Pillar[5]arene Based [1]rotaxane Systems With Redox-Responsive Host-Guest Property: Design, Synthesis and the Key Role of Chain Length

Introduction

Mechanically interlocked molecules (MIMs) are a type of “star” molecule due to their beautiful and interesting architectures and wide applications in the area of biology and nanoscience (Bissell et al., 1994; Brouwer et al., 2001; Zhu and Chen, 2005; Crowley et al., 2009; Yonath, 2010; Zhang et al., 2011; Li et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015, 2018). Among various MIMs, rotaxanes, which have dumbbell-like structures with a wheel sliding along an axle, have attracted great interest due to their wide application in preparation of artificial molecular machines (Green et al., 2007; Lewandowski et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013). [1]rotaxanes, whose wheels and axles are connected in one molecule by covalent bonds, have a stable threaded form in both solution and solid state (Hiratani et al., 2004; Franchi et al., 2008; Li et al., 2012). However, the efficient synthesis of [1]rotaxanes is very difficult due to their subtle structure. To the best of our knowledge, there are very limited studies about the synthesis and properties of macrocycle based [1]rotaxanes. For example, Prof. Yang et al. prepared a functionalized [1]rotaxane and applied it to catalysis Knoevenagel reaction in CHCl₃ (Du et al., 2017). Prof. Qu et al. fabricated a novel [1]rotaxane-based molecular motion modified with ferrocene groups (Li et al., 2012).

Pillar[n]arenes (Ogoshi et al., 2008; Cragg and Sharma, 2012; Xue et al., 2012; Si et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015, 2016; Sun et al., 2018; Xiao and Wang, 2018; Xiao et al., 2019a,b), which are the newest host compounds in supramolecular chemistry after crown ethers (Liu et al., 2017; Yoo et al., 2019), cyclodextrins (Fu et al., 2019), calix[n]arenes (Dalgarno et al., 2007), and cucurbiturils (Murray et al., 2017), have attracted extensive investigations due to their pillar-like topology, rigid structures, electron-rich cavities, and rich host-guest properties (Song and Yang, 2015; Li et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019). Up to now, pillar[n]arene-based pseudo[1]rotaxanes with ammonium units, urea groups, pyridinium salt or biotin units as the axles have been investigated a lot (Strutt et al., 2012; Ni et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2015), but the further formation of [1]rotaxanes is difficult due to the lack of reactivity with stoppers. With the constant efforts by scientists, several examples of pillar[n]arene-based [1]rotaxanes have been fabricated successfully. For example, Prof. Xue et al. combined C-H·π and ion-pair interactions to construct a pillar[5]arene-based [1]rotaxane in a yield of 73% (Xia and Xue, 2014). Prof. Yan et al. prepared a series of pillar[5]arene-based [1]rotaxanes from mono-amide-modified pillar[5]arenes with different lengths of the axles (Han et al., 2016).

Herein, we designed and synthesized a series of pillar[5]arene-based [1]rotaxanes with N-aminoalkyl amides as the axles and ferrocenecarboxylic acid as the stoppers through a method called “threading-followed-by-stoppering” (Cao et al., 2000). Self-included pillar[5]arene-based pseudo[1]-rotaxanes P[5]ⁿPRs were prepared from monoester modified copillar[5]arene according previous research. Then pillar[5]arene based [1]rotaxanes P[5]ⁿRs were directly obtained by P[5]ⁿPRs reacted with ferrocenecarboxylic acid as the stopper under the catalysis of HOBT/EDCL. Importantly, we found that the length of N-aminoalkyl chains play a key role in the formation of [1]rotaxanes—only when the number of carbon on the N-aminoalkyl chains larger than three can it form [1]rotaxanes. Moreover, these [1]rotaxanes showed electrochemically reversible properties due to the ferrocene unit on them.

Materials and Methods

Synthesis of Pillar[5]arenes-Based [1]rotaxanes and Mono-ferrocene Modified Pillar[5]arene

Based on previous work (Han et al., 2016), P[5]ⁿPRs were obtained directly from mono-ester modified pillar[5]arene (Scheme 1). Then, P[5]ⁿRs and mono-ferrocene modified pillar[5]arene were successfully synthesized by P[5]ⁿPRs reacted with ferrocene-carboxylic acid as the stopper under the catalysis of HOBT/EDCL. We take when n = 4 as a model reaction, P[5]⁴PR (0.203 g, 0.2 mmol), ferrocenecarboxylic acid (0.052 g, 0.2 mmol), HOBT(0.038 g, 0.25 mmol), and EDCL (0.055 g,0.25 mmol) were stirred in 10 mL dry CHCl₃ over night at room temperature. The reaction solvent was evaporated and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (CH₂Cl₂/CH₃OH, v/v 15:1) to give P[5]⁴R as a yellow solid (0.195 g). Other P[5]ⁿPRs and mono-ferrocene modified pillar[5]arene were prepared with the similar method (Scheme 1).

SCHEME 1

Scheme 1. Synthetic route to a series of pillar[5]arene based [1]rotaxanes.

P[5]²R

Yellow solid, 78.6%, m.p. 106.9-108.5°C; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ: 7.05–6.89 (m, 7 H, ArH), 6.84 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.80 (s, 1 H, ArH), 6.60 (s, 1 H, ArH), 5.04–4.81 (m, 4 H, CH₂), 4.50 (s, 2 H, ArH), 4.39 (s, 2 H, ArH), 4.24 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 5 H, ArH), 4.05–3.95 (m, 2 H, CH₂), 3.95–3.60 (m, 32 H, 24 CH₃, 8 CH₂), 3.54 (s, 4 H, CH₂), 1.80 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), 1.55 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), 1.02 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H, CH₂), −1.90 (d, J = 50.7 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), −2.19 (d, J = 42.0 Hz, 2 H, CH₂); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃) (Figure S9) δ = 169.0, 168.9, 168.9, 166.7, 151.4, 150.6, 150.6, 150.5, 150.3, 150.3, 150.2, 150.2, 150.2, 150.1, 150.1, 149.7, 148.9, 129.8, 128.8, 128.8, 128.5, 128.4, 128.0, 127.7, 126.6, 126.4, 119.0, 115.5, 113.8, 113.7, 113.5, 113.4, 113.0, 112.9, 112.5, 112.5, 112.4, 112.4, 77.3, 71.8, 71.8, 69.9, 69.9, 69.9, 69.6, 68.5, 67.8, 66.0, 57.0, 56.4, 56.0, 55.8, 55.6, 55.5, 55.3, 55.2, 39.5, 37.5, 31.9, 31.7, 29.8, 29.7, 28.6, 28.5, 27.2, 23.2, 22.3, 22.3, 19.5, 14.1; MS (m/z): HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C₆₄H₇₅FeN₂${\text{O}}_{12}^{+}$ ([M + H]⁺): 1119.4671, found: 1119.4669 (Figure S10).

P[5]⁴R

Yellow solid, 42.9%, m.p. 107.4-109.2°C; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.02–6.76 (m, 10 H, ArH), 5.67 (s, 1 H, NH), 5.26 (s, 1 H, NH), 4.75 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 4.59 (s, 2 H, ArH), 4.40 (s, 2 H, ArH), 4.24 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 5 H, ArH), 4.05–3.54 (m, 36 H, 24 OCH₃, 12 CH₂), 2.72–2.47 (m, 4 H, CH₂), 1.76 (dd, J = 15.2, 8.0 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), 1.52 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), 0.96 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3 H, CH₃), −0.18 (s, 2 H, CH₂), −0.90 (s, 1 H, CH₂), −1.09 (s, 1 H, CH₂), −1.61 (d, J = 23.6 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), −2.21 (s, 2 H, CH₂); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃) (Figure S13) δ = 169.25, 167.51, 150.91, 150.73, 150.56, 150.45, 150.40, 150.36, 150.32, 150.21, 150.12, 147.21, 129.75, 129.29, 128.75, 128.48, 128.45,128.19, 127.87, 127.82, 127.05, 115.82, 115.08, 114.71, 114.43, 114.00, 112.80, 112.78, 112.73, 112.23, 70.21, 68.88, 68.09, 67.81, 65.85, 56.83, 56.44, 56.29, 56.26, 56.08, 55.48, 55.43, 55.31, 55.10, 39.73, 37.87, 31.95, 30.15, 29.36, 28.89, 28.60, 28.44, 26.37, 24.41, 23.25, 19.57, 14.06; HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C₆₆H₇₉FeN₂${\text{O}}_{12}^{+}$ ([M + H]⁺): 1147.4981, found: 1147.4982 (Figure S14).

P[5]⁶R

Yellow solid, 38.9%, m.p. 109.9-112.1°C; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ: 6.98–6.70 (m, 10 H, ArH), 5.85 (s, 1 H, NH), 5.18 (s, 1 H, NH), 4.72 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 4.58 (s, 2 H, ArH), 4.39 (s, 2 H, ArH), 4.24 (s, 5 H, ArH), 4.00–3.59 (m, 36 H, 24 OCH₃, 12 CH₂), 3.42 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 3.29 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 1.86–1.79 (m, 2 H, CH₂), 1.60 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), 1.35 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 1.03 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 3 H, CH₃), 0.72 (s, 2 H, CH₂), −0.17 (s, 2 H, CH₂), −1.11 (s, 1 H, CH₂), −1.25 (s, 1 H, CH₂), −1.50 (s, 2 H, CH₂), −2.32 (s, 2 H, CH₂); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃) (Figure S17) δ = 169.86, 150.81, 150.52, 150.48, 150.30, 150.20, 149.99, 129.41, 129.05, 128.35, 128.24, 128.09, 127.85, 127.34, 115.04, 114.18, 114.13, 113.70, 112.76, 112.33, 77.34, 70.43, 69.72, 68.19, 68.11, 55.99, 55.69, 55.46, 55.39, 55.29, 55.12, 40.01, 37.99, 32.02, 30.71, 30.11, 29.27, 29.01, 28.89, 28.62, 28.41, 28.27, 27.72, 19.65, 14.14; MS (m/z): HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C₆₈H₈₃FeN₂${\text{O}}_{12}^{+}$ ([M + H]⁺): 1175.5294, found: 1175.5295 (Figure S18).

P[5]⁸R

Yellow solid, 25.9%, m.p. 114.6-116.8°C; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 6.95–6.80 (m, 9H, ArH), 6.71 (s, 1H, ArH), 5.23 (s, 1H, NH), 5.02 (s, 1H, NH), 4.68 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 2H, CH₂), 4.56 (s, 2H, ArH), 4.37 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 2H, ArH), 4.22 (s, 5H, ArH), 3.92–3.63 (m, 36H, 24OCH₃, 12CH₂), 3.42 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, CH₂), 2.41 (s, 2H, CH₂), 1.88–1.79 (m, 2H, CH₂), 1.62 (td, J = 7.4, 2.6 Hz, 4H, CH₂), 1.37 (p, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H, CH₂), 1.20 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, CH₂), 1.04 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, CH₃), 0.80 (s, 2H, CH₂), −0.05 (s, 2H, CH₂), −1.34 (s, 4H, CH₂), −2.38 (s, 2H, CH₂); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃) (Figure S21) δ = 170.09, 167.19, 150.80, 150.37, 150.24, 150.12, 150.06, 149.95, 146.97, 129.40, 129.01, 128.32, 128.20, 128.11, 127.94, 127.84, 127.83, 127.08, 114.73, 113.92, 113.58, 113.25, 112.73, 112.42, 76.31, 70.43, 69.72, 68.00, 67.82, 55.48, 55.45, 55.36, 55.32, 55.13, 39.72, 38.02, 32.05, 30.96, 30.66, 30.60, 30.21, 29.64, 29.26, 28.83, 28.76, 28.64, 28.22, 27.94, 19.65, 14.17; IR (KBr) υ: 3410, 2932, 2854, 1681, 1499, 1465, 1399, 1295, 1213, 1104, 1047, 929, 879, 855, 774, 704, 647cm⁻¹; MS (m/z): HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C₇₀H₈₇FeN₂${\text{O}}_{12}^{+}$ ([M+H]⁺): 1203.5602, found: 1203.5508 (Figure S22).

Mono-ferrocene Modified Pillar[5]arene P[5]⁰R

Yellow solid, 78.6%, m.p. 104.4–106.2°C; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) (Figure S1) δ: 6.78–6.82 (m, 4 H, ArH), 6.76 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 6.70 (s, 1 H, ArH), 6.65 (s, 1 H, ArH), 4.68 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 4.37 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 4.32 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 4.19 (s, 5 H, ArH), 3.88 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), 3.85–3.62 (m, 28 H, 24 OCH₃, 4 CH₂), 3.60 (s, 3 H, CH₂), 3.56 (s, 3 H, CH₂), 3.24 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 3.11 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 1.72–1.82 (m, 2 H, CH₂), 1.53 (h, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), 0.97 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3 H, CH₃); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃) (Figure S2) δ = 170.70, 151.19, 150.87, 150.82, 150.77, 150.76, 150.69, 150.66, 148.15, 129.28,129.23, 128.62, 128.46, 128.36, 128.08, 127.84, 127.72, 115.41, 115.34, 114.37, 114.31, 114.06, 114.03, 113.97, 113.90, 113.79, 76.13, 70.33, 69.70, 68.37, 68.24, 67.67, 56.68, 56.17, 56.06, 55.91, 55.87, 55.80, 55.77, 41.21, 38.87, 31.80, 30.21, 29.70, 29.64, 28.76, 19.50, 13.96; MS (m/z): HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C₆₂H₇₁FeN₂${\text{O}}_{12}^{+}$ ([M + H]⁺): 1091.4357, found: 1091.4356 (Figure S3).

P[5]¹R

Yellow solid, 71.9 %, m.p. 105.6-107.3°C;¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) (Figure S5) δ: 6.75–6.98 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.60 (s, 2 H, NH), 4.77 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 4.39 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 4.34 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 4.20 (s, 5 H, ArH), 3.46–3.97 (m, 36 H, 24 OCH₃, 12 CH₂), 1.81 (p, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H, CH₂), 1.68 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 1.56 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂), 1.01 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3 H, CH₃); ¹³C NMR (101 MHz,CDCl₃) (Figure S6) δ = 150.7, 150.6, 150.4, 148.6, 128.8, 128.3, 128.1, 128.1, 114.6, 114.6, 114.5, 114.4, 113.7, 113.4, 113.3, 113.2, 70.0, 70.0, 69.6, 68.2, 66.9, 56.2, 56.2, 56.2, 56.2, 55.9, 55.9, 55.7, 55.5, 39.4, 35.7, 34.8, 31.9, 29.7, 29.4, 19.5, 14.1; MS (m/z): HRMS (ESI) Calcd. for C₆₃H₇₃FeN₂${\text{O}}_{12}^{+}$ ([M + H]⁺): 1105.4512, found: 1105.4513 (Figure S7).

Synthesis of Monomer M³

AM³ was obtained from a previous report. Then the monomer M³ was synthesized from AM³ (Figure S23) and ferrocene-carboxylic acid with BOBT and EDCL as the catalyst (Scheme 2). AM³ (0.08g, 0.25 mmol), ferrocenecarboxylic acid (0.057 g, 0.25 mmol), HOBT (0.054 g, 0.40 mmol), and EDCL (0.076, 0.40 mmol) were stirred in 15 mL dry CHCl₃ over night at room temperature. The reaction solvent was evaporated and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (CH₂Cl₂/CH₃OH, v/v 25:1) to give M³ as a yellow solid (0.031 g). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) (Figure S24) δ 6.84 (s, 4 H, ArH), 6.65 (s, 1 H, NH), 5.87 (s, 1 H, NH), 4.68 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 4.44 (s, 2 H, ArH), 4.33 (s, 2 H, ArH), 4.19 (s, 5 H, ArH), 3.91 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), 3.36 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 4 H, CH₂), 1.80–1.68 (m, 4 H, CH₂), 1.58 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 4 H, CH₂), 1.48 (dd, J = 14.6, 7.1 Hz, 2 H, CH₂), 1.39 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 0.97 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H, CH₃).

SCHEME 2

Scheme 2. Synthetic route to monomer M³.

Materials

All reactions were performed in atmosphere unless noted. All reagents were commercially available and used as supplied without further purification. NMR spectra were collected on either a Bruker AVIII-400 MHz spectrometer or a Bruker AV-600 MHz spectrometer with internal standard tetramethylsilane (TMS) and signals as internal references, and the chemical shifts (δ) were expressed in ppm. High-resolution Mass (ESI) spectra were obtained with a Bruker Micro-TOF spectrometer. X-ray data were collected on a Bruker Smart APEX-2 CCD diffractometer.

Results and Disscussion

¹H NMR Investigation

The ¹H NMR spectra of AM³ and P[5]⁴PR were taken into consideration first. As shown in Figure 1B, the chemical shift of four groups of peaks shift below 0 ppm field, indicating that the alkyl chain penetrated into the cavity of pillar[5]arene to form either pseudo[1] rotaxane or [c2]daisy chain (Du et al., 2017). Then P[5]⁴R was prepared from P[5]⁴PR reacted with ferrocenecarboxylic acid as the stopper. ¹H NMR spectra of monomer M³ and [1] rotaxane P[5]⁴R in CDCl₃ at 293 K are shown in Figure 1 (spectra c and e). Compared with M³, we found that the signals of protons on the alkyl chain attaching onto the pillar[5]arene platform shifted upfield obviously due to the shielding effect (Figure 1C). Then we used a polar solvent, DMSO-d₆, for ¹H NMR investigations to confirm the formation of [1] rotaxane. In DMSO-d₆, we also found that the signals of protons on the alkyl chains upfield were below 0 ppm due to the shielding effect (Figure 1D), which indicated the formation of a mechanically interlocked structure (Dong et al., 2014). The ¹H NMR of P[5]²R, P[5]⁴R, P[5]⁶R, P[5]⁸R all showed several groups of protons on the alkyl chains upfield obviously (Figures S8, S12, S16, S20), and the formation of [1] rotaxanes was also confirmed. However, the ¹H NMR of P[5]⁰R and P[5]¹R showed no signal below 0 ppm, indicating the side-chain stayed outside of the cavity of the pillar[5]arene platform (Figures S1, S5). The reason for this phenomenon is due to the relatively short length of the axle (only two or three CH₂ groups) of P[5]⁰R, and P[5]¹R, which was not able to allow the large ferrocene group to connect it from the cavity. Thus, the amino-group of the side-chain of P[5]⁰PR (or P[5]¹PR) stayed outside of the cavity and was then reacted with ferrocene-carboxylic acid to obtain free form P[5]⁰R (or P[5]¹R). Furthermore, the temperature-dependent ¹H NMR of P[5]4R showed that the peaks became broad as the temperature increased, indicating the chain in the cavity (Figures S15, S19, S26).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. ¹H NMR spectra (400 MHz, 298K) of: (A) AM³ in CDCl₃; (B) P[5]⁴PR in CDCl₃; (C) P[5]⁴R in CDCl₃; (D) P[5]⁴R in DMSO-d₆; (E) M³ in CDCl₃.

2D NOESY Studies

The formation of [1]rotaxane was then confirmed by 2D Nuclear Overhauser Effect Spectroscopy (NOESY). Here we also take P[5]⁴R as the model compound. As shown in Figure 2, the hydrogens of the alkyl chain on P[5]⁴R were close to the pillar[5]arene platform because H₁₋₄ showed strong correlation with H_a and H_b, indicating that the alkyl chain was in close proximity to the cavity. The -NH- group H_c is close to H₁₋₂ while H_d is close to H₃₋₄. Furthermore, ArH-3 from the ferrocene group showed space correction to the hydrogen–OCH₃ and -OCH₂- on the pillar[5]arene platform (Data Sheets 1–4).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Partial 2D NOESY spectrum of a choroform-d solution of P[5]⁴R at 298K.

Single Crystal Structures

The direct evidence for the formation of [1] rotaxanes only when the length of axle longer than three CH₂ groups is from single crystal investigation. As shown in Figure 3A and Figure S4, the whole side chain of P[5]⁰R stayed outside of the cavity of pillar[5]arene. It should be pointed that we observed hydrogen bonding between the hydrogen atom of the amine group and the oxygen atom of carbonyl group (Figure 3A, pink dash line). However, for P[5]²R, we can clearly see that the alkyl chain penetrated into the cavity of pillar[5]arene to form a [1] rotaxane (Figure 3B and Figure S11). The C-H…π interactions and C-H…O interactions were the driving forces for the formation of [1] rotaxane.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. X-ray single-crystal structure of: (A) P[5]⁰R; (B) P[5]²R. Color code: C, blue; O, green; Fe, red; N, purple.

Cyclic Voltammetry Investigation

With the [1]rotaxanes in hand, we then investigated their reversible redox property by electrochemistry methods. Take P[5]⁴R as an example, in cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiment (Figure 4), the cyclic voltammogram was quasi-reversible with nearly equal i_pa and i_pc, in which the potential difference ΔE_p was around 0.090 V. Compared with ferrocene, P[5]⁴R has a larger half wave potential (E_1/2 = 612 mV). Further study showed that the free state P[5]⁰R has the similar redox property with P[5]⁴R due to the same ferrocene unit (Figure S25).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Cyclic voltammogram (scan rate = 100 mV s⁻¹) of the P[5]⁴R (5.00 × 10⁻⁴ M) in CH₂Cl₂.

Conclusions

In this paper, we synthesized a series of amide-linked pillar[5]arene-based [1]rotaxanes with ferrocene unit as the stopper. Under the catalysis of HOBT/EDCL, the mono-amido-functionalized pillar[5]arenes were amidated with ferrocene carboxylic acid, to constructed ferrocene-based [1]rotaxanes, respectively. The structure of the [1]rotaxanes were characterized by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, 2D NMR, mass spectroscopy and single-crystal X-ray structural determination. In the formation of [1]rotaxane, the key role is the length of the alkyl chain in this process, and only when the number of C on the alkyl chain is larger than three can the formation of [1]rotaxane occur. In addition, due to the ferrocene units, the pillar[5]arene-based [1]rotaxanes display electrochemically reversible properties. Based on this nature, we hope these pillar[5]arene-based [1]rotaxanes can be applied in battery devices in future.

Data Availability

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Author Contributions

RZ prepared all the pillar[5]arene-based [1]rotaxanes. CW and RL prepared the monomer M³. TC and CY analyzed the data. YY analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21801139), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20180942), the Natural Science Foundation of Nantong University for High-Level Talent (03083004), and the Large Instruments Open Foundation of Nantong University (KFJN1814).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2019.00508/full#supplementary-material

References

Bissell, S. A., Córdova, E., Kaifer, A. E., and Stoddart, J. F. (1994). A chemically and electrochemically switchable molecular shuttle. Nature 369, 133–136. doi: 10.1038/369133a0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brouwer, A. M., Frochot, C., Gatti, F. G., Leigh, D. A., Mottier, L., Paolucci, F., et al. (2001). Reversible translation motion in a hydrogen-bonded molecular shuttle. Science 291, 2124–2128. doi: 10.1126/science.1057886

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, J., Fyfe, M. C., Stoddart, J. F., Cousins, G. R., and Glink, P. T. (2000). Molecular shuttles by the protecting group approach. J. Org. Chem. 65, 1937–1946. doi: 10.1021/jo991397w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cragg, P. J., and Sharma, K. (2012). Pillar[5]arene: fascinating cyclophanes with a bright future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 597–607. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15164A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crowley, J. D., Goldup, S. M., Lee, A.-L., Leigh, D. A., and McBurney, R. T. (2009). Active metal template synthesis of rotaxanes, catenanes and molecular shuttles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1530–1541. doi: 10.1039/b804243h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dalgarno, S. J., Thallapally, P. K., Barbour, L. J., and Atwood, J. L. (2007). Engineering void space in organic van der Waals crystals: calixarenes lead the way. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 236–245. doi: 10.1039/b606047c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, S., Yuan, J., and Huang, F. (2014). A pillar[5]arene/imidazolium [2]rotaxane: solvent- and thermo-driven molecular motions and supramolecular gel formation. Chem. Sci. 5, 247–252. doi: 10.1039/C3SC52481G

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, X.-S., Wang, C.-Y., Jia, Q., Deng, R., Tian, H.-S., Zhang, H.-Y., et al. (2017). Pillar[5]arene-based [1]rotaxane: high-yield synthesis, characterization and application in Knoevenagel reaction. Chem. Comm. 53, 5326–5329. doi: 10.1039/C7CC02364B

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Franchi, P., Fanì, M., Mezzina, E., and Lucarini, M. (2008). Increasing the persistency of stable free-radicals: synthesis and characterization of a nitroxide based [1]rotaxane. Org. Lett. 10, 1901–1904. doi: 10.1021/ol800405b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, G.-G., Chen, Y., Yu, Q., and Liu, Y. (2019). A tumor-targeting Ru/polysaccharide/protein supramolecular assembly with high photodynamic therapy ability. Chem. Comm. 55, 3148–3151. doi: 10.1039/C8CC09964B

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Green, J. E., Choi, J. W., Boukai, A., Bunimovich, Y., Johnston-Halperin, E., Delonno, E., et al. (2007). A 160-kilobit molecular electronic memory patterned at 10¹¹ bits oer square centimetre. Nature 445, 414–417. doi: 10.1038/nature05462

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, Y., Huo, G.-F., Sun, J., Xie, J., Yan, C.-G., Zhao, Y., et al. (2016). Formation of a series of stable pillar[5]arene-based pseudo[1]rotaxanes and their [1]rotaxanes in the crystal state. Sci. Rep. 6:28748. doi: 10.1038/srep28748

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hiratani, K., Kaneyama, M., Nagawa, Y., Koyama, E., and Kanesato, M. (2004). Synthesis of [1]rotaxane via covalent bond formation and its unidue fluorescent response by energy transfer in the presence of lithium ion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 13568–13569. doi: 10.1021/ja046929r

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewandowski, B., De Bo, G. D., Ward, J. W., Papmeyer, M., Kuschel, S., Aldegunde, M. J., et al. (2013). Sequence-specific peptide synthesis by an artificial small-molecule machine. Science 339, 189–193. doi: 10.1126/science.1229753

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, B., Wang, B., Huang, X., Dai, L., Cui, L., Li, J., et al. (2019). Terphen[n]arenes and quaterphen[n]arenes (n = 3-6): one-pot synthesis, self-assembly into supramolecular gel, and iodine capture. Angew. Chem. 58, 3885–3889. doi: 10.1002/anie.201813972

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Q.-W., and Qu, D.-H. (2012). A switchable ferrocene-based [1]rotaxane with an electrochemical signal output. Org. Lett. 14, 5900–5903. doi: 10.1021/ol302826g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z.-Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, C.-W., Chen, L.-J., Wang, C., Tan, H., et al. (2014). Cross-linked supramolecular polymer gels constructed from discrete multi-pillar[5]arene metallacycles and their multiple stimuli-responsive behavior. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 8577–8589. doi: 10.1021/ja413047r

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Z., Nalluri, S. K. M., and Stoddart, J. F. (2017). Surveying macrocyclic chemistry: from flexible crown ethers to rigid cyclophanes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 2459–2478. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00185A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murray, J., Kim, K., Ogoshi, T., Yao, W., and Gibb, B. C. (2017). The aqueous supramolecular chemistry of cucuibit[n]urils, pillar[n]arenes and deep-cavity cavitands. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 2479–2496. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00095B

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ni, M., Hu, X.-Y., Jiang, J., and Wang, L. (2014). The self-complexation of mono-urea-functionalized pillar[5]arenes with abnormal urea behaviors. Chem. Comm. 50, 1317–1319. doi: 10.1039/C3CC47823H

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ogoshi, T., Kanai, S., Fujinami, S., Yamagishi, T.-A., and Nakamoto, Y. (2008). Para-Bridged symmetrical pillar[5]arenes: their lewis acid catalyzed synthesis and host-guest property. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 5022–5023. doi: 10.1021/ja711260m

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Si, W., Xin, P., Li, Z.-T., and Hou, J.-L. (2015). Tubular ubumolecular transmembrane channels: construction strategy and transport activities. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1612–1619. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, N., and Yang, Y.-W. (2015). Molecular and supramolecular switches on Mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 3474–3504. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00243E

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Strutt, N. L., Zhang, H., Giesener, M. A., Lei, J., and Stoddart, J. F. (2012). A self-complexing and self-assembling pillar[5]arene. Chem. Comm. 48, 1647–1649. doi: 10.1039/C2CC16030G

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, S., Geng, M., Huang, L., Chen, Y., Cen, M., Lu, D., et al. (2018). A new amphiphilic pillar[5]arene: synthesis and controllable self-assembly in water and application in white-light-emitting systems. Chem. Commun. 54, 13006–13009. doi: 10.1039/C8CC07658H

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Liang, B., and Xia, D. (2019). A linear AIE supramolecular polymer based on a salicylaldehyde azine-containing pillararene and its reverible cross-linking by Cu^II and cyanide. Inorg. Chem. 58, 2252–2256. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02896

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, W., Chen, L.-J., Wang, X.-Q., Sun, B., Li, X., Zhang, Y., et al. (2015). Organometallic rotaxane dendrimers with fourth-generation mechanically interlocked branches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.112, 5597–5601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500489112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X. Q., Wang, W., Li, W. J., Chen, L. J., Yao, R., Yin, G. Q., et al. (2018). Dual stimuli-responsive rotaxane-branched dendrimers with reversible dimension modulation. Nat. Commun. 9:3190. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05670-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Ping, G., and Li, C. (2016). efficient complexation between pillar[5]arenes and neutral guests: from host-guest chemistry to functional materials. Chem. Commun. 52, 9858–9872. doi: 10.1039/C6CC03999E

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, X., Ni, M., Xia, W., Hu, X.-Y., and Wang, L. (2015). A novel dynamic pseudo[1]rotaxane based on a mono-biotin-functionalized pillar[5]arene. Org. Chem. Front. 2, 1013–1017. doi: 10.1039/C5QO00159E

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, B., and Xue, M. (2014). Design and efficient synthesis of a pillar[5]arene-based [1]rotaxane. Chem. Comm. 50, 1021–1023. doi: 10.1039/C3CC48014C

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, T., and Wang, L. (2018). Recent advances of functional gels controlled by pillar[n]arene-based host–guest interactions. Tetrahedon Lett. 59, 1172–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.02.028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, T., Zhong, W., Xu, L., Sun, X.-Q., Hu, X.-Y., and Wang, L. (2019a). Supramolecular vesicles based on pillar[n]arenes: design, construction, and applications. Org. Biomol. Chem. 17, 1336–1350. doi: 10.1039/C8OB03095B

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, T., Zhou, L., Xu, L., Zhong, W., Zhao, W., Sun, X.-Q., et al. (2019b). Dynamic materials fabricated from water soluble pillar[n]arenes bearing triethylene oxide groups. Chin. Chem. Lett. 30, 271–276. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.05.039

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xue, M., Yang, Y., Chi, X., Zhang, Z., and Huang, F. (2012). Pillararenes, a new class of macrocycles for supramolecular chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 1294–1308. doi: 10.1021/ar2003418

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yonath, A. (2010). Hibernating bears, antibiotics, and the evolving ribosome. Angew. Chem. 49, 4340–4354. doi: 10.1002/anie.201001297

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoo, C., Dodge, H. M., and Miller, A. J. M. (2019). Cation-controlled catalysis with crown ether-containing transition metal complexes. Chem. Comm. 55, 5047–5059. doi: 10.1039/C9CC00803A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Zhou, B., Li, H., Qu, D.-H., and Tian, H. (2013). A ferrocene-functionalized [2]rotaxance with fluorophores as stoppers. J. Org. Chem. 78, 2091–2098. doi: 10.1021/jo302107a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z.-J., Zhang, H.-Y., Wang, H., and Liu, Y. (2011). A twin-axial hetero[7]rotaxane. Angew. Chem. 50, 10834–10839. doi: 10.1002/anie.201105375

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, X.-Z., and Chen, C.-F. (2005). A highly efficient approach to [4]pseudocatenanes by threefold metathesis reactions of a triptycene-based tris[2]pseudorotaxane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 13158–13159. doi: 10.1021/ja0546020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar