Dbx1 is a dorsal midbrain-specific determinant of GABAergic neuron fate and regulates differentiation of the dorsal midbrain into the inferior and superior colliculi

The mechanism underlying the differentiation of the dorsal midbrain into two morphologically and functionally distinct compartments, the inferior colliculus (IC) and superior colliculus (SC), which process auditory and visual information, respectively, remains largely unexplored. By using null and conditional alleles, we uncover the roles of a homeodomain transcription factor Dbx1 in the regulation of IC and SC differentiation. We show that Dbx1 regulates GABAergic neuron development in the dorsal midbrain. In the absence of Dbx1 function, the dorsal-most m1-m2 progenitor domains in the midbrain fail to activate GABAergic neuron-specific gene expression and instead switch to a glutamatergic phenotype. These results identify Dbx1 as a dorsal midbrain-specific GABAergic determinant that regulates the selector genes, Helt, Gata2, and Tal2. Furthermore, we demonstrate that maturation of the dorsal midbrain into the IC and SC is dependent on Dbx1. Null mutation of Dbx1 impairs the identity and fate of IC and SC neurons. Surprisingly, Dbx1 is required for preventing IC into SC fate switch and thus Dbx1-deficient IC neurons undergo acquisition of SC identity. Conditional inactivation of Dbx1 at late developmental phase leads to alteration in the identity and fate of the IC, but not the SC. These results suggest that SC differentiation is dependent on the early function of Dbx1, and that the IC requires the prolonged action for its normal formation. Furthermore, we uncover that Tcf7l2 acts downstream of Dbx1 selectively to promote IC differentiation. Altogether, our study identifies a molecular mechanism underlying spatial and temporal control of dorsal midbrain development.


Introduction
Early growth and patterning of the dorsal midbrain are tightly linked to the key signaling molecules of the isthmic organizer (Shamim et al., 1999;Joyner et al., 2000;Wurst and Bally-Cuif, 2001;Chi et al., 2003).FGF signaling functions in a dose-and timedependent manner to control growth, specification and survival of the dorsal midbrain (Chi et al., 2003;Basson et al., 2008;Dee et al., 2016).Engrailed, Pax and Meis2 play differential roles in forming the dorsal midbrain (Urbánek et al., 1994;Matsunaga et al., 2001;Sgaier et al., 2007;Agoston and Schulte, 2009), and Otx2 contributes to the control of multiple aspects of dorsal midbrain development (Broccoli et al., 1999;Puelles et al., 2003;Di Giovannantonio et al., 2014).Although previous works have greatly broadened our understanding of the early phase of dorsal midbrain development, the molecular basis underlying maturation of the dorsal midbrain at the late embryonic and postnatal stages remains unexplored.
Following the induction of the midbrain during early embryogenesis, the territories of midbrain progenitors are specified into the roof plate, alar plate, basal plate and floor plate along the dorso-ventral axis by Shh and Bmp/Wnt signals (Zervas et al., 2005;Puelles, 2007;Dessaud et al., 2008;Le Dréau and Martí, 2012).These midbrain progenitors are further assigned into seven subdivisions (m1-m7) with specific combinations of gene expression codes (Nakatani et al., 2007;Kala et al., 2009;Lahti et al., 2013).The most dorsal midbrain neuronal populations derived from m1-m2 domains are clustered in the superior colliculus (SC) and inferior colliculus (IC) along the anteroposterior axis.The SC forms its stereotypical laminated structure and differentiates into a number of layers that can be grouped into the superficial layers receiving inputs related to vision and the deeper layers responding to nonvisual multiple modalities (McLaughlin and O'Leary, 2005).The IC located caudal to the SC functions as an acoustic integration center, and develops into the central nucleus (core region) receiving auditory inputs and the lateral and dorsal cortex (shell region) receiving nonauditory projections (Oliver and Morest, 1984;Cant and Benson, 2006).Despite the functional significance of the IC and SC, how the dorsal midbrain differentiates into these two distinct compartments is largely unknown.
Distinct subtypes of GABAergic neurons are formed at different locations and times during midbrain development.GABAergic neurogenesis can be detected first in the ventral midbrain, where GABAergic neuronal markers are expressed at E10.5~E11.5.By contrast, in the dorsal midbrain, GABAergic neurogenesis begins 1 day later and persists longer (Achim et al., 2012).Basic HLH factors Helt (also known as Megane or Heslike), Ascl1, Tal2 and zinc finger protein Gata2 have been shown to be indispensable for specifying GABAergic identity in the midbrain (Guimera et al., 2006;Nakatani et al., 2007;Kala et al., 2009;Peltopuro et al., 2010;Achim et al., 2013;Wende et al., 2015).These observations suggest that GABAergic neuronal differentiation requires different dorsoventral molecular mechanisms.However, region-specific determinants or selector genes that govern genetic program remain to be determined.
Recently, we showed that a homeodomain transcription factor Dbx1 (Developing brain homeobox 1) functions as a key regulator that controls genetic programs for postnatal survival of the IC (Tran et al., 2023).Loss of Dbx1 causes apoptotic cell death by upregulating c-Jun and pro-apoptotic BH3 only factors and leads to specific loss of the IC.Furthermore, we found that the function of Dbx1 as a survival factor is mediated by Tcf7l2 and Ap-2δ transcription factors.
In the present study, we assess the role of Dbx1 in regulating developmental acquisition of dorsal midbrain neuron identity.We show that Dbx1 functions as a dorsal midbrain-specific GABAergic determinant by regulating the selector genes, Helt, Gata2, and Tal2.Furthermore, we uncover that Dbx1 is required to partition the dorsal midbrain into the IC and SC.

BrdU labeling and birthdating
BrdU labeling was performed as described previously (Miller and Nowakowski, 1988), with some modifications.Timed pregnant female mice were injected subcutaneously with 50 mg/kg of 5bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (Sigma).For pulse labeling experiments, mice were sacrificed after 2-24 h.For birth dating experiments, mice were sacrificed at E18.5.Cryostat sections were permeabilized in 0.4% Triton X-100, treated with 50% formamide/2x SSC for 2 h at 65 °C, 2x SSC for 10 min, 2 M HCl for 1 h at 37 °C with, washed twice for 10-min in 0.1 M sodium borate, and stained with anti-BrdU antibody.

Cell counting
For quantitation of proliferation and BrdU birth dating, images of stained sections were captured using a Leica DMI6000B digital camera (Leica Microsystems), and the number of cells was scored from captured images.Counting grids were set at 200 μm × 200 μm in the SC, and at 100 μm × 100 μm in the IC.In most cases, 20-30 counting sites were evaluated in one section for the region of interest.All data were obtained from at least three samples of each genotype, and tested for significance using a two sample Student's t-test with unequal variances.

In situ hybridization
Whole-mount and section in situ hybridization were performed using digoxigenin-UTP-labeled riboprobes essentially as described previously (Tran et al., 2020).Embryonic brains were collected from timed pregnant females, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for overnight.Brain tissues were embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound, and 25 μm frozen sections were collected.Sections were rehydrated in PBS, and immersed in pre-hybridization buffer (1% SDS, 5x SSC, 50% formamide) for 1 h at 65 °C.For riboprobes, template DNAs for in vitro transcription by T7 RNA polymerase were generated by using PCR primers, of which sequences were obtained from the Allen Brain Atlas or designed against unique regions of transcripts to avoid cross-reactivity (Supplementary Table S1).The promoter sequence for T7 RNA polymerase (5′-TGT AAT ACG ACT CAC TAT AGG GC-3′) was placed at the 5′ end of reverse primers.DIG-labeled RNA probe was then added in hybridization buffer (1% SDS, 5x SSC, 50% formamide, 200 mg/ mL yeast tRNA, 5% heparin).Incubation overnight at 65 °C followed washing for 30 min in 1x SSC/50% formamide at 65 °C.Slides were then treated with RNase A (20 mg/mL) in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA at 37 °C for 30 min, washed in 2x SSC for 20 min at 65 °C, and then twice for 20 min each in 0.2x SSC.After incubation overnight with anti-DIG AP antibody (1:2500, Roche), slides were washed in MABT and equilibrated in NTM for 10 min.Color detection was performed using BM purple (Roche).At least three independent experiments were performed for any given riboprobes, which showed highly reproducible gene expression data.

Dbx1 is an m1/2 dorsoventral domainsspecific determinant of the GABAergic neuron fate
In order to understand the role of Dbx1 in mesencephalic neuronal differentiation, we first compared the distribution pattern of Dbx1 with those of transcription factors potentially involved in the specification of mesencephalic progenitors and derived neurons.Dbx1 expression was detectable in the dorsolateral wall of the mesencephalic neuroepithelium at E9.5 ~E10.5 (Lu et al., 1992;Shoji et al., 1996) (Figure 1A), and subsequently, at E11.5, was limited to the ventricular zone (Figure 1A).At E12.5-E13.5,Dbx1 was co-expressed in the m1-m2 dorsoventral progenitor domains of the dorsal midbrain with Ascl1, Helt, Neurog1, Pax7, and Otx2 (Figure 1B; Figures 2A, B).At E14.5-E15.5, there was a marked reduction in Dbx1 expression in the SC, but its expression persisted in the IC (Figure 1C).The results of our gene expression experiments demonstrated that Dbx1 is actively expressed in the dorsal midbrain progenitors at the time when their dorsoventral identity is being established.Thus we intended to determine whether Dbx1 is involved in early regional patterning and neurogenesis in the dorsal midbrain.To achieve these goals, we analyzed Dbx1 del mutants in which Dbx1 is inactivated at the pre-implantation stage (Tran et al., 2023).Recent studies demonstrated that GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons derived from the progenitor domains of the developing midbrain are regulated by combinations of multiple transcription factors acting as fate selectors.GABAergic fate determination requires the function of Ascl1 and Helt in the progenitor region and then subsequent activation of the post-mitotic selectors Gata2 and Tal2 (Miyoshi et al., 2004;Guimera et al., 2006;Nakatani et al., 2007;Kala et al., 2009;Peltopuro et al., 2010;Achim et al., 2013;Wende et al., 2015), whereas the glutamatergic lineage fate is initiated by progenitors expressing Neurog1, which is required for post-mitotic activation of Pou4f1 (Brn3a) (Guimera et al., 2006;Nakatani et al., 2007).In Dbx1deficient embryos, Ascl1 expression was apparently normal, whereas the expression of Helt, Gata2, and Tal2 was lost specifically in the m1-m2 dorsoventral domains despite normal expression in the ventral domains (Figure 2A).Consistently, the post-mitotic GABAergic neuronal markers Gata3, Tal1, and Lhx5 were not detectable in the m1-m2 domain of Dbx1 del mutants (Figure 2A).By contrast, loss of Dbx1 resulted in upregulation of the glutamatergic lineage markers, Neurog1 and Pou4f1 in the m1-m2 domain despite normal expression in the ventral region.These defects in GABAergic differentiation were similarly detected also in the posterior-most region of the midbrain (Supplementary Figure S1).Next, we examined the neurotransmitter profile in Dbx1-deficient embryos.GABAergic neurons express genes encoding the glutamate decarboxylase enzyme, Gad1/2, while glutamatergic neurons express the vesicular glutamate transporter Slc17a6.Compared to controls, in Dbx1 del mutants, there was an almost complete loss of Gad1 staining in the m1-m2 domain, while Slc17a6 expression was increased (Figures 3A, B; Supplementary Figure S2).

Dbx1 is not involved in progenitor cell proliferation and neurogenesis
Since Dbx1 is selectively expressed in the ventricular progenitor region and the onset of its transcription precedes neurogenesis, we examined the general properties of m1-m2 progenitor cells in Dbx1 mutant embryos.During neural development, Sox2 acts to maintain an undifferentiated cell state, and its expression becomes restricted to early progenitor and neural stem cells (Bylund et al., 2003;Graham et al., 2003;Cavallaro et al., 2008;Hagey and Muhr, 2014).The neuron-specific RNA binding proteins HuC/D encoded by Elavl3/4 genes are restricted to post-mitotic neurons (Szabo et al., 1991;Okano and Darnell, 1997).In Dbx1 mutant embryos, we detected no major difference in the thickness of the Sox2 + ventricular zone or the Elavl3/4 + (HuC/D) marginal zone (Figure 4A).Consistently, there was no major changes in the numbers of phosphor-histone H3 + mitotic cells or BrdU + S-phase cells (Figures 4B, C).Thus, these results suggest that loss of Dbx1 does not impair generic neurogenic properties.

Dbx1 is required for identity and differentiation of the SC and IC and prevents IC into SC fate switch
Early failure in GABAergic fate determination in the dorsal midbrain of Dbx1 mutants led us to ask whether Dbx1 is also required for morphological maturation of the dorsal midbrain.We first characterized molecular features of the dorsal midbrain at E15.5, when the IC and SC, two morphologically distinct compartments of the dorsal midbrain, are detectable, and the SC forms multiple cellular and fibrous layers.Ap-2α expression was restricted to the SC and not detectable in the IC (Figure 5A1).Pou4f3, Barhl1, Meis2, and Tcf7l2 expression were continuous between the SC and IC at E15.5 (Figures 5B1-E1 F5).The SC develops a layered structure with a number of layers that varies by species.The SC layers can be grouped into the superficial layers (zonal, superficial gray, and optic layers) and the deeper layers (intermediate gray, intermediate white, deep gray, and deep white layers).Ap-2α, Barhl1, Meis2, and Tcf7l2 expression were detectable in the superficial and deeper layers (Figures 5A2-A4, C2-C4, D2-D4, E2-E4), but Pou4f3 expression was specific for the deep gray layer (Figures 5B2-B4).Besides, molecularly distinct regions of the IC can be identified by differential gene expression of Pou4f3, Barhl1, Meis2, Tcf7l2 and Nrgn (Figures 5B5-F5).The spatial distribution patterns of these genes observed at E18.5 were maintained until postnatal or adult stages (Allen Brain Atlas, https://mouse.brain-map.org/),indicating that the molecular organization of the SC and IC are established during a narrow window of embryonic development (E15.5-E18.5).
To investigate whether Dbx1 regulates differentiation of the SC and IC, we analyzed Dbx1 del mutants at E18.5, when morphological maturation is established.In the SC of Dbx1 del embryos, Ap-2α expression was severely downregulated despite strong staining in the cerebellum (Figures 6A3, A4).Pou4f1 (Brn3a) was expressed in multiple layers of control SC (Figures 6B1, B2), but its striped pattern was disrupted in the SC of Dbx1 del embryos (Figures 6B3, B4).Otx2 expression, which was confined to the superficial layers of control SC, was downregulated in the absence of Dbx1 (Figures 6C3, C4).In control embryos, Ntng2 expression was detected in both superficial and deep layers of the SC (Figures 6D1, D2), while in the SC of Dbx1 del embryos, the striped pattern of Ntng2 expression was abolished (Figures 6D3, D4).Pitx2 and Pou4f3, which normally mark the intermediate grey  E4, F3, F4).Notably, Pitx2 is identified as a target of Gata2 and required for GABAergic neuron differentiation in the SC (Kala et al., 2009;Waite et al., 2011).Barhl1, which marks the zonal layer, was strongly upregulated in Dbx1 del mutants (Figures 6G3,G4,arrowheads).Targeted deletion of Barhl1 have been shown to disrupt the formation of the SC layers (Martin et al., 2004;Li and Xiang, 2006;Masullo et al., 2019).Meis2, Tcf7l2, and Ap-2δ, which are normally expressed in multiple layers of the SC, were almost absent or downregulated in Dbx1 del mutants (Figures 6H3, H4, I3, I4, J3, J4).A previous report demonstrated that loss of Ap-2δ results in a diminished IC due to abnormal apoptotic cell death (Hesse et al., 2011).
Together, these observations indicate that Dbx1 is critical for normal SC laminar organization.
In the IC of Dbx1 del embryos, expression of Pou4f3, Meis2, Tcf7l2, Ap-2δ, Nrgn, and Mef2c genes were completely absent or severely downregulated (Figures 6F3, F4   We next examined whether abnormalities observed in the SC and IC might be associated with a defect in neuronal migration.To estimate the relationships between birthdates and destinations of the dorsal midbrain neurons, we labeled newly born cells with BrdU at E11.5 ~E14.5, when neurogenesis in the dorsal midbrain occurs (Cowan et al., 1968;Edwards et al., 1986;Tan et al., 2002).Harvesting embryos at E18.5, we counted labeled cells, having divided the SC into 20 equal zones and the IC into 10 equal zones.In control embryos, more of the earliest generated cells were situated in the SC than in the IC, while the majority of the latest born cells were situated in the IC (Figure 7).These observations were in agreement with previous findings that SC neurons are born earlier than IC neurons (Cowan et al., 1968;Altman and Bayer, 1981b;1981a;Edwards et al., 1986).We did not observe significant differences in the distribution of BrdU + cells in the SC and IC between controls and Dbx1 del mutants (Figure 7), suggesting that loss of Dbx1 does not affect cell migration in the developing dorsal midbrain.

Distinct temporal requirements for Dbx1 in the regulation of IC and SC differentiation
Given that Dbx1 expression persists at high levels in the dorsal midbrain during late gestation, our observations raise an intriguing possibility that Dbx1 has a continued role in IC and SC neuron development during embryogenesis.To determine whether the dependency of dorsal midbrain development on Dbx1 is regulated temporally, we analyzed Dbx1 cko mutants in which Dbx1 function in the midbrain is inactivated at E12.5 (Tran et al., 2023).In contrast to Dbx1 del embryos, Dbx1 cko mutants displayed no major alteration in expression of SCspecific genes such as Ap-2α, Pou4f1, Otx2, Ntng2 and Pitx2 (Figures 8A3, A4, B3, B4, C3, C4, D3, D3, E3, E4).Compared to controls, we observed no significant change in Barhl1 expression in the SC of Dbx1 cko mutants, whereas its expression in the IC was strongly upregulated in a pattern similar to Dbx1 del embryos (Figures 8F1-F4).In additions, expression of Meis2, Tcf7l2, and Ap-2δ genes were significantly lost in the IC of Dbx1 cko mutants despite similar expression in the SC (Figures 8G1-G4   We also examined early regional patterning and neuronal specification in the dorsal midbrain of Dbx1 cko mutant embryos. Compared to controls, we observed no substantial changes in the expression of Helt, Gata2, Tal2, Tal1, Gad1, and Slc17a6 in the developing midbrain of Dbx1 cko mutants (Supplementary Figure S3), indicating that specification of GABAergic neuronal identity is dependent on early Dbx1 activity.3.5 Tcf7l2 is required for differentiation of the IC, but not the SC Previously, we showed that Tcf7l2 mediates the function of Dbx1 in the regulation of IC survival (Tran et al., 2023).To address whether Tcf7l2 is involved in embryonic midbrain patterning and IC/SC differentiation, we first examined the temporal and spatial pattern of Tcf7l2 expression in the developing midbrain.Tcf7l2 transcription in the midbrain was detectable after E10.5, and limited to m1-m2 post-mitotic regions (Supplementary Figure S4).Tcf7l2 expression then persisted in the SC and IC during later embryonic and adult stages (Supplementary Figure S4).To address whether Tcf7l2 is involved in regulating GABAergc neuronal fate in the dorsal midbrain, we analyzed Tcf7l2 del mutants in which Tcf7l2 is inactivated at the pre-implantation stage (Tran et al., 2023).In Tcf7l2 del mutants, there was no significant alteration in the expression of GABAergic lineage markers such as Ascl1, Helt, Gata2/3, Tal1/2, and Gad1 (Supplementary Figure S5), indicating that Tcf7l2 is not required for specifying GABAergic neuronal identity.To determine whether Tcf7l2 regulates maturation of the dorsal midbrain into SC and IC, we next examined the expression of molecular markers for the IC and SC.We observed no major difference in expression of Ap-2α, Pou4f1, Otx2, Ntng2, and Pitx2 in the SC of Tcf7l2 del mutants compared with that in controls (Figures 9A1-A4, B1-B4, C1-C4, D1-D4, E1-E4).Barhl1 expression was similarly detected in the SC of control and Tcf7l2 del mutants, while its expression was strongly upregulated in the IC of Tcf7l2 del mutants (Figures 9F1-F4).Furthermore, expression of IC markers such as Ap-2δ, Nrgn, and Mef2c were severely downregulated in Tcf7l2 del mutants (Figures 9G1-G4, H1-H4, I1-I4), indicating that loss of Tcf7l2 leads to a phenotype reminiscent of Dbx1 cko mutants.These data suggest that Tcf7l2 is selectively required for differentiation of the IC, but not the SC.However, unlike Dbx1 mutants, there was no ectopic activation of SC-specific markers in the IC of in Tcf7l2 del mutants (Figures 9A3, A4, B3, B4, C3, C4).Therefore, the function of Dbx1 to promote IC differentiation is not likely to be mediated entirely by Tcf7l2 gene.

Discussion
The present study identifies Dbx1 as a master regulator of GABAergic neuron fate in the dorsal midbrain.Moreover, our results show that in the m1-m2 domains, Dbx1 functions upstream of Helt, Gata2, and Tal2, and that Dbx1 and Ascl1 act in parallel.Inactivation of Helt or Ascl1 resulted in complete loss of GABAergic neurons in m1-m2 domains, whereas GABAergic neurons in m3-m5 domains were still generated (Guimera et al., 2006;Nakatani et al., 2007;Peltopuro et al., 2010).However, combined deletion of Helt and Ascl1 abrogates induction of GABAergic neurons in all of the m1-m5 domains.Therefore, these observations suggest that GABAergic progenitor specification employs distinct molecular mechanisms depending on the location of the cells' birth (Wende et al., 2015).Interestingly, loss of Ascl1 resulted in delayed cell cycle exit and onset of differentiation (Peltopuro et al., 2010), whereas deletion of Dbx1 or Helt did not affect that process (Guimera et al., 2006;Nakatani et al., 2007) (Figure 4), suggesting that neurogenesis and subtype specification including neurotransmitter selection may be separate processes.After cell cycle exit, Gata2 and Tal2 function as post-mitotic selectors between GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons.Gata2 expression was dependent on Helt and Ascl1, whereas Tal2 activation required none of those factors except for in the m5 domain (Kala et al., 2009;Peltopuro et al., 2010;Wende et al., 2015).Notably, loss of Dbx1 abrogated Tal2 expression in the m1-m2 domains, indicating that Dbx1 functions to promote GABAergic fate determination at least by controlling two different regulatory axes, the Helt/Gata2-dependent and Tal2dependent cascades (Figure 3D).
By studying the sequential genetic changes underlying the role of Dbx1, we demonstrated that Dbx1 functions for distinct lengths of time in the development of different dorsal structures of the midbrain.A question arises why the SC require the early activity of Dbx1, and IC development is dependent on persistent expression of Dbx1.Previous studies showed that growth and expansion of the dorsal midbrain occur in an anterior-toposterior direction so that the posterior region of the dorsal midbrain continues to divide even after the anterior region ceases proliferation and undergoes neurogenesis (Cowan et al., 1968;Altman and Bayer, 1981b;1981a;Edwards et al., 1986).Consistently, our BrdU fate mapping experiments also demonstrated that SC neurons are born earlier with peak generation around E11.5 ~E12.5, whereas IC neuron generation peaks around E12.5 ~E14.5.In agreement with these results, Dbx1 expression persisted in the IC even after it was excluded from the SC (Figure 1C).These observations together may explain why IC, but not SC requires the prolonged activity of Dbx1 for normal differentiation.
Dbx1 plays important roles in the generation of specific subclasses of neurons in a region-specific manner by regulating the expression of effector genes, which work together to control the formation of V0 interneurons in the spinal cord, Pre-Bötzinger complex neurons in the hindbrain, orexigenic neurons in the hypothalamus (Pierani et al., 2001;Bouvier et al., 2010;Gray et al., 2010;Sokolowski et al., 2015)).In this study, we demonstrate that Tcf7l2 functions as an effector gene to mediate the activity of Dbx1 for IC differentiation.During embryogenesis, Dbx1 and Tcf7l2 expression are restricted to m1-m2 domains, which differentiate into the SC and IC.Loss of Dbx1 resulted in downregulation of Tcf7l2 in the SC and IC.However, unlike Dbx1, loss of Tcf7l2 did not affect SC differentiation.A question arises why the IC requires Tcf7l2 function for its development, and SC development is not dependent on Tcf7l2.Wnt/β-catenin signaling controls multiple processes during early midbrain development and dopaminergic (mDA) neuron differentiation.All Wnts that use canonical signaling converge on β-catenin, which activates target genes via Tcf/Lef factors (Liu et al., 2022).Vertebrates encode four Tcf/Lef genes (Tcf7, Lef1, Tcf7l1, Tcf7l2), which play important roles in mediating the diverse functions of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in different tissues at different stages.The overlapping expression patterns and functions of Tcf/Lef factors preclude an understanding of the specificity of individual factor involvement in neuron development in vivo.All four Tcf/Lef factors are expressed in the developing midbrain at early stages.Interestingly, later, Tcf7l2 is the only factor expressed in the IC (Allen Brain Atlas).Therefore, it is likely that functional redundancy may exist during SC development (Cadigan and Waterman, 2012).

FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2 Dbx1 is required for selection of GABAergic over glutamatergic neuronal fate in the m1 and m2 dorsoventral midbrain domains (A) ISH on midbrain transverse sections of control and Dbx1 del embryos at E12.5.Ascl1, Neurog1, and Helt were expressed in the ventricular progenitor region, while Gata2 and Tal2 expression were observed in the ventricular and intermediate zones.Tal1, Gata3, Lhx5, and Pou4f1 were detectable in the intermediate and postmitotic marginal zones.Loss of Dbx1 resulted in severe downregulation of GABAergic lineage genes Helt, Gata2, Tal2, Tal1, Gata3, and Lhx5, while glutamatergic lineage genes Neurog1 and Pou4f1 were upregulated.(B) Schematic view of E12.5 midbrain depicting domains m1-m7 and the distribution of glutamatergic (blue circles), GABAergic (red circles), and dopaminergic (green circles) neurons.Scale bar, A = 200 μm.

FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3 Distinct regulatory pathways control GABAergic neuronal fate determination in the m1 and m2 domains (A,B) ISH on midbrain transverse sections of control and Dbx1 del embryos at E12.5 (A) and E16.5 (B).In control embryos, Gad1 and Slc17a6 expression were commonly detectable in m1 and m2 domains of the midbrain.Inactivation of Dbx1 downregulated Gad1 staining selectively in m1-m2 domains, but not in m3-m5 domains.By contrast, Slc17a6 expression was upregulated in m1-m2 domains of Dbx1 del mutants.(C) Representative transverse midbrain sections of wild-type and Ascl1 −/− mouse embryos hybridized with Dbx1 and Helt riboprobes.(D) Schematic showing genetic cascades that control GABAergic neuronal specification in the dorsal midbrain.Scale bars, A, C = 200 μm, B = 400 μm.
Meis2 and Tcf7l2 displayed discontinuous and discrete expression pattern between the SC and IC (Figures 5D2, D3, E2, E3), and Nrgn expression was strongly detected in the lateral region of the IC (Figures 5F2,

FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4 Unaltered progenitor cell proliferation and neurogenesis in Dbx1 del midbrain (A) ISH of Sox2 and Elavl3/4 (HuC/D) on transverse sections of E12.5 embryos demonstrates no obvious difference between control and Dbx1 del midbrains.(B) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for phosphohistone H3 (pH3) on transverse sections of E12.5 midbrain.The number of pH3-positive cells counted from the ventricular zone of the m1-m2 domain (three sections from three embryos for each genotype) (C) Incorporation of BrdU in E12.5 control and Dbx1 del midbrain during a 2-24 h labeling pulse detected by anti-BrdU IHC (three sections from three embryos for each genotype).Scale bars, 200 μm.

FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5 Molecular organization of the developing SC and IC (Top) Schematic view of E15.5 and E18.5 brain sections showing the superior colliculus (SC, orange) and inferior colliculus (IC, purple).(A-F) ISH with Ap-2α (A), Pou4f3 (B), Barhl1 (C), Meis2 (D), Tcf7l2 (E) and Nrgn (F) probes on sagittal sections of E15.5 wild-type embryos, and sagittal and transverse sections of E18.5 wild-type embryos.Multiple cellular layers of the SC can be identified by the expression of Ap-2α, Barhl1, Pou4f3, Meis2, and Tcf7l2 (arrowheads).Meis2 and Tcf7l2 expression are present in the almost entire region of the IC, while Barhl1, Pou4f3, and Nrgn are confined to discrete regions of the IC.Dashed curves delimit the IC region.Scale bars, 400 μm.
, H1-H4, I1-I4).Like in Dbx1 del IC, the IC-specific markers Nrgn and Mef2c expression were almost absent in the Dbx1 cko IC (Figures 8J3, J4, K3, K4).Moreover, we observed ectopic activation of Ap-2α, Pou4f1, and Otx2 in the IC of Dbx1 cko mutants in a pattern similar to those in Dbx1 del embryos (Figures 8A3, B3, B4, C3, C4), indicating that persistent expression of Dbx1 is required for preventing IC into SC fate switch.Therefore, conditional loss of Dbx1 at later stages did not affect SC differentiation, but caused IC phenotypes with striking similarity to those of Dbx1 del mutants.These data suggest that SC differentiation is

FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7Birthdating of IC and SC neurons Pregnant mice were injected with BrdU at E11.5-E14.5, and brains were harvested at E18.5.For counting of BrdU + cells, 10-20 counting sites (counting grid for SC, 200 μm × 200 μm; for IC, 100 μm × 100 μm) were evaluated in one section.The values were calculated from five sections of six embryos for each genotype.Scale bars, 200 μm.