almeida, M. L., Mortara, R. A., and Yoshida, N. (1993). Mucin-like glycoproteins linked to the membrane by glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor are the major acceptors of sialic acid in a reaction catalyzed by trans-sialidase in metacyclic forms of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 59, 293–303. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90227-o

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schenkman, S., Jiang, M. S., Hart, G. W., and Nussenzweig, V. (1991a). A novel cell surface trans-sialidase of Trypanosoma cruzi generates a stage-specific epitope required for invasion of mammalian cells. Cell 65, 1117–1125. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90008-m

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schenkman, S., Pontes de Carvalho, L., and Nussenzweig, V. (1992). Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase and neuraminidase activities can be mediated by the same enzymes. J. Exp. Med. 175, 567–575. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.2.567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schenkman, S., Robbins, E. S., and Nussenzweig, V. (1991b). Attachment of Trypanosoma cruzi to mammalian cells requires parasite energy, and invasion can be independent of the target cell cytoskeleton. Infect. Immun. 59, 645–654. doi: 10.1128/IAI.59.2.645-654.1991

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schlagenhauf, E., Etges, R., and Metcalf, P. (1998). The crystal structure of the Leishmania major surface proteinase leishmanolysin (gp63). Structure 6, 1035–1046. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(98)00104-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schneider, P., Rosat, J. P., Bouvier, J., Louis, J., and Bordier, C. (1992). Leishmania major: differential regulation of the surface metalloprotease in amastigote and promastigote stages. Exp. Parasitol. 75, 196–206. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(92)90179-e

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schneider, P., Rosat, J. P., Ransijn, A., Ferguson, M. A., and McConville, M. J. (1993). Characterization of glycoinositol phospholipids in the amastigote stage of the protozoan parasite Leishmania major. Biochem. J. 295, 555–564. doi: 10.1042/bj2950555

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schneider, P., Schnur, L. F., Jaffe, C. L., Ferguson, M. A., and McConville, M. J. (1994). Glycoinositol-phospholipid profiles of four serotypically distinct Old World Leishmania strains. Biochem. J. 304(Pt 2), 603–609. doi: 10.1042/bj3040603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schroeder, R. J., Ahmed, S. N., Zhu, Y., London, E., and Brown, D. A. (1998). Cholesterol and sphingolipid enhance the Triton X-100 insolubility of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins by promoting the formation of detergent-insoluble ordered membrane domains. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1150–1157. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.2.1150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schroeder, R., London, E., and Brown, D. (1994). Interactions between saturated acyl chains confer detergent resistance on lipids and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins: GPI-anchored proteins in liposomes and cells show similar behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 12130–12134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schuster, S., Kruger, T., Subota, I., Thusek, S., Rotureau, B., Beilhack, A., et al. (2017). Developmental adaptations of trypanosome motility to the tsetse fly host environments unravel a multifaceted in vivo microswimmer system. eLife 6:e27656. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27656

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schuster, S., Lisack, J., Subota, I., Zimmermann, H., Reuter, C., Müller, T., et al. (2021). Unexpected plasticity in the life cycle of Trypanosoma brucei. eLife 10:e66028. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seay, M. B., Heard, P. L., and Chaudhuri, G. (1996). Surface Zn-proteinase as a molecule for defense of Leishmania mexicana amazonensis promastigotes against cytolysis inside macrophage phagolysosomes. Infect. Immun. 64, 5129–5137. doi: 10.1128/IAI.64.12.5129-5137.1996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Secundino, N., Kimblin, N., Peters, N. C., Lawyer, P., Capul, A. A., Beverley, S. M., et al. (2010). Proteophosphoglycan confers resistance of Leishmania major to midgut digestive enzymes induced by blood feeding in vector sand flies. Cell. Microbiol. 12, 906–918. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01439.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Serafim, T. D., Coutinho-Abreu, I. V., Oliveira, F., Meneses, C., Kamhawi, S., and Valenzuela, J. G. (2018). Sequential blood meals promote Leishmania replication and reverse metacyclogenesis augmenting vector infectivity. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 548–555. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0125-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Serrano, A. A., Schenkman, S., Yoshida, N., Mehlert, A., Richardson, J. M., and Ferguson, M. A. (1995). The lipid structure of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored mucin-like sialic acid acceptors of Trypanosoma cruzi changes during parasite differentiation from epimastigotes to infective metacyclic trypomastigote forms. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27244–27253. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.45.27244

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, R., Peacock, L., Gluenz, E., Gull, K., Gibson, W., and Carrington, M. (2008). Asymmetric cell division as a route to reduction in cell length and change in cell morphology in trypanosomes. Protist 159, 137–151. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2007.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheets, E. D., Lee, G. M., Simson, R., and Jacobson, K. (1997). Transient confinement of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein in the plasma membrane. Biochemistry 36, 12449–12458. doi: 10.1021/bi9710939

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheets, E. D., Simson, R., and Jacobson, K. (1995). New insights into membrane dynamics from the analysis of cell surface interactions by physical methods. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 707–714. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80113-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimogawa, M. M., Saada, E. A., Vashisht, A. A., Barshop, W. D., Wohlschlegel, J. A., and Hill, K. L. (2015). Cell surface proteomics provides insight into stage-specific remodeling of the host-parasite interface in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 14, 1977–1988.

Google Scholar

Shishioh, N., Hong, Y., Ohishi, K., Ashida, H., Maeda, Y., and Kinoshita, T. (2005). GPI7 is the second partner of PIG-F and involved in modification of glycosylphosphatidylinositol. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 9728–9734. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413755200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva Pereira, S., de Almeida Castilho Neto, K. J. G., Duffy, C. W., Richards, P., Noyes, H., Ogugo, M., et al. (2020). Variant antigen diversity in Trypanosoma vivax is not driven by recombination. Nat. Commun. 11:844. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14575-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silvius, J. R., and Leventis, R. (1993). Spontaneous interbilayer transfer of phospholipids: dependence on acyl chain composition. Biochemistry 32, 13318–13326. doi: 10.1021/bi00211a045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silvius, J. R., and Zuckermann, M. J. (1993). Interbilayer transfer of phospholipid-anchored macromolecules via monomer diffusion. Biochemistry 32, 3153–3161. doi: 10.1021/bi00063a030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simons, K., and Ikonen, E. (1997). Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387, 569–572. doi: 10.1038/42408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simons, K., and Sampaio, J. L. (2011). Membrane organization and lipid rafts. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3:a004697. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singer, S. J., and Nicolson, G. L. (1972). The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 175, 720–731. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sipos, G., Reggiori, F., Vionnet, C., and Conzelmann, A. (1997). Alternative lipid remodelling pathways for glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane anchors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 16, 3494–3505. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.12.3494

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, T. K., Bringaud, F., Nolan, D. P., and Figueiredo, L. M. (2017). Metabolic reprogramming during the Trypanosoma brucei life cycle. F1000Res 6:683. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10342.2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, T. K., Milne, F. C., Sharma, D. K., Crossman, A., Brimacombe, J. S., and Ferguson, M. A. (1997). Early steps in glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis in Leishmania major. Biochem. J. 326, 393–400. doi: 10.1042/bj3260393

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spira, F., Mueller, N. S., Beck, G., von Olshausen, P., Beig, J., and Wedlich-Soldner, R. (2012). Patchwork organization of the yeast plasma membrane into numerous coexisting domains. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 640–648. doi: 10.1038/ncb2487

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spodareva, V. V., Grybchuk-Ieremenko, A., Losev, A., Votypka, J., Lukes, J., Yurchenko, V., et al. (2018). Diversity and evolution of anuran trypanosomes: insights from the study of European species. Parasit. Vectors 11:447. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3023-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stefanova, I., Horejsi, V., Ansotegui, I. J., Knapp, W., and Stockinger, H. (1991). GPI-anchored cell-surface molecules complexed to protein tyrosine kinases. Science 254, 1016–1019. doi: 10.1126/science.1719635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stevens, J. R., and Gibson, W. (1999). The molecular evolution of trypanosomes. Parasitol. Today 15, 432–437. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(99)01532-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stevens, J., and Rambaut, A. (2001). Evolutionary rate differences in trypanosomes. Infect. Genet. Evol. 1, 143–150. doi: 10.1016/S1567-1348(01)00018-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Steverding, D., Stierhof, Y. D., Chaudhri, M., Ligtenberg, M., Schell, D., Beck-Sickinger, A. G., et al. (1994). ESAG 6 and 7 products of Trypanosoma brucei form a transferrin binding protein complex. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 64, 78–87.

Google Scholar

Stierhof, Y. D., Ilg, T., Russell, D. G., Hohenberg, H., and Overath, P. (1994). Characterization of polymer release from the flagellar pocket of Leishmania mexicana promastigotes. J. Cell Biol. 125, 321–331. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.2.321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stillwell, W. (2016). An Introduction to Biological Membranes. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Google Scholar

Subramanya, S., Hardin, C. F., Steverding, D., and Mensa-Wilmot, K. (2009). Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C regulates transferrin endocytosis in the African trypanosome. Biochem. J. 417, 685–694. doi: 10.1042/BJ20080167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sunter, J., Webb, H., and Carrington, M. (2013). Determinants of GPI-PLC localisation to the flagellum and access to GPI-anchored substrates in trypanosomes. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003566. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003566

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suzuki, E., Tanaka, A. K., Toledo, M. S., Takahashi, H. K., and Straus, A. H. (2002). Role of beta-D-galactofuranose in Leishmania major macrophage invasion. Infect. Immun. 70, 6592–6596. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6592-6596.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szempruch, A. J., Dennison, L., Kieft, R., Harrington, J. M., and Hajduk, S. L. (2016). Sending a message: extracellular vesicles of pathogenic protozoan parasites. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 669–675. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szöőr, B., Silvester, E., and Matthews, K. R. (2020). A leap into the unknown - early events in African trypanosome transmission. Trends Parasitol. 36, 266–278. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Takahashi, M., Inoue, N., Ohishi, K., Maeda, Y., Nakamura, N., Endo, Y., et al. (1996). PIG-B, a membrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum with a large lumenal domain, is involved in transferring the third mannose of the GPI anchor. EMBO J. 15, 4254–4261.

Google Scholar

Taron, B. W., Colussi, P. A., Wiedman, J. M., Orlean, P., and Taron, C. H. (2004). Human Smp3p adds a fourth mannose to yeast and human glycosylphosphatidylinositol precursors in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 36083–36092. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405081200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thompson, R. C. (2013). Parasite zoonoses and wildlife: one Health, spillover and human activity. Int. J. Parasitol. 43, 1079–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiengwe, C., Bush, P. J., and Bangs, J. D. (2017). Controlling transferrin receptor trafficking with GPI-valence in bloodstream stage African trypanosomes. PLoS Pathog. 13:e1006366. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiengwe, C., Koeller, C. M., and Bangs, J. D. (2018). Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation and disposal of misfolded GPI-anchored proteins in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biol. Cell 29, 2397–2409. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-06-0380

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tomlinson, S., Pontes de Carvalho, L. C., Vandekerckhove, F., and Nussenzweig, V. (1994). Role of sialic acid in the resistance of Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes to complement. J. Immunol. 153, 3141–3147.

Google Scholar

Treumann, A., Zitzmann, N., Hulsmeier, A., Prescott, A. R., Almond, A., Sheehan, J., et al. (1997). Structural characterisation of two forms of procyclic acidic repetitive protein expressed by procyclic forms of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Mol. Biol. 269, 529–547. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trevor, C. E., Gonzalez-Munoz, A. L., Macleod, O. J. S., Woodcock, P. G., Rust, S., Vaughan, T. J., et al. (2019). Structure of the trypanosome transferrin receptor reveals mechanisms of ligand recognition and immune evasion. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 2074–2081. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0589-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tse, A. G., Barclay, A. N., Watts, A., and Williams, A. F. (1985). A glycophospholipid tail at the carboxyl terminus of the Thy-1 glycoprotein of neurons and thymocytes. Science 230, 1003–1008. doi: 10.1126/science.2865810

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turco, S. J., and Descoteaux, A. (1992). The lipophosphoglycan of Leishmania parasites. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 46, 65–94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.46.100192.000433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turco, S. J., Spath, G. F., and Beverley, S. M. (2001). Is lipophosphoglycan a virulence factor? A surprising diversity between Leishmania species. Trends Parasitol. 17, 223–226. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(01)01895-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turner, C. M., Barry, J. D., and Vickerman, K. (1988). Loss of variable antigen during transformation of Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense from bloodstream to procyclic forms in the tsetse fly. Parasitol. Res. 74, 507–511. doi: 10.1007/BF00531626

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Umaer, K., Aresta-Branco, F., Chandra, M., van Straaten, M., Zeelen, J., Lapouge, K., et al. (2021). Dynamic, variable oligomerization and the trafficking of variant surface glycoproteins of Trypanosoma brucei. Traffic 22, 274–283. doi: 10.1111/tra.12806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Urban, I., Santurio, L. B., Chidichimo, A., Yu, H., Chen, X., Mucci, J., et al. (2011). Molecular diversity of the Trypanosoma cruzi TcSMUG family of mucin genes and proteins. Biochem. J. 438, 303–313. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110683

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Urbaniak, M. D., Yashunsky, D. V., Crossman, A., Nikolaev, A. V., and Ferguson, M. A. (2008). Probing enzymes late in the trypanosomal glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthetic pathway with synthetic glycosylphosphatidylinositol analogues. ACS Chem. Biol. 3, 625–634. doi: 10.1021/cb800143w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Urwyler, S., Studer, E., Renggli, C. K., and Roditi, I. (2007). A family of stage-specific alanine-rich proteins on the surface of epimastigote forms of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Microbiol. 63, 218–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05492.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uzcanga, G. L., Perrone, T., Noda, J. A., Perez-Pazos, J., Medina, R., Hoebeke, J., et al. (2004). Variant surface glycoprotein from Trypanosoma evansi is partially responsible for the cross-reaction between Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma vivax. Biochemistry 43, 595–606. doi: 10.1021/bi0301946

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Den Abbeele, J., Claes, Y., van Bockstaele, D., Le Ray, D., and Coosemans, M. (1999). Trypanosoma brucei spp. development in the tsetse fly: characterization of the post-mesocyclic stages in the foregut and proboscis. Parasitology 118, 469–478. doi: 10.1017/s0031182099004217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vassella, E., Acosta-Serrano, A., Studer, E., Lee, S. H., Englund, P. T., and Roditi, I. (2001). Multiple procyclin isoforms are expressed differentially during the development of insect forms of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Mol. Biol. 312, 597–607. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vassella, E., Butikofer, P., Engstler, M., Jelk, J., and Roditi, I. (2003). Procyclin null mutants of Trypanosoma brucei express free glycosylphosphatidylinositols on their surface. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 1308–1318. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-10-0694

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vassella, E., Oberle, M., Urwyler, S., Renggli, C. K., Studer, E., Hemphill, A., et al. (2009). Major surface glycoproteins of insect forms of Trypanosoma brucei are not essential for cyclical transmission by tsetse. PLoS One 4:e4493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004493

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Velge, P., Ouaissi, M. A., Cornette, J., Afchain, D., and Capron, A. (1988). Identification and isolation of Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigote collagen-binding proteins: possible role in cell-parasite interaction. Parasitology 97, 255–268. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000058467

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Venkatesh, D., Zhang, N., Zoltner, M., Del Pino, R. C., and Field, M. C. (2018). Evolution of protein trafficking in kinetoplastid parasites: complexity and pathogenesis. Traffic 19, 803–812. doi: 10.1111/tra.12601

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vickerman, K. (1965). Polymorphism and mitochondrial activity in sleeping sickness trypanosomes. Nature 208, 762–766. doi: 10.1038/208762a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vickerman, K. (1969). On the surface coat and flagellar adhesion in trypanosomes. J. Cell Sci. 5, 163–193.

Google Scholar

Vickerman, K. (1985). Developmental cycles and biology of pathogenic trypanosomes. Br. Med. Bull. 41, 105–114. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vinet, A. F., Fukuda, M., Turco, S. J., and Descoteaux, A. (2009). The Leishmania donovani lipophosphoglycan excludes the vesicular proton-ATPase from phagosomes by impairing the recruitment of synaptotagmin V. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000628. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000628

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vishwakarma, R. A., and Menon, A. K. (2005). Flip-flop of glycosylphosphatidylinositols (GPI’s) across the ER. Chem. Commun. (Camb) 453–455. doi: 10.1039/b413196g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Volf, P., Nogueira, P. M., Myskova, J., Turco, S. J., and Soares, R. P. (2014). Structural comparison of lipophosphoglycan from Leishmania turanica and L. major, two species transmitted by Phlebotomus papatasi. Parasitol. Int. 63, 683–686. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2014.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wagner, G., Eiko Yamanaka, L., Moura, H., Denardin Luckemeyer, D., Schlindwein, A. D., Hermes Stoco, P., et al. (2013). The Trypanosoma rangeli trypomastigote surfaceome reveals novel proteins and targets for specific diagnosis. J. Proteomics 82, 52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.02.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Walker, D. M., Oghumu, S., Gupta, G., McGwire, B. S., Drew, M. E., and Satoskar, A. R. (2014). Mechanisms of cellular invasion by intracellular parasites. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 1245–1263. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1491-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Walters, L. L. (1993). Leishmania differentiation in natural and unnatural sand fly hosts. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 40, 196–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1993.tb04904.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Hirata, T., Maeda, Y., Murakami, Y., Fujita, M., and Kinoshita, T. (2019). Free, unlinked glycosylphosphatidylinositols on mammalian cell surfaces revisited. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 5038–5049. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007472

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watanabe, K., Bianco, C., Strizzi, L., Hamada, S., Mancino, M., Bailly, V., et al. (2007). Growth factor induction of Cripto-1 shedding by glycosylphosphatidylinositol-phospholipase D and enhancement of endothelial cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 31643–31655. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702713200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watanabe, R., Ohishi, K., Maeda, Y., Nakamura, N., and Kinoshita, T. (1999). Mammalian PIG-L and its yeast homologue Gpi12p are N-acetylglucosaminylphosphatidylinositol de-N-acetylases essential in glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis. Biochem. J. 339, 185–192.

Google Scholar

Webster, J. P., Gower, C. M., Knowles, S. C., Molyneux, D. H., and Fenton, A. (2016). One health - an ecological and evolutionary framework for tackling Neglected Zoonotic Diseases. Evol. Appl. 9, 313–333. doi: 10.1111/eva.12341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weiss, B., and Aksoy, S. (2011). Microbiome influences on insect host vector competence. Trends Parasitol. 27, 514–522. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2011.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Welburn, S. C., Macleod, E., Figarella, K., and Duzensko, M. (2006). Programmed cell death in African trypanosomes. Parasitology 132, S7–S18. doi: 10.1017/S0031182006000825

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

WHO (2020). Ending the Neglect to Attain the Sustainable Development Goals. Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332094/WHO-UCN-NTD-2020.01-eng.pdf (accessed June 01, 2021).

Google Scholar

Winter, G., Fuchs, M., McConville, M. J., Stierhof, Y. D., and Overath, P. (1994). Surface antigens of Leishmania mexicana amastigotes: characterization of glycoinositol phospholipids and a macrophage-derived glycosphingolipid. J. Cell Sci. 107, 2471–2482.

Google Scholar

Yoneyama, K. A., Tanaka, A. K., Silveira, T. G., Takahashi, H. K., and Straus, A. H. (2006). Characterization of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis membrane microdomains, and their role in macrophage infectivity. J. Lipid Res. 47, 2171–2178. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M600285-JLR200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoshida, N. (2006). Molecular basis of mammalian cell invasion by Trypanosoma cruzi. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 78, 87–111. doi: 10.1590/s0001-37652006000100010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoshida, N., Mortara, R. A., Araguth, M. F., Gonzalez, J. C., and Russo, M. (1989). Metacyclic neutralizing effect of monoclonal antibody 10D8 directed to the 35- and 50-kilodalton surface glycoconjugates of Trypanosoma cruzi. Infect. Immun. 57, 1663–1667. doi: 10.1128/IAI.57.6.1663-1667.1989

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, J., Nagarajan, S., Knez, J. J., Udenfriend, S., Chen, R., and Medof, M. E. (1997). The affected gene underlying the class K glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) surface protein defect codes for the GPI transamidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 12580–12585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12580

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zamze, S. E., Ashford, D. A. Wrenn Wooten, E., Rademacher, T. W., and Dwek, R. A. (1991). Structural Characterization of the Asparagine-linked Oligosaccharides from Trypanosoma brucei Type I1 and Type I11 Variant Surface Glycoproteins*. E J. Biol. Chem. 266, 20244–20261. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)54916-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zamze, S. (1991). Glycosylation in parasitic protozoa of the trypanosomatidae family. Glycoconj. J. 8, 443–447. doi: 10.1007/BF00769843

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zeelen, J., van Straaten, M., Verdi, J., Hempelmann, A., Hashemi, H., Perez, K., et al. (2021). Structure of trypanosome coat protein VSGsur and function in suramin resistance. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 392–400. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00844-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, F., Crise, B., Su, B., Hou, Y., Rose, J. K., Bothwell, A., et al. (1991). Lateral diffusion of membrane-spanning and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked proteins: toward establishing rules governing the lateral mobility of membrane proteins. J. Cell Biol. 115, 75–84. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.1.75

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar